With a storm named Gustav gaining strength as it embarks on a trip across the Gulf of Mexico and, possibly, an unscheduled visit to Bourbon Street, there’s talk about whether the Saints will be able to host the Buccaneers on September 7 at the Superdome.
Our pal Todd Wright of Sporting News Radio tells us of scuttlebutt that the game could be moved to Tampa, with the Saints hosting the rematch on November 30.
Whether the Saints would be hosting that game in New Orleans or Baton Rouge or San Antonio or somewhere else remains to be seen.
It’s not too early to begin pondering the possibilities, in the event that New Orleans takes its second direct hit in three years from a major hurricane. Apart from whether the City would be able to play host to pro football a week from tomorrow, the broader question is whether, in the aftermath of Gustav, any football can be played there in 2008.
The Bucs could object to a flip-flop of the home-and-home series, given that a switcheroo would give them four straight road games in late November and early December. Still, we doubt that anyone will shed tears for Tampa’s tribulations in this regard, given that they’ll at least still have a town in which to play their home games and a building in which to do it. The Saints are facing their second 16-game all-road schedule in four seasons.
It’s also not too early to begin pondering whether another nightmare in New Orleans will be enough to prompt the NFL to pull up the stakes and move the franchise to another town.
After Katrina, such a possibility was rejected as heartless; after Gustav, it might be the only prudent option.
_2.gif)






August 30th, 2008 at 11:38 pm
Tampa may have to worry about Hanna too.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.5 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
August 30th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
Sure looks like it. New orleans needs to just pack up and move. Its in a very bad situational place. They should have moved the whole town after that last blow through.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.7 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
August 30th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
Tough call. It is unreal that this would happen again.
My prayers for the people in New Orleans.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.6 / 5 with 10 rating(s)
August 30th, 2008 at 11:51 pm
Forget whether they should play another NFL game in NO if Gustav hits, if it gets a direct hit again the U.S. gov’t will lock completely stupid if it even allows people to come back. The city for all intents and purposes should be leveled like Galviston (sp) then filled with dirt, and be kept as a small port city, and the only part of the city that should be salvaged is the French quarter and Burbon street for tourist/historical reasons. The last rebuild cost billions, and with Gustav looking even worse if thats possible this is just asking to much. I know people are going to say I’m heartless, but I’m not I’m just trying to be logical, and leveling the city is the only logical thing to do or we are going to revisit this over and over again. Remember the storm predictions for the hundred years only shows things getting much worse. To steal a quote used quite often here it’s time to move on and move out.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.1 / 5 with 11 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 12:06 am
i’m in the 504 right now — evacuating tomorrow morning.
the real shit here is, this hurricane is far more powerful than katrina but won’t do nearly as much damage because the circumstances are in our favor this time around, with the pumps and the levees and such. everything will be ok, we’ll be able to make the home game on the 7th ez.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 8:35 am
RIDICULOUS…
Should Miami have to move its franchise to another town? They get hit with a hurricane every year. Or Tampa Bay too?
You’re fishing for a story that’s not even there yet. You guys need to relax and let this storm play out.
New Orleans will be fine, instead of trying to take their team away before the storm even hits, why don’t you do a story on praying for the gulf coast in their time of need.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.2 / 5 with 12 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 9:00 am
You’re messin’ with karma here. So, using the same logic as this story uses…what if they move to say…LA…and an earthquake rocks the City of Angels into oblivion? Stranger things have happened.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.35 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 9:22 am
Stay safe rjakapeanut4u.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.5 / 5 with 8 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 9:30 am
Not for nothing, but there are dozens of places in Europe further below sea level with much less fear of flooding because their governments actually spend money on state of the art levees. Both parties can assume some responsibility as this problem has gone unresolved for decades. And what’s worse.. if the Gulf Coast gets crushed again, these same parties will politicize the carnage to gain favor with voters.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.5 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 9:39 am
You’re missing the point fuel52….New Orleans is a city below sea level and sinking. It’s protected by a series of levees that failed when Katrina hit and Gustav is predicted to make landfall stronger than Katrina did and by the worst quandrant of the storm.
How much money should the Louisiana tax payers and federal government be expected to shell out every few years for evacuations and reparations before it’s too much?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.55 / 5 with 8 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 9:54 am
fuel52, if you are actually tying to compare Miami to New Orleans then you are stupid. I guess you are forgetting that New Orleans is below sealevel and that any major storm that passes over you guys will destroy most of the city just like in Katrina. Miami doesn’t get hit my hurricanes every year is sits at sealevel not below it and doesn’t require dikes and levees to keep water away from the city.
The last major storm that hit Miami was Charlie a few years ago which mostly caused power outages and with moderate wind damage and minor flooding. The last major storm before Charlie that hit the city was hurricane Andrew back in 1992!!. New building codes where put into place for new building projects after Andrew hit which lead to many homes and business being able to withstand hurricane strength winds which lead lower levels of damage being reported by minor systems that either pass by or grazed Miami.
The city of New Orleans has been mismanaged for years and is already costing the country billions of dollars to fix the damages from Katrina. If Gustav actually hits New Orleans which is looking more likely that it will then the city shouldn’t be rebuilt. The port should be kept for commerce reasons, but thats about it. Galviston wasn’t rebuilt why should federal dollars should be used AGAIN to rebuild the city with half of the population already gone anyways. I didn’t even talk about global warming issues which could cause even more storms to pass through the gulf. I guess until next time.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 10:06 am
I heard LA is looking for a team? They can play in the LA colesium in the mean time.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.2 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 10:18 am
Hate to break it to you in the 504, yo but the real shizzle is that if Gustav hits where they are saying it is going to hit, it won’t matter if you are in the 504, the 985 the 225, 337 or even the 318. T
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1.6 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 10:19 am
Concerning the argument that if the Saints should be moved, why shouldnt the Dolphins and Buccanneers..
There difference there is that Miami and Tampa Bay werent built several feet below sea level.. The infrastructure of New Orleans simply isnt built to survive multiple hits from massive hurricanes.. No city really is, but some fare better than others.. New Orleans is not one of those..
In the end, it might not be a decision of the NFL.. I wouldnt be surprised if the Gov shut down that city for good after this depending on the damage it causes.. At least they got everyone out of there this time.
Good luck to everyone on the gulf coast..
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1.5 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 10:21 am
tallflguy.. Actually that last major hurricane that affted us was Wilma.. And it was a relatively small hurricane, but it still did a lot of damage.. Blew out a ton of windows and left us without power for a couple days..
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 10:25 am
Kotite is right. Long before Katrina, the federal government was asked for help in modifying the water containment facilities around New Orleans, but they failed to act, even faced with the certainty that a disaster of this type was inevitable at some point in time. Estimates say building state of the art facilities around New Orleans would have cost approximately 14 billion, while the cost of cleaning up and rebuilding after Katrina alone is well over 100 billion, not to mention the cost in lives. There doesn’t seem to be any reasonable excuse for not having corrected this situation before disaster hit the area. Now it may happen again. A stich in time, and all that. Seems like protecting what is reputed to be the 4th largest fresh water port in the world would be something well worth doing.
It wasn’t actually Katrina which flooded New Orleans. The city flooded when the levee system failed that held back the waters of Lake Pontchartrain. The city of New Orleans is equipped with a pumping system which is capable of handling heavy rainfall from a hurricane. A state of the art levee system protecting the city from the waters the lake, the Mississippi and the gulf would protect New Orleans from future disasters of this type.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.8 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 10:47 am
“It wasn’t actually Katrina which flooded New Orleans.”
So it wasn’t Katrina that caused the storm surge which resulted in the levees failing?
The best solution (although least likely to happen) is for the city to be completely razed, built up to at least sea level, and rebuilt.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1.8 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 10:59 am
@SkySpy:
No, it wasn’t actually Katrina itself which flooded New Orleans. It was the waters from the lake which flooded the city after the storm had passed. An adequate levee system would have kept this from happening.
It sounds to be very fortunate that you are not the one responsible for figuring out “the best solution”. I don’t imagine the residents of New Orleans would agree with you on that one either.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 11:25 am
@Kaotic:
The point is that without Katrina the lake would’ve never breached the levees. So Katrina was to blame for the flooding. Cause and effect.
My solution may be an unfortunate one, but it may also be necassary. People were just now getting back to normal three years after Katrina and this storm stands to do even more damage.
At what point do you plan for 10 years down the road instead of 2 years down the road?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 11:39 am
I have lived in Tampa Bay for 25 years now and the only hurricane that came close was Elaine in 1985 was 100 miles off the coast and Charley in 2004 which turned right early and hit way south of Tampa Bay. The last major hurricane to hit Tampa was 1921 (although you still do have to be prepared in case it does happen). I saw a map of hurricanes for the last century and more hurricanes have hit Maine than Tampa! The reason being is that not only does the hurricane have to make a right turn into the Gulf of Mexico, it would have to make another right turn if it wants to hit Tampa. So far, we have been fortunate! If need be, I dont see the Bucs saying no to switching games. I would hope they would understand.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 12:05 pm
It’s actually a scheduled visit, hence the evacuation three days before the arrival.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 1:22 pm
Its just government money going to waste as usual. Us americans are very used to pizzing away money. So no big deal I guess.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 1:29 pm
After seeing how rude Saints fans were to San Antonio after Katrina, no one from South Texas wants anything to do with that dump of a franchise.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 2:09 pm
And people thought France was stupid for selling Louisiana to the USA?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
August 31st, 2008 at 2:31 pm
Bob, ummmm….do you actually know how big the Louisiana Purchase was or are you just a really stupid smartass???
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)