We continue to be amazed by the fact that the Cincinnati Bengals decided to bring back receiver Chris Henry after cutting him in the wake of his most recent arrest and then proclaiming that he won’t be returning after the charges were finally dropped.
The organization now has zero credibility, in our view. Here’s more on the matter, courtesy of PFTV.
The deeper issue here is that teams will continue to believe it’s permissible to bring in (or back) a problem player under a “last-chance” agreement, if there are no real consequences to the organization if/when the player screws up again.
In theory, the NFL’s recent decision to fine teams harboring players who are suspended under the Personal Conduct Policy should have been enough to persuade the parsimonious (thanks, Tiki, you c–t) Bengals to not risk having to fork over any cash in the event that Henry gets busted yet again. Since not even the threat of being fined was enough to prompt the penny-pinching Bengals to steer clear of Henry, we’re now more convinced than ever that the only way to get teams to place principle over production will be to strip draft picks from franchises whose players get in trouble.
We laid out a formula for dealing with the situation a couple of months ago. It could be the only way to get teams to adhere to their principles both when it’s easy to do so, and when a rash of injuries at one position makes a miscreant suddenly look like Miss America.
_2.gif)





August 22nd, 2008 at 9:39 am
Whatever Florio!
Without your miscreant’s like Henry, you’d out of a job!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.45 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 9:43 am
That’s a disgrace. He obviously is not the caliber player that we want in the NFL. He has character issues that stem back to his college days at WVU. NFL needs to take a hard stand here - Adam Jones (ex-pacman)
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.3 / 5 with 10 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 9:44 am
Besides being an obvious Stealer apologist, why is it that you continue to bash the Bengals about the Henry signing… yet TOTALLY IGNORE the Cowboys and their signings of Tank “Third World Armorer” Johnson, Adam “I’m not Pacman, and if you don’t listen to me you’ll end up dead” Jones, and of course their signing of the pariah known as TO?
How about the Stealers and their continued support of the “Wife Beaters Club”?
Where’s the outrage that the good commissioner did nothing to Marshawn Lynch?
You’re a talking head hypocrite.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.35 / 5 with 15 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 9:45 am
This is a joke - the 3 biggest abusers of the player conduct policy are now back in the league. Pacman (of course he’ll get reinstated), Tank and now Henry.
I guess we know where Vick will be in 2009.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.8 / 5 with 8 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 9:45 am
I’m amazed that the Bengals get thrown under the bus and it’s their fault and they should be penalized if he screws up again is the choice of action and angst here. Why leave it up to the teams? If he is such a bad apple, the the NFL should step in and eliminate the problems from the league so the teams don’t even have the opportunity. Wow, if you feel this way when he was acquitted, I’d love to see what you would have done if he was convicted. Castration, tasers, sharks with laser beams attached to their heads? I’m not crazy about bringing him back out of necessity either, but I’ll live with it. Dude, chill out. I know you’re a Steeler fan and hate the Bengals, but try not letting it show so much.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 9 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 9:55 am
It’s the NFL they are in the business of football, not parenting. If a player has skills then they are worth being on the team. They only bad business decision they made was getting rid of him in the first place, it was a knee jerk reaction. Much like the Bears with Tank Johnson (to an extent Ced Benson but that was partly due to production). Look where the Bears are predicted to end up as opposed to the Cowboys who picked up Tank Johnson, Pacman and T.O.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 9:56 am
the cowboys never publicly slammed pacman / tank / etc… and then hired them. the bengals went out of their way to talk about morals, ‘earning the right’ to play in the NFL - “it’s not a right it’s a priveledge, etc… AND THEN THEY SIGNED HIM… i hope he burns down the clubhouse in week 4 and they learn a lesson here.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.85 / 5 with 8 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:07 am
Ha! The Bengals org had zero credibility with Florio already, so I don’t know why this pronouncement should carry any weight. Look, bringing Henry back has not been looked on with favor by very many Bengals fans, they are as fed up with him as any other fan of the league. But I can see why they did it. Chad is hurt, and no one is really sure how badly. Housh hasn’t practiced in weeks. The rest of the receiver corps are rookies and guys who are at best 4th or 5th receiver types. Henry knows the offense, and has a comfort zone already. Yeah, they are setting themselves up to get burned again, but in this case they felt it was worth the risk. Who knows. Cris Carter was a complete knucklehead alcoholic until he matured. And at least no one in his posse has killed anyone (or any dogs) - yet.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:08 am
Yea, yea, yea, the nerve of the Bengals. In the mean time days without arrest counter has been started over twice in the past week. If I didn’t know any better I would guess it was a Bengals player…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:15 am
“The deeper issue here is that teams will continue to believeit’s permissible to bring in (or back) a problem player under a “last-chance” agreement, if there are no real consequences to the organization if/when the player screws up again”
Why should it not be permissable? Management should run their team the way they want to. Any screwups by the player ultimately only hurt the team, which is punishment enough. If a player is available and a team wants to take a chance, that’s nobody’s business but the team’s. If the league does think it’s their business then stick to your guns and ban the player from signing with any team…and good luck with the union.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:17 am
Last word on Bengals and Chris Henry? I doubt it you pontificating asshole.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 10 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:20 am
man, bengal fans are all idiots. wah wah florio hates my team even though they made the dumbest move possible that destroyed any cred the bengals had left and now have solidified their role as setting the example of how NOT to run a franchise.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.25 / 5 with 13 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:20 am
“…(thanks, Tiki, you c–t)…”
LOL!!!!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:26 am
Yes it sucks to Bengal fan at the moment. And it’s getting tiring being the punching bag. For the record though the majority of fans in Cincinnati are really hacked off. To the point where after Tuesday decision to bring back Henry that tickets are being sold three weeks before the season starts.
In ‘09 we’ll be bringing back that old thing known as “local blackout”
due to lack of sellouts after this year
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:33 am
If teams want to go after players like this, I say, let ‘em.
It’s punishment enough to have to deal with the drama, unrest, and other unwanted baggage they bring into the locker room.
I thought the Bengals were on the right track a few months ago. Now they’ve succumbed to the same mentality that’s brought them grief (on and off the field) in the past. Again, if that’s what they want, they can have it.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.8 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:45 am
I think it is a defensive move, as Henry was showing interest in Baltimore and the Gals didnt want to have to deal with him in the division. The talking heads are saying this is about injuries, but he can’t play until week 5 anyway. I personally don’t care who they sign as long as they get back to where they were in 2005. Sure, Henry is an idioit but if he has to be somewhere it might as well be here.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:48 am
“Besides being an obvious Stealer apologist, why is it that you continue to bash the Bengals about the Henry signing… yet TOTALLY IGNORE the Cowboys and their signings of Tank “Third World Armorer” Johnson, Adam “I’m not Pacman, and if you don’t listen to me you’ll end up dead” Jones, and of course their signing of the pariah known as TO?”
1 - The Cowboys don’t have a HUUUGE problem with players that run afoul of the law. Unlike, you know, that criminal breeding ground known as the Bengals.
2 - The Cowboys never said that they were going to shy away from players with issues like these.
Simple enough for you, genius?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.15 / 5 with 10 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:50 am
Some of you guys are missing the point. It’s not about the Bengals signing another bad guy versus other franchises that have done the same. It’s about the way they threw any shred of credibility they had left out the window by cutting this guy for his off-field behavior, saying they wouldn’t bring him back after having his latest charges dropped, and then having an owner obviously overrule the head coach and bring him back anyway.
What a joke of an organization!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.3 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:56 am
Oh, and if anyone hasn’t seen the pic of the day from a few months ago about Chris Henry, go to the bottom of that page and hit previous a couple of times. ‘Crime for Dummies’. I still laugh when I see it.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.75 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:57 am
NOW they’ve lost credibility?
Mike Brown whines about not making enough money so he wants the other owners to give him some of theirs… as he names his new stadium after his dad, forgoing potentially millions in revenue that these other owners are not willing to just forget about. That wasn’t enough?
Then there’s the FACT that the Bengals have coddled miscreants like Henry for years. Enabled them, even. They didn’t do jack about it until word came down that the NFL might be getting into Mike Brown’s pockets if his criminals keep jumping out of line. Both of these things weren’t enough for you to declare that the Bengals have lost what little credibility they might have had? It takes the Bengals bringing back the criminal because the overrated loudmouth got hurt?
Apparently, the criminal element was getting too weak for Mike Brown’s taste. Or maybe the sales of Bengals bobblehead dolls had fallen off?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 8 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 11:07 am
Another day another article about the signing of Chris Henry. I agree that Henry has been in a lot of trouble. I am a little surprised that people are still slamming him for this recent arrest since he was found not guilty. I know, that’s not an acquittal, but it’s still NOT guilty. On the meantime Bengal’s fans are being ridiculed for supporting their team? We have been accussed of being “fairweather” fans in the past…and now we are being chastised for being fans.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 8 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 11:08 am
Dragon’s right. You Bengals fans focus on the supposed slanted nature of Florio’s blogging instead of the real point: the Bengals specifically say Henry has foreited the right to play for them due to about a zillion misdeeds, yet turn around in about 4 months and re-hire the guy. A 180 like that sets them up for all the criticism they are getting, whether its Florio, John Clayton, Peter King or Barak Obama for cripes sake. Neither Tank Williams nor Pac Man Jones played for the Cowboys and were re-hired after Jerry Jones said they didn’t deserve to be on his team. An organization run that poorly and with that lack of credibility doesn’t desreve a player like Carson Palmer.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 8 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 11:39 am
” parsimonious (thanks, Tiki, you c–t)” Too funny.
Florio you missed your calling.
You could be another Dave Barry.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 11:49 am
“…Tiki, you c-t.” Wow, your in full pissed off mode, eh Florio? I love it.
I’m pretty sure Goodell filled out all paperwork relating to fining the Bengals for Henry’s conduct the day he was signed, just waiting to stick a date on a send it up.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
August 22nd, 2008 at 11:52 am
No other team has criminals they’ve kept on the payroll or released and then re-signed. There are so many other negative things to focus on with the bengals, yet who broke the law and then got back on the team are always the major focus. Enjoy the hateorade everyone and next time jarred allen picks up a dui or pacman points a gun at someone, I expect the same angry fervor towards the teams who currently own their contracts.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)