In any other year, the holdout of Rams running back Steven Jackson would be a huge story. But since this is the “Summer of Favre,” Jackson is getting hardly any attention.
But the story isn’t going away, because Jackson is still a holdout. Though we are firm believers (generally) in guys honoring their contracts, we can understand why Jackson would take a stand. Just like Larry Johnson last season in Kansas City, Jackson enters the fifth year of a contract based on a low first-round slot. Neither man got big money as rookies, and both were faced with having to sprint to the finish line in season five in order to have a shot at free agency.
Even then, the franchise tag would have potentially required another year of high-end Haynesworth-style performance — and the risk of injury that it entails — before getting a chance to cash in.
So Jackson wants his money now. And we don’t blame him.
The question the Rams need to ask themselves is whether they think Jackson will still have the same fire once he gets paid. For some running backs, that eight-figure signing bonus operates like reverse Viagra. (Charles Haley should have taken some of that, apparently.)
According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, there have been no negotiations since July 25. And as the Post-Dispatch points out, today is the day on which Jackson must report, or else he’ll lose a year of credit toward free agency. If there’s an uncapped year in March 2010, Jackson will be short of the six years of service necessary to be an unrestricted free agent.
As we’ve previously explained, however, it doesn’t matter, as long as Jackson shows up by Week Ten. Under that scenario, he’d get credit for the present contract year, and he’d become an unrestricted free agent in March 2009 based on his existing four years of credit toward free agency. If the Rams keep his rights via the franchise tag, Jackson would still be entitled to 110 percent of the 2009 franchise tender for his position if the Rams apply the restricted free agency tender to him in 2010.
_2.gif)





August 5th, 2008 at 10:06 am
I am still picking him at 6 in my fantasy holdout draft.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
August 5th, 2008 at 10:11 am
Thats a shame, aside from LT, I think Jackson is the next most complete back in the league.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
August 5th, 2008 at 10:33 am
I dont think the Rams are too worried about it. I mean whats the difference between 3 wins and 6 wins anyway?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
August 5th, 2008 at 10:53 am
Eugene Parker seems to have taken a pretty large gamble with both Steven Jackson and Jason Peters. So far, it doesn’t seem to be paying off. Both teams have stated that they will not negotiate with players that aren’t in camp.
And maybe Larry Johnson is exactly why the Rams aren’t giving a huge extension to Jackson. They don’t want to give him $50M and then watch him go down for the season in Week 2 or 3.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
August 5th, 2008 at 11:48 am
normally, you inform us of news in a similar way in which we would tell our friends. this time, i am displeased with you on this one. you mention charles haley needing reverse viagra, which was fine, but that about travis henry? we all know, deep down, you have a sincere hatred of the broncos just like the rest of us. but you really missed the boat this time. maybe it was because henry has been released by the broncos, but honestly, i believe that any chance to get to rip on the broncos, you should take it.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
August 5th, 2008 at 12:15 pm
He should have retired, that would have saved him the fine money. He could ask for reinstatement at week 10.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
August 6th, 2008 at 2:17 am
this guy deserves his money. the rams are screwing themselves over by not getting a deal done and getting this guy in camp…unless he is asking for more than tomlinson…which no RB does
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
August 6th, 2008 at 3:05 am
Man wouldn’t it suck:
-If player were paid for their performance as they go (seasons by season). It would take out all the fun out of Drafts and F.A. Busts! It’s not like carrying you team matter anymore, remember ladies and gentlemen, it’s business.
- I love this sport, but it’s becoming just about money, some who deserve it, don’t get it. No more loyalty. Soon the famous acronym will remind us:
No F(other word for fornication) Loyalty.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated