NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell has announced that former Patriots video employee Matt Walsh has provided him with no new evidence of cheating by the team, beyond the information that already has been discovered and disclosed regarding the taping of coaching signals.
Most importantly, Goodell said that Walsh claims there is no evidence of any videotape of the Rams’ walk-through prior to Super Bowl XXXVI. Walsh told Goodell that Walsh didn’t tape it, that he was not aware of anyone who might have taped it, that he hasn’t seen it, and that he knows of no one who taped it. Walsh also said that he was in Superdome at the time of the walk-through, that he was going about his required busines, and that he was on sidelines in Patriots gear while the Rams were practicing.
Goodell said that Walsh also is aware of no other violations of league rules of policies by the Patriots. Goodell specifically ruled out evidence of bugging of locker rooms, manipulation of communications systems, augmenting of crowd noises, and/or placing microphones on players to pick up opponents’ audibles or signals by the Patriots.
Walsh supplied only two new pieces of information — that the Pats used a player on injured reserve during a practice in 2001, and that Walsh was involved in the scalping of eight to ten Super Bowl tickets. As to the former, Goodell claimed that the penalty for using a player in practice who is on injured reserve is the imposition of a fine. But Goodell said that there will be no additional penalty, given the $750,000 in fines previously imposed on the team.
Walsh told Goodell that he wasn’t looking for publicity, and that when Walsh hinted that there was more evidence of cheating to the New York Times, Walsh was under the impression that it wasn’t well known that the practice dated back to the 2000 season.
And that’s because it wasn’t well known. Though the NFL has tried to perpetuate the notion that the Pats ‘fessed up to taping it has been common knowledge since September, it wasn’t widely reported until February 2008.
Finally, and we hope that the people at ESPN were listening closely to this, Goodell said that Walsh’s tapes weren’t used during the same game.
_2.gif)





May 13th, 2008 at 1:07 pm
What about Ernie Adams? He was the head of the Pats’ video Dept and Belichick’s right hand man right? Does this mean that Adams’ role in the organization isn’t sinister?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:07 pm
I got over the Super Bowl loss faster than the “haters” will get over this.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:08 pm
Not if they were aimed at the coaches. You can tame from the HEZ if you’re making coaches tape for scouting and game planning, but you can’t use the position to record defensive signals.
-C
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:09 pm
The haters will now say that Matt Walsh is a scumbag and can’t be trusted….yet, had he said what they hoped he’d say, he would be a highly reputable source!!
And, to the poster above citing (once AGAIN) that the Pats are ‘cheaters” and their reputation is tainted….that’s OLD NEWS!!
That perspective has been around since September of ‘07!! Time to find a new soapbox!!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:09 pm
This entire drama is more of an indictment on current journalistic practices than on the NFL. Shame on you to The NY Times, Boston Herald, and ESPN to name a few.
haters: feel free to crawl back under your rocks now.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:10 pm
bc_22, I would say that the 49ers being busted for tampering would qualifying as the League also branding them cheaters. Of course, those who hate the Patriots will never admit that anything any other team did qualifies as cheating. Yeah, facts are stubborn things, including the ones that show other teams cheated too.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
Yes, yes they would.
Clayton making a good point now on ESPN saying this issue is similar to the 49ers issue of breaking the salary cap rules during their SB runs.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:14 pm
Rob0769: Mark Schlereth kept going after the press conference. Now there is a contradiction. Walsh said he had the tape in his possession the entire game and never used during the game. Then after the game he labeled it and gave it to Ernie Adams. He said he then had no idea what happened to it. So you see, because he has no idea what happened to the tape, it could’ve been used during the game, according to Mark Schlereth.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
The videos themselves are legal. The only thing wrong with the tapes is the location from which they were shot.
Again, Goodell admitted that taping of the opponents signals are permissable. The location is the only thing the Patriots did wrong.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
they paid walsh off
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.2 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
So this is how it ends, huh? After looking at the tapes and listening to the former players on ESPN, as well as reviewing the punishment for taping during only “the 2006 season/2007 preseason” I can’t help but feel there should be more done about this. We have a coach that didn’t understand the rules, tapes that were destroyed immediately by the league, and yet the Patriots still pick up a first-round pick.
Now I’m just a normal fan… I get the Sunday Ticket every year, buy jerseys for myself and the kids every year and take in at least 2 game a season. I feel vested in the NFL and frankly feel kind of betrayed by the league. “Everyone else does it”? Stop with that…there needs to be more done about this. If we’re holding players to higher conduct standards now, why not the coaches and owners? A high school coach would have been sent packing for this.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.1 / 5 with 10 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
You can file this one under “Least Surprising Headline of the Day”.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:28 pm
Weren’t the Patriots caught transferring the tapes at half time of the Jets game last year? That is inconsistent with turning them over after the game.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 13th, 2008 at 1:31 pm
“Not if they were aimed at the coaches. You can tame from the HEZ if you’re making coaches tape for scouting and game planning, but you can’t use the position to record defensive signals.”
Sorry, but thats wrong. As long as the video is not being used during the game, you’re free to film anything you like as long as it is done from the approved areas (enclosed on all sides, roof overhead, I don’t remember the phrase word-for-word).
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:33 pm
Insomniac,
So Schlereth thinks Ernie Adams has a timemachine now? Wow! I knew he wasn’t the brightest bulb on the tree, but come on! Goodell said Walsh said he gave Adams the tape AFTER the game. How can they use it in the game? Stinky is grasping desperately to not look like the moron he is.
I know they press portray Ernie Adams as an evil genius, but apparently he is a mad scientist too. He could do what Einstein didn’t - bend space and time.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 13th, 2008 at 1:34 pm
Maybe, and I’m just spit-balling here, the reason the initial reports of the Patriots being punished for taping during the “2006 season/2007 preseason” and confusion regarding how long the Patriots had been doing this is due to the open-ended wording of the original rule. The NFL realized there was a loop-hole that was being exploited and closed it off with the memo issued to all 32 teams. Therefore the Commish felt he could only punish the team for violations that occurred after his memo, because while they violated the spirit of the rule they never violated the wording of the initial rule.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 13th, 2008 at 1:35 pm
“I got over the Super Bowl loss faster than the “haters” will get over this.”
Damn, wish I could agree with you on this, but I’m still in denial mode. I don’t think I’ll be on to step 12 until the season starts again. Of course, the haters will still be shaking their tiny fists of fury about this until sometime in the mid-2010’s.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 13th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
Well it seems like everyone is falling into one of three categories:
Category 1- The Patriot lovers who would defend the team no matter what happened and don’t think the Patriots should have been punished at all even though they did break a rule and though it is small, it is still cheating. They aren’t liking being at the top and having everybody throw stuff at them.
Category 2- The ESPN crowd who just plain doesn’t like the Patriots or Bill Beeeeelichick and no matter what will say they won because they cheated. Which is pretty moronic. Look I am no Patriots fan, but I think players like Brady, Brown, Bruschi, Law, Harrison, Vrabel, and Poole (ha ha just kidding there) were the reson they won 3 in 4 years. This category of people will say they were the only ones cheating and either don’t understand the game, or just plain don’t like the team.
Category 3- The people who beliueve that although small they did break the rules and that does consist of cheating, Beeeeelichick’s arrogance is what caused this penalty, but it is now over and you all need to let it go. This is where I fall. The draft is over, they were penalized, it is over, let’s move on. Training camp starts in a few weeks (Except for my bengals, it starts after the probation for half the team ends)
In the end though it is fun watching Category 1 and 2 fight amongst each other.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:37 pm
beninaz,
I can see why you are upset. Get caught up with the facts and maybe you won’t. Chris Mortensen reported back in September or October that the Pats were punished for taping as far back as 2000.
Using ESPN as your source is part of your problem too. Schlereth is taking the high ground because he would never play for a cheater except both of his Super Bowl rings were a direct result of the Broncos cheating the cap.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 13th, 2008 at 1:41 pm
jdog1, a Cheerleader, says:
Members of the 1919 Blacksox were banned for life for throwing a game. Too bad, Roger Goodell doesn’t have the same standards that the baseball commissioner at the time did (then again Commiskey was too cheap to pay off anybody, unlike Kraft).
If he did have the same standards, the Colts and Titans would have been banned for life.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 13th, 2008 at 1:41 pm
LOL.. REJOICE Patsy fans…
Like we all said, “nothing new”… PFT and the media hinted otherwise - All most claimed was that he was a Cheat and he IS.
Your guy is still a Cheating, adulturer, Lying sack.. But, not THAT much of one….. lol.
But, REJOICE!!!!!!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 13th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
In a related story, Matt Walsh’s bank account is now $300 million richer. Thanks NFL!
Its sad to think that a team can cheat for the better part of a decade, win multiple Super Bowls, then lose 1 draft pick and pay some pocket change. How’s that for justice?
Also, if they weren’t using the signals in the same game, what would be the point of taping them in a playoff game?
Someone obviously paid Matt Walsh a boatload of hush money. My only question is whether it was the Pats or whole NFL.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:44 pm
why would Walsh know anything about any bugging or electronic interference anyway? he’s a video assistant.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:48 pm
beninaz - I don’t feel betrayed. The Patriots didn’t ‘pick up a first-round pick’ they lost one.
I guarantee right now, if you’d have said to the NE heirachy in 2001 that this was illegal and the punishment could be losing a first rounder down the line… they’d have stopped. Gambling away draft picks is not how the better franchises (The Pats, Colts, Chargers) have built up their dominance.
I’m no Pats fan at all, but I’d like to see a line drawn under this purely for the reason that it looks like NFL fans are petty, small-minded and unreasonable people.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:53 pm
I wouldn’t say this will never go away. I’m a Pats fan (all boston sports for that matter) and how often do people bring up things about the Red Sox past. This is going to be mentioned for years, it is what it is they got caught and they got punished. Now the only thing I have to disagree with is Kate773 comment that the Patriots are the only one team branded as cheaters. The Pats do have a fraternity in that club:
The Miami Dolphins in the 70’s they got busted for tampering with Don Shula the cost one first round pick, they also won some super bowls
The Denver Broncos in 96-98 circumvented the cap (to the uneducated they reportly paid less for their players to cheat the cap in order to have a stacked line up) the cost 950,000 a third-round pick. If I am not mistaken they won a couple of Super Bowls
The 49ers did the samething the broncos did in 97 their punishment:
$300,000 fine and give up a 5th round draft choice in 2001 and a 3rd round choice in 2002 a bit more drastic than the Broncos, maybe they cheated in 95 when they won their last super bowl wh.
The 49ers again got busted but this time for tampering in 2008 their punishment they had to give their 5th rounder to Chicago and flipped 3rd round picks with Chicago.
So let me ask you this besides it being the most current occurance of cheating why are the Patriots any different than these organizations? Why is there no talk of asterisks after their Super Bowl Victories. All these teams cheated and they got punished, I think what the Pats did was stupid and they got caught thinking they probably never would be. Go ahead and hate on the Patriots and call me a Patriots apologist but at least do some research so you have a leg to stand on when say: “The fact remains that only one team has been officially branded by the NFL as cheaters. That team is the New England Patriots.”
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.2 / 5 with 5 rating(s)