Yesterday we asked where Buffalo Bills Pro Bowl left tackle Jason Peters is, noting that he’s been missing from the team’s organized team activities and there has been no explanation offered for his absence.
Today Mark Gaughan of the Buffalo News provides the explanation: Peters, who still has three years left on the contract he signed in 2006, is seeking a pay raise.
Per Gaughan, Peters is scheduled to make $3.3 million this year, including a $100,000 escalator he achieved with his selection to the Pro Bowl last season. Although $3.3 million isn’t bad money, it’s not a lot for a Pro Bowl left tackle.
It’s also not a lot for a Bills offensive lineman: Peters makes less than two of his linemates, left guard Derrick Dockery (who signed one of those seven-year, $49 million contracts that it seemed like half the guards in the league signed last year) and right tackle Langston Walker, whose deal averages $5 million a year.
If the Bills decide to give Peters a raise, they do have plenty of cap space available. But they could decide they’re not ready to give another raise to a player whose contract they re-negotiated in 2006, at a time when he had just 11 NFL starts under his belt. If they hold firm, the Bills may have an unhappy Pro Bowler on their hands.
_2.gif)






May 22nd, 2008 at 9:30 am
Unhappy Pro Bowl linemen wanting new contracts.. you sure thats not the Vikings?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 22nd, 2008 at 9:45 am
If I were Buffalo, I’d do what it takes to lock up Peters for a long time. They can’t expect to have this sort of luck a second time. I mean, the guy was an undrafted FA out of college and they converted him from TE, and 3-4 years later he’s an All-Pro left tackle? He’s certainly worth what they’re paying Dockery and Walker, and probably an extra $2M beyond.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 22nd, 2008 at 10:17 am
I pretty much believe the time to do a new contract is when there is one year left. There are exceptions, and this is clearly one. Sure the Bills can (and probably will) tell him too bad. But you cant expect a pro bowl guy making much less than two also-rans next to him to want to stay with the team once the time does come for him to have the chance to go, even if they are offering the big money at that time. With three years left, thats a ways away, especially when the franchise tag comes into play.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 22nd, 2008 at 10:28 am
shut up and play you big baby!how much of a signing bonus which is guaranteed did you get?either these crybabies need to sign 1yr. deals or live with the fat contract they signed. you know the minute you sign it somebody else will get a better deal so why complain about later.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 22nd, 2008 at 10:42 am
The Bills should definitely lock him up especially after how much they paid Dockery. I’m sure the Canadians will love him when the team moves to Toronto and become the NAFTA Bills.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 22nd, 2008 at 1:59 pm
classic case of wait for the franchise tag. unless there is no cba at all and it is a free-for-all.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 22nd, 2008 at 2:52 pm
Under any other circumstance I’d say atleast wait until there’s only 1 year left on the current deal. But the contract he signed in 06 was for guard. A probowl left tackle on a guard’s pay should not be happy with his situation. The Bills have the money and need to get deals done to keep Peters happy and to keep Lee Evans in Buffalo.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 22nd, 2008 at 2:54 pm
Peters needs to stop acting like a spoiled baby and play out his contract. I’m sick of these NFL players who think they are entitled to renegoiate their contracts just because the guy next to him is making a little bit more than they are. Peters needs to man up and play this year without whinning like a little baby and then maybe this time next year he will be offered a better contract.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated