With a CBA that won’t expire until 2011 at the earliest but also with the prospects of the “last capped year” threatening to create all sorts of challenges in 2009, the NFL and the NFL Players Association finally have commenced the process of negotiating a possible extension to the labor contract.
Daniel Kaplan and Liz Mullen of SportsBusiness Daily report that the two sides met on May 8 in New York.
NFLPA Executive Director Gene Upshaw’s weekly “100 words” item on NFLPA.org disclosed the meeting: “We met with NFL negotiators last Thursday in New York. Attendees included owners Jerry Richardson and Pat Bowlen, the League’s financial team and its new outside attorney, Bob Batterman. The NFL discussed the 32 teams’ financial condition and how the CBA has caused every club to lose money. They are attempting to gather financial information to share with the NFLPA. We made it clear that we are willing to discuss their financial condition, but we cannot expect our players to embrace the NFL’s position without the owners providing audited financial statements. This is just the first step in the process.” (By the way, that comes out to 100 words on the nose . . . we wonder whether there’s an NFLPA employee who is paid in part to make sure that exactly 100 words are used by Upshaw. If so, it would be a prudent use of those player dues. Eye roll.)
We wonder whether the NFL genuinely has taken the position that “every club” is losing money, or whether Upshaw is slanting the issue to advance his own agenda. There’s a buzz in some league circles that Upshaw prefers labor problems to labor peace, given the tenuous hold he now has on his position. Last week, NFLPA President Kevin Mawae declared that there would be no leadership change while the CBA is in flux, which naturally gives Upshaw a clear incentive to keep the CBA in flux for as long as possible.
The league and the union both have the opportunity to pull the plug on the current CBA two years early, which would make 2010 the final year of the deal — and also a season without a salary cap. Though from the league’s perspective the proposition is often characterized as the ability of the owners to opt out of the deal, the reality is that 24 of the 32 owners must affirmatively agree to continue the deal or it will expire early.
And that means that it only will take nine owners to pull the plug two years early on the CBA.
_2.gif)






May 12th, 2008 at 5:18 pm
“There’s a buzz in some league circles that Upshaw prefers labor problems to labor peace, given the tenuous hold he now has on his position.”
Seems to me that it would be in Upshaw’s best interests to maintain labor peace and deliver a deal to the players that is acceptable. His worst case scenario would be for the NFL to encounter labor problems given the things that have been said about his leadership. Also, if Upshaw does follow the NFLPA bylaws and steps down, this will be the CBA that will determine his legacy. Does he go out by causing labor problems and contributing to a possible work stoppage or does he go out by taking the high road and getting his union the best deal he can for them?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 12th, 2008 at 5:24 pm
Well I hope they can find a way to either fix the rookie contract system, Or eliminate the salery cap. That way the veterans who put in their time can get paid. Hey florio you should volenteer your services to the NFL..pro bono of course. Looking at the pile of debt that teams are accrued.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 12th, 2008 at 5:25 pm
i dont read these articles….dont wanna hear bout this drag over 3 years….boring.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 12th, 2008 at 7:38 pm
hey stoogie,mr. upshaw is going to take the path that
lines his pockets with the most green.i don’t think he
really cares about the membership or the retirees who
are living a hand to mouth existance.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 12th, 2008 at 8:27 pm
It’s time to put Gene Upshaw on the Turd Watch.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 12th, 2008 at 8:42 pm
The NFL seriously expects the NFLPA to believe that the Cowboys and Redskins are losing money much less some of these other teams??? Yeah, right………
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 12th, 2008 at 10:40 pm
Upshaw’s tactics and rhetoric are as old as dictators and despots. The way to maintain power and control is to create an enemy, real or imagined, and frame yourself as the only savior and deliverer. That to challenge the leader is an act of treason and disloyalty and tantamount to sleeping with the enemy.
Fear-mongering and Despotism 101 with Paranoia 101 as a prerequisite.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 13th, 2008 at 7:20 am
“Lose money” is a pretty vague statement. Could every team be taking in less net profit because the players are now getting a larger percentage of gross revenues? Yes. But I doubt that any team is actually posting a loss.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 13th, 2008 at 2:12 pm
“(By the way, that comes out to 100 words on the nose . . . we wonder whether there’s an NFLPA employee who is paid in part to make sure that exactly 100 words are used by Upshaw. If so, it would be a prudent use of those player dues. Eye roll.)”
Funny you mention it. Yes, each time it comes out to exactly 100 words. Gene Upshaw doesn’t write it. I’ve already concluded that someone is else is paid to write for him and meet “100 words” each time.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated