One of the things that drives us crazy about preseason NFL predictions is that the so-called experts (us included) tend to take the safe path, assuming that the good teams will still be good — and likewise picking only one team from the AFC (usually the Bengals) and one team from the NFC (usually the Lions) that will surprise us all.
But history tells us that there typically will be 50-percent turnover in the playoff field.
So this means that, of the 12 teams that made the playoffs in 2007, it’s a safe bet that six of them won’t return in 2008. And that they’ll be replaced by six that didn’t make it a year ago.
Is it a guarantee? Hardly. But it’s hard to ignore the fact that so many teams typically don’t get back to the postseason field, and that so many failures find a way to succeed in the next season.
Recognizing this reality, the challenge then is to try to identify the six teams that won’t make it back to the playoffs, and then to peg the six non-playoff teams that will fare far better in 2008. And this spawned an idea for a three-part series of SportingNews.com columns — one that lists the six playoff teams from 2007 that won’t return, one that lists the six non-playoff teams that will make it to the postseason, and one listing six teams that didn’t make it last year, and won’t make it this year.
In pegging the half-dozen who’ll fall out of the playoff pack, I tried to be objective and fair. In so doing, I’ve now ensured that I’ll receive a stream of unfriendly e-mails from Steelers fans and Packers fans from now until the date that either or both teams are eliminated from postseason contention.
And if either or both teams qualify for the playoffs, I just might never hear the end of it.
Of course, I’m used to taking a foolish bold risk. I predicted that the Steelers wouldn’t make the playoffs the year after they won Super Bowl XL, and I didn’t hear the end of it . . . until the Steelers didn’t make the playoffs the year after they won Super Bowl XL.
Anyway, the full list of teams is right here. We don’t expect to get them all right. But if we accept the premise that six of the twelve teams won’t get back, it’s inevitable that fans of six teams who were spoiled by a playoff run a year ago will be disappointed in 2008.
Even if one of the teams that might not make it back played in the Super Bowl.
_2.gif)





May 21st, 2008 at 9:47 am
“The defensive line received no real upgrade despite the team’s desire to do so, and the LINEBACKERS and defensive backs are getting older but not necessarily better.”
Yeah guys, our linebackers are getting old and worse. I mean look at James Harrison. His play is getting real sloppy…getting to the Pro Bowl his first season starting over Joey Porter. Not to mention Timmons and Woodley…man they’re going to be 23 this upcoming season.
Its not just the LBs though…its the whole defense. I mean come on. We went from a top 10 defense in 2006 to the number 1 defense in 2007 even with our injury plagued Aaron Smith, Ryan Clark and Troy Polamalu.
Please PFT.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 9:54 am
I am curious as to how Steeler’s fans justify their opinions of the AFC North. Assuming of course that Nostra-Florio is correct in that the Steelers are going backwards, who will be the team?
Baltimore has an older, yet very solid defense. Although they have big question marks on offense.
Cinci has a very potent offense (if they can get all their knuckleheads on the field). Although they have question marks on defense.
The Browns won 10 games last year with a very good offense & special teams, but had a very bad (run) defense. As a result, they resign all key FA’s, and immediately upgraded their big weakness (run defense) with the signings of Rogers, and Williams. From an unbiased football perspective, what exactly did the Browns do to be considered “over-rated”, or a “fraud” or “exposed”?? And before anyone chimes in with the “Rogers is high risk & lazy” points, you may want to take a read of Jim Wexall’s recent interview with your own Casey Hampton. I believe Hampton calls Rogers “the best in the league” and concedes “it’s going to be ugly this year”.
Anyway, I am willing to bet that one of the teams that makes Nostra-Florio’s list of “who will make it to the post-season” will be the previously mentioned Cleveland Browns.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 9:58 am
They drafted Brohm because he was by far the highest rated player left on the board, not because they don’t think Rodgers is the answer. If they were worried about Rodgers they would have drafted Brohm at no.30 not 56.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 10:02 am
Bengals or the Steelers in the AFC North. Cleveland was a fluke last year. I would say its probably going to be the Steelers eventhough I am a Bengals fan. Too many inside problems for the Bengals. Chad sucks!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 10:03 am
What about the ones that will surprise and make it?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 10:06 am
DonalMurphy, have you checked the packers schedule last year before your post? they beat (in order) new york, san diego, washington.. all playoff teams, and you called their schedule weak when they played supposively the best division in the league and came up a game short of the 4 game sweep not to mention they only lost to two teams during the regular season.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 10:21 am
Well the Steelers didn’t have the number 1 defense, that would be the Colts. Steelers were second, but also tied for last in Int’s, and they were in the middle of the pack in sacks. Don’t forget that #1 defense, gave up 29 points to the Jags, 31 to Denver, 28 to Cleveland, 19 to Jets(losing to the jets is a embarrassment), lost 34-13 to the Pats, gave up another 32 to the Jags, 24 to the Rams, and than 27 to the ravens…the ravens. This was a team that at one point was 7-2…they finished 10-6…do the math yourself this team played like crap down the stretch.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 10:45 am
So what is this like the FOURTH year in a row the Giants are on this list?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 10:46 am
JKennedy’s “genius” insight aside — for example, what team was playing its second string against the Ravens that last game, and what was the score of the first Balt-Steelers game? — any objective Steelers fan will tell you this could be a tough year. The schedule is the toughest I’ve ever seen. And yes, there were some defensive breakdowns, where the “#1″ unit couldn’t hold leads and ruined some great Big Ben comebacks.
On the other hand, everybody’s trendy pick, Cleveland, flopped down the stretch led by Derek “Fader” Anderson. Behind him is Brady “Big Game Choker” Quinn. Cincy has no D, and Palmer tends to disappear in big games vs. playoff-caliber teams. Baltimore doesn’t even have a QB,
and we’ll see if boot-foot Flacco is the answer. So you tell me.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.4 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 10:46 am
Hell yeah, keep the Steelers under the radar. I love that. Strength of schedule based upon last year’s output means jack. You’re going to see some big things with FWP and Mendy out of the backfield. We’re healthy again on defense across the board. Special Teams is undergoing big changes in philosphy (just check Pittsburgh Post Gazette). Sweed will integrate nicely thanks to the tutelage of Hines Ward. The last time we saw Hines take a WR under his wing was Santonio Holmes, and he was decleateing people last year…….just like Hines does almost every game. O-line production remains to be seen but it has to be better than last year…………and even if it’s not that brings us to BIG BEN. Despite the atrocious O-line play last year he still finished just behind Tom Brady and broke several Bradshaw passing records. Ben can do it all in AND out of the pocket if necessary. Can’t say that for most other QB’s in the league.
The Ravens and Bungles won’t do jack this year. The Browns will crumble under the pressure of 5 primetime games. The Steelers will repeat as division champs.
Oh and Florio, you might want to consider the fact that Big Ben was nearly killed in a motorcycle accident just before the season after Super Bowl XL and then had apendectomoy surgery after the season started. He was WAY below the weather that year and it showed. And last year’s performance proved he’s back better than ever and that he is no fluke.
Keep the Steelers under the radar. We love that, and so so they.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 10:58 am
Not sure about that best division in the league comment finishim. 7th easiest season based on strength on schedule. Not saying they don’t have a sold team, just don’t think they’re in a position to repeat.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 11:04 am
Right now I see all division champs repeating except tampa and pittsburgh. I also see the giants failing to make the playoffs.
into the breach step philly, saints, browns.
indy was injured a lot last year and still made it. i dont see the pats’ and chargers’ challengers getting there. i dont see the seahawks’ or packers’ challengers getting there this time. could see jax leapfrogging indy for division title.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 11:21 am
I thought the analysis was very good.
As a Vikings fan, I thought the Packers QB draft was very curious. If they really thought Rodgers was the answer they would have gotten depth with experienced QB’s. Drafting a spread of QB’s to complement Rodgers sure says they hope they have at least one out of the three.
It could be that they are worried about Rodgers injury potential. Lets face it, the Packers have led a charmed life having a QB that shows up every week for 17 years, and plays through injuries. Those days are over.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 11:25 am
empty13 says:
“I also see the giants failing to make the playoffs.”
Please explain.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 11:34 am
I would think Steeler fans are treating you far more kindly than Giants fans, whose team is shining their Lombardi trophy on the gleaming forehead of Eli, buffing the same with the radiant Zenesque personality of the Colonel, and finally spit shining it with the various excrements of Osi. I doubt Giants fans will accept that their team will not be once again competing for the prize this season and several thereafter, given their young D, Strahan notwithstanding.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 11:56 am
I’d say you got it pretty close. The fans that always seem to overestimate the talent of their teams is Pitt, GB, and Philly.
Packer fan is really delusional if it thinks Rodgers is going to just step right in for even an aging Favre.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 11:59 am
Interesting predictions and logic. I like the pick of the Green Bay Packers because of the uncertainty of the quarterback position. Still, I’d have to guess that the Packers will make the playoffs based on the dreadful NFC North. But who knows? Da Bears can pull a shocker.
I like you saying the Steelers won’t make it, but not necessarily because of the team — my belief is that the team is fringe-playoff worthy, but that is a daunting schedule they have. It can be like last year’s Cleveland Browns — having a team that is good enough but can easily get screwed over in the end.
I disagree with doubting the Seahawks. That team will play with fire in its belly, wanting to send out coach Holmgren on top. Despite the loss of Shaun Alexander, the team seems too talented (and in the NFC) not to make the playoffs. We shall see.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 12:01 pm
WHEW! Thanks for taking the weight off my shoulders for this season!
Signed,
Aaron Rodgers
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 12:04 pm
Crack kills.
For your own health and your readers’ mental stability, get off the stuff.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 12:05 pm
Of course the Squeelers won’t make the playoffs. They suck, and barely made the playoffs last year. Great December they had. Then one and done in the playoffs.
Too bad Squeeler fans, maybe next decaded. Hey get an O-Line, would ya?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 12:31 pm
Great article sharing your opinion of what could happen. Anyone with the ability to read will see this. If you’re getting mad at an offseason article that isn’t putting things in definites, then well, you’re an idiot and you need to be mad at your parents for being siblings, not at Florio.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 21st, 2008 at 12:40 pm
@cantgetenough - It depends, do you think Eli is the real deal or not. He has shown that he can be a good QB in the league, but he has also shown that he can still be inconsistant. Not to take anyhting away from the Giants, but they got on a roll at the right time. Anyone with half a brain can see that. Honestly, most teams who win the super bowl fall right into that category. This should be a big year for Eli and I think he still has a lot to prove. Dallas improves dramatically if they can get Pacman on the field, and I think the Eagles and Redskins have taken a few steps forward. It’s a tough division I think thats all the previous poster was getting at. I, for one, wouldn’t be too suprised to see any one of those teams in the playoffs.
I strongly disagree with the Steelers being on this list. Seriously, who else in that division is going to step up? I assume you mean the Browns will win that division - and I think they are still very suspect.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 12:42 pm
Rogers played very well against Dallas lasty year. Brohm wasn’t at all drafted because of any uncertainty. They need depth at that position. Nothing more. There will no QB controversey in Green Bay. And let’s stop acting like Favre is irreplacable. He was pretty average the 2nd half of his career. And it was typical Favre in that playoff OT where he threw his team’s chances away on a HORRIBLE pick. Rogers played better than Favre when he stepped in against Dallas.
Keep talking Ravens fans, you only beat us last year because we started Charlie Batch, Najeh Davenport, and half our starting defense was out with injuries. Tell us all what happened to you guys on Monday night when we were healthy. Oh yeah I remember, Big Ben had 5 TD’s and our defense made the Ravens offense look like it was a High School squad. Oh and I also remember Hines Ward giving both Ed Reed and Bart Scott snot bubbles from laying knockout blows on both of them. Now you guys are just a another year older with no considerable WR threats and a rook at QB. You guys will battle the clusterf*&k up in Cinci for last place in the division.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.75 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 12:54 pm
The only risky thing I thought about this article was taking two teams from the NFC East not to make the playoffs. Sure, it makes sense that the Eagles and Cowboys could go 1-2 in that division, but I find it hard to believe that the team that finishes higher: Giants or Redskins, won’t make the playoffs.
In the AFC North, the smart money has to be on the Bengals. They may not ever get a pass defense, but it’s hard to see them being as bad as last year in that respect, and Chad or no Chad…Carson Palmer is still the best QB in that division.
I thought it was a good article, and I’m just waiting to see who Florio picks to make the playoffs–so I can rip him for taking the Browns.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 21st, 2008 at 1:04 pm
I believe this year Mark Bulger will break all of Terry Bradshaws records (God Rest His Soul).
And I anticipate another banner season for the Steelers.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)