Jim Thomas of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch raises a great point regarding Rams running back Steven Jackson, who is holding out despite a rookie contract that covers 2008, his fifth NFL season.
If the Collective Bargaining Agreement isn’t extended by 2010, then 2010 will have no salary cap, and only players with six NFL seasons will be eligible for unrestricted free agency.
As we’ve recently pointed out (and as we first learned three years ago when Brian Westbrook was contemplating a holdout from the Eagles), a player under contract who fails to report 30 days before the start of the regular season does not accrue a year of service for the purposes of free agency.
And so, in Jackson’s case, he won’t accrue a fifth year in 2008 if he doesn’t report at least 30 days prior to the start of the regular season. Thus, his first shot at accruing a fifth year would come in 2009. And then, come March 2010, he’d be eligible for restricted free agency only.
But there are two glitches in the reasoning offered up by Thomas. First, as long as Jackson shows up by Week Ten of the regular season, he’d get credit for the fifth year of his Rams contract, making him an unrestricted free agent in March 2009, even though he’d only have four years of NFL service for free agency purposes if his holdout lasts beyond 30 days before the start of the regular season.
Second, the CBA provision in question is based not on the first regular-season game of the player’s team, but the first regular-season game, period. Thus, if Jackson shows up on August 8 (which is 30 days before the Rams’ opener), he’ll be three days too late, since the regular season starts on September 4 with the Redskins at the Giants, not on September 7.
Potential awkwardness in this case could arise if Jackson gets credit for the fifth year of his contract and the Rams restrict his movement with the franchise tag as of March 2009. In 2010, Jackson would be a restricted free agent, if there’s no salary cap. As we pointed out several months ago, however, Jackson’s one-year RFA tender would be determined by multiplying the 2009 franchise tag by 1.1,resulting in far greater earnings that restricted free agents otherwise receive.
Per Thomas, the Rams reportedly have offered Jackson a deal worth $7 million per year, which would place him among the top four highest-paid running backs in the league.
_2.gif)





July 29th, 2008 at 1:14 pm
Makes one wonder if the likes of Jackson knows any/all of this.
And whether his former agent advised him the best way to go and he just wouldnt listen…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 29th, 2008 at 1:34 pm
The team will cave in, they almost always do.
I give props to the Eagles & Bucs for going after player’s bonus money if they don’t live up to their contracts.
Everyone is replaceable. Teams should just go forward with the attitude that the player holding out tore his ACL and proceed appropriately. Injury replacements happen all of the time (Earnest Graham). A few high profile players losing millions per year with their holdouts could change the culture VERY quickly.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 29th, 2008 at 1:46 pm
Top 4 money to a guy who is at best top 10. I’d take it before the rams smarten up!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 29th, 2008 at 2:14 pm
so the rams offered him 7 mil a year and he’s not satisfied? thats the real question people. if this team doesnt become DEVASTATED be injury like they did last year they will very competitive in a weak division and have a very good chance of being a play-off team. idk 7 million a year and the pretty comfortable assurance that you have a more than capable o-line (when healthy), one of the most dynamic receivers in the game to keep the d from stacking the box on you, and a qb that is of course no peyton manning but can definitely get the job done (also when healthy) sounds like a rock-solid deal to me.
hell or look at it this way, play this year and one of three things happen:
1. you get tagged after this season, giving you the average of the top 5 salaries at your position, which is a crap-load of money then becomes an unrestricted f.a. in 2010, the year in which there is no salary cap.
2. you get rewarded for being a team player and the rams pay you handsomly in the upcoming offseason.
3. you become a free agent after this season and land a huge deal with the “raiders/vikings/jets/browns” of next season who drastically over-pay for your services.
i dont see a losing situation by showing up. unless he gets hurt, God forbid. (knocking on wood as i type.)
am i the only one who notices this?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 29th, 2008 at 2:35 pm
Could someone show up for camp before August 5th and then leave and still get credit?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 29th, 2008 at 3:10 pm
Pay him his money - on September 8th.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated