Let me preface this by saying that I’m a firm believer that Hall of Fames are diluted. I don’t begrudge the guys who make it, I simply believe that the construct of the processes has resulted in the cliche “Hall of Very Goods.”
That being said, Rod Smith’s retirement announcement immediately kicks off the debate about whether he should be enshrined in Canton. I think he absolutely deserves a spot.
Compared to the current crop of 19 Hall of Fame receivers, Smith has more career receptions (849) than all but Art Monk. His yardage totals (11,389) rank seventh. And while those comparisons are skewed because Smith played in an era of evolved passing, his achievements (including two Super Bowl wins and three Pro Bowls) compare favorably with the contemporary pass-catchers in the group, especially Michael Irvin. He proved effective in big games, as well, catching five receptions for 152 yards and a touchdown (an 80-yard catch) in Super Bowl XXXIII. He had two stellar seasons in 2000 and 2001, but also showed consistency, posting eight 1,000-yard seasons, including six in a row from 1997-2002.
It also might seem like a double standard, as prominent NFL draftees are warned that it’s not how they get there, but what they do once they get there, but Smith rose from the ranks of undrafted free agency to ascend to those heights and did it with character — he was a finalist for the league’s Walter Payton Man of the Year award in 2004.
Smith will suffer from his workmanlike demeanor and relative lack of name power, as well as the fact that even in his prime he was never the NFL’s best receiver, even for a season. And with a lot of prominent names looking to enter Canton in the near future, including Cris Carter, Tim Brown, and Jerry Rice at his own position, Smith would have to wait a few (possibly many) years. In the end, though, I think the evidence stacks up that he should be in Canton someday.
_2.gif)





July 25th, 2008 at 2:59 pm
Starting a team I take Rod Smith ever day of
the week. Tim Brown was a good receiver on
some very poor teams. So, yes, I take Rod Smith
over Tim Brown. Further, Tim Brown never
blocked as well as well as Rod Smith.
The fact that Smith was undrafted is all the
more special. Putting Mr. Smith in the Hall
of Fame honors both the player and the institution.
One last thing: the bust of Walter Payton at the
HOF looks absolutely nothing like him. In fact,
I know a Jewish attorney in Denver who
looks more like that bust in Canton than does
Walter Payton. Not too late to fix that…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 3:07 pm
Rod Smith should be inducted for his blocking alone.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 3:28 pm
Alright, let’s see here… a few replies to people:
1. The Rod Smith-Monk comparison is a good one
2. Jimmy Smith > Rod Smith
3. Jimmy Smith did have a QB throwing him the ball. Mark Brunell was better than “Very Good” for ~7 years. And unlike ROD Smith, he was a top-5 guy at his position for a while.
4. Fred Taylor was mentioned here as well, and I do think FT belongs in the Hall. Along with Brunell. That Jaguar team would have had a super bowl appearance if it wasn’t for a number of key drops against the Titans in the AFC CG.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 4:15 pm
While Rod will always be THE MAN, he played in the HOF black hole known as Denver. How many Broncos are in there? John Elway, with Zimmerman soon to follow. How does this make sense for a team with 2 Superbowl victories, 6 AFC Championships, and 8 division championships. Even the lowly Cardinals have more with 11. THE CARDINALS! It doesn’t make sense. For this reason it will be hard for Rod to get in.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 4:20 pm
NOPE! Not even close as far as I am concerned.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1.8 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 4:51 pm
My personal opinion is that Smith does not deserve to be in the Hall. Opinion aside, I do not believe Smith has any chance to make the Hall! Because the voters are made up of NATIONAL media and Smith is not recognized outside of Denver he will never get the support necessary to even be seriously considered (even if his numbers say he is worthy).
Thats my two cents.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 4:53 pm
No, he was great for a few years and good for many many years and in my view that’s not hall-worthy.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 5:07 pm
Rod Smith > Jimmy Smith.
Rod Smith has two rings, and put up great stats on a running team. and he only played with Elway for a few years. the majority of his career was post Elway.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 5:39 pm
How to counter the dilution of the Hall? An off the cuff proposal:
Have a set number of spots per position, almost like a roster. Increase the number per position by one once every 5 or 10 years or so. But still vote every year. In order to elect someone new… you have to demote someone already there.
Heh. That would make being in the Hall even more of an honor, without ever being cheap, but I know it would never happen. It would be considered too mean or harsh. But wow, it would be interesting!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 7:28 pm
Henry Ellard was a better receiver than Rod Smith, Art Monk, John Stallworth, Chris Carter ….
No one talks about Ellard.
Everybody needs to quit being a stat reading ball watcher and forget about their fantasy and Madden games. There are too many skill position players going into the HoF lately, and most, undeservedly.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 25th, 2008 at 8:05 pm
Not a chance.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 25th, 2008 at 10:03 pm
Rod has lesser stats than Jimmy all day. Man of the Year doesn’t mean a thing for the Hall. Just look at O.J., L.T., Irvin, need I go on?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 25th, 2008 at 10:15 pm
Florio brings up Art Monk and Michael Irvin as examples of two guys that are in the HOF that show why Rod Smith should be in. First of all, Smith wasn’t as good as either of those two guys, and secondly neither Irvin or Monk actually belong in the Hall.
Rod Smith was a good receiver and a great guy, but Hall of Fame? Nope.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 10:22 pm
The Gipper:
1) The comment that Rod Smith put up his numbers on “running teamss”, as if Jimmy Smith played for Mike Martz or something, is brainless. Take a look at where the Jaguars ranked in passing attempts (save for the one crazy 1996 season), then smack yourself in the forehead for such a bad argument. Do you even know who Tom Coughlin or Jack Del Rio are? (Jimmy Smith’s biggest season was 1999. The Jags were 12th and 17th in passing yards and attempts, and 3rd and 2nd in rushing yards and attempts. Now who’s playing on a “running team”?)
2) You’re right that Rod Smith only played a few years (4) with John Elway. That’s four more years than Jimmy Smith played with a Hall of Fame quarterback. (To anyone saying Brunell is a HOF QB… no.)
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 26th, 2008 at 12:35 am
What everybody has failed to mention is that guys like Michael Irvin, Jimmy Smith, Art Monk, whoever else…were 1st and 2nd round talent…Rod Smith was an undrafted FA who went from being on the Broncos Practice Squad to Special Teams to prominent WR…No other player in the History of the NFL has accumulated better stats being an undrafted FA….
To the guy who mentioned Henry Ellard…props to the Fresno Native but, no way should his name be mentioned…
Besides all that…Look at all the Broncos team records Rod has set, let me remind you that a guy named Shannon Sharpe, (hands down 1 ballot HOFer) played 12 years setting those records that Rod broke…
I know its a tough decision and its hard to say that he 100% needs to be it tn the HOF but, it shouldn’t be disregarded as quick as the majority of this board has already…
#80
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 26th, 2008 at 5:25 am
Ok, seriously, the thing you guys are all neglecting here is that Rod Smith is a) The greatest undrafted WR ever. In every stat category. So, and Jimmy Smith, Irving, or Monk comparisons all need to colored by the fact that all those guys were deemed good enough for a team to spend a draft pick on, wheras Rod Smith was not. Not only is Rod Smith the greatest undrafted WR ever, he should be in contention for greatest undrafted player ever.
And to try and argue that Rod should be in using stats as a argument is missing everything that makes Rod Smith HOF worthy. Stats do not matter to that man. Winning is all that matters. His favorite game ever was Super Bowl 32, a game where he didn’t catch a pass. Why? Because his team won the Super Bowl. His contract escalators each year, they weren’t based on his stats, they we’re based on team related things. “If we get a 1000 yard rusher, I’ll get So and so much money, if we win 11 games, if we make the playoffs,” ect. This man scheduled his retirement press conference last minute so it would be over before training camp, because he didn’t want to have it be a distraction to his team. Ask any one who he played with and they’ll tell you nothing but how he is the best team mate they’ve ever had.
Irving got penalized for his off the field issues and had to wait a year for his induction, and yet Rod Smith, who is ten times the man Irving has ever shown himself to be, should be left out? Nonsense. Move the Broncos to Dallas, New York and LA, and this wouldn’t be a discussion. Rod Smith, with his numbers and the man he is, not even factoring in the fact that he was undrafted, playing for a major market team would be a first ballot hall of famer.
But, we Bronco fans are used to this, and realize that he probably won’t make it. And while it breaks our heart, we don’t need Canton. Our hall of fame is a ring around the lip of the stadium. Where future Bronco greats can look up and be inspired by the over looked great ones, Tom Jackson, Randy Gradishar, Karl Mecklenberg, Floyd Little, Steve Atwater, Ed MacAffery, Terrel Davis, Rod Smith, and the few the world has deemed “great” enough to remember, Elway, Sharpe, and now Zimmerman. He’ll be in the “hall of players we wish would never grow old.” A first ballot in the “Hall of Heart.” A first ballot in the “Hall of guys you’d want on your team any time.” We’ll miss Rod Smith when it’s 3rd down in the 4th quarter and the receiver drops the ball. We’ll always remember, and cherish, #80 on Sundays.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 27th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
two super bowl rings, and yes he did lead the league in receptions one year, and he was a great blocker as a receiever, all-time leader in every major recieving record as a non-drafted reciever, his hard work alone deserves it, his numbers just help his case.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated