In an admission that is almost as stunning as the absence of any meaningful mainstream media reaction to it, Hall of Fame quarterback Terry Bradshaw admitted last week that he took steroids while playing pro football in the 1970s.
“We did steroids to get away the aches and the speed of healing,” Bradshaw said on The Dan Patrick Show. “My use of steroids from a doctor was to speed up injury, and [I] thought nothing of it. . . . It was to speed up the healing process, that was it. It wasn’t to get bigger and stronger and faster.”
But the problem is that plenty of players use and have used and will use steroids for the exact same reason. When Pats safety Rodney Harrison was popped last year for possession of HGH, he claimed he wasn’t cheating because he was only doing it to recover from an injury — ignoring the obvious reality that using banned substances to speed recovery from an injury is simply another form of cheating.
Bradshaw says that he took steroids with a doctor’s prescription. It’s irrelevant, in our view. Steroids are now widely viewed as proof of cheating, both in the days before and after they were officially banned by the NFL. Today, no player can use them, with or without a piece of paper with a squiggly line intended to reflect an approximation of a physician’s signature.
And Bradshaw’s use of the pronoun “we” reflects a recognition that he was hardly the only one using them. Meanwhile, Bradshaw has continued to earn a very nice living as a member of the mainstream media while previously not once offering up any frank and candid admission of his own use of the substances, or regarding his knowledge of the extent to which others were using it.
It’s unclear why Bradshaw opted for candor with Patrick. Maybe Dan is simply a damn good interviewer, who was able to get Bradshaw to talk about something he’d previously concealed. Either way, this is a big story, and it deserves a lot more play than it has received.
_2.gif)





June 24th, 2008 at 9:14 am
What’s the big shock? Everyone has known for years that Steelers is synonymous with steroids. The only people who deny it are the delusional Steelers fans who think their team would have been good without being on the juice.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.9 / 5 with 25 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:18 am
Or, maybe Bradshaw “stupid” act on Fox isnt really an act & he actually is an absolute moron.
Sounds like we need asterisks beside the 4 Super Bowl wins of the 1970s Steelers!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.65 / 5 with 18 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:20 am
My goodness, members of the Steel curtain were taking steroids, Mike Golic admitted on ESPN while a member of the Eagles he took steroids.And I thought after reading the intelligent comments of the PFT readers, that only the Patriots broke rules.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.3 / 5 with 14 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:20 am
Hey Arlen Specter, how about a federal investigation? Oh wait, this has to do with the the Steelers and not the Patriots.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.8 / 5 with 16 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:22 am
He shouldn’t have been allowed to use something he can’t spell…Oh wait, that would be most things.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 10 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:22 am
Medical use and drug abuse are two entirely different things…non-athletes get them prescribed to recover from injuries…but I not surprised there is not a balanced viewpoint coming from a guy who 1) thought Bradshaw was already dead and 2)didn’t realize the majority of nfl athletes participate in youth sports camps at no charge
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.8 / 5 with 10 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:26 am
Granted it’s looked down upon but steroids weren’t a banned substance in the NFL at the time he would’ve taken them. I’d hardly be surprised if I read that other teams during that Era used steroids too. Doesn’t make it any better but what do you expect to happen with this other then media talking about it. The NFL isn’t just going to take away there SB victories or achievements at this point.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 11 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:26 am
Message to monger: The Steelers are the team that is most notorious for steroids because they were so successful in the 1970s. HOWEVER, don’t be so naive to think that at that time just about every team - if not every team - was using steroids because they were not illegal then. While it does not excuse the Steelers for using, it certainly does not besmudge their success because it was a time when everybody used and not just certain teams or players. Only “delusional” fans would think the Steelers were the only team to use steroids in the 70s.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.3 / 5 with 13 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:29 am
1970’s Pittsburgh Steelers*
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 18 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:29 am
What is the big deal with steroids?
The default position should be that men that earn huge amounts of money by being bigger, stronger, tougher, and faster than other men will do what is necessary to maintain and increase their abilities. No professional sport will ever be clean. The NFL should simply say these are the performance enhancing drugs we allow (perhaps rationalizing it as drugs that help players heal from injury) and if you use one not on this list you will be banned for life. Simple. Problem solved.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.25 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:29 am
I don’t feel that there’s any cause to condem TB for his admission. After all, it wasn’t illegal during his playing time. During my playing time, I was taught and used techniques that have since been outlawed as too dangerous. Nothing I did was illegal at the time, nor do I feel guilty for playing by the rules.
Applying a retroactive standard of conduct would be wrong. Play by the rules that are in effect. To have the ability to devine future changes and rule-adoptions would be nice, but if TB had the ability to see into the future, he would have been wasting his time as a player instead of an investor/futurist.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.35 / 5 with 18 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:32 am
what a bunch of Dirty Cheaters.
No wonder they won all those games. Break out the asterisks.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 24 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:33 am
Maybe I am mistaken here, but in the 70’s was the issue of steroid use in the forefront? I think we were still at the point of not discovering or just discovering about it. That said, in that day & time don’t we have to view a players steroid use in that context?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.45 / 5 with 15 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:36 am
So monger, you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that your team, I’m thinking probably Browns, has never had a steroid user on it? Time to come back to earth and be realistic.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.45 / 5 with 10 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:41 am
Okay, before all you haters come out and say “all the Steelers were using. They should have an asterisk in the book!”, know this; steriods were a common practice in football 30 years ago. People on every team did it.
Now, I’m not excusing the behavior. But it’s not just the Steelers. Read any interview with football players from that era, if they didn’t do it, they certainly know someone who did.
You ever hear of Mike Golic? He (and others) were doing it long after the ’70s.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.1 / 5 with 15 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:42 am
Geez Florio, you’ve got to consider the times here. Steroids were NOT illegal in the 70’s and early 80’s (not sure when they were made illegal). Nobody thought anything about it because they might not have realized the performance enhancing aspects early on but especially because they did not recognize how dangerous steroids are. Everyone knows Arnold Schwarzenegger took steroids when he was a competetive body builder and no one thinks anything of it because you have to consider the times.
Hindsight is always 20-20. Steroids were made illegal at some point and since then there are no excuses. Before that you can’t crucify someone for doing something that almost no one considered a “problem” at the time.
You usually see things pretty clearly but I think your criticism is out of line this time.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.8 / 5 with 16 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:45 am
Where are all of the high and mighty, standing on the soap box, Steelers fans now???? For almost a year, Steelers fans have been the most outspoken against the Pats, and their “cheating ways”. Now, the face of the Steelers franchise, admits that the Steelers of the 70’s, winners of 4 Super Bowls, were using steroids for all of them. Wow, those in glass houses…. well, you know how the saying goes. Those glass walls are started crack
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.6 / 5 with 15 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:45 am
And like the Cowboys and Vikings were not taking steroids either. All of those teams back in the day were juicing up. You must be a jealous fan from the mistake on the lake.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.8 / 5 with 9 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:45 am
3 Super Bowl wins*
(…Just kidding…)
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.2 / 5 with 9 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:46 am
Give me a break monger - steroid use was rampant throughout the NFL in the 1970s. Any delusions that it was just the Steelers is an even bigger denial. While the admission is news, the fact that lots of players from the era used steroids is not.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.85 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:48 am
Why should “using steroids to recover more quickly from injury” be considered cheating? To me, it seems like a perfectly legitimate use for steroids. Why is it okay to have surgery to recover more quickly from injury? Why isn’t that cheating?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:49 am
This still doesn’t explain his cameo appearance in the movie “Hooper”.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:50 am
I hope Goodell doesn’t suspend him from pre-game coverage.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.35 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:53 am
The rumors were always there about the Steelers but this is a big admission by Bradshaw.
Of course I didn’t see anything about it on ESPN because Shaq rapped in NY about Kobe and Don Imus needs to crawl back into his cave.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.65 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
June 24th, 2008 at 9:55 am
First off some horrible grammar in that article: “But the problem is that plenty of players use and have used and will use steroids for the exact same reason.” — ugh
An editor is your friend
Next. Rodney never said he “wasn’t cheating.” Like Bradshaw he admitted the reasons he was using HGH, which technically is not a steroid. But please don’t let facts get in the way of a good story.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)