Brian Urlacher continued his media tour by chatting with Vaughn McClure of the Chicago Tribune, who didn’t credit Michael Silver of Yahoo! for the initial scoop, about his plans to skip minicamp.  And roughly $8,000 in fines isn’t going to be enough to shake Urlacher into changing his mind.

“Yeah, it would bug me to get fined, but it’s my choice,” he said. “Unless something happens [with the contract] between now and then, I won’t be there.”

Urlacher’s got every right to ask for more money but it’s hard to find much about his complaints to agree with.  He signed a nine-year contract and then uses a rise in the salary cap as part of his rationale for wanting a new deal.  What did he think would happen over the course of a decade?  He either got bad advice or misunderstood the nature of a contract, either way that’s his own fault.

His other gripe, the right of a team to cut a player if they don’t perform, is a long-standing issue in the CBA between the league and the players.  It should be revisited, but Urlacher and others need to realize their signing bonuses will have to come down as a result, because that’s what they get for giving up guaranteed money down the road.

The Bears made a reasonable offer to Urlacher, a $5 million bonus with $1 million per year through reachable playing time incentives and one more year tacked on with $9 million base salary, and he rejected it.  My guess is he wants more up front because he’s worried about making it through the life of the contract.

Urlacher says he’s healthy, “my neck is not an issue, my back is sweet,” but those are both injuries that have a nasty habit of coming back.  It doesn’t make any sense for the Bears to take on that risk by issuing a larger signing bonus, though it would help explain why Urlacher wants all that money right now.