Peter King of SI.com reported Monday that agent Bus Cook will send a letter to the Green Bay Packers within the next 10 days asking that quarterback Brett Favre be reinstated from the reserve-retired list.
After the letter is mailed, Cook should call G.M. Ted Thompson and shout, “Checkmate.”
Really, what option will the Packers have but to bring Brett back? Cutting him would likely result in Thompson and/or coach Mike McCarthy being hanged in effigy (or, as Ernie Pantusso would say, right here in Green Bay). Reinstating him only to then try to trade him, would cause the legion of pro-Favre members of the fan base to break out the No. 4 jerseys (as if they even put them away) and prepare for a season that promises to be even more magical than 2007.
The only way the team could contain the emotions of folks like the kid who wore a Favre jersey every day for something like eight straight years would be to announce upon reinstatement that the Packers will try to trade him. But that would be the same thing as cutting him, and making such a declaration would hurt whatever little leverage the team would already have in trade talks.
Besides, the Packers would have little control over the outcome of a trade. No team will want Favre unless Favre wants to play for that team. He thus can block any trade by refusing to restructure his $12 million salary, or by making it clear that he’d simply retire, again.
(Then there’s the whole Jake Plummer angle on this one, where a team could trade for Favre’s rights based on a low-round pick, with a higher-round pick going to Green Bay if Favre reports. If Favre doesn’t report, the team could then try to recover any signing bonus money that might still apply to the last two seasons of Favre’s contract. However, the fact that the Packers didn’t file a grievance to recover any bonus money within 45 days after Favre initially retired could be an impediment to such a maneuver.)
The bottom line is that, even though the Packers apparently don’t want Brett and Brett apparently wants to play for a new team, these two parties might have no choice but to set aside their differences and coexist.
Meanwhile, Favre has missed the entire offseason program, which has been premised in large part on tweaking the offense in order to fit Aaron Rodgers’ strengths. Though Favre might not have needed the weeks of T-shirts and shorts practice to get himself ready to play, guys like rookie receiver Jordy Nelson have zero experience with No. 4, so it will place more pressure on Nelson and other members of the team to get ready for a season in which expectations will suddenly spike.
Perhaps that’s why the Packers have sent an intermediary to Mississippi. Surely, the franchise is going to try to talk Brett into staying on his tractor instead of provoking a test of wills that will give neither side what they each seem to want.
If the Packers want to move forward without Favre and if Favre wants to move forward with another team, putting the Pack in checkmate will make it very difficult, if not impossible, for that to happen.
There is, however, one way out of this mess, for both sides. If Brett is willing to admit publicly that he wants to play for another team (without blaming the team for his desires in this regard), then the Packers would be able to grant his release.
Maybe.
_2.gif)






July 8th, 2008 at 8:17 am
The only thing the Packers can do is cough up the 12 million and then make him inactive for every game. Expensive, but would serve him right for jerking them around so much.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.15 / 5 with 11 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 8:22 am
I disagree.. I think the majority of Packers fans are smart enough to realize that it is time to move on and would be interested to see what a trade could bring to the team. If I were McCarthy, I would feign enthusiasm to up his trade value (or at least untie the hand behind his back), and then casually seek offers. Worst case scenario, he’s stuck with an aging Pro-Bowl quarterback for another year.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.15 / 5 with 8 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 8:23 am
cant they just drop him to number 2 on the depth chart and say Rodgers beat him out in training camp. It would make Brett look senile, and then they wouldnt be the badguys cause the best man wins the job right? He cant force anything if they bench him, then he can either sit and hope Rodgers sucks, or re-retire in a much lesser spectrum after a failed comeback attempt. He doesnt even look like the Brett of LAST year, he really seems to have aged over the year, i think he’s messin up!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.4 / 5 with 10 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 8:31 am
I agree. Put him on the roster and make him the backup qb. He’d quit before training camp ended.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.2 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 8:40 am
Favre is a selfish baby. For the last two offseasons we have had to listen to all the speculation. This is getting almost laughable. I hope he gets on with another team and throws 32 picks or better yet 32 picks for the packers and the favrestruck fans might throw his ass out.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 8:48 am
This whole thing was staged by Favre after the loss to NY. Now, he can come back the conquering hero rather than the choker in the cold.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 8:49 am
The solution is simple - Let Brett come back but make it clear that they want to move on and enter the Aaron Rogers era, only giving Favre the option to be the experienced backup, ready to step in if/when Aaron gets injured or struggles. The Packers have the cap room to fit Favre in easily so they just have to put up with having him hang around until he decides he’d rather be hunting than getting frostbite sitting on the bench at Lambeau. ‘Nuff Said.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.75 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 8:49 am
I’m not sure you’ve got all of this right Florio…there are a couple other options that would be better for the TEAM, which is what TT is suppose to be looking out for:
1) As stated above; move Favre to #2 on the depth chart. If he doesn’t like that, then he can just stay retired. If he accepts (which he wouldn’t, I would guess) and Rodgers gets hurt or doesn’t play well in the first few weeks, then he’s still there.
2) Trade him to whoever the hell they want. If Favre doesn’t like it, stay retired.
3) upon Favre’s announcement that he wants to return, announce him as the teams starter as to not undermine his trade value…
a couple side notes here: you sure as hell can’t just release him if you’re Green Bay. You can’t have this guy playing for Minnesota, or Chicago (although he’d be much scarier in Minnesota)…I don’t believe Favre has any signing bonus left to collect, which is why GB didn’t go after any of it. When Favre signed that 10 year deal (or whatever the hell it was), the signing bonus was prorated on 8 years, which is why he has 2 years left on his contract with no guaranteed money to be collected yet….Finally, has anybody considered that Thompson saw this coming all along, and that is why he never went out and spent any of that HUGE cap money?? Interesting.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 8:49 am
I still think Bus Cook’s behind this. Dude must have a bookie or bills to pay.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 8:52 am
This is kind of a dick move by Farve. Didn’t the Pack draft a couple of QB’s to fill out the depth chart?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 8:52 am
Favre just needs to let it go. He had a great run last year, what else is there to prove?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 9:06 am
This entire situation has really become a no-win scenario for McCarthy and the Packers organization. The Packer fans are smart, but they are also more loyal than most any fans I’ve ever experienced. They name streets, bars & their pets and kids after past players. If Favre is let go to another team and the Packers have a bad season, the fans are going to be at McCarthy’s door with torches & pitch-forks. The Pack is stuck with Favre. Holding firm on what’s best for the team may be admirable and truly the best thing to do, but it’s also most likely career suicide for McCarthy.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 9:08 am
well I’d love to say I’m not a biased source, but the fact is I’ve been a huge Favre fan for the last 74 seasons that he’s led us onto the field…lol anyways, this is something that probably should have happened several years ago because I think everybody feels the same way-Thompson takes the “building through the draft” philosophy to the extreme and wanted to move on with a younger quarterback as soon as he took over. So I guess what I’m actually hoping for is to see Favre get traded to a super bowl caliber team and have another great season. if you haven’t guessed yet, I’ve never been a fan of Thompson…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 9:08 am
favre is a chump for putting green bay in this predicament, i mean the guy has been in the league for 18 years & the franchise has treated him like royalty & this is what he does to them, nobody forced him to retire, so he should live w/his decisions!!!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 9:20 am
Yeah, Florio, I know us Pack fans are funny to make fun of and all being from the countryside but this constant assumption that we are certain to take Brett’s side in this is a bit presumptuous. I think we all loved Brett as a player and were willing to accept him regardless his flaws, but I also think we’re smart enough to see when a once great player is shoving a gigantic wooden dowel up the rear-end of our franchise. My loyalty ain’t to Brett, though I loved him as a player, but to the Pack. It’s his fault he retired, and I won’t blame TT or McCarthy one bit if they flush his ass at this point in the offseason.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 9:20 am
Favre has as much to lose in this whole situation. Packers football isn’t about one guy. Fans that supported the Packers through the suck years of the 70’s and 80’s appreciate what Favre did but aren’t going to be held hostage by him and the Green Bay Favre fans who probably couldn’t tell you the names of other players on the team.
Even those who would support Favre coming back are looking at how he does it, if he does it. His legacy is already tarnished. Just because some freakin’ kid wears a smelly arse jersey for 4 years doesn’t mean the rest of Packer fandom will follow blindly.
Thompson and McCarthy took a burned out hulk of a team and turned it around in 3 seasons. When Favre played within MM’s offense, he was proficient and they won. That’s why certain fans are excited about Rodgers. He’s got two years in MM’s system as well as his tutelage at the position. The kid will take his lumps as all rookies do but he’s in a enviable position (football wise, not PR wise) for a first season guy.
Get over it Favre fans. The last thing I want to see is Brett Favre waddling around the field with his uni stuffed within hand warmers when it’s time to deliver.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 9:27 am
@maddenchamp610
If they Packers bench Favre for Rodgers, support for the move will last until the 3rd quarter of the first bad game that Rodgers plays.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 9:30 am
” The bottom line is that, even though the Packers apparently don’t want Brett and Brett apparently wants to play for a new team, these two parties might have no choice but to set aside their differences and coexist. ”
Why would Favre want to play for a new team? I can understand why the Packers may want to move on. It makes a great deal of sense. When Favre plays under control, he can be a great QB. However, when he just starts chucking the ball all over the field, then IMO, he is absolutely useless. He may be a veteran QB, but he still makes the same bone-headed rookie mistakes he has in the past, usually at the most inopportune time. He had an opportunity to take the Packers to the Super Bowl last year and he blew it, by throwing one of the ugliest interceptions I have ever seen in the Giants game.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 9:34 am
i don’t think the Packers can look like bad guys in this instance. Favre is thinking about Favre, not the Packers.
If i had a girl friend who decided 17 happy years was enough, then i found another girlfriend (who’s younger, with more chance of a longer future, with exciting questions yet to be answered) only to have the ex decide she wants me back… well… what would you say in that instance?
i’d say something like “i’m sorry. you made your decision, i’ve moved on, and the situation we had doesn’t exist anymore because of how i adapted to your decision. Please, let’s be friends and help each other move on with our lives.”
Bringing the ex back while trying to keep things going with the new girl would be trouble, and both relations would be over before you know it as a result.
there’s my relationship analogy. Favre has to realize he’s a crazy ex-girlfriend right now.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.2 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 9:50 am
OOHHHH! Brett Favre’s locker!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 9:51 am
Favre is the crazy ex-girlfriend?
Yeah, the one who goes on to blow all your friends.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.5 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 9:55 am
I don’t know where all this animosity about Favre comes from. A lot of players have retired and than came back. i.e. Jordan, Unites, and the countless bands. They never got any of this animosity. The media mostly is to blame for the “will he or won’t he”, the past couple of years. They started the whole thing, Favre’s reaction is typical for an ageing person in any industry. It’s impossible to say when your ready to retire. In this instance, it is obvious that Favre made a knee-jerk reaction due to the way he felt the team was treating him. Now, he feels he made a mistake and he would like to change his mind. How many of us have made a decision and turned around and decided it wasn’t the best thing for us. So, everyone should get off his back and let him do what he wants. As for the Packers taking him back, I just don’t get why they wouldn’t. He is still a good quarterback that makes quick decisions in the pocket. Most of his teamates know him and are fimilar with him. There must be some kind of personal issue between Ted and Favre. If that’s the case than Ted should retire, because he’s letting personal issue effect his decision makeing. However, if he honestly thinks the Packers are better with Aaron Rodgers then Brett Favre he needs his head examined.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 9:56 am
The Packers can’t have Favre as a back up. The first game Rodgers struggles, everyone will be calling to put in Favre. Rodgers may not perform as well with always looking over his shoulder at Favre. Either the Packers take Favre back and at least have the starting job as an open competition or they have to cut or trade him. I don’t think they have much options otherwise.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 10:01 am
The last thing Green Bay can do here is release Favre, because upon release he can sign with anybody. The worst case scenario here is to have Favre playing for a division opponnent, particularly MN. Their owner is just obnixious enough to do that just to rile up GBP fans. What would it be like for TT and MM if Favre rolls in to Lambeau on opening weekend and lights it up…they will burn down the stadium and lynch Thompson and McCarthy. If they truly can’t work him back into the team, they need to trade him. A release simply is too risky.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 10:02 am
there’s my relationship analogy. Favre has to realize he’s a crazy ex-girlfriend right now.
==============================================
Maybe the Packers should file a restraining order.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)