Comments on: HAIR ISSUE IS BACK ON THE TABLE

Comments on: HAIR ISSUE IS BACK ON THE TABLE http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/ The Best Pro Football Scoop on the Internet Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:08:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: twohorses http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32215 twohorses Tue, 20 May 2008 00:56:38 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32215 "Does this cover hair extensions or plugs?"--signed Peyton Manning. Long hair COULD be a safety issue just as the horse collar (Roy Williams' rule) is a safety issue. You could get a hold of a long ponytail and jerk that player's head back so hard his neck snapped. I love the dreds flowing from the helmets. But it could be a safety issue. As far as tucking it up in the helmet, there are dogs bred to protect sheep called Komondors. They have dreds all over their body. If a wolf tries to bite, theoretically all the wolf gets is a mouthful of hair. (That's wolf as in the animal, not Wolf as in "All we are is a fart in the wind.") (Though certain sheepherders might prefer the fart in the wind wolf.) If you tuck your dreds into your helmet, that will be just a giant cushion. Of course, then you would need a helmet even larger than the swell-headed Charlie "I thought "Walsh" was just a different pronunciation on what I've done on my last hundred dinner bills at really expensive restaurants" Weiss. “Does this cover hair extensions or plugs?”–signed Peyton Manning.

Long hair COULD be a safety issue just as the horse collar (Roy Williams’ rule) is a safety issue. You could get a hold of a long ponytail and jerk that player’s head back so hard his neck snapped.

I love the dreds flowing from the helmets. But it could be a safety issue.

As far as tucking it up in the helmet, there are dogs bred to protect sheep called Komondors. They have dreds all over their body. If a wolf tries to bite, theoretically all the wolf gets is a mouthful of hair. (That’s wolf as in the animal, not Wolf as in “All we are is a fart in the wind.”) (Though certain sheepherders might prefer the fart in the wind wolf.) If you tuck your dreds into your helmet, that will be just a giant cushion. Of course, then you would need a helmet even larger than the swell-headed Charlie “I thought “Walsh” was just a different pronunciation on what I’ve done on my last hundred dinner bills at really expensive restaurants” Weiss.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Vandilay_Industries http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32210 Vandilay_Industries Tue, 20 May 2008 00:47:46 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32210 Seriously... could the Chiefs be any more retarded? Every year they propose some brain-dead rule like expanding the playoffs (usually since they're one game away) and now something like this. Imbeciles. Seriously… could the Chiefs be any more retarded? Every year they propose some brain-dead rule like expanding the playoffs (usually since they’re one game away) and now something like this.

Imbeciles.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: 33243324 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32201 33243324 Tue, 20 May 2008 00:29:48 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32201 Phllitttt..... Phllitttt…..

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: bpenlandjr http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32158 bpenlandjr Mon, 19 May 2008 23:11:37 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32158 Guess this means the return of the bobble-head size helmets like the saftey for the Bills used to wear (what's his name?!). Also, I think the league could also persue this item as a uniform violation, since the long hair covers up the players name. Lord knows they have fined players for wearing socks that are too short/long, pants that are too short, etc. Guess this means the return of the bobble-head size helmets like the saftey for the Bills used to wear (what’s his name?!).

Also, I think the league could also persue this item as a uniform violation, since the long hair covers up the players name. Lord knows they have fined players for wearing socks that are too short/long, pants that are too short, etc.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Fustooge http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32124 Fustooge Mon, 19 May 2008 22:14:19 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32124 Let them wear the hair as long as they want....take away the penalty if someone tackles them by the hair, a couple of times being snatched down by the hair and they would get it cut on their own! Let them wear the hair as long as they want….take away the penalty if someone tackles them by the hair, a couple of times being snatched down by the hair and they would get it cut on their own!

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: GeauxSaints12 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32121 GeauxSaints12 Mon, 19 May 2008 22:03:37 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32121 Whoever thinks athletes are good role models has to be stupid. Hopefully you are teaching your kids to look up to someone else as a role model. Whoever thinks athletes are good role models has to be stupid. Hopefully you are teaching your kids to look up to someone else as a role model.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Schmedlap http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32094 Schmedlap Mon, 19 May 2008 21:06:43 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32094 Surely the NFL can make a rule that states that a player's name and number cannot be obscured. Then it is up to the player to solve a hair problem with a haircut, tucking the hair inside his jersey or into his helmet, or retiring. Surely the NFL can make a rule that states that a player’s name and number cannot be obscured. Then it is up to the player to solve a hair problem with a haircut, tucking the hair inside his jersey or into his helmet, or retiring.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: EskinSux http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32059 EskinSux Mon, 19 May 2008 20:30:24 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32059 In a league filled with thugs, drug offenses,spygate, domestic violence, guns, the only way the NFL can "act" concernened is to limit people's human freedoms. The public relations arm of the NFL, and that's ALL this is, has to be the worst orginization in the history of business, the popularity of the sport hides all of their inept decisions. These are the same people who brought you NFL Europe, had the brains to send the Miami Dolphins, arguably one of the worst teams in NFL history over to England to promote the sport. But i can see owners setting up barber shops at training camp, and then sending runners in to sweep up the hair, and offer it on NFL.com. I can see it now, but two jersey's get free locks of Al Harris hair, after all it's just about $$$$$$$. What a joke... In a league filled with thugs, drug offenses,spygate, domestic violence, guns, the only way the NFL can “act” concernened is to limit people’s human freedoms. The public relations arm of the NFL, and that’s ALL this is, has to be the worst orginization in the history of business, the popularity of the sport hides all of their inept decisions. These are the same people who brought you NFL Europe, had the brains to send the Miami Dolphins, arguably one of the worst teams in NFL history over to England to promote the sport. But i can see owners setting up barber shops at training camp, and then sending runners in to sweep up the hair, and offer it on NFL.com. I can see it now, but two jersey’s get free locks of Al Harris hair, after all it’s just about $$$$$$$. What a joke…

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: RedbullnRaiders http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32028 RedbullnRaiders Mon, 19 May 2008 19:58:17 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-32028 Interesting posts. But I'm more concerned that my "rookie" status is now missing. Long hair, tattoo's and beards...it's all personal preference. Some of these players are coined for their looks. So, it's not always a marketing move by the league to inforce a silly rule such as dress codes, much like the NBA claim uptop a little. Someone also mentioned a racial issue involved. I won't even comment on that because it's the dumbest statement I've ever heard. Tuck your jersey in and be respectable to the officials and you're good to go in my book. Sports icons are role models. Show respect and keep yourself out of trouble and you're a good role model regardless of how you look. Interesting posts. But I’m more concerned that my “rookie” status is now missing.

Long hair, tattoo’s and beards…it’s all personal preference. Some of these players are coined for their looks. So, it’s not always a marketing move by the league to inforce a silly rule such as dress codes, much like the NBA claim uptop a little. Someone also mentioned a racial issue involved. I won’t even comment on that because it’s the dumbest statement I’ve ever heard. Tuck your jersey in and be respectable to the officials and you’re good to go in my book. Sports icons are role models. Show respect and keep yourself out of trouble and you’re a good role model regardless of how you look.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: ButchD http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31992 ButchD Mon, 19 May 2008 19:26:53 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31992 When I went to boot camp, they shaved my head. For all my years in the miliary, my hair was very short. Was it really necesary? mostly no, at times probably. Did i like it? heck no, i'm a headbanger. now that im old & out, i cant have long hair as im half bald. why did i put myself through that? so all the rest of you civs can have long hair if you want. Are there jobs that need to have it short? yes when it is a matter of serious injury risk to the person, or a risk to others safety. Is that the case in the NFL? no, maybe some, but not going to be any more serious injury than a hard hit or other legal tackle, and its not a risk to others. When I went to boot camp, they shaved my head. For all my years in the miliary, my hair was very short. Was it really necesary? mostly no, at times probably. Did i like it? heck no, i’m a headbanger. now that im old & out, i cant have long hair as im half bald. why did i put myself through that? so all the rest of you civs can have long hair if you want.
Are there jobs that need to have it short? yes when it is a matter of serious injury risk to the person, or a risk to others safety. Is that the case in the NFL? no, maybe some, but not going to be any more serious injury than a hard hit or other legal tackle, and its not a risk to others.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: dlmcc0202 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31971 dlmcc0202 Mon, 19 May 2008 18:57:10 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31971 This is similar to the NBA's dress code approach, which is to make these guys look more professional a/k/a marketable. This is not a safety issue, this is the league trying to get everyone to look nice for the cameras. Dumb way to improve their image. Try removing the turds from the league instead This is similar to the NBA’s dress code approach, which is to make these guys look more professional a/k/a marketable. This is not a safety issue, this is the league trying to get everyone to look nice for the cameras. Dumb way to improve their image. Try removing the turds from the league instead

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: dlmcc0202 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31970 dlmcc0202 Mon, 19 May 2008 18:54:21 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31970 "Rookies are making $30MM before ever playing a down in the NFL, and the league is concerned about the length of players’ hair? Oh, brother." Agreed 100%. League has more pressing issues to worry about. This is a complete waste of time and serves no purpose “Rookies are making $30MM before ever playing a down in the NFL, and the league is concerned about the length of players’ hair?

Oh, brother.”

Agreed 100%. League has more pressing issues to worry about. This is a complete waste of time and serves no purpose

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: VDogg http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31964 VDogg Mon, 19 May 2008 18:42:51 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31964 I would have to agree with most of the postings here in one way or another, on one hand you can't force these guys to cut their hair, but on the other hand you could because, as many of the players want to remind everyone of during hold outs is that, this is a business and if this is so, the boss can make his own rules...reiterate the fact that the hair hanging out of the helmet as fair game during a tackle or other form of legal contact and be done with it. If an O-lineman grabs a hold of a ponytail as the DE flys by, guess what...the flag comes out for holding. If a RB streaks past a guy and gets tackled by his hair, tough, he could have grabbed the towel in your belt and made the same tackle...this is a stupid arguement that does not need this kind of attention....Did ya get the memo? I would have to agree with most of the postings here in one way or another, on one hand you can’t force these guys to cut their hair, but on the other hand you could because, as many of the players want to remind everyone of during hold outs is that, this is a business and if this is so, the boss can make his own rules…reiterate the fact that the hair hanging out of the helmet as fair game during a tackle or other form of legal contact and be done with it. If an O-lineman grabs a hold of a ponytail as the DE flys by, guess what…the flag comes out for holding. If a RB streaks past a guy and gets tackled by his hair, tough, he could have grabbed the towel in your belt and made the same tackle…this is a stupid arguement that does not need this kind of attention….Did ya get the memo?

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: RaiderNation12 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31963 RaiderNation12 Mon, 19 May 2008 18:42:35 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31963 you know who I blame, the kansas city chiefs they're the one who started all this crap when larry johnson pulled polomalu's hair and was penalized for 15 yards, and I think cost the chiefs the game and now they're complaining about it so put the blame on the chiefs, and rodger goodell for actually putting consideration in this stupid subject damn you No Fun Leauge!!! you know who I blame, the kansas city chiefs they’re the one who started all this crap when larry johnson pulled polomalu’s hair and was penalized for 15 yards, and I think cost the chiefs the game and now they’re complaining about it so put the blame on the chiefs, and rodger goodell for actually putting consideration in this stupid subject damn you No Fun Leauge!!!

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: spanky07 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31962 spanky07 Mon, 19 May 2008 18:33:16 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31962 Let's ask Don Imus! Let’s ask Don Imus!

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: cantgetenough http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31955 cantgetenough Mon, 19 May 2008 18:16:50 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31955 Well, if the hair is so long its on the the table that is too long in my opinion. Well, if the hair is so long its on the the table that is too long in my opinion.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Mr. Touchdown http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31946 Mr. Touchdown Mon, 19 May 2008 18:06:45 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31946 Or... the players/owners could both exercise a little "gamesmanship" and humanity by allowing long hair, and not allowing it to be a "target for tackling/advantage" like you snarly intolerant people suggest. You guys are the ones with the "problem" here, what does that tell you? Get over it. Or… the players/owners could both exercise a little “gamesmanship” and humanity by allowing long hair, and not allowing it to be a “target for tackling/advantage” like you snarly intolerant people suggest.

You guys are the ones with the “problem” here, what does that tell you? Get over it.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: spyboots http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31944 spyboots Mon, 19 May 2008 18:04:10 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31944 I like the long hair; mine's almost to my waist. I like the long hair; mine’s almost to my waist.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Mr. Touchdown http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31943 Mr. Touchdown Mon, 19 May 2008 18:03:52 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31943 Why do you even need to see the name anyway? Its always said the number is what matters to officials anyway, and in college some teams have jerseys with no names anyway. This is just another cop out reasoning that doesn't make sense when you give it the logic test. They want to say "we don't like it, we'd rather you all look like jesus choir boys and since we pay you, we own your soul" but they know that wouldn't go over as well. Hence the illogical "reasoning" behind it. Player safety is b.s. Has anyone had any serious injuries from a hair pull? I don't think so. Cultural war, really, between "real world current day reality" and "filthy rich, old and delusional control freaks" You can dress a turd in a tux, and he's still a turd. Image is NOT everything, as tv marketing campaigns would "like" to you believe (i certainly do not subscribe to that thinking, personally) And i don't give much credibility to those that do, either. ;) Why do you even need to see the name anyway? Its always said the number is what matters to officials anyway, and in college some teams have jerseys with no names anyway. This is just another cop out reasoning that doesn’t make sense when you give it the logic test.

They want to say “we don’t like it, we’d rather you all look like jesus choir boys and since we pay you, we own your soul” but they know that wouldn’t go over as well. Hence the illogical “reasoning” behind it.

Player safety is b.s. Has anyone had any serious injuries from a hair pull? I don’t think so.

Cultural war, really, between “real world current day reality” and “filthy rich, old and delusional control freaks”

You can dress a turd in a tux, and he’s still a turd. Image is NOT everything, as tv marketing campaigns would “like” to you believe (i certainly do not subscribe to that thinking, personally)

And i don’t give much credibility to those that do, either.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: corydangerous http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31942 corydangerous Mon, 19 May 2008 18:00:54 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31942 "Many work environments require codes for dress and appearence. Hair leanght facial hair, visable tattoos ect. I have no problem with the employer setting guidlines for the empolyees. If they don’t like it, do what I did, go work for someone else." I couldn't disagree more. This is football. These guys are not working for Bank of America or Microsoft. Just let them play. “Many work environments require codes for dress and appearence. Hair leanght facial hair, visable tattoos ect. I have no problem with the employer setting guidlines for the empolyees. If they don’t like it, do what I did, go work for someone else.”

I couldn’t disagree more. This is football. These guys are not working for Bank of America or Microsoft. Just let them play.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: TCLARK http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31935 TCLARK Mon, 19 May 2008 17:41:25 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31935 Many work environments require codes for dress and appearence. Hair leanght facial hair, visable tattoos ect. I have no problem with the employer setting guidlines for the empolyees. If they don't like it, do what I did, go work for someone else. Many work environments require codes for dress and appearence. Hair leanght facial hair, visable tattoos ect. I have no problem with the employer setting guidlines for the empolyees. If they don’t like it, do what I did, go work for someone else.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: joe28 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31922 joe28 Mon, 19 May 2008 17:16:54 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31922 Easy solution: Declare, or restate if it is already, that hair outside the helmet is fair game. A few tackles via dreadlocks/ponytail will cause the player to rethink their fashion choices. If they choose to keep the hair then they are at a disadvantage. Play on. /it usually is defensive players though. //so get a hand full of hair while blocking. Easy solution: Declare, or restate if it is already, that hair outside the helmet is fair game. A few tackles via dreadlocks/ponytail will cause the player to rethink their fashion choices. If they choose to keep the hair then they are at a disadvantage. Play on.

/it usually is defensive players though.
//so get a hand full of hair while blocking.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Insomniac http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31905 Insomniac Mon, 19 May 2008 16:58:51 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31905 Could the hair be tied and tucked inside the jersey? Couldn't they be fined for a uniform violation for say covering up the name on their jersey if they refused? Could the hair be tied and tucked inside the jersey? Couldn’t they be fined for a uniform violation for say covering up the name on their jersey if they refused?

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Klutch http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31896 Klutch Mon, 19 May 2008 16:38:29 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31896 They wouldn't be punished because of the length, they'd be punished for it being down. Just like my privates, I'm not punished because of the girth, it's when I don't cover it that is the problem. They wouldn’t be punished because of the length, they’d be punished for it being down. Just like my privates, I’m not punished because of the girth, it’s when I don’t cover it that is the problem.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: NFL Rumor Mill http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31895 NFL Rumor Mill Mon, 19 May 2008 16:38:09 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31895 Rookies are making $30MM before ever playing a down in the NFL, and the league is concerned about the length of players' hair? Oh, brother. Rookies are making $30MM before ever playing a down in the NFL, and the league is concerned about the length of players’ hair?

Oh, brother.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: mcrowell http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31894 mcrowell Mon, 19 May 2008 16:37:34 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31894 this would become the stupidest f**k-n rule in all of sports. if a guy wants to have long hair and have people pulling on his noggen at the bottom of every pile, who gives a crap...waste of time for everybody involved. this would become the stupidest f**k-n rule in all of sports. if a guy wants to have long hair and have people pulling on his noggen at the bottom of every pile, who gives a crap…waste of time for everybody involved.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: PJW http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31890 PJW Mon, 19 May 2008 16:36:16 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31890 Since he is still new at his position, Goodell does not want a hair apparent. Personally I say let the opposing players yank it out of their heads. Since he is still new at his position, Goodell does not want a hair apparent.

Personally I say let the opposing players yank it out of their heads.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: GeauxSaints12 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31884 GeauxSaints12 Mon, 19 May 2008 16:25:59 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31884 Get over yourselfs owners and coaches. Its a new time and long hair is in now of days. If they are not careful this can turn into a racist situation, because mostly black players have long hair. Its part of haritage and if you make them hide that, what is next: no team prayer, no tattoos should be showing,you cant thank god for letting you have the chance to win a superbowl. You are already being called the no fun leauge. Stop being stupid and worry about something else. Get over yourselfs owners and coaches. Its a new time and long hair is in now of days. If they are not careful this can turn into a racist situation, because mostly black players have long hair. Its part of haritage and if you make them hide that, what is next: no team prayer, no tattoos should be showing,you cant thank god for letting you have the chance to win a superbowl. You are already being called the no fun leauge. Stop being stupid and worry about something else.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: cantgetenough http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31883 cantgetenough Mon, 19 May 2008 16:25:47 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31883 Hey what happened to the titles? I was proud of my water boy status! Hey what happened to the titles? I was proud of my water boy status!

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: corydangerous http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31882 corydangerous Mon, 19 May 2008 16:25:08 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31882 What a joke! Why are they even wasting their time on this so-called 'issue'? What a joke! Why are they even wasting their time on this so-called ‘issue’?

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Stoogie http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31878 Stoogie Mon, 19 May 2008 16:22:14 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31878 For players like Al Harris, they'd probably need a helmet so big to fit all that hair under it, he'll look like some human bobble-head doll out there on the corner. For players like Al Harris, they’d probably need a helmet so big to fit all that hair under it, he’ll look like some human bobble-head doll out there on the corner.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: cantgetenough http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31875 cantgetenough Mon, 19 May 2008 16:19:44 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31875 "it’s a matter better left for negotiations with the union" But since it's the offseason... “it’s a matter better left for negotiations with the union”

But since it’s the offseason…

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: JayPhilly http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31867 JayPhilly Mon, 19 May 2008 16:10:40 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/19/hair-issue-is-back-on-the-table/#comment-31867 Whatever happened to the titles next to our names? Whatever happened to the titles next to our names?

(report as inappropriate)

]]>