<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RAIDERS MIGHT BE TROLLING FOR DEFENSIVE TACKLES</title>
	<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/</link>
	<description>The Best Pro Football Scoop on the Internet</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Garret</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-53620</link>
		<dc:creator>Garret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-53620</guid>
		<description>yo trikee pull yer head otta yer ass this ain't no pats posting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yo trikee pull yer head otta yer ass this ain&#8217;t no pats posting&#8230;
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=53620">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: empty13</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51692</link>
		<dc:creator>empty13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 02:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51692</guid>
		<description>Grady is a quitter.

Oakland now suffers from Detroit-itis (which predated M2).

Overpay to get anybody to come on over!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grady is a quitter.</p>
<p>Oakland now suffers from Detroit-itis (which predated M2).</p>
<p>Overpay to get anybody to come on over!
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=51692">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin from Philly</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51460</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin from Philly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51460</guid>
		<description>Sam Adams may be done as a player, but he brews a hell of a beer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam Adams may be done as a player, but he brews a hell of a beer!
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=51460">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishdagger</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51396</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishdagger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51396</guid>
		<description>What I see is most of the moves that have been made by the Raiders this off season have smart.  What I don't think was wise is throwing the big coin at some of those players who haven't proved they deserve that type of money yet.  

We've all seen it were players sign a fat contract and before the ink is dry, instead of hitting the gym, or at the facility working on technique, they are plopped down on the couch with their PS3 playing M07.  That is where you'll fine them before manditory camp, and they lose the hunger to succeed.  In their mind and heart, they just made it...

Getting back to the original message...since the Raiders are also one of the younger teams, it would could aid in having those vets in the locker room.  It isn't like they would be signed to contend for starting positions.   If they could sign them for the veteran league minimum, the downside is low.  

What the Raiders need to do first is get their other draft choices signed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I see is most of the moves that have been made by the Raiders this off season have smart.  What I don&#8217;t think was wise is throwing the big coin at some of those players who haven&#8217;t proved they deserve that type of money yet.  </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve all seen it were players sign a fat contract and before the ink is dry, instead of hitting the gym, or at the facility working on technique, they are plopped down on the couch with their PS3 playing M07.  That is where you&#8217;ll fine them before manditory camp, and they lose the hunger to succeed.  In their mind and heart, they just made it&#8230;</p>
<p>Getting back to the original message&#8230;since the Raiders are also one of the younger teams, it would could aid in having those vets in the locker room.  It isn&#8217;t like they would be signed to contend for starting positions.   If they could sign them for the veteran league minimum, the downside is low.  </p>
<p>What the Raiders need to do first is get their other draft choices signed.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=51396">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joetoronto</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51385</link>
		<dc:creator>joetoronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51385</guid>
		<description>Sam Adams is done but Grady Jackson still has some gas left in the tank. 

This would be a real good move for the Raiders, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam Adams is done but Grady Jackson still has some gas left in the tank. </p>
<p>This would be a real good move for the Raiders, in my opinion.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=51385">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiRTY PIMP C</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51367</link>
		<dc:creator>DiRTY PIMP C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51367</guid>
		<description>I think we should bring back Sam Adams !!! 

Hes a Monster of a man ... he would be a awesome 2nd string DT behind Tommy Kelly !!! 

Warren Sapp Said Tommy Kelly is gonna be a beast in the middle when hes 100% !!! 

Having Sam Adams &#38; Tommy Kelly would awesome !!! 

Plus we could put Sam Adams in the NT position on 3 man lines haha hes Huge Centers in the League will be crapping in there paints when he lines up in front of them LOL

our 2008 DT's should be Tommy Kelly , SAm Adams, Gerrad Warren,Josh shaw 

Kiffin says Josh has been playing awesome in camp ... 

Im Also looking forward to seeing Greg spires on the field for us hes a beats !!! 

2008 starting line Derek Burgess Tommy Kelly Sam Adams Greg spires 

I would like too see the Oakland Raiders make a attempt to trade for Albert Haynesworth 

but if not lets get Sam Adams !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should bring back Sam Adams !!! </p>
<p>Hes a Monster of a man &#8230; he would be a awesome 2nd string DT behind Tommy Kelly !!! </p>
<p>Warren Sapp Said Tommy Kelly is gonna be a beast in the middle when hes 100% !!! </p>
<p>Having Sam Adams &amp; Tommy Kelly would awesome !!! </p>
<p>Plus we could put Sam Adams in the NT position on 3 man lines haha hes Huge Centers in the League will be crapping in there paints when he lines up in front of them LOL</p>
<p>our 2008 DT&#8217;s should be Tommy Kelly , SAm Adams, Gerrad Warren,Josh shaw </p>
<p>Kiffin says Josh has been playing awesome in camp &#8230; </p>
<p>Im Also looking forward to seeing Greg spires on the field for us hes a beats !!! </p>
<p>2008 starting line Derek Burgess Tommy Kelly Sam Adams Greg spires </p>
<p>I would like too see the Oakland Raiders make a attempt to trade for Albert Haynesworth </p>
<p>but if not lets get Sam Adams !!!
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=51367">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garret</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51366</link>
		<dc:creator>Garret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51366</guid>
		<description>is alameda man really from alameda, or just another jackass blowing smoke outta his ass? and, uh, did russell really lose (or really gain) that weight to begin with or you just some DB (read D**K BAG) that believes everything you read? DB?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is alameda man really from alameda, or just another jackass blowing smoke outta his ass? and, uh, did russell really lose (or really gain) that weight to begin with or you just some DB (read D**K BAG) that believes everything you read? DB?
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=51366">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trikee</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51365</link>
		<dc:creator>trikee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 05:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51365</guid>
		<description>bill belicheck goes trolling for other people's wives and other teams signals and other ways to cheat such as falsely reporting injured players

the pats should go trolling for dolphins highlights because that's a real undefeated season.

the pats troll for HGH regularly

the police troll for pats offensive lineman regularly

tom brady goes trolling for flowers regularly because he is wipped by a anorexic model who used to date leonardo dicaprio

if the league makes a list of the dirtiest players, most coaches troll for rodney harrison

bruschi and seau are trolling for their AARP cards as we speak

asante samuel trolls for more dollars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bill belicheck goes trolling for other people&#8217;s wives and other teams signals and other ways to cheat such as falsely reporting injured players</p>
<p>the pats should go trolling for dolphins highlights because that&#8217;s a real undefeated season.</p>
<p>the pats troll for HGH regularly</p>
<p>the police troll for pats offensive lineman regularly</p>
<p>tom brady goes trolling for flowers regularly because he is wipped by a anorexic model who used to date leonardo dicaprio</p>
<p>if the league makes a list of the dirtiest players, most coaches troll for rodney harrison</p>
<p>bruschi and seau are trolling for their AARP cards as we speak</p>
<p>asante samuel trolls for more dollars
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=51365">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AFKfootball</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51353</link>
		<dc:creator>AFKfootball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51353</guid>
		<description>Grady Jackson still has some downs left in him and would go a long way to  strengthening a run defense that will now be attacked even more with the addition of DeAngelo Hall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grady Jackson still has some downs left in him and would go a long way to  strengthening a run defense that will now be attacked even more with the addition of DeAngelo Hall.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=51353">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whocanitbenow</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51348</link>
		<dc:creator>whocanitbenow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51348</guid>
		<description>Too bad JaMarcus Russell lost all that weight...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad JaMarcus Russell lost all that weight&#8230;
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=51348">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alamedaman</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51337</link>
		<dc:creator>alamedaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51337</guid>
		<description>jeez sam adams is still playing? Well I guess its good to have more depth- though drafting Glenn Dorsey when he was available would have been much much much wiser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeez sam adams is still playing? Well I guess its good to have more depth- though drafting Glenn Dorsey when he was available would have been much much much wiser.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=51337">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raidersmojo</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51332</link>
		<dc:creator>Raidersmojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51332</guid>
		<description>because they don't have a hall of famer owner, drafted a QB, sign/draft WRs, OL was much improved last year and we have howard and morrison (some of the better LBs in the league) on our team as well.

we need depth at DL and OL thats about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because they don&#8217;t have a hall of famer owner, drafted a QB, sign/draft WRs, OL was much improved last year and we have howard and morrison (some of the better LBs in the league) on our team as well.</p>
<p>we need depth at DL and OL thats about it.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=51332">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ampats</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51324</link>
		<dc:creator>ampats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51324</guid>
		<description>Since they are trolling,they should add a new owner,QB,receivers,OL,LB's to that list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since they are trolling,they should add a new owner,QB,receivers,OL,LB&#8217;s to that list.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=51324">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hooded swan</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51323</link>
		<dc:creator>Hooded swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51323</guid>
		<description>Veteran depth is always a good thing.  On the other hand, you gotta wonder since this comes after:
Signing Terdell Sands to a big contract a year ago
Trading for Gerard Warren
Signing Tommy Kelley to huge contract in the spring
Drafting Darren McFadden instead of Glenn Dorsey or Sedrick Ellis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veteran depth is always a good thing.  On the other hand, you gotta wonder since this comes after:<br />
Signing Terdell Sands to a big contract a year ago<br />
Trading for Gerard Warren<br />
Signing Tommy Kelley to huge contract in the spring<br />
Drafting Darren McFadden instead of Glenn Dorsey or Sedrick Ellis
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=51323">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ItsNolen</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51322</link>
		<dc:creator>ItsNolen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/07/04/raiders-might-be-trolling-for-defensive-tackles/#comment-51322</guid>
		<description>You can say old or past their prime, but it's a VERY smart move for a Raider team thin at DT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can say old or past their prime, but it&#8217;s a VERY smart move for a Raider team thin at DT.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=51322">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
