The NFL typically doesn’t investigate tampering allegations unless and until a team officially files tampering charges. But that doesn’t give a team license to claim tampering without formally claiming tampering.
According to Adam Schefter of NFL Network, the league will be looking into whether owner Al Davis violated rules prohibiting criticism of other teams when Davis accused the Patriots of tampering with receiver Randy Moss.
The Raiders have never, to our knowledge, filed tampering charges over the circumstances surrounding the trade that sent Moss to the Patriots on the second day of the 2007 draft. And while, on the surface, it doesn’t make sense to think that the Pats could have tampered with Moss at a time when the Raiders were trying to trade him, keep in mind that the Niners were nailed earlier this year for tampering that arose in conjunction with trade talks regarding Bears linebacker Lance Briggs. Also, two years ago, the Pats accused the Jets of tampering with receiver Deion Branch, who eventually was traded to Seattle.
The question ultimately boils down to whether the Pats did anything to entice Moss to join them before receiving permission from the Raiders to attempt to entice him to play for the Patriots.
The fact that it all happened more than a year ago will make it even harder to reconstruct the facts. But the investigation likely will commence with the league asking Davis to set forth with specificity and in detail the basis for his belief that there was tampering.
And if Davis was merely making a frivolous and/or reckless claim, then the Raiders should be punished. The fact that the league rarely takes action as to tampering absent a smoking gun and/or a ricocheting bullet could prompt some teams to refrain from ever filing charges. That’s fine, but the team that believes it was the victim of tampering then needs to never suggest publicly that tampering occurred.
_2.gif)





October 5th, 2008 at 1:30 pm
“And if Davis was merely making a frivolous and/or reckless claim, then the Raiders should be punished. The fact that the league rarely takes action as to tampering absent a smoking gun and/or a ricocheting bullet could prompt some teams to refrain from ever filing charges. That’s fine, but the team that believes it was the victim of tampering then needs to never suggest publicly that tampering occurred.”
You obviously missed Tamperin’ Ted’s Travellin’ Salvation Show in Green Bay this summer, with his obviously bogus, obviously baseless, and obviously idiotic tampering charges against Minnesota.
Ted Thompson should have been punished, too. . .but with the lips of the league so firmly glued to the ass of the Green Bay Packers, there was no way that could possibly have been allowed to happen.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
October 5th, 2008 at 2:08 pm
“And if Davis was merely making a frivolous and/or reckless claim, then the Raiders should be punished.
What? I thought Florio had been telling us all week that since Al Davis sounded less senile then most 79 year olds he knows, everything Davis said was gospel? Now I’m lead to believe he may have been making frivolous and/or reckless claims in the (insane) press conference? Well color me shocked!! This clearly must have been an isolated incident.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
October 5th, 2008 at 2:42 pm
Pay attention. Davis said someone from the Patriots put Moss through a workout to see if he could still run. Belichick said that ‘he’ had never spoke to Moss and
“There was no workout. There was no other contact with him.”
When Moss was asked if he could refute Davis’ claim he responded, “No, not at all.”
There is plenty of smoke here.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
October 5th, 2008 at 10:49 pm
Even if it is true, it seems to me that the league did not enforce the tampering rule until this year. Multiple times leading up the Deion Branch case Pats players were tampered with and the league turned a blind eye. It wasn’t until this year that the league decided to suddenly begin enforcing this rule and make an example of SF. If they were to open up cases from prior years they would have a pretty big backlog.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
October 6th, 2008 at 7:31 am
Al Davis is a sleeze. He needs to be put out to pasture.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
October 6th, 2008 at 7:50 am
askMarc said “Moss was asked if he could refute Davis’ claim he responded, “No, not at all.”
Incorrect, Marc. Moss said in an interview that he had no response to Davis’s remarks. Do you work at the Jon Tomase School of Journalism?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
October 6th, 2008 at 8:28 am
Mike - Johnathan Kraft addressed this prior to the SF game. He claims it was the Raiders that contacted the Patriots on draft day because they wanted the Patriots 4th round draft pick. Apparently Belichick said that Moss would have to arrive in Foxboro for a physical before the 4th round started before the trade would be agreed upon. Moss arrived before the 4th round started and submitted to a physical.
If those comments are accurate it sure doesn’t sound like tampering to me.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
October 6th, 2008 at 9:43 am
Al Davis is just upset that Moss was good last year. Talk about jealousy, the word out of Oakland last year was that he was finished. If he hadn’t led the league in touchdown passes and taken Brady to all new level of stat stardom, Davis wouldn’t be pressing the issue. Give me a 1 rating, but you KNOW that’s true, otherwise the tampering allegations would have came up a lot sooner. Besides, how can you tamper with someone who is being traded. They are contractually obligated to play the season with your team. The only way tampering REALLY matters is if a person is in a contract year and they are trying to resign him.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated