A reader has forwarded to us a link from a February 5 radio broadcast, during which John Tomase of the Boston Herald talked about his February 2 story asserting that the Patriots videotaped the Rams’ walk-through practice prior to Super Bowl XXXVI.
By way of background, it previously was presumed that former Pats video employee Matt Walsh was the source for the Herald item. Recently, however, Walsh’s lawyer denied that Walsh was the source.
The discussion begins at 12:20 of the segment, and Tomase clearly links his day-before-the-Super-Bowl story to the New York Times article from Friday, February 1, which contained the first public quotes from Matt Walsh.
Said Tomase: “I woke up on Friday, that story wasn’t even on my radar screen. . . . [The] New York Times and ESPN seem[ed] like they’re close to something that we heard, so we have to start digging. And when you find something, it’s gotta go in the paper.”
Tomase also said that he first heard about the Super Bowl XXXVI cheating allegation in September 2007, after Spygate. But, for whatever reason, he didn’t have enough to justify reporting it before February 1.
But, then, Walsh finally emerges from the shadows of a volcano via the Times on February 1, and Mike Fish of ESPN.com follows up later that day with an article that shows Fish was hunting Walsh as well.
And so Tomase is able to develop enough evidence in one day to warrant publishing a story that he’d known about for so long that it had dropped off his “radar screen”? (Presumably, Tomase chased this story to a successful conclusion while otherwise in Arizona covering the Super Bowl.)
In our view, this is further proof that Walsh was the source, and that (as we believe) the Herald previously had declined to go with the story without Walsh speaking on the record. Once Walsh seemed to be close to going on the record with the Times and/or ESPN.com, the Herald likely became inclined to drop the requirement (if there was such a requirement) that Walsh be on the record before they’d publish.
Regardless, something happened between Friday morning and Saturday morning — and it was something that allowed Tomase to overcome more than four months of futility. If the source wasn’t Walsh, who in the hell was it?
_2.gif)





May 10th, 2008 at 10:54 am
Yeah, he needs to get fired. Period. He’s of no use to the Boston Herald at this point. The only reason why he hasn’t been run off town yet is because that would be a virtual admission of doing something wrong and then welcome a lawsuit with open arms.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.4 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
May 10th, 2008 at 10:55 am
The source was Eric Mangini
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
May 10th, 2008 at 11:00 am
Tomase should be fired or reveal his source. I can not see any other reason to keep him employed. Can anyone else?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.6 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
May 10th, 2008 at 11:09 am
Perhaps the source has seen how they have treated Walsh and decided it is a lot safer to stay a secret. He may actually still want a job, or a peaceful life without paparazzi, lawyers and hit men looking over his shoulder.
The Pats cheated. They knew they were cheating, they got caught, turns out it was worse than anyone imagined. they tried to suppress it and that sort of blew it out of proportion. I know other teams do it/ or have done it, but they got caught after being specifically warned. That is why the punishment was pretty severe, even though way too secretive and suspect. The bottlom line is they were knowingly cheating, and they deserve to be humiliated, but it is getting a little crazy.
Who really cares exactly who did what and when? I have lost all respect for the team coach and town, but beyond that, who cares? They are not taking away records, they are just tainting them.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.05 / 5 with 8 rating(s)
May 10th, 2008 at 11:49 am
Betting Tomase’s source is another media type and his evidence is pressbox gossip. Tomase and the Herald jumped the gun because they thought ESPN and/or the NY Times were going to run with it. At the very least Tomase should have his Gillette Stadium press credential pulled. He’s got no credibility left. Whatever happened to journalistic standards in which at least TWO sources are needed to verify a story before it’s published? Looks like more than the Patriots broke the rules that governr their profession. This media witchhunt is disgusting!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
May 10th, 2008 at 11:50 am
Tomase is being whipped badly on-air by the sports radio powerhouse WEEI. This, even though the station has a relationship with the Herald to use its writers on the air (and not the rival Globe’s). Tomase’s Herald stories about the Walsh tapes the past couple days have been bland, just-the-info stuff that buried the central idea that there was no Rams walkthrough tape. Of course, this is quite unlike other media that gives the “No Rams Tape” the lead. Because Tomase is a decent writer and actually knows a couple things about football, his “Point After” blog has always been an interesting read. You think he’s got anything to say right now? Nope. In the immediate aftermath of this, he stayed off his blog for a couple days, and the Herald now doesn’t allow for reader comments there. Tomase is also “known” around New England for a vicious anti-Manny Ramirez artcile from ‘05 that was sourced badly and was similarly pounced upon by readers/other media as being a piece simply designed for attention.
In short, this guy’s credibility has now been irreparably damaged.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 10th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
It’s the Herald for heaven’s sake–a rag that never lets the truth stand in the way of a suggestive/scandalous headline. There is no need to take away Tomase’s press pass–there isn’t an individual in the Pat’s organization who will so much as cough in his direction.Loved reading his recent stuff–what’s that saying? “Nothing from nothing is nothing”–it’s what he had and it’s what he’ll get.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 10th, 2008 at 12:18 pm
Well yes Tomase should be strung up BUT it was the editors at the Herald that were afraid they would lose the story to another newspaper and decided they had better run it. Ultimately that was not Tomase’s call and we will never know what his position was on it.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
May 10th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
Although I think Tomase used irresponsible journalism and didn’t follow the journalistic code of independent verification, but I don’t think Tomase should be forced to give up his source. No journalist should. He definitely won’t be fired for not doing it.
I do think if Walsh was the source (and personally don’t think he was) and he denies that the Rams walkthrough was taped on Tuesday, I think Tomase should call out him on it. When an unname source gives a journalist bad information and then leaves him/her hanging out to try by giving conflicting stories publically, I think the journalist has the right to call the source on the carpet. Otherwise, it is bad journalism to out an unnamed source.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
May 10th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
Why does it matter who Tomase’s source is? Are you gonna start divulging all of your sources too? In all of your columns are you going to start listing every source for every column you right?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 10th, 2008 at 1:40 pm
Fire Tomase now and ask questions later…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 10th, 2008 at 2:29 pm
Jeremiah W. writes: “They knew they were cheating, they got caught, turns out it was worse than anyone imagined.”
Worse than anyone imagined? If you’ve paid any attention to the seething mob, then you would be aware that people have imagined some rather incredible conspiracies concerning the potential extent and implications of the Patriots videotaping practices. Thus, your contention that the filming of offensive signals is somehow a greater infraction than “anyone imagined” is, well, ridiculous.
Of course, once one realizes the contradictory nature of the following contention, “Who really cares exactly who did what and when? I have lost all respect for the team coach and town, but beyond that, who cares,” then the subtle absurdity of the entire post becomes plain.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 10th, 2008 at 3:27 pm
Since Ron Borges left the Globe, it seems Tomase has become the new most hated in Patriots Nation. But really, I haven’t wanted to read the Herald sports page in years. I’ll even endure an occasional Dan Shaughnessy column over anything in the Herald.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 10th, 2008 at 5:02 pm
Please forgive me if I’m way off base on this, but if Tomase were to give up a source, even one who fed him bad information, his remaining pond of sources would just dry up and cease to exist, no?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 10th, 2008 at 7:57 pm
Shackman, the only way it would dry up is if someone added pudding mix to and Tomase ate it.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 10th, 2008 at 9:25 pm
Jeremiah W. writes: “They knew they were cheating, they got caught, turns out it was worse than anyone imagined.”
Worse than anyone imagined? If you’ve paid any attention to the seething mob, then you would be aware that people have imagined some rather incredible conspiracies concerning the potential extent and implications of the Patriots videotaping practices. …per poster Mephistopholes.
…sounds like someone touched a nerve Mephistopholes. One doth protest a little too much. …* snicker
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 10th, 2008 at 11:27 pm
NR4 writes: “sounds like someone touched a nerve Mephistopholes. One doth protest a little too much. …* snicker”
touched a nerve, sure. One can stomach only so much foolishness a day, though given the sheer volume on the internet these days, I might as well just stick to the t.v., wait…that won’t work either. A cave perhaps?
I’ll just get back to the books.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 11th, 2008 at 4:15 pm
It’s immaterial whether Tomase discloses his source, and I don’t think he should be forced to do so.
Essentially, if no evidence is produced to corroborate the allegations in Tomase’s notorious pre-Super Bowl story, we can all safely assume that the source was exploiting the situation for his own spurious ends, whatever the malign motivation. The source either was Walsh the golf pro or somebody else who had reason, real or imagined, to make the Patriots’ lives difficult before the big game.
In any event, considering that the source was selling nothing but misinformation, it doesn’t matter now. It’s a non-story, except to the extent that it reflects badly on Tomase’s rushed and shoddy journalistic practices.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 12th, 2008 at 8:45 am
There is no obligation on the media to protect a source that lied to you. Tomase SHOULD out his source…it’ll send a message to “unnamed sources” who can slander, allege, or lie and hide behind their anonymity.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
May 12th, 2008 at 11:44 am
Like I’ve been saying all along, Walsh shot off his mouth to make an impression and make himself look a lot more important than he is. Tomase ran with it. Sometimes where there’s smoke, it’s just a kid with a cigarette in the bathroom trying to be cool.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated