In a legal brief submitted to the NFL on Sunday, Saints running back Deuce McAllister and defensive ends Charles Grant and Will Smith make their case for avoiding discipline under the league’s policy regarding anabolic steroids and related substances.
Per a source with knowledge of the arguments, the Saints players have focused primarily on the fact that Dr. John Lombardo, the administrator of the steroids policy, had actual knowledge that StarCaps had been spiked with Bumetanide, a potent medication available only by prescription, and that Dr. Lombardo had failed to warn the league’s players regarding the presence of Bumetanide in StarCaps.
The league learned that StarCaps contained Bumetanide after a player who tested positive for the substance said he had taken StarCaps. Dr. Brian Finkle, the consulting toxicologist for the steroids policy, testified at last month’s hearing that he thereafter requested an investigation into StarCaps.
The investigation revealed that StarCaps contains Bumetanide.
Dr. Finkle also testified that he was concerned about the presence of Bumetanide in StarCaps, and that he had shared his concerns with Dr. Lombardo. Dr. Finkle testified that his final discussion with Dr. Lombardo centered on the best ways for communicating the information to players.
Ultimately, Dr. Lombardo opted to issue a memo to the players warning them generally about weight loss reduction products, without specifically mentioning StarCaps. Dr. Lombardo testified that, if StarCaps had been specifically mentioned, players would later claim that other supplements later determined to contain banned substances should have been mentioned as well.
In this specific case, however, it’s undisputed that Dr. Lombardo knew that StarCaps contains a prescription-only substance that NFL players are prohibited from taking. Surely, the memorandum could have been worded in a way that would have allowed Dr. Lombardo to specifically identify StarCaps as a product that secretly contains a banned substance while explaining generally that there might be other supplements that have been spiked with banned substances about which the league currently isn’t aware.
The Saints players also tackle the notion of “strict liability” as it relates to the presence of banned substances in their bodies. The players claim that the phenomenon is more accurately described as “assumption of the risk,” since the player who takes a product in reliance upon the truthfulness of its label is taking a chance that the product contains something that isn’t listed, and that he’ll bear the consequences via a four-game suspension. In this case, the players claim that the league was in a superior position to apprise them of the true risks they were assuming by taking StarCaps, but failed to do so.
Prior media reports have focused on the “Hotline” that the league makes available to players who have questions about certain supplements. We’re told that the Saints players contend in their brief that the Hotline merely recites for the players the information contained on a given product’s label, and that Will Smith testified that he called the Hotline regarding StarCaps, and was told nothing about the presence of Bumetanide in the product.
Although the steroids policy and its appendices clearly explain to players the general risks of taking over-the-counter supplements, the fact that Dr. Lombardo specifically knew that StarCaps had been spiked with a drug available only by prescription seems to make this case different from the usual situation of a player relying erroneously on the accuracy of a product label. Here, the NFL through its agents and/or employees knew that the label on the StarCaps product wasn’t accurate, but didn’t share that information with the players or their union.
Giving the players who ingested StarCaps a pass on this basis wouldn’t create a dangerous precedent for the league, in our view. The rule will continue to be that the players assume the risk that over-the-counter products not on the NFL’s approved list of supplements might contain a banned substance. The only exception will be that, if the NFL has actual knowledge that a supposedly legal supplement has been illegally spiked with a banned substance, the league won’t be permitted to suspend players unless the league has specifically warned the players and/or the union about the supplement in question.
Similar appeals are pending involving Vikings defensive tackles Pat and Kevin Williams, Falcons defensive tackle Grady Jackson, and Texans long snapper Bryan Pittman.
_2.gif)




December 1st, 2008 at 11:13 am
The NFL knows exactly what it needs to do. I would expext a huge drawn out offseason debate resluting in lawsuits should these suspensions be upheld. In my opinion, if they are infact upheld, Roger G. should be removed from his position.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
December 1st, 2008 at 11:20 am
I believe that the Saints players have a valid point, however, the way the rules are written works against them.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
December 1st, 2008 at 11:20 am
If the NFL knew it was spiked, shouldn’t it be on the unapproved list? What list was Starcaps on, approved or not?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
December 1st, 2008 at 11:21 am
The suspensions should be voided due to the NFL not divulging pertinent information.
Goodell has a whole lot on his plate this week = Plaxico Burress, Antonio Pierce and most likely Bradshaw or Ward. On this one he can not take the wait and see approach. This week we will find out if he has a spine. The betting windows are open in Las Vegas and Atlantic City.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
December 1st, 2008 at 11:26 am
There is a list of NFL approved supplements, not banned supplements. It’s really simple…IF IT’S NOT ON THE LIST, DON’T TAKE IT! At the very least, if it’s not on the list, have it tested by a lab. Everyone knows that the supplement industry is a shady industry, especially when it comes to diet pills.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
December 1st, 2008 at 11:31 am
So is the league now supposed to test each and every supplement available on the market and then tell each player individually whether they contain banned substances? Or are these players supposed to be grown men who are capable of being responsible for themselves?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
December 1st, 2008 at 11:47 am
Here’s why I think these guys have to be suspended. There is absolutely NO way for these 7 players to PROVE they had bumetanide in them because of StarCaps. Sure, they might have a receipt saying they bought them, but there is no way to prove that they weren’t taking bumetanide by itself, or from a different source. StarCaps became a very convenient excuse for players who may have been cheating the system all along.
As I I’ve said before…an NFL player should be suspended “just because” for taking StarCaps to begin with. That is the pansiest website you will ever see. How on earth would an NFL player star taking these pills made for desperate women in the first place?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
December 1st, 2008 at 11:55 am
‘whatthehellisgoingonoutthere’ has the right idea. While you may disagree about the efficacy of the policy, it is far easier to list the approved substances than the myriad of banned ones. These professional athletes are no dummies and under intense scrutiny. In this day and age ignorance is no excuse. You take something not on the list, you deal with the consequences.
If my livelihood paid millions, you can be damn sure I’d know exactly what I put in my body. When in doubt, leave it out…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
December 1st, 2008 at 11:58 am
No, I don’t think the league should test each and every diet pill on the market but in the event that they do know about a specific product, don’t you think they should share that information with the players?
9 times out of 10 I’m on the league’s side when it comes to banned substance suspensions, but in the Starcaps situation I’m on the player’s side.
If the league had not known previously that Starcaps contained a banned substance, I would say they deserve suspensions but that is not the case.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
December 1st, 2008 at 12:00 pm
SpartaChris,
The players are supposed to be grown men capable of being responsible for themselves. Which is why the players read labels to make sure the product they’re taking doesn’t contain a banned substance. That’s where the problems lies. This product didn’t list its banned substance. The NFL knew it had a banned substance, but the players didn’t. And the NFL didn’t inform the players with anything more than a generic “be careful” without naming what product they need to be careful with.
The NFL basically hid its knowledge that a product it knew players were taking under the assumption it was a legit product, actually had a banned substance. And now the players — and their team’s and fans’ playoff hopes — may be penalized for this.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
December 1st, 2008 at 12:03 pm
Personally, I think punishments should fit the crime. Clearly in this case none of the players involved were knowingly violating league rules, and clearly none of them had Bumetanide in their system in an effort to mask steroids. So, regardless of that fact that the NFL should shoulder most of the blame for withholding information that it absoultely should have shared with all of the players… four game suspensions are a ridculously harsh punishment when you consider that none of these guys intended to do anything wrong, and none of them have ever been in trouble before. Such a punishment would be especially idiotic when you consider that doing so might very well dash the playoff aspirations of three NFL teams.
$0.02,
–Z
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
December 1st, 2008 at 12:07 pm
Finkle and Lombardo. Lombardo and Finkle. In it together…how, and why?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
December 1st, 2008 at 12:57 pm
starcaps is not on the approved product list - probably because Dr Lombardo knew that is had banned substances in it.
up to 25 saints players taking it??? sounds like a major group effort to mask steroid/HGH use.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
December 1st, 2008 at 1:21 pm
I wonder if it would be possible to raise an anti-trust issue? The drug policy is the result of collective bargaining, so normally anti-trust would not be a factor. But here, an employee of the NFL is involved, and his action/inaction had a disparate impact on the various teams and players (e.g., the Vikings would be devastated without the Williams on the inside, the Saints would be badly hurt, etc., while some other teams would not be affected at all).
If I’m the Saints or Vikings, I’d make the case that first, this situation was not contemplated by the CBA and therefore the policy cannot be defended on the grounds that the franchises and players agreed to it. Then, I’d argue the NFL is restraining the franchises from freely competing without any pro-competitive effects to offset the damage.
My guess is that the Vikings & Saints owners wouldn’t go for it, since the owners are a collegial bunch, but it would scare the crap out of the NFL (if in fact my legal understanding holds any water on the matter). Clearly the players can just sue on their own, which is a certainty if the appeals are denied.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
December 1st, 2008 at 2:35 pm
Why does this guy Lombardo still have his medical license instead of being a band conductor? He knew an OTC drug had a controlled substance in it and it was available to the public and he told nobody. Hello FDA? Aside from any question about suspensions or not, seems like any player who took Starcaps would have a legal case against him for negligence for not informing them or the FDA of the risks and unlawful nature of the product.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated