[Editor’s note: Ralph Vacchiano of the New York Daily News covers the Giants as well as anyone. His new book, Eli Manning: The Making of a Quarterback, looks at the stunning rise of Super Bowl XLII’s MVP. Vacchiano has shared with us the following column, which looks at life for the Giants without enigmatic-yet-talented tight end Jeremy Shockey.]
‘Twas the night before Christmas in 2005 and the Giants were one win away from clinching the NFC East, but they were losing early in the game to the Washington Redskins. They were struggling and things were tense until late in the first half when they were finally able to exhale in the offensive huddle.
Because Jeremy Shockey wasn’t around.
He had injured his ankle (while committing a pass interference penalty) and his backup, Visanthe Shiancoe, was forced onto the field.
“There were plays where (Shiancoe) was running free down the middle of the field (and) Shank would come back and say, ‘I think you had me, but don’t worry, we’ll get it,’” former Giants backup quarterback Tim Hasselbeck says in my new book, Eli Manning: The Making of a Quarterback. “If that’s Jeremy, he’s thinking ‘I just had a 60-yard touchdown that Eli didn’t throw to me. I’m pissed.’ Then he comes back saying, ‘I’m wide open!’”
Added one of their teammates, who preferred to remain anonymous: “There was a calm on the sidelines that was never there before.”
Scenes like that were played out far too frequently over the previous three years, ever since Jim Fassel and his tight-end-friendly offense were replaced by Tom Coughlin’s “tom-foolery” (which is how Shockey described some of his responsibilities in Coughlin’s scheme back in 2004). And while that’s not the reason why the Giants traded Shockey to the New Orleans Saints back in July, it’s a great example of why they’re better off that they did.
Shockey, as it turned out, was more of a disruptive force for the team and for Manning than anyone ever knew.
That should be clear to anyone who watched the Giants win a Super Bowl without him last season, after he broke his leg in Week 15, or to anyone who’s watched the Giants calmly avoid a Super Bowl hangover and get off to a 3-0 start in 2008. It’s not that they and their quarterback are better off without Shockey’s enormous talent – even Manning calls that a “stupid” theory.
It’s that they are both better off without his tired act.
Just look at what they were able to do in Weeks 2 and 3 of this season, when they struggled to put away inferior opponents. It was in situations like those, when the offense would be struggling to score points against teams they knew they should beat, that Shockey would be slamming his helmet, waving his arms, cursing at his teammates and demanding the ball.
Without him, when things get tough, the Giants can do what Manning does best – calmly analyze the situation, regroup, and get their act together. After they rallied to beat the Cincinnati Bengals in overtime in Week 3, even Plaxico Burress – an admitted ego-maniac who wants the ball all the time because he thinks he’s an unstoppable football force – talked about the patience the offense showed in waiting for their opportunities.
That’s something they often didn’t have the luxury to do during the Shockey years.
In fact, one Giants coach concedes that they were often forced to design plays for Shockey for the sole purpose of keeping him happy and quiet. That’s because Shockey still thought he was living in 2002, when then-GM Ernie Accorsi traded up in the first round to get him because Fassel wanted a Shannon Sharpe-like player to be the centerpiece of his offense. Accorsi talked about how Shockey was drafted to be a “weapon” and a “play-maker” not a tight end.
Coughlin wanted a tight end.
And you can see that in his offense since Shockey got hurt last year, and suddenly a healthy Steve Smith blossomed in the third-receiver role. The Coughlin/Kevin Gilbride scheme wants to rely on a strong running game and use three- and four-receiver sets to keep the defense off balance. They use the tight end – now primarily Kevin Boss – as a blocker first, and only occasionally sprinkle him in as a weapon in the passing game.
Shockey, in his years under Coughlin, averaged 4.2 catches per game. Since Shockey went down in Week 15 last year, Boss has averaged 1.3.
And Boss doesn’t complain the way Shockey did about the “tom-foolery” in the offense, or about how they were “out-coached” as Shockey said after a blowout loss in Seattle in 2006, or the way he complained to anyone who would listen all offseason long about how misunderstood and mistreated he was in New York. Boss doesn’t engage in shouting matches with the general manager. He’s not embarrassing the organization by discussing his party habits or sexual fantasies in magazine interviews.
And, perhaps most importantly, he’s not constantly yelling in his quarterback’s ear.
In other words, as Gilbride says in my book, when Shockey went down with his season-ending injury last year, “Some of the volatility was gone, so it made it a little easier.”
Under those conditions, since last Dec. 16, Manning has begun his ascent to the upper echelon of NFL quarterbacks.
And it can’t just be a coincidence that without Shockey, the Giants have gone 8-1.
_2.gif)





October 3rd, 2008 at 12:33 pm
As Schocky found out, there’s no “me” in team; …Right JeroME?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
October 3rd, 2008 at 12:35 pm
Let’s see how Shockey and Saints do. He’s out injured r-a-t now.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
October 3rd, 2008 at 12:44 pm
As a Giants fan, I like Ralph and I liked Shockey when he was on the team. Ralph does a great job staying unbiased in his writing and Shockey was the best TE when he wanted to be. While it was had to admit, I now know we are better off without him (although I would’ve liked to have gotten a player and a draft pick, instead of 2 picks).
So, my question is for Ralph. After writing SEVERAL articles this season about negative Shockeyisms, what will you say when run into him? Or did he do something personally to you when he was in the locker room? It seems you have some type of vendetta against Shockey, and I think there is more to this story than just a writer following up a story. I appreciate your insight and I will continue to read NYDN, but how about focusing on the guys who helped make this a championship team, not the one who didnt.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
October 3rd, 2008 at 1:05 pm
Shockey will do fine with the Saints, who have a more aggressive leader in Brees. Until he gets injured. Again.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
October 3rd, 2008 at 1:20 pm
You know why Kevin Boss doesn’t do any of that? Because he’s not one of the best TEs in the NFL. He’s a nobody. The biggest problem in New York was they had a top receiving TE and treated him like a blocking TE. It was a waste of talent. The Chargers, Cowboys, and Chiefs all have great receiving TEs. You know what they do? Catch the football. They are receivers first and blockers second because they have that ability. Shockey has it too. I’m not saying Shockey always took the best approach, not at all. But maybe the problem all along was Coughlin had a dynamic TE and used him like an ordinary TE. If you have a big, slow bruising RB, you don’t give him a lot of tosses and sweeps. You run him between the tackles. Same with guys like Shockey and Gates and Witten and Gonzalez.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
October 3rd, 2008 at 1:35 pm
I think the move was best for everyone. Shockey gets to play in a wide open offense, and Eli gets to play with Shockey crying for the ball in his ear every play.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
October 3rd, 2008 at 1:38 pm
Before reading this piece I was almost expecting a “Slam Shockey” speech, but that was a great read. I am not a Giants fan but can see the difference in Eli since Shockey went down, and as a fan of the greatest game in the planet, he is defintely on his way to being mentioned with some pretty select company. I think the best quote had to be where Eli said it was “a stupid theory” that they were better off without his talent. That right there shows the growth and maturity you want in your franchise QB.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
October 3rd, 2008 at 2:10 pm
It is very true that shockey was very much wanting the ball when the giants struggled espcially.
Some of Eli’s worst games came when he tried forcing the ball into shockey. Two specific scenarios come to mind. the 8-8 giants struggled to make the playoffs late in the season they played again the redskins. Early on in the first half the giants were struggling on Defense and the offense was horrid. Eli throws pick #2 trying to force the ball into Shockey. Ironically against minnesota last year he did the same exact thing. Late in the game he blatently forces the ball into shockey and Greenway runs off with the 4th pick of Eli manning. ITs a common theme i noticed. FORCING the ball. Eli still has a tendency to do it when it comes to Plaxico burress but i give him credit for learning how to start spreading it around especially with Steve Smith who i regard as a younger quicker Amani toomer. The giants have blossomed and so has Eli from out of that shadow that was cast by Shockey.
It really is no secret that Eli is turning into a MUCH better quarterback.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
October 3rd, 2008 at 2:43 pm
The best thing about Shockey in New Orleans is that I don’t hear about him any more. I feel bad for Brees, though.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
October 3rd, 2008 at 3:27 pm
Simple addition by subtraction.
In the Giants system, intermittently pounding the rock and spreading the field with 3+ receivers is the goal. With their 2 receiver sets, the Giants run the ball quite a bit. This calls for the tight end to block quite a bit, for which Shockey either didn’t like to do or is not very good at doing.
With their 3+ receiver sets, they spread the field and either look for openings against the zone or exploit matchups against man coverage. Shockey is good at receiving, but he was not utilized as much in this role.
This is a classic example of when an athlete, a great one at that, cannot be fully utilized because of the system. Some athletic corners are great at man coverage, but their value cannot be maximized in a zone-influenced system. Some athletic defensive ends are great in a 4-3 front, but they struggle in a 3-4.
In essence, we have a tight end with all of the physical tools who was a negative influence because he had did not have a consistent role in this offense. I understand the frustration Shockey had because of his role, but his negative influence on the offense and the team made him expendable. His frequent outbursts and tantrums, coupled with the possibility the team may have tried to force the ball to Shockey to appease him, only served to keep a good team from being great.
Kudos to the Giants for getting rid of him and putting all their money into the system, which won a Super Bowl, and not a player. Maybe he’ll fit in better with the Saints offense, only time will tell.
Now, if only the Bengals could follow this example…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
October 3rd, 2008 at 3:39 pm
Obviously a lot of football is left to be played here. I agree with nps6724 that Shockey was absolutely misused in NY. If the coaches just wanted a blocking TE, then ship Shockey elsewhere cause you aren’t getting the proper value for him being on the field.
Eli Manning has had a couple good games and a couple bad games without Shockey. The Giants had a lucky defensive-driven run to the SB. Awesome. So far this year, Eli had a good game against the Rams, an average game against the Bengals, and a bad game against the Redskins.
Looking at a QB’s winning % is almost as dubious as looking at a starting pitcher’s win-loss record. There are a lot of factors that go into it. Trent Dilfer wasn’t a great QB before, during, or after his SB win, and I don’t think Eli will ever be much more than an inconsistent signal caller. It doesn’t matter if they have Shockey or Bo Scaife. Or Kevin Boss.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
October 4th, 2008 at 9:38 am
Here is the bottom line with out JS the team won on the road all of the play off games then kicked NE back to Mass where there cheating asses belong
The team has 53 players and one Leader and zero big mouths and they are winning
I was so happy to see JS shipped off I just wish he went to Dallas or Philly so he could screw up there teams
Anyway he is hurt and guess what Saints won with out him so maybe a hurt JS is a good thing for his team
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
October 4th, 2008 at 10:20 am
Shockey’s teammates like him but fans only see the results on the field.
Shockey is infuriating to root for. Every so often he’ll make a great play, not very often though. Too often he runs indifferent routes and doesn’t get open. Too often instead of doling out the punishment to much smaller defensive backs they punish him. Now instead of crumpling and getting up he crumples and is injured. Too often the ball hits him in the hands and he doesn’t catch it. Too often he’ll make the catch and then fumble the ball.
I am glad the Giants traded him.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
October 4th, 2008 at 11:00 am
Law of murphy…….
“The Giants had a lucky defensive-driven run to the SB. Awesome”.
Are you kidding me? Obviously you didnt watch any of the games if your gonna use the word “luck”. Luck had nothing to do with it idiot. The defense was unstoppable and the offense continuosly had long drives that ended in touchdowns. Eli Manning made plays for the Giants, and, oh yeah, had the greatest throw in Super Bowl history. He led the Giants to a S.B. victory with a 2 minute t.d. drive against the undefeated Patriots. I know, I know,…..your gonna say the Pats D was old. Its funny how nobody else could score at will on them. He beat 4 very good defenses. What do you want from him, a 350 yard, 3 TD game every day??? Romo, Brees, and Palmer do that and what have they won?? NOTHING. A great qb does not have to have stats. He wins games. Big games.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
October 4th, 2008 at 2:51 pm
nps6724 says - “It was a waste of talent. The Chargers, Cowboys, and Chiefs all have great receiving TEs. You know what they do? Catch the football.”
You forgot one very important thing. How do you design an offense around a great receiving TE (it’s debatable whether Shockey is in that category, but let’s say he is) knowing that TE will never last the season. Shockey’s endless history of injuries mean you simply cannot rely on him to be there game after game. Yes, he often “toughed” it out and played hurt, but he was never effective under those circumstances even when Fassel was there. So, if you were to build an offense around him, what do you do when he goes down? Install a whole new offense in the middle of the season? If Jeremy had shown the durability of Witten or Gonzales, I would be in agreement with you. The guy is fragile. He cannot play effectively when hurt. Been that way for a long time and the Saints are learning that lesson early. I disagree with Coughlin on a lot of things, but installing a game plan that does not rely on a guy that will never play all 16 games is spot on. You also conveniently forget that neither Witten, Gonzales, Gates, or even Cooley have repeated shown up their own QBs while on the field and offer no apologies for their own mistakes (which in Shockey’s case was many). Shockey was an asshole on and off the field and I’m glad that the Giants finally shut the show down. Enjoy the tantrums, the drops, the injuries, and the endless bitching New Orleans. I can tell you it grows old faster than you can imagine.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated