Let me preface this by saying that I’m a firm believer that Hall of Fames are diluted. I don’t begrudge the guys who make it, I simply believe that the construct of the processes has resulted in the cliche “Hall of Very Goods.”
That being said, Rod Smith’s retirement announcement immediately kicks off the debate about whether he should be enshrined in Canton. I think he absolutely deserves a spot.
Compared to the current crop of 19 Hall of Fame receivers, Smith has more career receptions (849) than all but Art Monk. His yardage totals (11,389) rank seventh. And while those comparisons are skewed because Smith played in an era of evolved passing, his achievements (including two Super Bowl wins and three Pro Bowls) compare favorably with the contemporary pass-catchers in the group, especially Michael Irvin. He proved effective in big games, as well, catching five receptions for 152 yards and a touchdown (an 80-yard catch) in Super Bowl XXXIII. He had two stellar seasons in 2000 and 2001, but also showed consistency, posting eight 1,000-yard seasons, including six in a row from 1997-2002.
It also might seem like a double standard, as prominent NFL draftees are warned that it’s not how they get there, but what they do once they get there, but Smith rose from the ranks of undrafted free agency to ascend to those heights and did it with character — he was a finalist for the league’s Walter Payton Man of the Year award in 2004.
Smith will suffer from his workmanlike demeanor and relative lack of name power, as well as the fact that even in his prime he was never the NFL’s best receiver, even for a season. And with a lot of prominent names looking to enter Canton in the near future, including Cris Carter, Tim Brown, and Jerry Rice at his own position, Smith would have to wait a few (possibly many) years. In the end, though, I think the evidence stacks up that he should be in Canton someday.
_2.gif)






July 25th, 2008 at 1:03 pm
Smith > Irvin, so I vote “in.”
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.8 / 5 with 11 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:07 pm
He should make it into the Hall, but not for at least few years after he is eligible
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.65 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:07 pm
I think the comparison to Art Monk is very appropriate. Low profile, high performance. Actually, I would have put Rod Smith ahead of Michael Irvin. Irvin benefited tremendously from the talent around him. I never thought of him as a HOF receiver, even during his prime. The Cowboys won Super Bowls while he was there and he benefitted from the “halo effect”. I say that if Irvin was good enough, Smith is definitely good enough.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.05 / 5 with 11 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:10 pm
I agree. Gene freaking Hickerson was lucky to have lived to see his induction after being the lead blocker for Jim Brown, Leroy Kelly, and Bobby Mitchell (3 HOFs). Hopefully Rod Smith doesn’t have to endure the same circumstance, but I’m not holding my breath.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
No.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.75 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
Is Jimmy Smith a Hall of Fame guy? I am not sure…and I would have rather had Jimmy Smith than Rod Smith - and their stats are identical…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.2 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:17 pm
Rod Smith had a long, consistently good career, true. But so did (do!) guys like Fred Taylor, and I doubt he’ll get the votes either.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:17 pm
Pop quiz: Rod Smith deserves to be in the Hall of Fame because he:
a) Caught fewer passes than Jimmy Smith
b) Totaled fewer yards than Jimmy Smith
c) Caught ONE more TD than Jimmy Smith
d) Was a good player that won a Super Bowl
Let’s face it, “d” is all he truly has.
Rod Smith, like Steve McNair, is a perfect candidate for the Hall of Very Good.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.4 / 5 with 8 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:17 pm
He should not be a HOF’er. He was never even considered a top 5 WR in the league in any season.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.2 / 5 with 9 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
Rod Smith can go into the Hall of Very Good…He will be waiting to get into the NFL Hall of Fame…behind Jerry Rice, Tim Brown, and Chris Carter who all have better numbers than he does.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
Oops, forgot to include:
c.5) Went to 2 fewer Pro Bowls than Jimmy Smith
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.25 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:22 pm
He was a great player, but unfortunately for him, he will be compared to the guys he played with: Rice, Harrison, Moss, Owens, etc.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
I forgot two big names he’ll be up against in Tory Holt and Isaac Bruce.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:40 pm
He was not a game changer like Michael Irvin and got to benefit from the Shanahan system and Elway. He would be a #2 WR on most teams.
He’s a good player, but he’s not in the class of Michael Irvin.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.65 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
P.S., Jimmy Smith is far more deserving than Rod Smith.
Jimmy Smith struck fear in the opposition..while never having a John Elway throw him the ball, much akin to Steve Smith these days.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.8 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 1:51 pm
no way. 3 pro bowls. so only 3 years he was considered among the top 8 at his position?
just no way
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
Wow, so Michael Irvin must be the only guy to ever play with a bunch of talented guys. I guess that makes John Elway, Terrell Davis, Shannon Sharpe, Clinton Portis and Ed McCaffery the very definition of chopped liver.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 2:02 pm
I can’t believe people are dissing Michael Irvin. Irvin was the progenitor of today’s big, physical receiver.
And don’t forget that while Rod Smith had a very long, steadily productive career, Irvin’s was cut short due to injury. Irvin is still 3rd all time in 100-yd games.
I respect Rod Smith (I’m a Raiders fan), and the guy is a class act and a great story.
But to say he was better than Irvin is ridiculous.
Smith = reliable
Irvin = playmaker
That’s the difference.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.25 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 2:05 pm
Here’s the big problem… since 1983 there have been zillions of seasons of passers putting up over 4000 yards and WR’s with over 1000 yards.. the game has evolved, changed to a point that is nearly unrecognizable to the game pre-1983, when there were only a handful of 4000 yard passers in the entire league history (Joe Namath 68, Sipe and Fouts 80, and I think one other guy that escapes me for the moment).
Anyways, the game has changed, just because a QB or a WR has better numbers than a guy in the Hall, that doesn’t mean squat! The game is different, according to numbers and a vastly different game, shlubs like Dave Krieg, Neil Lomax, Trent Green, Brad Johnson and others would be shoo-ins for the Hall-of-Fame because their numbers and ratings are far better than many QBs already in the Hall (look at Namath’s pathetic numbers). The WR position is no different, 1000 yard seasons for WRs were rare for WR’s pre-1983, now there’s 20 a season, not exactly a worthy accomplishment when compared to players of a different era.
As for Smith, he was good, not nearly great…for that matter Irvin doesn’t either, or his QB, because in an age of inflated passing game numbers, these guys truly didn’t stand out.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 2:08 pm
Why is it that Andre Reed is always left out of HOF talk ?Look at his numbers were fabulous, especially for a guy who played half of his career games in arctic Ralph Wilson stadium.
951 catches for 13,198 yards and 87 receiving TDs. Reed had 2,000 yards more receiving than Irvin. He earned 7 trips to the Pro Bowl.
Thats 201 more catches and 22 more TDs than Michael Irvin.
Number 5 alltime in receptions with 951. 102 more than Rod Smith
Number 8 alltime in yardage with 13,198. Smith had 11389 yards.
And Reed hardly ever gets mention as a HOFer !? WTF ????I’d like to see the career stats of any of those other guys after playing in the tundra of Buffalo for that long.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.25 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 2:22 pm
Blackbeard stole my thunder..
There’s list that should get in before him.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 25th, 2008 at 2:33 pm
*Legion* says:
Pop quiz: Rod Smith deserves to be in the Hall of Fame because he:
a) Caught fewer passes than Jimmy Smith
b) Totaled fewer yards than Jimmy Smith
c) Caught ONE more TD than Jimmy Smith
d) Was a good player that won a Super Bowl
Let’s face it, “d” is all he truly has.
Rod Smith, like Steve McNair, is a perfect candidate for the Hall of Very Good.
***********************************************
First of all Legion, Rod has TWO Super Bowl rings, not one.
Secondly, did Jimmy Smith block for a 2,00 yard RB in his career? Not quite.
Lastly, was Jimmy Smith ever nominated for NFL Man of the Year?
Nope.
Rod Smith’s body of work should all be taken into consideration. Not just his stats. Jimmy Smith, while a productive player, couldn’t hold Rod’s jock in a side-by-side comparison done by a knowledgable person. Rod didn’t get the “pub” he deserved because he’s not the media whore that Irvin, TO and so many WR’s are/were.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 2:34 pm
Shanahan said it best “There are 19 receivers (in the Hall of Fame) with Art coming into the Hall of Fame this year, and Rod Smith’s catches that he has rank second (in that group). Take a look at the Super Bowl rings, there’s only four guys ahead of him. Take a look at [receiving] yards of all the receivers in the Hall of Fame, there are only (six) ahead of him. But the thing that separates Rod Smith, it was never about the stats. One of the reasons we have one of the best running games in the National Football League on a consistent basis, is that your wide receivers have to be able to block on the field. He took as much pride in blocking for the running backs, for other people, as he did catching the football.” HOW MANY OF THESE OTHER WR’s were apart of so many 1,000 yard rushers??? This guy was undrafted for pete’s sake!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.35 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 2:44 pm
Not in a million years should this guy be in the Hall. The HOF is diluted because writers like Tom Mantzouranis think that players like Rod Smith deserve to be in. He was always good, but never came close to being considered a top 5 or even 10 WR in any of the years he played. If this is what Florio thinks qualifies as an assistant, he needs to look harder at candidate’s resumes.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
July 25th, 2008 at 2:48 pm
hell no, why don’t we just let anybody in while we’re at it
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 4 rating(s)