Though Brett Favre was able to get out of Green Bay without going through the motions of participating in training camp, Falcons receiver Joe Horn hasn’t been so lucky.
Horn has made it clear that he wants out of Atlanta. The team hasn’t cut him, preferring instead to work out a trade.
To date, no one has been interested. One of the reasons surely is that Horn is due to receive a base salary of $2.5 million in 2008. Anyone who trades for Horn acquires the responsibility to pay that amount.
Now, Horn is contemplating reducing his salary in order to make himself more attractive.
“I’m even contemplating giving some money back to further this thing along,” Horn said. “I’m ready to get it solved and move on. The longer I stay here, the worse it’s going to get.”
We’d been under the impression that the Falcons would squat on Horn until the eve of the regular season, and then cut him loose — if they haven’t suffered a rash of injuries at the receiver position. But the Atlanta Journal-Constitution suggests that Horn’s $2.5 million salary is fully guaranteed, and that he’ll earn that amount even if he is cut.
Though former Falcons G.M. Rich McKay made some questionable moves, we doubt that he gave an aging receiver a two-year contract with a fully guaranteed second-year salary. Instead, we think that there’s possibly some confusion regarding the concept of termination pay.
For any “vested veteran” (i.e., a player with four or more credited seasons) who is on a team’s opening-day roster, the player is entitled to take the balance of his salary as “termination pay” if he is later released, if and only if the player has never elected to take termination pay at any other time in his career. The practical effect is that, for most of the vested veterans in the league, their base salary is guaranteed if they make it to Week One.
If that’s the case with Horn, the Falcons can cut him with no further financial obligation before the start of the regular season, forcing him to then find a new job on the open market, which likely won’t result in a contract paying him $2.5 million for 2008.
And so he’ll likely have to give up a lot of money in order to persuade another team to trade for him. Otherwise, any team that wants him will just continue to wait it out.
_2.gif)






August 13th, 2008 at 8:50 am
But he is under contract. Didn’t the TEAM sign a contract? This is what bugs me about NFL fans. When a player is under contract and holds out for more $$ or a longer deal, he is being a greedy SOB. When a team cuts a player under contract noone cares … it’s the business side of the NFL.
NFLPA who do you represent?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
August 13th, 2008 at 8:55 am
Joe Horn is a loser that thinks he still is a premier wr in this league at age of 51 . He couldnt comprehend when the Saints didnt want him any more only to sign with a division rivial only to play with a QB that wasnt even one. Then to put the cherry on top his monday night actions with the free Mike Vick was comicial . Joe Horn no one wants you bud the Falcons were looking for a 6th round pick and no one bit
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
August 13th, 2008 at 8:59 am
A pay cut? What’s the going rate for washed up WRs that are locker room cancers?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
August 13th, 2008 at 9:09 am
“But he is under contract. Didn’t the TEAM sign a contract? This is what bugs me about NFL fans. When a player is under contract and holds out for more $$ or a longer deal, he is being a greedy SOB. When a team cuts a player under contract noone cares … it’s the business side of the NFL.”
There is nothing in the CBA saying contracts have to be non-guaranteed. The player and his agent negotiate the contract, they can say they want it all guaranteed, but they will have to come down on the contract total, way down. I don’t know the exact details of Horn’s contract, but let’s say he signed 5 million over 2 years, 1 million guaranteed. Well he could have asked for a 2 year 3 million fully guaranteed contract, but he was greedy and went for 5 million. He then went out and underperformed that non-guaranteed contract he agreed to sign. His mistake.
Tell the players to stop signing non-guaranteed contracts and they won’t have to worry about being cut half way through it. The NFL has a salary cap based on revenues and most teams spend right up to the cap every year, so it’s not like they are cutting players in order to make a profit. They cut players so they have more money to spend on other players without going over the cap.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
August 13th, 2008 at 9:25 am
What was McNabb saying earlier this week about WRs?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
August 13th, 2008 at 9:33 am
sorry joe you cant play for less than the league minimum.
sorry atlanta he has less than zero trade value. he’s a cancer, get it?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
August 13th, 2008 at 11:17 am
Since the Bears are the team that WR’s go to die, why wouldn’t they take an already dead one?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated