The unexpected holdout of Bears receiver/kick returner Devin Hester illustrates the flipside of the mess that is the manner in which NFL rookies are paid.
Under the current system, players are paid over the first three-to-six years of their careers based primarily on when they were drafted. If a top-five pick flames out, he keeps the money. If a seventh-rounder becomes a stud, he gets nothing more — until he gets a new contract.
For many of the picks, they receive only a slotted signing bonus and minimum salaries for the life of the deal.
”For me to be being paid as much as players on other teams who are sixth- and seventh-round picks who haven’t played a snap,” Hester said, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. ”They’re getting paid the same amount as me after the two years I’ve had. . . . It isn’t fair.”
Amen, Devin. It isn’t fair.
And so the NFL and the NFL Players Association need to agree on a system that permits every rookie to earn more money based on performance.
That said, the NFL currently makes available a league-wide pool that is distributed to players based on a formula that takes into account how much they play and how little they’re paid. In 2008, for example, Willie Colon of the Steelers picked up an extra $309,000 on top of his $450,000 base salary.
But Hester surely wants more than that. He wants a base salary that reflects his abilities and that reward him for his performance over the first two years of his contract.
The best approach could be to create a new players’ incentive system that, like the performance-based pay, isn’t part of each team’s salary cap. The rookies’ base pay would be determined by a narrow NBA-style formula, making contract negotiatons simple and eliminating the opportunity for ridiculous increases from one year to the next (and reducing significantly the influence of agents). Then, every rookie’s pay would be supplemented based on a system of incentives specifically negotiated for each position.
It’s the easiest path to a win-win. The rookies would consume less cap space on each of their teams, and thus more of it would be available to veterans. But the rookies would then be compensated fairly and appropriately for what they actually do between the white lines.
_2.gif)





July 24th, 2008 at 8:11 am
That’s all well and good, but how does that money work under the 60% of total revenue scenario? Doesn’t the 60% go entirely to the salary cap? I assume not since a pool is available beyond the cap. How much extra money would this new system need and how much would it reduce the cap? How much of a negotiation ploy would this seemingly innocent system create and how ugly would it get?
I would be interested in your take on some of these details Mr. Florio. Keep up the good work by the way (I don’t want to lose my special free subsciption after all!).
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 24th, 2008 at 8:24 am
Some guy runs around on Sunday playing a game for a few hours and complains publicly that he’s only getting a couple hundred thousand dollars for it. Go explain to the guys in Iraq and Afganistan how that’s not fair. Oh, and don’t forget to take your body armor when you go.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.7 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
July 24th, 2008 at 8:26 am
Devin, like my father always told me….”Life aint fair, get over it”
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1.75 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
July 24th, 2008 at 8:49 am
Awesome monger - you nailed it. Vets don’t get a chance to hold out on their contracts with the Services instead of deploying to the overseas theaters either. Most folks don’t make $450K in 10 years work - Hester gets it for practicing, showing up on time and standing around on the sideline until it’s time to return a kick.
I hear all over the radio waves these days in the camp and pre-camp interviews all the NFL prima donnas complaining about having to leave home to go to training camp for a month. What about the vets that head off to parts unknown for 15 months at a stretch?
Anyone that plays a game for a living should shut up, show up and be damn grateful they have the talent to play the game.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
July 24th, 2008 at 9:09 am
If you idiots could get paid to do what NFL players can do, you would see it a lot differently. How would you like it if you outperformed everyone at your work for 2 years and then someone comes in with less skills and experience than you and makes more money that you?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.85 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
July 24th, 2008 at 9:26 am
All the NFL has to do is look at the NHL’s rookie pay scale to figure out how they should be paying their rookies.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
July 24th, 2008 at 9:28 am
Devin, take a page from Marques Colston of the Saints- do your job with a smile and you’ll get paid. Devin Hester needs to realize he’s NOT going to get a mega deal, he has no leverage. He needs to smarten up, shut up, and honor the deal HE signed.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.4 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
July 24th, 2008 at 10:38 am
ericfay81….
Happens ALL THE TIME in the corporate world. People slaving getting menial wages every year and then the company hires some young buck fresh out of college making more than anyone else in the department.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 24th, 2008 at 10:48 am
There should be an arbitration system of some sort, but also there should be a buyout or opt out clause in every contract as long as the team can terminate contracts.
Another fair option would be restricted free agency from the very start. If the team that picks you does not want to meet your price but someone else does, they get the player and the team that drafted them gets a compensatory pick of similar value.
Why should a football player or a fire fighter have no choice in where he works or how much he will make? Almost anyone in any industry in the country can quit the job they have and work somewhere else in the same industry with little or no finacial penalty. usually they can get more money, and that is why they left.
There are far too many rules preventing finacial “tampering” and not enough prevention of “collusion’ price fixing and salary capping. This is supposed to be a free market and free country. How are the richest capatilists in the country running a commie finacial operation?
I love football as much as anyone, but I don’t think it has to be exempt from the same finacial laws and rules the rest of the economy operates under just to be viable. They are an ultra monopoly with a complete stranglehold of the market.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 24th, 2008 at 10:54 am
yeah, why is it that everything reverts back to the war. This is football with HUGE TV bargaining rights. Who else on the Chicago Bears squad makes fans want to watch them in the stands or on TV. DEVIN HESTER. The guy has more highlights than almost any other NFL player. And you don’t want him to get paid. Why the hell do you think players go to the NFL, to work for minimum wage? Monger I am sure you get minimum wage and like it.
Conversely, lets take a ex-Bear, Cedric Benson who was selected 4th overall. His contract was $17 million in guaranteed money. And he is no longer on the team, and when he was on the team he was the biggest draft bust EVER.
So why should he get paid, but Hester should not? Oh, yeah, cause he didn’t go to war. Wow.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
July 24th, 2008 at 10:55 am
Please stop commenting that players are overpaid. They are the ones we tune in to watch, and they wouldn’t be on the field if they didn’t put in long hours working out, studying playbooks, practicing, etc. Longer hours than most of us watching them on Sundays put in all week. Without them the sport wouldn’t be what it is, and without them the owners wouldn’t make ridiculous profits. Advertisers wouldn’t make money on their products that are advertised to us. The networks that sell those ads for 1.2 million a second during the Superbowl wouldn’t be able to sell at that rate without them.
Imagine all the people that watched the commercial immediately after Devin Hester’s return for a touchdown on the opening kickoff of the superbowl. The money made from one second of that advertisement is less than Hester’s contract for this year.
Give us a break already with the tired line “these athletes need to put up or shut up” — the athletes are only doing what’s in their power to do when a whole slew of others are making bank and never play a down.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
July 24th, 2008 at 11:18 am
BlackJack:
Maybe that’s your particular situation. But actually, the young buck out of college usually gets paid significantly less than the people with tenure. Companies often hire that way to cut back on payroll.
How about this… you sign a 4 year contract at your work and everyone else’s salaries go up but yours stays the same. I’d like to see you just grin and bear it.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 24th, 2008 at 11:54 am
Jeremiah W, the NFL is indeed a monopoly, but you are mistaken in believing that we live in and operate under free market principles in this country. Forget what you learned in econ class. Free market is more an ideal, than reality.
Who here doesn’t have some ideas to fix the NFL? It’s getting more jacked up every year!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 24th, 2008 at 1:38 pm
first thing:no one stuck a gun up hester’s ass and made
him sign the contract.
second thing:nothing is going to change until every one
realizes the agents and gene upshaw want to keep it this way.
the agents are all gaming the system to line their pockets.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 24th, 2008 at 4:29 pm
pretty soon the concept of “team” is going to be ignored in the nfl. hester has obviously out performed his contract and should be thrown a bone. before long players are going to ignore the team concept and start publicly declaring their intent to dog it.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated