In conjunction with the arrival of Dan Patrick to NBC, former ESPN partner Keith Olbermann cracked wise regarding Patrick’s presence on Football Night in America, the one-hour-plus highlights show that precedes the Sunday night game on NBC.
“My concern is that we didn’t have enough people on the show,” Olbermann said Monday, according to Michael Hiestand of USA Today. “We really needed to get that 19th guy.”
But Olbermann is right. There are too many of them. Patrick (whom we genuinely like and admire) is now Talking Head No. 7 on the show.
Along with Patrick and Olbermann are Bob Costas, Cris Collinsworth, Peter King, Tiki Barber, and Jerome Bettis.
Last year, NBC reshuffled the format a bit, relegating Barber and Bettis to the kiddie’s table, where the two of them and Collinsworth would provide the former players’ perspective on various issues. Costas and Collinsworth and Olbermann handled the highlights packages from the Sunday afternoon games, with Peter King chiming in on the results of any information gathering in which he engaged regarding any hot topics that had unfolded as a result of the 1:00 EDT and 4:00 EDT kickoffs.
We like the idea of Patrick and Obermann handling the highlights, but if we were calling the shots (and the shareholders of GE should be glad we aren’t), the show would be only Patrick and Olbermann, and no one else.
For years, ESPN handled the Sunday night highlights show with only Chris Berman and Tom Jackson. That’s it. No frills, just football.
Really, that’s all we care about come 7:00 p.m. on Sunday night. We want to see extended highlights of the games, and maybe snippets of post-game interviews and press conferences. We don’t need analysis from guys like Tiki and Jerome; we’ve got the rest of the week for that. We just want highlights. Extended highlights. With narration crafted in the present tense, so that it creates the illusion that the game is still be played as we’re watching the best plays from it.
We’d probably still have a couple of segments with Peter King, but we’d dump the rest of it and focus on the highlights.
For Tiki, the loss of his football gig wouldn’t be the end of the road for him at NBC. He’ll be one of the staffers on “You Might Be Rich!”, a new show that reunites Americans with unclaimed funds that they didn’t realize they owned.
A better title? “You Might Be Canceled!”
What were we talking about? Oh yeah. Give the gig to Patrick and Olbermann, with extended highlights. And pepper in some Peter King. And cut the rest of them loose.
_2.gif)





July 8th, 2008 at 8:49 pm
I also think that Michael Vick should do a segment called ” The View from the Slammer”, in which Vick talks about how a prison sentence might affect an NFL player.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.25 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 8:54 pm
“No frills, just football” sounds like a workable plan.
And if Keith Olberman promises not to introduce partisan politics disguised as editorial commentary to the format…
Then I promise not to constantly call him “a Snot”.
F2B
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 8:57 pm
King should go…THAT is what the rest of the week is for.
Costas should go ….How many Baseball guys do we need?
Let Keith and Patrick handle extensive highlights. Keep the kiddie table. Production does not have to be void of talent to be simple. The players perspective while the action is still fresh in my mind is priceless.
Have it produced as two separate entities…..No interaction between the players panel and the highlight crew. One goes to commercial the other comes back from.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 9:03 pm
Why not add emmitt smith and dan marino to dicuss what players are dying their hair.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 8th, 2008 at 9:06 pm
It’s just that there’s sooo much pure talent there. It’s like watching Inside the NBA. I mean, perhaps get rid of Tiki Barber and Jerome Bettis, and use them judiciously during the week; but, how can you simply get rid of Chris Collinsworth or Bob Costas?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 8th, 2008 at 9:30 pm
They would still need to keep Collinsworth. He’s one of the best at what he does and he left a very cushiony job at FOX to work for Dick Ebersol at NBC. I know he has like 3 other side gigs, but none of the over jobs have the exposure as this pregame show.
As for the other networks, has FOX finally fired Jimmy Johnson and has CBS let go of Shannon the Horse?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 8th, 2008 at 9:36 pm
BTW, for those Chris Berman lovers out there - I have to admit that used to love Primetime in the early 90s when it was the ONLY extensive highlight show. He was witty for that era and Tom Jackson played the straight man angle well. That said, 16-17 years later, we have several highlight shows, ESPN News, and the internet. In addition, Berm’s antics are STALE. I cringe when he does SportsCenter (on the rare occasion when I watch SC) or Baseball Tonight. He still uses the SAME damn lines (I can’t even call them jokes at this point). Rumblin’ stumblin’ embarrasin’ yourself and your network by calling yourself a sports anchor.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 8th, 2008 at 9:42 pm
This show really does need to be pruned and the entire kiddie table could be dropped without any real loss of quality or content. You are right in that you really only need Dan & Keith. Peter King is fine and well connected and Jay Glazer already works for FOX.
This show as currently constituted is actually even more crowded since there is always at least one drop-in with Al Michaels and Madden. Dan & Keith with commentary from Coach Madden would be ideal but I bet Al Michaels would have an ego-driven hissy fit at not being invited to the tea party.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 8th, 2008 at 10:06 pm
I wouldn’t mind a little Costas either but Dan and Keith back together should be a win for the fans.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 8th, 2008 at 11:17 pm
@CountSnail:
“I also think that Michael Vick should do a segment called ” The View from the Slammer”, in which Vick talks about how a prison sentence might affect an NFL player.”
LMAO! That’s just funny, right there…
Other posters: Why the Peter King slam? Forget the coffee nerdness. The guy IS connected, and seemingly well-respected in the biz.
Big Daddy Rog: Granted, I’m kind of a newbie here, but what’s with the Al Michaels ‘hissy-fit’ reference? Madden & Michaels are real pros, I think.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 8th, 2008 at 11:58 pm
Regarding Peter King - I think his Monday articles are an enjoyable, albeit light read, but you can’t tell me that he ever breaks a big story like Jay Glazer or Mr. Florio. Also, he really likes to flip flop on teams from week to week which I find aggravating. Finally, I can do without articles about his bowel movements, images of him exercising on a treadmill, or anything about Colgate University.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 9th, 2008 at 6:39 am
Might as well go for the best and get Brent Musburger
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 9th, 2008 at 8:15 am
I will never watch this lame show as long as Olbermann is on it. He is too political for me .
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 9th, 2008 at 9:38 am
I’m happy Olberman is doing this stint….someone with some intelligence in the booth..who woulda thunk it?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 9th, 2008 at 9:45 am
Maybe Florio can produce MNF on ESPN, and bring some of these same ideas with him.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
July 9th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
Tiki could always land a job with the nice people at Webster’s Dictionaries. Then he could bad mouth the people at NBC and by years end the network will probably be the most watched in the nation.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
July 9th, 2008 at 11:19 pm
Olbermann is terrible. He’s just a news reader and he can’t even do that without grinning at his own attempts at humor. But he’s so smart, i mean he must be, he keeps telling us so.
The fact that people are actually psyched about a Patrick/Olbermann reunion shows how desperate people are for decent sports commentary. ESPN treats us more and more like children everyday. Most of their anchors think they are on Last Comic Standing.
Patrick is very good, but Olbermann adds nothing. The only reason he’s on the football show is because NBC pays him lots of money for a news/ whinefest show nobody watches and they’re trying to get him in front of a larger audience.
Just wait for the highlights to become secondary to Patrick and Olbermann’s neverending inside jokes, then talk about how great they are together.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated