We firmly believe that the United States Congress, as the sole source of federal legislation in our country, has the prerogative to hold hearings to assess whether legislation is necessary to ensure the integrity of the NFL or any other sport that conducts business in multiple states and that attracts the interests of millions of American citizens.
But we also believe that it requires more than Senator Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) to prompt action in this regard. To date, Specter has found no one to support his desire to push the question of whether the NFL properly handled the inquiry into whether and to what extent the Patriots (and other teams) have broken the rules in an effort to gain an advantage on the field of play.
And now the voices are lining up against Specter. Several days ago, Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Ma.) predictably rebuffed Specter’s blustering about the Patriots. According to the Washington Post, two Republican senators have said that the NFL is capable of policing itself.
The two senators are Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).
“Number one, I have great respect for Senator Specter,” Graham said. “He is probably one of the most respected members of the body. But I respectfully disagree in terms of Congress getting involved. I don’t see a need. I believe the NFL has the desire and capability to monitor its own business. It is in its best interests to do so, and there are far better matters for our time.”
Kyl echoed Graham’s sentiments. “It doesn’t seem to me that it’s something the Congress should be involved in.”
Though this might mean for Spygate to die, Specter surely will be poised to chime in again, if there are any further cheating scandals that arise in the future.
_2.gif)





May 17th, 2008 at 12:23 pm
My opinion is this: there is no way this will be pressed any further at this point. Let it end. I beleive that it should have been handled differently & the NFL should not be an island unto itself, but it is obvious that the NFL & many of its fans don’t care/want it pursued anymore. The fact is, just like the baseball, scandals of recent years, there will always be a big question mark next to the Patriots dynasty years with a lot of folks wondering was it deserved. I guess the sood thing is that anymore of this type of thing in the future, the NFL will have to be more thorough & approach things differently.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.7 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 12:27 pm
Although part of me would love to see a league wide investigation since it would most likely expose other teams of cheating, I think this should all end.
I am glad to see that other Senators are speaking out against Specter’s desires to get the Government involved. Specter has little credibility in this whole thing because of his perceived or real agendas with being an Eagle fan and Comcast and their lobbyist being his biggest contributors. Without any support, he needs to just let it go.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.75 / 5 with 8 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
First of all anyone who has respect for Senator Arlen Specter is someone I would not want in the Senate. Had Mr. Specter’s beloved Steelers or Eagles done what the Patriots admitted to doing then nothing would have been done. If it was the lowly Jets who the Commissioner worked for he would have patted them on the back and said good job. Because the Patriots are successful the NFL targeted them. Even the Commissioner stated that it is not illegal to tape it is only where you are standing when taping. If the taping is done where it is legal then this becomes a non-issue. Senator Specter has wasted thousands of tax dollars on this matter. His job is Senator for the State of Pennsylvania not Commissioner of the NFL. Since the commissioner saidthe case is closed then the case should be closed.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.4 / 5 with 15 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 12:42 pm
I think 99-1 is pretty convincing evidence that Congress SHOULD NOT be investigating the NFL on this issue. Certainly, Florio would prefer they do but it logically makes no sense when there are critical national issues to address and not whether Florio’s favorite pastime can provide more fodder for his rumour mill.
And just why does the media give more credence to some no name videographer they never heard of or met than Bill Belichick or Goodall? The media would rather focus on the possibility of a conspiracy than the real news…..just look at the Boston Herald and ESPN for proof.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.2 / 5 with 9 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Kyl as usual is a rare voice of reason in DC.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 2:46 pm
WOW what a surprise two senators saying they have “respect ” for this senator or that senator! of course they do, senators are the ONLY people in this country that have respect for senators! the senate and the whole congress for that matter, are filled with scumbags, pukes, aholes, assclowns, queers, and the rest suck also! lindsey graham? didn’t she used to be the bionic woman?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.2 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 3:28 pm
Why does anyone, let alone another Senator, respect Arlen Magic Bullet Specter? Oh, that’s right, they’re all in bed together. Graham’s just as worthless as Specter, who is trying to promote his book by getting his name in the paper.
Still waiting on Jimmy Johnson’s fine for taping…if NFL cheating was funny in 1967, it should still be funny. It’s not little league. The Commish should have done some research before he made this an issue.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.35 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 3:29 pm
Okay, first of all, anyone who thinks the NFL targeted the Patriots because they are successful has a clear bias towards their team. The NFL got involved because the Jets reported their CHEATING.
Secondly, I also agree that congress should not get involved at this juncture; however I strongly disagree that the NFL can police itself. Unfortunately, Roger Goodell proved that once he destroyed the initial tapes that the Patriots turned over. It is his fault and his fault alone that the public will never know the truth and that people will always bring up spygate whenever the greatness of the Patriots is discussed…ESPECIALLY when they are discussed as being a dynasty or of the greatest teams.
I will state that I am not a Pats fan, and that the talent alone that they have acquired puts them up there with one of the greatest teams ever. But I cannot help but think, would they have been able to get veterans to come in and play for less $$$ in N.E. just for the chance of a ring if they were NOT as successful?
Thanks Mr. Goodell for leaving a shadow of a doubt when you had the opportunity to end this back in September when the Patriots first gave you the tapes.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.15 / 5 with 8 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
Those claiming “Congress has better things to do” simply don’t understand how Congress is structured. Part of Specter’s job is to look at anti-trust matters. Since the NFL has an anti-trust exemption, it is his sworn duty to look into matters such as these.
It’s obvious public education is doing a lousy job when people can’t understand this SIMPLE point. Of course, most of these people are Pats fans…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.4 / 5 with 10 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 3:49 pm
ky,
thanks for explaining how congress works for MY simple mind.
Now, can you explain how it is that Senator Graham him/herself was quoted as saying that there are “far better matters for our time”. The good Senator must be the product of a public school, right…you sanctimonious SOB!!!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 10 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 4:19 pm
Yes, let’s end this nonesense. Its gone as far as it can go. Mr.Specter should go back to tending to affairs of state. The NFL and Mr Goodell and Mr Kraft can breathe a collective sigh of relief. Mr. Walsh can go back to the golf course. And Mr Belichick can crawl back in his hole.
I am a Pats fan who has lost all respect for the Pats organization and supercilious Belichick. There was no smoking gun this time, but the fact remains the organiztion condones a culture of cheating.
PS: Mr Capers, your free to look for a more lucrative position now.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 4:24 pm
“Those claiming “Congress has better things to do” simply don’t understand how Congress is structured. Part of Specter’s job is to look at anti-trust matters. Since the NFL has an anti-trust exemption, it is his sworn duty to look into matters such as these.
It’s obvious public education is doing a lousy job when people can’t understand this SIMPLE point. Of course, most of these people are Pats fans”
Someone who has a lunatic obsession with promoting his non-sensical rule about what constitutes a so-called dynasty is in no position to berate the intelligence of others.
The “anti-trust exemption” which you reference is not specifically related to the NFL, and applies only to broadcasting. It does not give the Congress carte blanche to stick its nose into the internal workings of a private business.
Specter’s only authority related to the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961 would be to sponsor a new act repealing the earlier one, which he has talked about but had no success.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 4:55 pm
Did someone say the Patriots’ success***? We’ll never know for sure how much they were “helped.” But that’s besides the point. Goodell did a poor job in handling this situation.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.6 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 5:35 pm
KY,
If it is Specter’s sworn duty, why didn’t he get involved in the NBA cheating scandal? The NBA enjoys antitrust exemptions too.
Besides, it is Senators from Arizona and SC who are saying that Congress has more important things to address than this, not just Patriots fans.
Besides, if Specter wants a truly independent investigation by the government, shouldn’t he want a Senator without obvious conflicts of interests as he has to be running it? The fact that his two largest campaign donors are Comcast and their lobbyist and the NFL is in a very public and messy legal battle with each other, how is an independent investigation by Specter be independent? This kind of conflict of interest would be enough to get a judge removed from a trial.
It goes beyond that Congress has better things to do. It goes nothing has risen to the point that Congress has a right to get involved. This isn’t like steriods in baseball (and I was against the Senate having hearing in that case too) where illegal drug use was running rampart and MLB really didn’t have a drug policy to stop the use, test properly, or punish whoever got caught.
It is hard to say when the Patriots got the harshest penalty ever levied on a team that the league definitely didn’t do enough. Goodell interviewed over 50 people and only Walsh had dirt beyond whatever Belichick admitted to and most of it was only on Walsh’s word. And until proven one way or anyone you have to admit that he could have some credibility issues until proven true or false.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 5:37 pm
I’m not so sure the NFL can police itself since Roger Goodell gave the Patriots a slap on the wrist the first time and nothing more would have come of it if Specter hadn’t started asking questions.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 6:35 pm
This better end now. Or Belichick will expose everyone and everything he knows about cheating that he has seen in his thirty plus year career.
Make no mistake. The hoodie took his medicine. But he told Goodell that the next time he was taking everyone with him. Notice the rest of the NFL teams have been completely silent.
By the way, when Mangina gets fired this December he’s done in pro football. Forever.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 6:36 pm
before Spygate dies, maybe Kennedy will. He was just rushed to the hospital.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 7:34 pm
Specter revealed in his press conference on May 16 that Pat Leahy, the majority head of the judiciary committe, had offered government funds for a neutral third party investigation. Isn’t this the only vote neccessary to move forward?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 7:45 pm
I am more convinced than ever that the whole videotaping uproar was a direct result of the increasingly acrimonious relationship between the Jets and Patriots.
The Jets, with some justification, dropped the Pats into a boiling pot of water at the inception of last season by tipping off the NFL to the Patriots’ sideline videotaping practices during the season opener. Furthermore, it is becoming increasingly likely that former Patriots coaching personnel, now with the Jets, served as sources for the spurious claim that a New England videographer (golf pro Walsh) allegedly taped the walkthrough at the 2002 Super Bowl.
This isn’t a matter that requires the attention of Congress. This is an NFL issue, one that principally involves a vitriolic vendetta between two teams in the AFC East. It’s now officially impossible to tell truth from fiction, but it has become glaringly obvious that the issue was never as big a deal as some made it out to be.
It’s time to move on, but I have a feeling there will be more recriminations between the Pats and Jets.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.4 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 8:07 pm
I wonder how many people realize that Specter also has a bill before the Senate which would end the antitrust benefits enjoyed by OPEC.
It seems to me it would be a lot more productive to get behind that bill than threatening the NFL’s antitrust exemption.
What’s weird about it is that even Specter seems to think that the NFL’s antitrust exemption is more important.
Not to get too political here but when I heard that George Bush went, hat in hand, to Saudi King Abdullah to beg the Saudis to produce more oil and was told no, and just laid down and took it, it made me sick to my stomach. Bush is a disgrace, but I digress.
It is astounding that the bill ending antitrust exemptions for OPEC has gotten no play while this stupid Spygate story won’t go away.
Specter should be ashamed, but if you know anything about his history you know that shame is not an emotion that he possesses.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 8:21 pm
Hey Robo,
What has been proven to be true: Patriots cheated.
And the “everybody does it” excuse is getting old when there is no proof that “everybody does it.”
Relax. Looks like congress is not getting involved so all the other ways the Pats cheated are safe.
For now.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 8:43 pm
“It is astounding that the bill ending antitrust exemptions for OPEC has gotten no play while this stupid Spygate story won’t go away.”
No it isn’t - they’re both wastes of time. Specter has no authority over OPEC, either.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
“It is hard to say when the Patriots got the harshest penalty ever levied on a team that the league definitely didn’t do enough. Goodell interviewed over 50 people and only Walsh had dirt beyond whatever Belichick admitted to and most of it was only on Walsh’s word. And until proven one way or anyone you have to admit that he could have some credibility issues until proven true or false.”
None of the 50 people interviewed by the NFL were ever identified. If Goodell wanted to prove the sincerity of his investigation, he would have identified them just like Walsh was. If Walsh was only the 3rd vodeo assistant, who were assistant #1 and #2, and what did they have to say? Was Walsh’s boss interviewed? Ernie Adams? Scott Pioli? Why was Goodell’s investigation so secret? Did it ever even happen? No one can question the credibility of Walsh before they question everyone else involved in the investigation. What is Goodell hiding?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Its not specters job to investigate anti trust exemptions because he’s not the chairman of the judiciary committee anymore. Its patrick leahys job now.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 17th, 2008 at 9:11 pm
“Specter revealed in his press conference on May 16 that Pat Leahy, the majority head of the judiciary committe, had offered government funds for a neutral third party investigation. Isn’t this the only vote neccessary to move forward?”
From the Washington Post:
“Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), the Judiciary Committee chairman, has not taken a formal position on whether to hold hearings, a spokesman for Leahy said, adding that Specter had not asked Leahy to hold hearings.”
Specter has not asked for Leahy’s support yet. In fact, Specter has stated that he doesn’t think congressional hearings are very productive. He favors the NFL sponsoring an independent investigation, not the congress. I don’t know where you get the idea that the governement sponsors 3rd party investigations. They only do that in the case of a Special Prosecutor for serious government crimes. That doesn’t apply here.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)