As it turns out, Cowboys owner Jerry Jones will be fined for his recent public criticisms of referee Ed Hoculi.
Per Chris Mortensen of ESPN, Jones will be asked to pay $25,000 for his comments.
The strangest aspect of this story is that Jones wasn’t even complaining about a call made by Hochuli in a Cowboys game.
In the wake of Hochuli’s Week Two blunder in Denver, Jones said that Hochuli is a “highly criticized official.” A couple of days later, Jones elaborated.
“You know, that guy is quick to call penalties,” Jones said. “He’s quick to draw. He’s known for that. . . . He’s very quick. His crews call a lot of penalties. Maybe the answer is to tell people like that, ‘Keep that whistle out your mouth.’”
The league wasn’t nearly as quick to penalize Jones, but they finally got him.
And, frankly, it could be that Jones was relying upon the interpretation of the anti-criticism rule that we obtained from NFL spokesman Greg Aiello. Before Jones said anything about Hochuli, we quoted Aiello as saying that the rule is interpreted only to prohibit criticism of the integrity of game officials. (Aiello later added “personal attacks” to the list of forbidden conduct.)
This disclosure prompted some league insiders to scratch their heads in confusion in light of the plain terms of the rules, and it prompted others to think that it was now permissible to tell it like it is regarding the refs, as long as personal attacks or criticism of integrity are avoided.
So we think that Jones should appeal. And we think that his appeal should prevail.
Meanwhile, Mort reports that Chargers coach Norv Turner won’t be fined for calling the Hochuli error “unacceptable” in the immediate aftermath of the Week Two loss.
And, frankly, that decision still leaves us confused. If the league is going to prohibit criticism of game officials, then it needs to punish all criticism. If the league is recognizing as to Turner that it might not be fair to expect a coach who has been screwed by a bad call to dig his teeth into his tongue during a league-mandated appearance before the media, then the language of the rule needs to be crafted to provide such leeway.
Our goal is to make sure that every team has a clear understanding of what is and isn’t allowed. We’re getting a lot closer, but there’s still more work to be done.
_2.gif)






September 28th, 2008 at 11:50 am
$25,000 to Jerry is like 5 cents to the average income family man.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
September 28th, 2008 at 11:57 am
What ever happened to “Freedom of Speech”?…this ruling is unconstitutional. We should add this to the presidential debates.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
September 28th, 2008 at 12:00 pm
I don’t have a problem with the league’s decision to not fine Turner, largely because the referee and the league admitted that the officiating was bad. Norv’s exact words: “It was clearly a fumble. Ed came over to me … and said he blew it, and that to me is not acceptable.” The only part of that that I would consider worthy of a fine under the circumstances is the “not acceptable” part, but it’s a judgment call, and I think the NFL made the right one.
I don’t have anything against the Cowboys or Jones as a rule, but Jerry Jones was just flat out being an asshole. He had no reason to get onto Hochuli, and I thought that his taking the opportunity to criticize an official just because he saw somebody else do it without getting fined was really cheap. It was immature and classless for him to leech off of the Chargers’ woes to publicly air his own grievances.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
September 28th, 2008 at 12:10 pm
jerry jones is the antichrist
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
September 28th, 2008 at 12:19 pm
NOW YOU MUST FINE BILL POLIAN FOR WHAT HE SAID ABOUT WALT COLEMAN ON HIS RADIO SHOW!!!!!!!!!!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
September 28th, 2008 at 12:26 pm
they should fine that bastard hochul lol
as for the free speech arguement
that never flies when we’re talking about personal conduct policies , or to simplify it for some of you people “terms of service” on a message board
freedom of speech doesn’t exist when you sign on the dotted line and agree to conduct yourself in a crtain manner.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
September 28th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Of course there are limits to “Freedom of Speech”; for example, “threats”…not sure what Jerry Jones signed, but making a comment about how you feel a referee made calls or about his officiating crew should not be included in the “personal conduct policy” clause.
They are men, face-up to the opinions and defend your position if you wish to.
Commenting on how a referee or his crew make bad calls has nothing to do with commenting about their integrity…making a comment about them possibly taking bribes or favoring certain teams does.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
September 28th, 2008 at 2:43 pm
Right on Kayc. I am a cowboys fan, but I was still glad to see Jerry get hit like that. Regardless of whether or not his statements were true or false, being critical of the refs in a public venue does not enhance the NFL.
Hence the reason for the rule.
If criticism needs to be made of the officiating, it should be done internally to the NFL and in a non public matter.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated