One of the things that drives us crazy about preseason NFL predictions is that the so-called experts (us included) tend to take the safe path, assuming that the good teams will still be good — and likewise picking only one team from the AFC (usually the Bengals) and one team from the NFC (usually the Lions) that will surprise us all.
But history tells us that there typically will be 50-percent turnover in the playoff field.
So this means that, of the 12 teams that made the playoffs in 2007, it’s a safe bet that six of them won’t return in 2008. And that they’ll be replaced by six that didn’t make it a year ago.
Is it a guarantee? Hardly. But it’s hard to ignore the fact that so many teams typically don’t get back to the postseason field, and that so many failures find a way to succeed in the next season.
Recognizing this reality, the challenge then is to try to identify the six teams that won’t make it back to the playoffs, and then to peg the six non-playoff teams that will fare far better in 2008. And this spawned an idea for a three-part series of SportingNews.com columns — one that lists the six playoff teams from 2007 that won’t return, one that lists the six non-playoff teams that will make it to the postseason, and one listing six teams that didn’t make it last year, and won’t make it this year.
In pegging the half-dozen who’ll fall out of the playoff pack, I tried to be objective and fair. In so doing, I’ve now ensured that I’ll receive a stream of unfriendly e-mails from Steelers fans and Packers fans from now until the date that either or both teams are eliminated from postseason contention.
And if either or both teams qualify for the playoffs, I just might never hear the end of it.
Of course, I’m used to taking a foolish bold risk. I predicted that the Steelers wouldn’t make the playoffs the year after they won Super Bowl XL, and I didn’t hear the end of it . . . until the Steelers didn’t make the playoffs the year after they won Super Bowl XL.
Anyway, the full list of teams is right here. We don’t expect to get them all right. But if we accept the premise that six of the twelve teams won’t get back, it’s inevitable that fans of six teams who were spoiled by a playoff run a year ago will be disappointed in 2008.
Even if one of the teams that might not make it back played in the Super Bowl.
_2.gif)





May 21st, 2008 at 1:24 pm
Well every year, all the “experts” predict the downfall of the Seahawks, and every year, they are wrong. Every year they think that somehow the Arizona Cardinals and the 49ers are the team to beat and are going to have a break out year, and everyone keeps saying that until that critical moment when *gasp* they actually start playing games.
As long as the Seahawks have a semi healthy Matt Hasselbeck, they will contend for the playoffs every year.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 1:30 pm
As a Packer fan I’m not upset at the lack of respect, but I tend to disagree. I do agree that the Packers would be a logical choice to make this list of six, as losing a legendary QB will let the team down. But there was more to the team than Favre. Besides our starting CBs and OTs, we are an extremely young team that should improve. Most importantly, I am not sold on Minnesota, the sxey pick of the decade. Awesome D-line, yes. Best RB in the game? He’s got my vote. The QB is going to be their achiles heal, and I don’t think he will hold up. We demonstrated twice last year that is you stack the line and are able to contain AD and make Jackson beat you throwing, he can’t. If Jackson has a great, break-through year, the Vikings will be extremely good, but I don’t see that happening.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 1:36 pm
As a previous poster said, as a Packer fan I disagree that drafting Brohm with the 56th pick says we are not confident in Rodgers. If we drafted him at 30, maybe, but not 56. We drafted him because the only QBs on the roster at the time other than Rodgers were practice squad guys that will never wear a uniform on Sundays. We drafted Brohm because we needed another QB on the roster that could step in when Rodgers misses some time. That is all. We had no interest in the crappy lot of veterans like Holcomb, Frerotte, Culpepper, etc. Now IF Rodgers is a total bust in the next year and a half, we have another talented guy to step in and produce. And if Rodgers is the real deal like we think he is, than we have some future trade bait. I just don’t see how drafting a guy in order to have two QBs on the active roster sends Rodgers a message.
And why is everyone looking closely at us drafting ANOTHER QB in the draft?? Remember, he’s a SEVENTH ROUND PICK. Let’s not make it something its not.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 2:55 pm
kellyb9 says:
“@cantgetenough - It depends, do you think Eli is the real deal or not. He has shown that he can be a good QB in the league, but he has also shown that he can still be inconsistant. Not to take anyhting away from the Giants, but they got on a roll at the right time. Anyone with half a brain can see that. Honestly, most teams who win the super bowl fall right into that category. This should be a big year for Eli and I think he still has a lot to prove. Dallas improves dramatically if they can get Pacman on the field, and I think the Eagles and Redskins have taken a few steps forward. It’s a tough division I think thats all the previous poster was getting at. I, for one, wouldn’t be too suprised to see any one of those teams in the playoffs.”
I think Eli is the real deal. I’ve seen glimpses of what he showed through the latest playoffs in past years. Consistency is key, and I am anxious as all get out to see how he plays this season. But when I think about this line-up of names I can’t help but get excited.
Burress, Toomer, Smith, Tyree, Manningham
Jacobs, Bradshaw, Ward
Shockey, Boss
Half of those guys spent considerable time injured last year. Imagine if they are all healthy?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 2:56 pm
All this is just speculation. Obviously, none of us knows for sure until the season is played. A couple of key injuries to star players and ANY team could have a losing season. The one point I did find interesting is, Florio says the Giants won’t make it because after their other Super Bowl wins, they struggled. That’s true. But, if he’s going to use the past as his guideline, then why is he NOT favoring the Redskins? The Skins won the Super Bowl each year after the Giants did. If the past is your guideline Florio, then, by YOUR reasoning, the Skins are the team to beat.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 3:07 pm
I predict:
AFC
Cleveland
Indianapolis
Jacksonville
New England
Pittsburgh
San Diego
Tennessee out.
NFC
Arizona
Chicago
Dallas
Green Bay
New Orleans
New York
Seattle, Tampa Bay and Washington out.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 3:15 pm
Oh and as for the Steelers LB’s “getting older”. Do the names Lamaar Woodley, Lawrence Timmons, and Bruce Davis mean anything to you? Not to mention that Silverback (James Harrison) is only going into his 4th season. We’re just fine at LB. All the op O-lineman were off the board in first round, which is why Mendy was the 1st round pick not to metnion the fact that FWP had way too many carries last year. We had a need at WR so we took Sweed in the 2nd, also because all the top OL guys were off the board. The Steelers aren’t going to pass on top players remaining on the board to reach for O-lineman in the early rounds that don’t deserve to be first day picks. There will be some shifting around on the O-line with Hartwig in the mix. Faneca was grossly overpaid by the NYJ. Don’t you worry, we’ll handle our issues in the trenches next draft.
You might’ve also noticed that we drafted a safety to bring some youth into the secondary and we have a young Anthony Smith who will hopefully develop into a better (and smarter) player. Jenkins out of USF is over-rated and most certainly NOT the better pick at #23 than Raashard Mendenhall.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 3:41 pm
ACDC84: If Jackson struggles and is the one reason for non-success in Minnesota, I’m sure they will have no problem putting in Frerotte who is more than capable of managing the team. I don’t see the Packers not making it to the playoffs, however, but I still see Minnesota winning that division ala the way the Bears did it for two years without a QB, a tough D, and a solid running game.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 3:46 pm
You forgot a team. Everyone knows the Super Bowl loser implodes the following season.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 4:43 pm
Insomniac,
Those look like good picks. Swap out Arizona for Washington though. Zorn looks to be the right coach to help Campbell become a better QB, and I think that team has a lot of talent anyway.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 4:46 pm
Florio, honestly I honestly think its too soon to start looking
at trends because re-alignment (of divisions) added a new
factor to the post-season equation. Instead of three division
winners you now have four, leaving one less non-division winner
in the playoffs.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 5:31 pm
You didn’t pick the Steelers to make it to the palyoffs and we won the Superbowl.
Go for it, Florio! I like the trend!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 22nd, 2008 at 7:37 am
“JKennedy says:
May 21st, 2008 at 10:21 am
Well the Steelers didn’t have the number 1 defense, that would be the Colts. Steelers were second, but also tied for last in Int’s, and they were in the middle of the pack in sacks. Don’t forget that #1 defense, gave up 29 points to the Jags, 31 to Denver, 28 to Cleveland, 19 to Jets(losing to the jets is a embarrassment), lost 34-13 to the Pats, gave up another 32 to the Jags, 24 to the Rams, and than 27 to the ravens…the ravens. This was a team that at one point was 7-2…they finished 10-6…do the math yourself this team played like crap down the stretch. ”
Steelers did have the number 1 defense based on yards given up. You’re basing it on points. Points scored can also come from something called special teams.
28 to Cleveland- A top ranked offense was manhandled. 14 points due to Joshua Cribbs…thats special teams budd.
34 to Pats- The #1 offense in the league. Please. Giants gave up more to them during the season. Guess their defense was bad too
19 to Jets- yeah 19 points…this one was the DEFENSE’s fault…???
32 to Jags- Another blunder on special teams after marching down the field to score first. Then the refs decided to take away points from us (invisible hold by Mahan on a 2 pt conversion) and add points to their score (James Harrison and Polamalu being raped on Garrard’s 30-yd run)
Anyways as much as I like making people feel stupid, what was your point in that? You’re trying to tell me that any other team in the division has a better defense? Bengals? Browns? lmao. Do the math.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
June 2nd, 2008 at 3:17 am
Here we go again. More predictions of the Seahawks demise. Again, and again and again and as usual misplaced by Mr Florio (#2 in the East Coast Bias World next to Peter King. If it wastn’t so funny, someone might take him serious.
Seattle might very well not improve this year and who knows, but I’ll tell you what, if you think that SanFrancisco, starting a pathetic 3rd stringer at quarterback, or Arizona with every single good player demanding a trade or a new contract, or maybe you are dreaming that the worst team in football, ST. Louis, can bring back the “greatest show on turf” and somehow win a 10 more games then last year — I can’t stop laughing enough right now. SOMEONE from the NFC West will be the playoffs next year and the Seahawks are the team. It won’t be close. They are 10000% better off without Shaun. He WAS the problem last year and they still won the division by 2 + games.
Mike, read your own blog some day and you will see the light.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated