Like several other members of the Chicago Bears over the past few seasons, linebacker Brian Urlacher has boycotted voluntary drills in protest of his contract.
Unlike his colleagues, Urlacher might stay away from a mandatory minicamp that opens on May 30.
“I would bet I wouldn’t be there,” Urlacher told Michael Silver of Yahoo! Sports. “My agents and the team had some good dialogue early on, but nothing’s happened lately. It’s been almost two months since there’s been any action on their end, and it’s a waiting game right now.”
Does this mean that Urlacher also might not show for training camp? “I haven’t even thought about it. I’m hoping it doesn’t get that far.”
Urlacher also addressed the root of the problem — his desire to tear up a contract that has four years left on it. “It’s easy for people to criticize me for wanting [a new deal], and I understand that it’s a contract and I signed it,” Urlacher said. “But this is the NFL, and if I’d signed it and I’d played like [expletive], they’d have cut me or tried to get me to take less. In my mind, there’s no difference. If they can ‘break’ a contract, I have a right to ask for more if I play well enough.”
Hey, Brian — take it up with Upshaw. The union that Gene Upshaw runs has agreed to a system that allows a team to legally cut a player who “plays like [expletive].” The system doesn’t allow the player to cut a team that “pays like [expletive].”
The Bears are within their rights to insist on Urlacher honoring his contract. If they are willing to suffer the possibility that Urlacher will get miffed and/or might retire early, that’s the Bears’ prerogative.
And the Bears have already done dumber things. Look no farther than their current depth chart at quarterback for proof of it.
_2.gif)





May 13th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
i am so sick of reading about these asssclowns and wanting a new contract one or two years after signing their current contract. let them sit out and draw no pay or better yet, let them go into the real world and make a living. that’s why a few years from now when they are retired and they are bellyaching about their current lot in life few of us care or want to hear about it. honor the damn contract!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.35 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 12:36 pm
I totally agree with the bears stance, but this might have to be the one exception. Urlacher has been the face of this franchise through all the good and bad, something they haven’t had since Walter Payton. This is about being loyal to what has been good to you. Very different than what is going on with Chad Johnson.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 12:36 pm
Hohohoho no! I suppose this means there will be another five years in the cellar for the Bears.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
Technically, of course, he is wrong. It’s not the same thing. But. This is a problem that has to be addressed. I would hold-out too.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
Robbie Gould is now making $3.1 M a year now - wonder how Urlacher reacted to that…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
This is the most uninformed argument that we all see.
Brian, the fact that the team can cut whenever is taken into account when they gave you that huge signing bonus up front! That is why your salary seems so small this year, you got most of this year’s pay when you signed your contract.
If you want your contract guaranteed for the duration of the deal, your signing bonus would be alot lower.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
Don’t hate the player, blame the game. He has a right to try to get as much money as he can. F you, pay me.
Don’t go messing with Big Gene though unless you want a frigging broken neck.
Do you think Urlacher was involved in the details of the CBA? He is a one man corporation like every other player out to make a name and some money for themselves.
What was the deal with Lavar Arrington, and how was he able to not join the NFLPA and buy out his contract in Washington?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1.6 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:03 pm
Jeremiah said… What was the deal with Lavar Arrington, and how was he able to not join the NFLPA and buy out his contract in Washington?
I submit to you the following… Would you SAY NO to Lavar Arrington?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 13th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
CndViking is completely right. These guys have very short memories about the huge signing bonuses they get - if you “play like [expletive]” the team can’t get that huge signing bonus back (convenient how the players forget about that part of it).
I can’t stand it when NFL guys whine about their low salary and how they can get cut and when they point to the guaranteed contracts in the NBA and MLB. First, to CndViking’s point, you already have guaranteed money in your contract in the form of your guaranteed signing bonus - they don’t (or rarely) get those in the other leagues (obviously b/c the contract is already guaranteed). Second, a big part of the reason why the NFL is light-years ahead of the other sports leagues in terms of popularity is because of the flexibility and parity that the current NFL system promotes. If you mess with the core aspects of the NFL system, you risk jeopardizing the overall popularity of the league and, in the long run, that would jeopardize the amount of money that the players will make in the future. I’m sure Urlacher or any other current player (or at least the older ones) don’t care about the future players’ earnings-power, but I’m sure that that’s what goes through Gene’s and the union’s minds.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
Why is any of this a shock? I am a lifelong Bears fan and yes he has been the face of the franchise for many years now, has done a lot to bring back some dignity to a defense that used to be feared throughout the NFL. But this day and age are much different when compared to the days of Walter Payton. They simply cannot be compared, guys back then played for each other and a common goal of winning a championship, the only thing the players of today have in common is the same desire to cash in on the biggest contract they can get for themselves.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.6 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:22 pm
I’m curious to see if people will ever admit they were wrong if Bears QB’s play above average, and this year’s crop of QB’s end up being hot garbage, like it seems they might. Probably not, then again Bears QB’s would first be reqired to play above average.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:24 pm
Just get rid of the one sided contracts and the just shut up and play argument makes sense. Teams would not hand out long term deals, and no one would be able to complain about signing a deal that no longer reflects current market conditions.
You only have a “contract” when both sides are reuired to honor it. NFLPA players don’t technically have “contracts”, they have agreements, that are constantly renegotiated or termanated by the owner side with little to no public outcry.
Shaun Alexander had a contract too, anyone crying for the Hawks to “Honor” it? If Urlacher tears an ACL in minicamp, how much of the contract he signed and has to “honor” is he going to get? Not much more than he already has gotten. They will tear that contract up faster than his knee, and take back some of what they already gave him if he simply tries to retire.
There is no honor among thieves.
Why is the public always on the owner’s side of the honoring the contract issue?
Free Ocho Stinko.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:27 pm
I like Urlacher as much as a Packer fan possibly could but I think its pretty lame when you are under contract for FOUR MORE YEARS and you are pulling these shenanigans. If you have anything more than one year on your contract you should shut up and honor it. It’d be awesome if the Bears would call his bluff and see if he would sit out for four years.
It’s getting impossible for teams to win these days with all the ginormous money floating around. A team will break the bank for a guy and guarantee huge money. If the guy’s a bust, the teams is still on the line for the $20MIL+ they guaranteed, but if the guy actually lives up to the huge contract he signed he will become unhappy in as little as two years and demand more money. Its getting out-of-control, and its going to be pretty scary to see what kind of money will be demanded five years from now. I just hope as a fan that the both sides work something out so the sport I love will not be greatly affected.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:40 pm
MLB does not have good competitve balance, but they are not going out of buis because they have huge gauranteed contracts.
The New York Knicks have a higher payroll than the Jets.
Melvin Mora makes 3 mil more per season than Ray Lewis, and Ray has gotten all of the contract that made him the highest paid defensive player ever at the time.
The NFL TV contracts dwarf the NBA and MLB deals combined with the NHL. Where is the money going? why do those unions have legit contracts and job security and the NFL does not?
The game will still be great with fair finacial practices and real contracts.
That argument does not make any sense. Why would a guy do anything but play harder if there was an arbitration type system like MLB? They still are trying to upgrade every position all the time, they will still pay a guy to go away if a younger, bigger, faster stronger is available to replace him.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:41 pm
Brian Urlacher played poorly (lower than his contract, anyway) last season, and was the captain of a defense that fell apart. He’s seeking a new contract when he’s already signed through 2011 to the deal he signed that was, in 2002, the largest deal in Bears history, and the largest contract for a defensive player. And he’s for facing a supposed arthritic back condition that isn’t going to go away, and a neck issue that required surgery this offseason, and wants to extend his contract further?
Oh, and those four years have a base salary average of 5.6 million, and include 2.9 millions in roster bonuses. Plus the $13 million signing bonus he got up front.
They have him under contract, and he’s not going to dog it or he’ll be done in the league; nobody’s going to take the risk and sign him for more than he’s already making. They don’t know how his body’s going to hold up over the next year, let alone the next four. Keep talking, Brian. When it comes time to suit up, you’ll be there. A game’s pay check goes a lot farther than a player’s pride.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 13th, 2008 at 1:44 pm
I know you’re a Vikings fan Florio so you naturally are biased against the Bears, but you really should try to hold it in check a little better. Your comments in this article make you look like an idiot. So the Bears are dumb if they don’t just roll over and give Urlacher whatever he wants? You think they would be smart to give a 30 year old linebacker with neck & back problems a giant new contract? The Bears are being more then reasonable about this. Per Urlacher’s own admission, they offered to inject $18 million in new money into his existing deal to bring it up to the standards of today’s salary cap. How is that unreasonable? He has no leverage and they are not obligated to do anything, so I think they are being very fair by offering that to him.
@DozenDeuce - You have a good point. When given decent protection, Grossman has proven he can be a very good QB. Orton also showed signs late last season that he’s come a long way since his rookie year. What are the media people going to say if one of them comes out and plays well this year (a very strong possibility if Chris Williams pans out at LT)?
@Jeremiah W - You clearly have no idea how NFL contracts work. The Seahawks DID honor their contract with Alexander. Did he have to give back his signing bonus? No. That’s how NFL contracts work. The player gets a signing bonus that is his to keep regardless of how he actually performs. In return, the team gets the right to terminate the contract early to avoid paying other future money. Alexander got his signing bonus that he never really earned so the Seahawks did honor the contract.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 1:52 pm
MARVIN HARRISON AND JIM SORGI FOR BRIAN URLACHER SOUNDS LIKE A DEAL TO ME!!!!!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 2:04 pm
Jeremiah W, a Dim Bulb, says:
“Just get rid of the one sided contracts and the just shut up and play argument makes sense. Teams would not hand out long term deals, and no one would be able to complain about signing a deal that no longer reflects current market conditions.”
So Jeremiah, just how do they go about this transformation you suggest above? Since both the players/agents and the “NFL corporations” agreed to the terms of these contracts, apparently the players/agents are satisfied with the guaranteed, up front bonus millions they receive. At least in the 1st year or two they are happy, then decide they want their cake and eat it too.
Until the players want the guaranteed contracts as bad as you, Jeremiah, etc., we’re just going to have to settle for letting these adults make their own decisions which contracts they want to sign.
Free killer ray ray!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 2:11 pm
Brian should be more concerned about Tyna Robertson taking him back to court for child support.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 13th, 2008 at 2:24 pm
These guys make way too much money as it stands. They should be paid a lot less but have a solid after-football disability and medical program. A large majority of the people in this country can’t afford to go watch these overgrown kids play a game.
As to Urlacher, maybe he should worry about being run over on the goal line instead of pissing and moaning.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 2:59 pm
Bungle man Frank, my favorite critic.
There are so many ways to do it better but here are a few.
They get rid of Upshaw and take a vote. They negotiate. They can create a wage scale like the SAG. They could create an arbitration system like MLB, or an NBA style scale.
They can take the NFL to court, or they can disband the Union and subject the NFL to the finacial laws of the land instead of the ones they gangsterd up.
Why should a player who was not even in the NFl when they agreed to the CBA be subjected to it? Why should he be drafted and told where he has to work?
If they were free to negotiate an actual contract with every employer in the first place, without one of them drafting the exclusive right to employ them, they would not have an argument.
The Ocho Saga is a perfect example. He never had the chance to negotiate with anyone but the Bungles. He did agree to a long term extension when offered before free agency, but now that contract is dwarfed by Larry Fitzgerald’s and Javon Walker’s.
Then there is the fact that A Rod just got 300 million, or the NBA is paying 12th men more than probowlers, is just as much public knowledge as the fact that the NFL makes more money than the rest of the sports combined right now.
I don’t exactly feel bad for Urlacher or Ocho Stinko, but they have a good point.
I was pretty much on the other side of the issue until I saw Melvin Mora get 30 million for 3 years from the Orioles to play mediocre 3rd base for a perrenial loser, while Ray Lewis was making between 6-7 mil per season as a fisrt ballot HOF player who has been defensive MVP of the NFL and super bowl MVP. Actors getting 20 mill per year to make crappy movies I never watch.
Why should the players of the most popular and dangerous game in the country have such finacial restrictions when no one else in that type of industry does?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 3:07 pm
Urlacher doesn’t seem to realize that when he acts like a [expletive] he loses endorsment money.
And BRH, better check your glasses before ranting here.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 13th, 2008 at 3:20 pm
What a whiner. He must have blown all his signing bonus running with Vegas dollies. Maybe he should get an offseason job to help pay for his lifestyle.
These pea brains all know that sports salaries aqppreciate faster than the price of oil.Sign a one year deal with no signing bonus, but remember that next year you’ll get paid on performance, not promise.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 13th, 2008 at 3:56 pm
Hey Bryan are you related to Travis Henry and need to pay more child support cus you can’t control yourself?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 13th, 2008 at 4:01 pm
I’m with Urlacher, let’s get rid of this contract situation and make every player contract incentive based. You play like [expletive], you get paid [expletive]. Eliminate signing bonuses so guys don’t get 20-30 mil up front before even playing a down under their contract. How many other people have jobs where you get 3/4ths of your next 6 years pay the first day of work?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)