<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BELICHICK TAKES AIM AT WALSH</title>
	<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/</link>
	<description>The Best Pro Football Scoop on the Internet</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: skaybaltimore</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31579</link>
		<dc:creator>skaybaltimore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 16:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31579</guid>
		<description>brian_21 wrote:

"I want my division champ label back. It made me feel special!"

Don't worry man -- your rep stands on its own even without the little tag. LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brian_21 wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;I want my division champ label back. It made me feel special!&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry man &#8212; your rep stands on its own even without the little tag. LOL.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31579">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian_21</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31518</link>
		<dc:creator>brian_21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 12:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31518</guid>
		<description>I want my division champ label back. It made me feel special!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want my division champ label back. It made me feel special!
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31518">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NR4</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31499</link>
		<dc:creator>NR4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 03:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31499</guid>
		<description>Recap of comments(Cliff Notes) for this thread:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The entertainment value in Patriots fans talking their way out of this stuff is great.


Belichick’s got no credibility, and he makes it worse every time he speaks - like McGwire and Palmeiro at the BALCO hearings. He and the Pats are frauds.
=================================================

That's it. That will save you a good hour or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recap of comments(Cliff Notes) for this thread:<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
The entertainment value in Patriots fans talking their way out of this stuff is great.</p>
<p>Belichick’s got no credibility, and he makes it worse every time he speaks - like McGwire and Palmeiro at the BALCO hearings. He and the Pats are frauds.<br />
=================================================</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it. That will save you a good hour or so.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31499">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bpenlandjr</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31421</link>
		<dc:creator>bpenlandjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 21:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31421</guid>
		<description>1TruePatriot, a Cheerleader, says: 

May 17th, 2008 at 3:22 pm 
my family thinks Im pretty ok, actually. Not sure what part of my post is so inexcusable, being it was my first time posting here I guess you will hafta forgive me. Geesh. 
----------------------------------------------------------
Nothing was inexcusable. You just gotta understand you are wading into a cesspool when you post on here. Every thing, and every one is fair game once your name goes up in lights - just like the celebrities and atheletes - only without any true substance and certainly no money!! LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1TruePatriot, a Cheerleader, says: </p>
<p>May 17th, 2008 at 3:22 pm<br />
my family thinks Im pretty ok, actually. Not sure what part of my post is so inexcusable, being it was my first time posting here I guess you will hafta forgive me. Geesh.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Nothing was inexcusable. You just gotta understand you are wading into a cesspool when you post on here. Every thing, and every one is fair game once your name goes up in lights - just like the celebrities and atheletes - only without any true substance and certainly no money!! LOL
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31421">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hadley Rille</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31407</link>
		<dc:creator>Hadley Rille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 20:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31407</guid>
		<description>"When I watched the movie Idiocracy, I had no idea it was a documentary about Boston. Who know?"

When insulting the intelligence of others it's usually considered appropriate to actually use the correct word tenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When I watched the movie Idiocracy, I had no idea it was a documentary about Boston. Who know?&#8221;</p>
<p>When insulting the intelligence of others it&#8217;s usually considered appropriate to actually use the correct word tenses.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31407">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1TruePatriot</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31392</link>
		<dc:creator>1TruePatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 19:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31392</guid>
		<description>my family thinks Im pretty ok, actually. Not sure what part of my post is so inexcusable, being it was my first time posting here I guess you will hafta forgive me. Geesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my family thinks Im pretty ok, actually. Not sure what part of my post is so inexcusable, being it was my first time posting here I guess you will hafta forgive me. Geesh.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31392">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: castlelong1</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31390</link>
		<dc:creator>castlelong1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 19:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31390</guid>
		<description>http://youtube.com/watch?v=Hyg9BhqESxU
you might want the whole interviewWill it go through this time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=Hyg9BhqESxU" rel="nofollow" class="extlink" target="_blank">http://youtube.com/watch?v=Hyg9BhqESxU</a><br />
you might want the whole interviewWill it go through this time?
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31390">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FootballFan</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31389</link>
		<dc:creator>FootballFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 19:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31389</guid>
		<description>When I watched the movie Idiocracy, I had no idea it was a documentary about Boston.  Who know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I watched the movie Idiocracy, I had no idea it was a documentary about Boston.  Who know?
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31389">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanMartin</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31317</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanMartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 16:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31317</guid>
		<description>Hey Mom,

Grow up? I'm giving my opinion on the matter, and in no way was I acting immature or uneducated. I strongly believe that people who were sick of seeing the Patriots beat them by an average score of 37-17, just don't think about the other side of this matter. I came in here, not writing to any of you, but writing to Florio. If you stuck me in a room full of football fans, none of which were Patriot followers, I guess I would be called out on my response, and my Rating would be 2.02/5 with 24 votes. But honestly, you aren't a Patriots fan, and comparing Bill Belichick to your child is NONSENSICAL. That, to me, is more immature and a more unintelligent move than anything I've seen in response to this article.

And to jrhsd,

Wow. Class act there. That's all I have to say.

Go Patriots.

(Since we were caught "cheating", we've gone 18-1, through SCRUTINY and intense battles EVERY WEEK. We played in 10 Super Bowls that season, and in most cases we came out winning by 30 points.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mom,</p>
<p>Grow up? I&#8217;m giving my opinion on the matter, and in no way was I acting immature or uneducated. I strongly believe that people who were sick of seeing the Patriots beat them by an average score of 37-17, just don&#8217;t think about the other side of this matter. I came in here, not writing to any of you, but writing to Florio. If you stuck me in a room full of football fans, none of which were Patriot followers, I guess I would be called out on my response, and my Rating would be 2.02/5 with 24 votes. But honestly, you aren&#8217;t a Patriots fan, and comparing Bill Belichick to your child is NONSENSICAL. That, to me, is more immature and a more unintelligent move than anything I&#8217;ve seen in response to this article.</p>
<p>And to jrhsd,</p>
<p>Wow. Class act there. That&#8217;s all I have to say.</p>
<p>Go Patriots.</p>
<p>(Since we were caught &#8220;cheating&#8221;, we&#8217;ve gone 18-1, through SCRUTINY and intense battles EVERY WEEK. We played in 10 Super Bowls that season, and in most cases we came out winning by 30 points.)
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31317">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skaybaltimore</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31274</link>
		<dc:creator>skaybaltimore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 14:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31274</guid>
		<description>To: 1TruePatriot:

I feel sorry for your husband and kid(s). You must totally suck the life out of them if your post is any example of how you discuss things.

Carry on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To: 1TruePatriot:</p>
<p>I feel sorry for your husband and kid(s). You must totally suck the life out of them if your post is any example of how you discuss things.</p>
<p>Carry on.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31274">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: promichael</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31255</link>
		<dc:creator>promichael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31255</guid>
		<description>Mike, Goodell's decision to penalize Belichick and to
indicate that he did not accept the ignorance argument
is a reflection of the 2006 memo being sent to Belichick
which Matt Walsh had nothing to do with because he was
terminated in 2003. Goodell is basing Belichick's guilt
on his 2006 memo and not the Matt Walsh testimony. He
gave the fine and did not need the Walsh testimony. Roger
Goodell correctly states that Matt Walsh did not have 
anything to add...and so it goes.

Goodell is doing his job and the rehashing over this is
because of Arlen Comcast Specter who still wants his team
the Philadelphia Eagles to appear to have been cheated out
of the Super Bowl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, Goodell&#8217;s decision to penalize Belichick and to<br />
indicate that he did not accept the ignorance argument<br />
is a reflection of the 2006 memo being sent to Belichick<br />
which Matt Walsh had nothing to do with because he was<br />
terminated in 2003. Goodell is basing Belichick&#8217;s guilt<br />
on his 2006 memo and not the Matt Walsh testimony. He<br />
gave the fine and did not need the Walsh testimony. Roger<br />
Goodell correctly states that Matt Walsh did not have<br />
anything to add&#8230;and so it goes.</p>
<p>Goodell is doing his job and the rehashing over this is<br />
because of Arlen Comcast Specter who still wants his team<br />
the Philadelphia Eagles to appear to have been cheated out<br />
of the Super Bowl.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31255">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bpenlandjr</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31252</link>
		<dc:creator>bpenlandjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31252</guid>
		<description>1TruePatriot, a Cheerleader, says: 

"If Arlen gets his way, there is gonna be HELL to pay in the NFL. But I suspect his new statements about “not seeking an investigation” are the direct result of other Senators telling him that he was beginning to sound like he needed some prozac, or something. The man is certifiably NUTS. Cause yeah, this is a big deal, in the sports world..but um…arent we at WAR? And by the way, about those gas prices? (I still cant believe no one has blamed GWB for spygate yet.)"
---------------------------------------------------------------
I SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BUSH WAS BEHIND THIS TOO!!! FIGURES, ANYTHING WITH A MAJOR COVERUP AND LOTS OF LYING DEFINITELY STINKS OF GWB!! Wow, that must really irk you Pats fans terribly! To think of a democratic stronghold like MASS being associated with GWB!!!!

BTW, are you wearing your cheerleader outfit at theis moment? Got a pic to share?? LMAO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1TruePatriot, a Cheerleader, says: </p>
<p>&#8220;If Arlen gets his way, there is gonna be HELL to pay in the NFL. But I suspect his new statements about “not seeking an investigation” are the direct result of other Senators telling him that he was beginning to sound like he needed some prozac, or something. The man is certifiably NUTS. Cause yeah, this is a big deal, in the sports world..but um…arent we at WAR? And by the way, about those gas prices? (I still cant believe no one has blamed GWB for spygate yet.)&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
I SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BUSH WAS BEHIND THIS TOO!!! FIGURES, ANYTHING WITH A MAJOR COVERUP AND LOTS OF LYING DEFINITELY STINKS OF GWB!! Wow, that must really irk you Pats fans terribly! To think of a democratic stronghold like MASS being associated with GWB!!!!</p>
<p>BTW, are you wearing your cheerleader outfit at theis moment? Got a pic to share?? LMAO
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31252">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah W</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31251</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31251</guid>
		<description>That is rich.  I was jealous of the Pats before I discovered how they won. Now I would rather be a Bungle fan.

Stop trying to smear the messenger and focus on the message.

What did or does Walsh actually have to gain by talking? Not another NFL job, that is for sure. Probly wont help him attract too many more tennis lessons either. Perhaps he can eventually sell a book or something, but I doubt that would work if was making up the story.

What does he stand to lose if the Pats can actually prove he is lying about anyting?
Bwah ha ha ha.
Think about it idiots.

He kept the tapes for insurance like Macnamee kept the Rocket feuled needles. He knew it was wrong, but was in on it and if or when he was forced out or called a liar, he had evidence to support his story.

What have the Pats got in the form of evidence against his story? Other than cliams of ingorance of an obvious rule, and a few pictures of Walsh wearing Pats garb?

He was a Pats camera man with some legit job duties, I would assume not all of his work was filming playcalling.
Perhaps he was not very good at his job, but that does not make him a liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is rich.  I was jealous of the Pats before I discovered how they won. Now I would rather be a Bungle fan.</p>
<p>Stop trying to smear the messenger and focus on the message.</p>
<p>What did or does Walsh actually have to gain by talking? Not another NFL job, that is for sure. Probly wont help him attract too many more tennis lessons either. Perhaps he can eventually sell a book or something, but I doubt that would work if was making up the story.</p>
<p>What does he stand to lose if the Pats can actually prove he is lying about anyting?<br />
Bwah ha ha ha.<br />
Think about it idiots.</p>
<p>He kept the tapes for insurance like Macnamee kept the Rocket feuled needles. He knew it was wrong, but was in on it and if or when he was forced out or called a liar, he had evidence to support his story.</p>
<p>What have the Pats got in the form of evidence against his story? Other than cliams of ingorance of an obvious rule, and a few pictures of Walsh wearing Pats garb?</p>
<p>He was a Pats camera man with some legit job duties, I would assume not all of his work was filming playcalling.<br />
Perhaps he was not very good at his job, but that does not make him a liar.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31251">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjcruiser</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31250</link>
		<dc:creator>jjcruiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31250</guid>
		<description>I'm a Patriots fan and this is just depressing.  The one time he ought to just shut up and he has to go open his mouth.  This is the same sort of powerful/brilliance that translates into arrogance that resulted in everything from Watergate to Whitewater.  Just apologize and move on and get back to football, Bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Patriots fan and this is just depressing.  The one time he ought to just shut up and he has to go open his mouth.  This is the same sort of powerful/brilliance that translates into arrogance that resulted in everything from Watergate to Whitewater.  Just apologize and move on and get back to football, Bill.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31250">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bpenlandjr</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31249</link>
		<dc:creator>bpenlandjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31249</guid>
		<description>President Camacho, a Cheerleader, says: 

May 17th, 2008 at 2:52 am 
Please. It’d be one thing if after being put on notice Belichick stopped. But he didn’t. He continued to cheat, after he was explicitly warned that what he was doing was cheating. So whether or not he was intentionally cheating before that (which he cleary was), he was intentionally cheating after it. He’s a cheater. He’s a liar. He’s an embarrassment to the NFL and to its fans. I don’t care how effective his cheating was. I don’t care when it started or when it ended. I don’t care about Walsh or Specter. I don’t even care how much of the Pats’ success is owed to their cheating. The fact is that Belichick, and many of the Patriots coaches and coordinators over the years, have knowingly and willingly cheated. They have purposefully tarnished the integrity of the game and breached the bounds of fair play. They should be banned from the NFL for life and stripped of any accomplishments or awards they’ve been given. But, of course, they won’t be. Because the NFL has no interest in actually cleaning the league up. They just want to maintain the appearance that the league is clean. Because perception is reality… right? 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Very well Said!! This statement is the icing on the cake, and cherry on the sundae!!

'Nuff Said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Camacho, a Cheerleader, says: </p>
<p>May 17th, 2008 at 2:52 am<br />
Please. It’d be one thing if after being put on notice Belichick stopped. But he didn’t. He continued to cheat, after he was explicitly warned that what he was doing was cheating. So whether or not he was intentionally cheating before that (which he cleary was), he was intentionally cheating after it. He’s a cheater. He’s a liar. He’s an embarrassment to the NFL and to its fans. I don’t care how effective his cheating was. I don’t care when it started or when it ended. I don’t care about Walsh or Specter. I don’t even care how much of the Pats’ success is owed to their cheating. The fact is that Belichick, and many of the Patriots coaches and coordinators over the years, have knowingly and willingly cheated. They have purposefully tarnished the integrity of the game and breached the bounds of fair play. They should be banned from the NFL for life and stripped of any accomplishments or awards they’ve been given. But, of course, they won’t be. Because the NFL has no interest in actually cleaning the league up. They just want to maintain the appearance that the league is clean. Because perception is reality… right?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Very well Said!! This statement is the icing on the cake, and cherry on the sundae!!</p>
<p>&#8216;Nuff Said!
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31249">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackglass3</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31248</link>
		<dc:creator>blackglass3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31248</guid>
		<description>Can people overdose on jealousy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can people overdose on jealousy?
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31248">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PFTiswhatitis</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31247</link>
		<dc:creator>PFTiswhatitis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31247</guid>
		<description>Belicheck is no fool.  If you actually listen to what he siad you might have understoiod it better Florio.

The interview had nothing to do with Kraft being friends with CBS. It has more to do with the fact that Belichick respects Artmen K.  

Since you didn't understand it Florio I'll explain it.  When Belichick said that Walsh was simply a 3rd camera man and What does he know about football?  He was referring to all that was said about being on the field for the Rams walk through and how he relayed info to Daboll.  
As far as discrediting him for being fired, he was pointing out that Walsh has an agenda against the patriots. 
Is that so difficult to comprehend?  C'mon Florio.

As per the commish believing Walsh but not BB, I dont really see that he believed Walsh more that Walsh brought NOTHING to the table.  If he had something of substance then Goodell would have looked into it for proof.

As per the taping prior to 2006, if it was more or less commonplace and not cracked down on by the NFl then how can we expect to hang them for it now?

Irrational haters save your dribble.  Belichick will be back and he will once again devise schemes to crush your team without mercy.  ESPN will probably talk about piling on the points again and Pats fans will love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belicheck is no fool.  If you actually listen to what he siad you might have understoiod it better Florio.</p>
<p>The interview had nothing to do with Kraft being friends with CBS. It has more to do with the fact that Belichick respects Artmen K.  </p>
<p>Since you didn&#8217;t understand it Florio I&#8217;ll explain it.  When Belichick said that Walsh was simply a 3rd camera man and What does he know about football?  He was referring to all that was said about being on the field for the Rams walk through and how he relayed info to Daboll.<br />
As far as discrediting him for being fired, he was pointing out that Walsh has an agenda against the patriots.<br />
Is that so difficult to comprehend?  C&#8217;mon Florio.</p>
<p>As per the commish believing Walsh but not BB, I dont really see that he believed Walsh more that Walsh brought NOTHING to the table.  If he had something of substance then Goodell would have looked into it for proof.</p>
<p>As per the taping prior to 2006, if it was more or less commonplace and not cracked down on by the NFl then how can we expect to hang them for it now?</p>
<p>Irrational haters save your dribble.  Belichick will be back and he will once again devise schemes to crush your team without mercy.  ESPN will probably talk about piling on the points again and Pats fans will love it.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31247">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan1919</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31246</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan1919</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31246</guid>
		<description>Even the 2006 Memo included the phrase "Assessibility to the coaching staff during the game"

Look it up Florio.   Belichick read that clause and believed the rule was in tact.

Please explain why Matt Estrella was in plain view so anyone could see what he was doing.  If Belichick was intentionally cheating he would have put the camera man in the stands someplace where the opposing team couldnt see what he was doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even the 2006 Memo included the phrase &#8220;Assessibility to the coaching staff during the game&#8221;</p>
<p>Look it up Florio.   Belichick read that clause and believed the rule was in tact.</p>
<p>Please explain why Matt Estrella was in plain view so anyone could see what he was doing.  If Belichick was intentionally cheating he would have put the camera man in the stands someplace where the opposing team couldnt see what he was doing.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31246">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeSixPack</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31243</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeSixPack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31243</guid>
		<description>Neither the pre-2006 policy nor the post 2006 policy prohibited taping playcalling from approporiate areas... but interestingly Goodell is attempting to re-write history asserting that all playcall taping is prohibited regardless of the location - regardless of the fact that his own rules say otherwise (even the 2006 clarifying memo makes clear that taping of signals is only prohibited from certain locations.)

This creates a very interesting environment in the NFL thanks to Goodell - one where the rules are only relevant if Goodell says so - and one where Goodell can change the rules on a whim.

Of course no one among the NFL or among the media who wants to remain in Goodell's good graces is willing to call Goodell on this matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither the pre-2006 policy nor the post 2006 policy prohibited taping playcalling from approporiate areas&#8230; but interestingly Goodell is attempting to re-write history asserting that all playcall taping is prohibited regardless of the location - regardless of the fact that his own rules say otherwise (even the 2006 clarifying memo makes clear that taping of signals is only prohibited from certain locations.)</p>
<p>This creates a very interesting environment in the NFL thanks to Goodell - one where the rules are only relevant if Goodell says so - and one where Goodell can change the rules on a whim.</p>
<p>Of course no one among the NFL or among the media who wants to remain in Goodell&#8217;s good graces is willing to call Goodell on this matter.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31243">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outrage</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31242</link>
		<dc:creator>outrage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31242</guid>
		<description>Walsh is a well known liar and yet Belichick isn't allowed to fight back? When he does, the masses choose to believe Walsh is a saint and Belichick is just saying more lies?
OK, just so I'm straight on all this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walsh is a well known liar and yet Belichick isn&#8217;t allowed to fight back? When he does, the masses choose to believe Walsh is a saint and Belichick is just saying more lies?<br />
OK, just so I&#8217;m straight on all this.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31242">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drboyer5191</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31240</link>
		<dc:creator>drboyer5191</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31240</guid>
		<description>The reason Belechick does not talk is there is no reason for him to.  It a waste of time.  Everything he says is a lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason Belechick does not talk is there is no reason for him to.  It a waste of time.  Everything he says is a lie.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31240">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ESPN</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31239</link>
		<dc:creator>ESPN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31239</guid>
		<description>I thought Belichicks point about Walsh not being credible had more to do with Walsh's statement how things would be passed along to the QB during the game.  Once again, I think Bill would have made a better point and saying "hey you could believe Walsh who lead you to believe for three months that he had a video tape of the Rams walthrough, or you can believe what I said."  

Did anyone see Walsh's interview with Andrea Kremer?  I think she was way to easy on him.  She asked a question whether Bill could pick Matt out of a line up.  His response (and I quote), "I bet he could now."  I think that speaks volumes for who Matt Walsh really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Belichicks point about Walsh not being credible had more to do with Walsh&#8217;s statement how things would be passed along to the QB during the game.  Once again, I think Bill would have made a better point and saying &#8220;hey you could believe Walsh who lead you to believe for three months that he had a video tape of the Rams walthrough, or you can believe what I said.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Did anyone see Walsh&#8217;s interview with Andrea Kremer?  I think she was way to easy on him.  She asked a question whether Bill could pick Matt out of a line up.  His response (and I quote), &#8220;I bet he could now.&#8221;  I think that speaks volumes for who Matt Walsh really is.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31239">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve_70196</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31236</link>
		<dc:creator>steve_70196</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31236</guid>
		<description>The article's just fine.  The closest thing to a shortcoming is that, while it points out that Belichick said one thing, and Walsh believes another with regard to whether or not he knew he was doing anything wrong, an Belichick claims that he made no effort to hide it.  It leaves out that the Specter report detailed Walsh's testimony, that the Pats told him to do a variety of things to conceal what he was doing and make sure that he didn't get caught taping, and suggested lies in case he did get caught.  Again, the Pats knew that they were doing wrong from the get-go, and Belichick's a liar.

Belichick says that Walsh claimed to have "advised coaches" on football, but Walsh has never said that.  From what I've read, he only told coaches what he saw during a walkthrough, and a player told Walsh that the videotaping and stealing signals helped them pick off plays 75% of the time.  

The CBS bias, however small, is worth bringing up.  They're opening a multimillion dollar CBS Sports restaurant in the middle of Patriot Place, and they gave it a plug during the interview - do you really think that Keteyan was going to ask Belichick tough questions?

Belichick's got no credibility, and he makes it worse every time he speaks - like McGwire and Palmeiro at the BALCO hearings.  He and the Pats are frauds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article&#8217;s just fine.  The closest thing to a shortcoming is that, while it points out that Belichick said one thing, and Walsh believes another with regard to whether or not he knew he was doing anything wrong, an Belichick claims that he made no effort to hide it.  It leaves out that the Specter report detailed Walsh&#8217;s testimony, that the Pats told him to do a variety of things to conceal what he was doing and make sure that he didn&#8217;t get caught taping, and suggested lies in case he did get caught.  Again, the Pats knew that they were doing wrong from the get-go, and Belichick&#8217;s a liar.</p>
<p>Belichick says that Walsh claimed to have &#8220;advised coaches&#8221; on football, but Walsh has never said that.  From what I&#8217;ve read, he only told coaches what he saw during a walkthrough, and a player told Walsh that the videotaping and stealing signals helped them pick off plays 75% of the time.  </p>
<p>The CBS bias, however small, is worth bringing up.  They&#8217;re opening a multimillion dollar CBS Sports restaurant in the middle of Patriot Place, and they gave it a plug during the interview - do you really think that Keteyan was going to ask Belichick tough questions?</p>
<p>Belichick&#8217;s got no credibility, and he makes it worse every time he speaks - like McGwire and Palmeiro at the BALCO hearings.  He and the Pats are frauds.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31236">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stlrfan1</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31235</link>
		<dc:creator>Stlrfan1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31235</guid>
		<description>I'm giving Florio credit on this one.  Well thought out article and (finally) a story about this situation that doesn't attempt to make the Patriots look like the victim of a mean-spirited Matt Walsh.  

Facts - Belichick lied, Goodell didn't believe him, the public doesn't believe him (unless you're a Patriot fan), and several head coaches (current and previous) have spoken out about it.

Fact- If Matt Walsh had an axe to grind about his termination, this story would have come out years ago - closer to the time when darling Tom Brady was grabbing his head in disbelief and awe (insert gag here) after winning one of his Super Bowls. 

Fact - Belichick is considered brilliant.  That presumption and his reputation is the only thing he's trying to protect.  Both of which are forever tarnished - especially after trying to discredit a guy who obviously had something believable to say.  What has Belichick said in the last 8-9 months that anyone has believed?  He didn't know cheating was wrong? (lie), He only cheated in 2006-2007? (wrong).  

Last fact - To be fair, he grew up cheating - people like Jimmy Johnson and others have acknowledged that they've done it in the past.  However, the rules put into place in the last 7-8 years or so were put there to prevent the Jimmy Johnson era from occuring again.  Bill Belichick thought he could circumvent those rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m giving Florio credit on this one.  Well thought out article and (finally) a story about this situation that doesn&#8217;t attempt to make the Patriots look like the victim of a mean-spirited Matt Walsh.  </p>
<p>Facts - Belichick lied, Goodell didn&#8217;t believe him, the public doesn&#8217;t believe him (unless you&#8217;re a Patriot fan), and several head coaches (current and previous) have spoken out about it.</p>
<p>Fact- If Matt Walsh had an axe to grind about his termination, this story would have come out years ago - closer to the time when darling Tom Brady was grabbing his head in disbelief and awe (insert gag here) after winning one of his Super Bowls. </p>
<p>Fact - Belichick is considered brilliant.  That presumption and his reputation is the only thing he&#8217;s trying to protect.  Both of which are forever tarnished - especially after trying to discredit a guy who obviously had something believable to say.  What has Belichick said in the last 8-9 months that anyone has believed?  He didn&#8217;t know cheating was wrong? (lie), He only cheated in 2006-2007? (wrong).  </p>
<p>Last fact - To be fair, he grew up cheating - people like Jimmy Johnson and others have acknowledged that they&#8217;ve done it in the past.  However, the rules put into place in the last 7-8 years or so were put there to prevent the Jimmy Johnson era from occuring again.  Bill Belichick thought he could circumvent those rules.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31235">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smashmouthd</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31234</link>
		<dc:creator>smashmouthd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31234</guid>
		<description>OK so CBS got some kudos

What about the connection of Specter to Comcast?

What about ESPN's yearS long crusade against Belichick (lets go back to 2006 and review "the Handshake" "the Divorce" and all the other earth shattering anti-Belichick stories they could drum up) which began long before they brewed up "Spygate".

What about the fact that Walsh was FIRED, has been caught embellishing the facts, and has repeatedly been caught in falsehoods?

What about folks like Jimmy Johnson, Bill Parcells, and others who have the history and credentials who have come out and stated they had done this in the past, and knew of other teams who have done it, and that it is MUCH ado about nothing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK so CBS got some kudos</p>
<p>What about the connection of Specter to Comcast?</p>
<p>What about ESPN&#8217;s yearS long crusade against Belichick (lets go back to 2006 and review &#8220;the Handshake&#8221; &#8220;the Divorce&#8221; and all the other earth shattering anti-Belichick stories they could drum up) which began long before they brewed up &#8220;Spygate&#8221;.</p>
<p>What about the fact that Walsh was FIRED, has been caught embellishing the facts, and has repeatedly been caught in falsehoods?</p>
<p>What about folks like Jimmy Johnson, Bill Parcells, and others who have the history and credentials who have come out and stated they had done this in the past, and knew of other teams who have done it, and that it is MUCH ado about nothing?
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31234">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve_70196</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31233</link>
		<dc:creator>steve_70196</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31233</guid>
		<description>The Pats, their titles and their team are frauds.  But let Belichick talk, he'll wreck his credibility the more that he speaks. It'll be like Mark McGwire and Raffy Palmeiro at the BALCO hearings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pats, their titles and their team are frauds.  But let Belichick talk, he&#8217;ll wreck his credibility the more that he speaks. It&#8217;ll be like Mark McGwire and Raffy Palmeiro at the BALCO hearings.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31233">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grogans heroes</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31230</link>
		<dc:creator>grogans heroes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31230</guid>
		<description>Mike:

Am I missing something?  When did Belichick concede that the Sept 2006 memo left no room for misinterpretation?  Hasn't he always said he thought that memo only prohibited video taping signals for use in the same game?  That is what he said he was wrong about-thinking that the rule only prohibited videotaping for use in the same game.  As far as I know he's never said that he knew the whole practice of taping (from the sidelines) was prohibited.  I think you are misconstruing the facts here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:</p>
<p>Am I missing something?  When did Belichick concede that the Sept 2006 memo left no room for misinterpretation?  Hasn&#8217;t he always said he thought that memo only prohibited video taping signals for use in the same game?  That is what he said he was wrong about-thinking that the rule only prohibited videotaping for use in the same game.  As far as I know he&#8217;s never said that he knew the whole practice of taping (from the sidelines) was prohibited.  I think you are misconstruing the facts here.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31230">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looky Lou</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31229</link>
		<dc:creator>Looky Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31229</guid>
		<description>boy, you media people really are a piece of work....when Belichick DOESN'T talk he gets BASHED.....and when he does talk,he gets BASHED...no wonder people hate the media's guts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>boy, you media people really are a piece of work&#8230;.when Belichick DOESN&#8217;T talk he gets BASHED&#8230;..and when he does talk,he gets BASHED&#8230;no wonder people hate the media&#8217;s guts
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31229">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: castlelong1</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31227</link>
		<dc:creator>castlelong1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31227</guid>
		<description>from patsfans.com

Quote:
Q. The week before the 2002 Super Bowl against the Rams — walk me through the week.

A. Me and Steve didn’t get down until Tuesday, with all the other assistant coaches. Bill and the other players went down Monday, because they had to be there for media day on Tuesday. Since it was a short week because of 9/11, we stayed behind until Tuesday with the coaches, helping them prepare the game plan.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/16/sp...1&#38;ref=football

Its a ridiculous suggestion by Walsh and what Belichick was referring to. That and other suggestions by Walsh he was involved in game planning. And Walsh goes on to say me and Steve stayed behind until Tuesday "with all the OTHER assistant coaches." First of all, he is talking about Steve Scarnecchia, who was a video assistant like Walsh. Yet apparently, in Walsh's delusional mind, he was an assistant coach.....i.e. his reference to "all the OTHER assistant coaches" as if he is one himself. This is clearly delusional and twisted. He was a video assistant. Low level. So was Steve. He wasn't an assistant coach.

Too bad Florio didn't research this blog entry very well, obviously missing these comments by Walsh. Walsh is a desperate guy with delusions of what he was in the past being greater than the facts indicate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from patsfans.com</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
Q. The week before the 2002 Super Bowl against the Rams — walk me through the week.</p>
<p>A. Me and Steve didn’t get down until Tuesday, with all the other assistant coaches. Bill and the other players went down Monday, because they had to be there for media day on Tuesday. Since it was a short week because of 9/11, we stayed behind until Tuesday with the coaches, helping them prepare the game plan.<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/16/sp...1&amp;ref=football" rel="nofollow" class="extlink" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/16/sp&#8230;1&amp;ref=football</a></p>
<p>Its a ridiculous suggestion by Walsh and what Belichick was referring to. That and other suggestions by Walsh he was involved in game planning. And Walsh goes on to say me and Steve stayed behind until Tuesday &#8220;with all the OTHER assistant coaches.&#8221; First of all, he is talking about Steve Scarnecchia, who was a video assistant like Walsh. Yet apparently, in Walsh&#8217;s delusional mind, he was an assistant coach&#8230;..i.e. his reference to &#8220;all the OTHER assistant coaches&#8221; as if he is one himself. This is clearly delusional and twisted. He was a video assistant. Low level. So was Steve. He wasn&#8217;t an assistant coach.</p>
<p>Too bad Florio didn&#8217;t research this blog entry very well, obviously missing these comments by Walsh. Walsh is a desperate guy with delusions of what he was in the past being greater than the facts indicate.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31227">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slomojoe</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31223</link>
		<dc:creator>slomojoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31223</guid>
		<description>I suspect that by "advising coordinators" BB was referring to Walsh's claim that he gave pointers to some of the Pats' coaches about what he saw during the Rams' walk-through.  If that is the case, it doesn't really matter how sophisticated Walsh's understanding of football strategy was: any competent fan can tell an unusual formation, and of course even my kid would notice if a major player like Faulk practiced returning kicks.

On the other hand, I think BB's objection is definitely more believable with regard to the taping rule.  Suffice to say, he had been taping openly for a while, since Pats cameramen were caught a couple times, tapes exist of coaches waving at the cameras, and of course the taping during the Jets game was completely in the open.  Thus, the options are:
- Walsh's claim that he was told to hide was false;
- Walsh's claim was true, but the Pats did not think it was a big deal  to tape anyway (e.g., they thought they would not get punished, or only get a slap on the wrist if caught), so they didn't tell other cameramen;
- the Pats knew they would be in trouble if caught, but decided they would be in more trouble if caught hiding than if caught in the open (plausible deniability);
- the Pats grew complacent with time, assuming that what they were doing was not really breaking but more like stretching a rule, as a result of the league not doing anything the other times they got caught, and possibly of their knowledge that the practice was common enough (corroborated by Walsh's own claim he saw other teams taping the Pats).

The last one seems the more likely to me.  The only conclusion that doesn't hold water is that the Pats told all of their cameramen to hide because they knew they were seriously breaking a rule, but then didn't care if the cameramen did or did not follow orders.  That really doesn't jibe with BB's detail-oriented and paranoid coaching style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that by &#8220;advising coordinators&#8221; BB was referring to Walsh&#8217;s claim that he gave pointers to some of the Pats&#8217; coaches about what he saw during the Rams&#8217; walk-through.  If that is the case, it doesn&#8217;t really matter how sophisticated Walsh&#8217;s understanding of football strategy was: any competent fan can tell an unusual formation, and of course even my kid would notice if a major player like Faulk practiced returning kicks.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I think BB&#8217;s objection is definitely more believable with regard to the taping rule.  Suffice to say, he had been taping openly for a while, since Pats cameramen were caught a couple times, tapes exist of coaches waving at the cameras, and of course the taping during the Jets game was completely in the open.  Thus, the options are:<br />
- Walsh&#8217;s claim that he was told to hide was false;<br />
- Walsh&#8217;s claim was true, but the Pats did not think it was a big deal  to tape anyway (e.g., they thought they would not get punished, or only get a slap on the wrist if caught), so they didn&#8217;t tell other cameramen;<br />
- the Pats knew they would be in trouble if caught, but decided they would be in more trouble if caught hiding than if caught in the open (plausible deniability);<br />
- the Pats grew complacent with time, assuming that what they were doing was not really breaking but more like stretching a rule, as a result of the league not doing anything the other times they got caught, and possibly of their knowledge that the practice was common enough (corroborated by Walsh&#8217;s own claim he saw other teams taping the Pats).</p>
<p>The last one seems the more likely to me.  The only conclusion that doesn&#8217;t hold water is that the Pats told all of their cameramen to hide because they knew they were seriously breaking a rule, but then didn&#8217;t care if the cameramen did or did not follow orders.  That really doesn&#8217;t jibe with BB&#8217;s detail-oriented and paranoid coaching style.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31223">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1TruePatriot</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31222</link>
		<dc:creator>1TruePatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31222</guid>
		<description>look, Im just a girl. My 12 yr old son oftens corrects me on things I say stupid stuff about, so Im by no means a professional football anything. That said, heres my take on this whole mess:

The Patriots have been taping signals for years...legally until 06..illegally (ok, not &lt;i&gt;illegally&lt;/i&gt; but &lt;i&gt;against the rules&lt;/i&gt;) for ONE game, in which they were caught.
 
They really werent attempting subterfuge, they taped in the wide open, and it wasnt &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; they taped that was the issue, it was &lt;i&gt;from where&lt;/i&gt;. 

Matt Walsh is one of those guys that women hate, he brags about the things "he" has done, and glorifies them into something they just arent. "I drive a Maserati" versus "I &lt;i&gt;parked&lt;/i&gt; some rich guys Maserati at the club last night." It has some truth to it, he did drive a Maserati, but it wasnt his and it sure didnt last long, but he feels big and important by saying it.

Throughout all of this, I cannot shake the image in my mind of the pictures from the article about his wedding. The man had a bedroom that was less a man's room than said 12 year old son currently has. Can you say glory-seeker? He made it LOOK like he was something he wasnt, with all of his pats paraphanelia, but the stuff was mostly stolen. The hubris of going public with shots of the piles 'o stuff was shocking. And I have no doubt it was latched onto by the team when his name started popping up again. That same article made it sound like he did everything but wipe BBs butt. He was a THIRD STRING camera dude, who got fired for ineptitude and deceit. But that didnt look good on a resume, so he...uh...lied. (And the world believed this guy?)

What MW had to offer to anyone was nothing but a big old bowl of spoiled grapes. He had nothing new to offer. He came out of that meeting looking like even more of a schmuck than he did going in.

I wonder what his wife thinks? Or better yet, his Father-In-Law? Is he a Pats fan? Must make for some awkward silences around the table, dont you think?

I think Tomasse of the Herald is an ass. I think his explanation sucked. I think he and whoever ok'd that story should be fired, because the integrity of the paper is only as good as the lowest man n the rungs. 

I wonder what the guys on the team must have felt like, seeing that article and living with that kind of hatred and disgust (Cheatriots, Belicheat, asterisks, walkthroughs). How could they have played that game, with the wind knocked right out of them? I see them as individuals, I guess, and I cant help but wonder what it felt like for a man of great character like Tedy B to suit up that day, when he has done everything in his power to lead a good and decent life and be an example of GOOD sportsmanship? what did he tell his sons? What will they remember about this day? 

I may be one of the only fans who look forward to what you write here, and how often that is about the Patriots. I get it, it is on my mind a lot too. So thanks , even when you say things I disagree with, you say them respectfully. And you dont make things up, or at least I dont think you do, to get a scoop.

Speaking of scoops. I will ALWAYS think of Tomasse as "Scoop" from now until forever. And it isnt a good kinda scoop. I cannot imagine how he thinks he can continue to cover our beloved patriots, and that ANYONE will read his drivel ever again. He is a traitor, more hated than mangini. and that says a LOT. 

My biggest rivalry used to be the Colts. Now I just want to pummel the Jets into oblivion. Hypocritical asshats. 

If Arlen gets his way, there is gonna be HELL to pay in the NFL. But I suspect his new statements about "not seeking an investigation" are the direct result of other Senators telling him that he was beginning to sound like he needed some prozac, or something. The man is certifiably NUTS. Cause yeah, this is a big deal, in the sports world..but um...arent we at WAR? And by the way, about those gas prices? (I still cant believe no one has blamed GWB for spygate yet.)

I respect BB more now than ever. Crazy, isnt it? But he could have been blabbing this whole time, and he didnt. I &lt;i&gt;like&lt;/i&gt; his mysteriousness. Its a whole lot more manly than Mr Blabbermouth walsh. When BB talks, its worth listening to. 

I hope our team takes it all the way this year, and silences the critics. Sadly, if we dont have a GOOD showing, we will forever be tarnished, and people will say we only won because we cheated. we did cheat. in ONE game. Boy would I love old Arlen to prove that we werent the ONLY ones. But then again, thats a can o worms that would likely destroy the NFL as we know it, and even for revenge, I wont go there.

Oh...one more thing. Yeah, Im old. Middle aged, work my ass off. and yep, I PROUDLY wear my bruschi jersey...still. and no, I couldnt probably run the length of a football field. and no, I dont care what ANYONE thinks. They're my team, and I love em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look, Im just a girl. My 12 yr old son oftens corrects me on things I say stupid stuff about, so Im by no means a professional football anything. That said, heres my take on this whole mess:</p>
<p>The Patriots have been taping signals for years&#8230;legally until 06..illegally (ok, not <i>illegally</i> but <i>against the rules</i>) for ONE game, in which they were caught.</p>
<p>They really werent attempting subterfuge, they taped in the wide open, and it wasnt <i>that</i> they taped that was the issue, it was <i>from where</i>. </p>
<p>Matt Walsh is one of those guys that women hate, he brags about the things &#8220;he&#8221; has done, and glorifies them into something they just arent. &#8220;I drive a Maserati&#8221; versus &#8220;I <i>parked</i> some rich guys Maserati at the club last night.&#8221; It has some truth to it, he did drive a Maserati, but it wasnt his and it sure didnt last long, but he feels big and important by saying it.</p>
<p>Throughout all of this, I cannot shake the image in my mind of the pictures from the article about his wedding. The man had a bedroom that was less a man&#8217;s room than said 12 year old son currently has. Can you say glory-seeker? He made it LOOK like he was something he wasnt, with all of his pats paraphanelia, but the stuff was mostly stolen. The hubris of going public with shots of the piles &#8216;o stuff was shocking. And I have no doubt it was latched onto by the team when his name started popping up again. That same article made it sound like he did everything but wipe BBs butt. He was a THIRD STRING camera dude, who got fired for ineptitude and deceit. But that didnt look good on a resume, so he&#8230;uh&#8230;lied. (And the world believed this guy?)</p>
<p>What MW had to offer to anyone was nothing but a big old bowl of spoiled grapes. He had nothing new to offer. He came out of that meeting looking like even more of a schmuck than he did going in.</p>
<p>I wonder what his wife thinks? Or better yet, his Father-In-Law? Is he a Pats fan? Must make for some awkward silences around the table, dont you think?</p>
<p>I think Tomasse of the Herald is an ass. I think his explanation sucked. I think he and whoever ok&#8217;d that story should be fired, because the integrity of the paper is only as good as the lowest man n the rungs. </p>
<p>I wonder what the guys on the team must have felt like, seeing that article and living with that kind of hatred and disgust (Cheatriots, Belicheat, asterisks, walkthroughs). How could they have played that game, with the wind knocked right out of them? I see them as individuals, I guess, and I cant help but wonder what it felt like for a man of great character like Tedy B to suit up that day, when he has done everything in his power to lead a good and decent life and be an example of GOOD sportsmanship? what did he tell his sons? What will they remember about this day? </p>
<p>I may be one of the only fans who look forward to what you write here, and how often that is about the Patriots. I get it, it is on my mind a lot too. So thanks , even when you say things I disagree with, you say them respectfully. And you dont make things up, or at least I dont think you do, to get a scoop.</p>
<p>Speaking of scoops. I will ALWAYS think of Tomasse as &#8220;Scoop&#8221; from now until forever. And it isnt a good kinda scoop. I cannot imagine how he thinks he can continue to cover our beloved patriots, and that ANYONE will read his drivel ever again. He is a traitor, more hated than mangini. and that says a LOT. </p>
<p>My biggest rivalry used to be the Colts. Now I just want to pummel the Jets into oblivion. Hypocritical asshats. </p>
<p>If Arlen gets his way, there is gonna be HELL to pay in the NFL. But I suspect his new statements about &#8220;not seeking an investigation&#8221; are the direct result of other Senators telling him that he was beginning to sound like he needed some prozac, or something. The man is certifiably NUTS. Cause yeah, this is a big deal, in the sports world..but um&#8230;arent we at WAR? And by the way, about those gas prices? (I still cant believe no one has blamed GWB for spygate yet.)</p>
<p>I respect BB more now than ever. Crazy, isnt it? But he could have been blabbing this whole time, and he didnt. I <i>like</i> his mysteriousness. Its a whole lot more manly than Mr Blabbermouth walsh. When BB talks, its worth listening to. </p>
<p>I hope our team takes it all the way this year, and silences the critics. Sadly, if we dont have a GOOD showing, we will forever be tarnished, and people will say we only won because we cheated. we did cheat. in ONE game. Boy would I love old Arlen to prove that we werent the ONLY ones. But then again, thats a can o worms that would likely destroy the NFL as we know it, and even for revenge, I wont go there.</p>
<p>Oh&#8230;one more thing. Yeah, Im old. Middle aged, work my ass off. and yep, I PROUDLY wear my bruschi jersey&#8230;still. and no, I couldnt probably run the length of a football field. and no, I dont care what ANYONE thinks. They&#8217;re my team, and I love em.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31222">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob21hatesyou</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31221</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob21hatesyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31221</guid>
		<description>HA HA

Look at all the little cheating maggots trying to destroy you now Mike. Of course earlier this week they were in love with you. Fickle little hyenas- they are as dirty as their cheating coach.

Face it cheaters, the interview- all 15 minutes of it, is garbage. Bill is a liar. Bill knows that he's playing a game because he knows while he didn't directly tell Walsh not to get caught his compadre in cheating- Ernie Adams did. Bill also knows that this lame claim that Walsh doesn't know anything about football is a bunch of junk. All Walsh claimed was to have advised Romeo of someone doing the same thing and yet Bill wants to make it seem like Walsh was implying he was giving advice on what plays to call. Face it cheaters, Bill doesn't know anything about football either, he only knows how to lie and cheat. 

No one is as stupid as Bill and the rest of you idiots thinks, we know that these other guys that Bill paid to do this were producing tapes in 2002+ that were used during the games.

Your Super Bowls are meaningless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA HA</p>
<p>Look at all the little cheating maggots trying to destroy you now Mike. Of course earlier this week they were in love with you. Fickle little hyenas- they are as dirty as their cheating coach.</p>
<p>Face it cheaters, the interview- all 15 minutes of it, is garbage. Bill is a liar. Bill knows that he&#8217;s playing a game because he knows while he didn&#8217;t directly tell Walsh not to get caught his compadre in cheating- Ernie Adams did. Bill also knows that this lame claim that Walsh doesn&#8217;t know anything about football is a bunch of junk. All Walsh claimed was to have advised Romeo of someone doing the same thing and yet Bill wants to make it seem like Walsh was implying he was giving advice on what plays to call. Face it cheaters, Bill doesn&#8217;t know anything about football either, he only knows how to lie and cheat. </p>
<p>No one is as stupid as Bill and the rest of you idiots thinks, we know that these other guys that Bill paid to do this were producing tapes in 2002+ that were used during the games.</p>
<p>Your Super Bowls are meaningless.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31221">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeSixPack</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31218</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeSixPack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 11:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31218</guid>
		<description>...and the team that Walsh witnessed "cheating" as everyone calls it (even though the NFL's rule had a gaping loophole that the NFL actually recognized and closed in 2006) was?

What?  You mean NO ONE at the New York Times, in the Commissioner's office, or in the United States Senate sought to ask Walsh the most basic of all follow up questions to such a bombshell announcement?

Am I the only one who gets the feeling they don't WANT to know?  They've got a handy scapegoat... the last thing everyone wants is to do is entertain the notion that some, most or all teams cheat in some way or another.

It's just amazing they get away with this even when someone makes an announcement in the NY times - they think no one will notice or wonder why they didn't ask the natural next question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and the team that Walsh witnessed &#8220;cheating&#8221; as everyone calls it (even though the NFL&#8217;s rule had a gaping loophole that the NFL actually recognized and closed in 2006) was?</p>
<p>What?  You mean NO ONE at the New York Times, in the Commissioner&#8217;s office, or in the United States Senate sought to ask Walsh the most basic of all follow up questions to such a bombshell announcement?</p>
<p>Am I the only one who gets the feeling they don&#8217;t WANT to know?  They&#8217;ve got a handy scapegoat&#8230; the last thing everyone wants is to do is entertain the notion that some, most or all teams cheat in some way or another.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just amazing they get away with this even when someone makes an announcement in the NY times - they think no one will notice or wonder why they didn&#8217;t ask the natural next question.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31218">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outrage</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31217</link>
		<dc:creator>outrage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 11:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31217</guid>
		<description>If Walsh was instructed to conceal what he was doing, why woul he be in full Patriot gear, viewable to 70,000 people?
That seems to be a major point of contention yet it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. The Patriots went to "great lengths..." to conceal what they were doing? Please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Walsh was instructed to conceal what he was doing, why woul he be in full Patriot gear, viewable to 70,000 people?<br />
That seems to be a major point of contention yet it doesn&#8217;t make a whole lot of sense. The Patriots went to &#8220;great lengths&#8230;&#8221; to conceal what they were doing? Please.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31217">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31216</link>
		<dc:creator>All Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 11:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31216</guid>
		<description>Good post Florio.  I only disagree with one thing.  You said that many who watched the CBS report will not recognize that Goodell agreed with Walsh.  I think that most honest, objective fans are well aware of that.  This New Englander is willing to admit that Belichick cheated and is now lying about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Florio.  I only disagree with one thing.  You said that many who watched the CBS report will not recognize that Goodell agreed with Walsh.  I think that most honest, objective fans are well aware of that.  This New Englander is willing to admit that Belichick cheated and is now lying about it.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31216">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31215</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 10:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31215</guid>
		<description>The fact that mediots like Mike Florio now embrace Matt Walsh as a truthful source of info is really hilarious. Not surprising but quite funny. The 3rd video assistant on the Patriots was game planning with the coaches? That is what Walsh told the NY Times. How long before Walsh, who was fired for secretly taping conversations of Scott Pioli (Did the mediots who interviewed Walsh ask him about that??) is hired my some mediot outfit to do NFL analysis. Hey why not? Walsh is as trustworthy and knowledgable as most mediots working the NFL beat.
Hey Mike Florio is shooting video "conducted in secrecy" when it's done out in the open on the sidelines in front of 70,000 people with opposing coaches waving at the camera?
And you wonder why we call you mediots? ha ha ha ha ha 
As I said in an earlier post for the Florio's and other mediots this is all about being obsessed with Bill Belichick and his refusal to suck the media lollipop and has very little to do with the breaking of an NFL "rule". If this is any other NFL coach this story is over in two weeks.  
Spygate has been a living breathing example of an agenda driven media feeding frenzy generated because of a personal dislike for their target.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that mediots like Mike Florio now embrace Matt Walsh as a truthful source of info is really hilarious. Not surprising but quite funny. The 3rd video assistant on the Patriots was game planning with the coaches? That is what Walsh told the NY Times. How long before Walsh, who was fired for secretly taping conversations of Scott Pioli (Did the mediots who interviewed Walsh ask him about that??) is hired my some mediot outfit to do NFL analysis. Hey why not? Walsh is as trustworthy and knowledgable as most mediots working the NFL beat.<br />
Hey Mike Florio is shooting video &#8220;conducted in secrecy&#8221; when it&#8217;s done out in the open on the sidelines in front of 70,000 people with opposing coaches waving at the camera?<br />
And you wonder why we call you mediots? ha ha ha ha ha<br />
As I said in an earlier post for the Florio&#8217;s and other mediots this is all about being obsessed with Bill Belichick and his refusal to suck the media lollipop and has very little to do with the breaking of an NFL &#8220;rule&#8221;. If this is any other NFL coach this story is over in two weeks.<br />
Spygate has been a living breathing example of an agenda driven media feeding frenzy generated because of a personal dislike for their target.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31215">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbarian</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31213</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 10:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31213</guid>
		<description>Belichick is a grade A anus.  Plain and simple.  His coaching record sucked before he started taping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belichick is a grade A anus.  Plain and simple.  His coaching record sucked before he started taping.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31213">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outrage</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31212</link>
		<dc:creator>outrage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 10:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31212</guid>
		<description>I think what got Belichick riled about was Walsh
was Walsh telling people and publications that he was a scout
in his last year with the Patriots. He was not an area college scout.
You can choose to not believe anything Belichick says.
But it's unfair to not look into all of Matt Walsh's misstatements and
inconsistencies while only choosing to call out Belichick for 
having the nerve to counter-attack.
I realize the Patriots are expected to just take all the shots
lest they be attacked even more for fighting back.
But they're only going to take so much before they're forced to strike back, even though it's fight that can't be won in the media.
The Patriots are all alone, but I know there's plenty of silenty hypocricy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what got Belichick riled about was Walsh<br />
was Walsh telling people and publications that he was a scout<br />
in his last year with the Patriots. He was not an area college scout.<br />
You can choose to not believe anything Belichick says.<br />
But it&#8217;s unfair to not look into all of Matt Walsh&#8217;s misstatements and<br />
inconsistencies while only choosing to call out Belichick for<br />
having the nerve to counter-attack.<br />
I realize the Patriots are expected to just take all the shots<br />
lest they be attacked even more for fighting back.<br />
But they&#8217;re only going to take so much before they&#8217;re forced to strike back, even though it&#8217;s fight that can&#8217;t be won in the media.<br />
The Patriots are all alone, but I know there&#8217;s plenty of silenty hypocricy.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31212">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mongo6901</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31211</link>
		<dc:creator>mongo6901</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 10:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31211</guid>
		<description>Good lord, people, just let it go...

It ain't worth the oxygen or keystrokes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good lord, people, just let it go&#8230;</p>
<p>It ain&#8217;t worth the oxygen or keystrokes&#8230;
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31211">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bundgaard</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31210</link>
		<dc:creator>bundgaard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 10:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31210</guid>
		<description>does Belichick realize that his own credibility isn't exactly shooting through the roof these days???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does Belichick realize that his own credibility isn&#8217;t exactly shooting through the roof these days???
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31210">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian_21</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31205</link>
		<dc:creator>brian_21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 09:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31205</guid>
		<description>Bill Belichick is ticked, and he is unloading his anger. Let him be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Belichick is ticked, and he is unloading his anger. Let him be.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31205">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stugacz</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31203</link>
		<dc:creator>stugacz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 09:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31203</guid>
		<description>Hey Cowboy (Florio):

Thanks for the opinion.

For those of us who no longer shive a git, do you think it possible to move on to other "infotainment"!

Thanks,

Chief</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Cowboy (Florio):</p>
<p>Thanks for the opinion.</p>
<p>For those of us who no longer shive a git, do you think it possible to move on to other &#8220;infotainment&#8221;!</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Chief
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31203">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Plainview</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31202</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Plainview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 09:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31202</guid>
		<description>anyone can tape signals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anyone can tape signals.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31202">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roofdog</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31200</link>
		<dc:creator>roofdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 08:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31200</guid>
		<description>Hey facts you would love to have him as your coach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey facts you would love to have him as your coach.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31200">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bondem777</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31199</link>
		<dc:creator>bondem777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 08:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31199</guid>
		<description>SeanMartin, as one of the "unintelligent crowd," I laugh at those of you who think you are so smart that you're beyond common sense.  Do you actually believe that Bellichick didn't know what he was doing was wrong?  I bet you've never had a teenager because as a Mom I've heard excuses like that many a time and I can tell you it would lame even for a teenager, and a  totally ridiculous excuse for a coach of a professional football team to try.   I don't claim to be a football expert, but I know a line of BS when I hear it.  I also think that if I was handed a video camera and told to film the coaches on the sideline, even in my "unintelligent" state I could figure out what they wanted from the film.  

I laugh at your self importance Sean Martin.  Grow up.  

I also have to say I thought this site was biased towards the Patriots, but this article is fair and well written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SeanMartin, as one of the &#8220;unintelligent crowd,&#8221; I laugh at those of you who think you are so smart that you&#8217;re beyond common sense.  Do you actually believe that Bellichick didn&#8217;t know what he was doing was wrong?  I bet you&#8217;ve never had a teenager because as a Mom I&#8217;ve heard excuses like that many a time and I can tell you it would lame even for a teenager, and a  totally ridiculous excuse for a coach of a professional football team to try.   I don&#8217;t claim to be a football expert, but I know a line of BS when I hear it.  I also think that if I was handed a video camera and told to film the coaches on the sideline, even in my &#8220;unintelligent&#8221; state I could figure out what they wanted from the film.  </p>
<p>I laugh at your self importance Sean Martin.  Grow up.  </p>
<p>I also have to say I thought this site was biased towards the Patriots, but this article is fair and well written.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31199">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreeAgentPro</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31196</link>
		<dc:creator>FreeAgentPro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 08:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31196</guid>
		<description>Well, Mike, I applaud you for telling it like it is and risk alienating the Patriot jock suckers. I used to think you aimed your message at the masses, but you are finally addressing the hypocricy of the Patriot organization. When Belichick opens his unrepentent mouth on national TV , it must make Goodell squirm as he imagines Sen. Specter livid all over again. As much as Goodell would like to close the book on Spygate, he knows most fans suspect that only the tip of the unscrupulous iceberg has been discovered thus far from Belichicks book of tricks. With all the recent focus on the 'incompetent' 3rd video assistant, why hasn't Goodell reported what the more responsible 1st and 2nd videomen over the past 8 years have to say, as well as Ernie Adams and his crew of assistants? Could it be that Belichick's CBS rant was also a warning shot across the bow of any other Patriot employee who might want to blow the whistle as well. The message clearly was Belichick will destroy anyone who dares to challenge his domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Mike, I applaud you for telling it like it is and risk alienating the Patriot jock suckers. I used to think you aimed your message at the masses, but you are finally addressing the hypocricy of the Patriot organization. When Belichick opens his unrepentent mouth on national TV , it must make Goodell squirm as he imagines Sen. Specter livid all over again. As much as Goodell would like to close the book on Spygate, he knows most fans suspect that only the tip of the unscrupulous iceberg has been discovered thus far from Belichicks book of tricks. With all the recent focus on the &#8216;incompetent&#8217; 3rd video assistant, why hasn&#8217;t Goodell reported what the more responsible 1st and 2nd videomen over the past 8 years have to say, as well as Ernie Adams and his crew of assistants? Could it be that Belichick&#8217;s CBS rant was also a warning shot across the bow of any other Patriot employee who might want to blow the whistle as well. The message clearly was Belichick will destroy anyone who dares to challenge his domain.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31196">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazzaman12</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31195</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazzaman12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 07:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31195</guid>
		<description>Walsh knew he was part of something big. Belichick did to. Why else would Walsh secretly record meetings with Scott Pioli.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walsh knew he was part of something big. Belichick did to. Why else would Walsh secretly record meetings with Scott Pioli.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31195">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubba</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31193</link>
		<dc:creator>bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 06:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31193</guid>
		<description>This makes me laugh.  It insenuates that Belichek did not know it was bcheating before 06 but when he found out, he continued to do it.  He knew it the whole time.  AND IF TAPING DID NOT GIVE AN ADVANTAGE, THEN WHY CONTINUE TO DO IT AFTER IT WAS MADE CLEAR TO BELLICHEK THAT IT WAS NOT ALLOWED.  BS.  The question is not if Walsh is credible, it is did you cheat knowingly or unknowingly when and how?  Why should we believe that it was only a couple of times?  This WHOLE thing freaking Stinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes me laugh.  It insenuates that Belichek did not know it was bcheating before 06 but when he found out, he continued to do it.  He knew it the whole time.  AND IF TAPING DID NOT GIVE AN ADVANTAGE, THEN WHY CONTINUE TO DO IT AFTER IT WAS MADE CLEAR TO BELLICHEK THAT IT WAS NOT ALLOWED.  BS.  The question is not if Walsh is credible, it is did you cheat knowingly or unknowingly when and how?  Why should we believe that it was only a couple of times?  This WHOLE thing freaking Stinks.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31193">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: President Camacho</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31192</link>
		<dc:creator>President Camacho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 06:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31192</guid>
		<description>Please. It'd be one thing if after being put on notice Belichick stopped. But he didn't. He continued to cheat, after he was explicitly warned that what he was doing was cheating. So whether or not he was intentionally cheating before that (which he cleary was), he was intentionally cheating after it. He's a cheater. He's a liar. He's an embarrassment to the NFL and to its fans. I don't care how effective his cheating was. I don't care when it started or when it ended. I don't care about Walsh or Specter. I don't even care how much of the Pats' success is owed to their cheating. The fact is that Belichick, and many of the Patriots coaches and coordinators over the years, have knowingly and willingly cheated. They have purposefully tarnished the integrity of the game and breached the bounds of fair play. They should be banned from the NFL for life and stripped of any accomplishments or awards they've been given. But, of course, they won't be. Because the NFL has no interest in actually cleaning the league up. They just want to maintain the appearance that the league is clean. Because perception is reality... right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please. It&#8217;d be one thing if after being put on notice Belichick stopped. But he didn&#8217;t. He continued to cheat, after he was explicitly warned that what he was doing was cheating. So whether or not he was intentionally cheating before that (which he cleary was), he was intentionally cheating after it. He&#8217;s a cheater. He&#8217;s a liar. He&#8217;s an embarrassment to the NFL and to its fans. I don&#8217;t care how effective his cheating was. I don&#8217;t care when it started or when it ended. I don&#8217;t care about Walsh or Specter. I don&#8217;t even care how much of the Pats&#8217; success is owed to their cheating. The fact is that Belichick, and many of the Patriots coaches and coordinators over the years, have knowingly and willingly cheated. They have purposefully tarnished the integrity of the game and breached the bounds of fair play. They should be banned from the NFL for life and stripped of any accomplishments or awards they&#8217;ve been given. But, of course, they won&#8217;t be. Because the NFL has no interest in actually cleaning the league up. They just want to maintain the appearance that the league is clean. Because perception is reality&#8230; right?
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31192">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mactator</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31190</link>
		<dc:creator>Mactator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 06:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/05/16/belichick-takes-aim-at-walsh/#comment-31190</guid>
		<description>The only good thing that happened out of this whole fiasco is that the cheaters got embarrassed in the Super Bowl.  It's kind of sad when cheaters can't find a way to win the big one.  I guess there is some truth to karma after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only good thing that happened out of this whole fiasco is that the cheaters got embarrassed in the Super Bowl.  It&#8217;s kind of sad when cheaters can&#8217;t find a way to win the big one.  I guess there is some truth to karma after all.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=31190">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
