The status of Browns receiver Joe Jurevicius continues to be unclear.
Over the weekend, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that Jurevicius plans to return to the field despite undergoing a fourth knee surgery on July 1. The most recent procedure was the third attempt to clean out staph infection resulting from normally routine arthroscopic surgery.
Per the Plain Dealer, there is no truth to rumors that Jurevicius needs microfracture surgery, a coin-flip procedure aimed at stimulating scar tissue development that then simulates the performance of missing cartilage.
But we continue to hear that Jurevicius is done, and that he’s privately saying he won’t be back.
So what’s with the report in the Plain Dealer? It could be that the Browns are putting out phony information about the situation in order to squeeze a better deal out of the Chargers for Eric Parker, who remains on the trading block. If the Browns can perpetuate the notion that they don’t really need a replacement for Jurevicius, then the Chargers might not hold firm in whatever they’re demanding for Parker.
Regardless, the broader point here is that the staph infection problem in Cleveland has not been solved, and we wonder when if ever the franchise and its medical providers will make a meangingful effort to solve the problem, which will continue to force the Browns to overpay free agents in order to persuade them to assume the risk of extended absences from the field, amputation, and/or death.
_2.gif)






July 14th, 2008 at 8:03 am
The media darlings might as well trade next years draft too…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
July 14th, 2008 at 8:24 am
Yeah Kaz… might as well trade next years draft too. Makes sense… Seriously though, I like JJ as much as the next fan, but if the “media darlings” (as you said) season is in the tank because JJ is not on the field, then the team wasn’t that good to begin with. He’s not even a starting receiver anymore, so let’s not forget that.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 14th, 2008 at 8:38 am
Oh please…
You falsely presume that the Browns and the Cleveland Clinic have not made “a meaningful effort to solve the problem” of staph infections. Then you infer, without offering evidence, that staph is responsible for swelling the contracts of the Browns’ free agents.
That’s your broader point? Thanks for your “concern.”
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.35 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
July 14th, 2008 at 8:42 am
I’m not sure what else the team can do until they narrow down the cause. They already had the training facilities rebuilt and sanitized by a private company. Outside of hiring the Ghostbusters, I’m not sure what you would do next.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
July 14th, 2008 at 8:43 am
here’s a case in point of why jj should retire now.
if he continues to play and become permanently crippled,
he hasn’t any safety net in place to cover his disability.
sadly,the player’s union will not come to his aid.
the trouble with the union is that they live for the
present and ignore the future.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 14th, 2008 at 10:08 am
Get your facts straight, Florio. JJ developed the staph infection 2 weeks after he left the Cleveland Clinic while he was traveling the west coast over 2,000 miles away. It was his own fault for not keeping the wound clean, not the Clinic’s or the Browns.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
July 14th, 2008 at 10:51 am
@No_Man
Still, strange coincidence, wouldn’t you say?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 14th, 2008 at 11:11 am
Here is the problem, The Cleveland Clinic has been having issues with infections for the past few years. It isn’t the Browns fault that the medical facility has issues. Yeah, maybe they should pick another facility, but this is Cleveland, the clinic with their issues are still better than any of the other options in the city.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 14th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
‘Mistake By The Lake II”
subtitle: the staph infection from hell!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 14th, 2008 at 2:25 pm
Matt, if what you say about the Cleveland Clinic being the best option available for the Browns in the city, just maybe the team should be looking for an out of town facility then, don’t you think? With as many players ending up with staph infections after being operated on there, I certainly would.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 14th, 2008 at 2:48 pm
No options in cleveland other than the Clinic? What about University Hospital? It’s one of the top teaching hospitals in the country? What about Cleveland Metro Hospital? There are options…but the other options aren’t paying the Cleveland Browns for advertising and endorsements.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 14th, 2008 at 9:07 pm
Well, the union ignores the past, that’s fer sure!
Folks, seriously, I am not sure the clinic really is forcing the browns to overpay for FAs the way a team like the lions has to overpay to even get low tier FAs to switch teams.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated