Comments on: WHERE WILL CULPEPPER LAND? http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/ The Best Pro Football Scoop on the Internet Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:18:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: Mr. Shalz http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22422 Mr. Shalz Wed, 30 Apr 2008 05:41:55 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22422 How about Arizona. Obviously they don't really have anyone behind the aging Warner. How about Arizona. Obviously they don’t really have anyone behind the aging Warner.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Bradybunch http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22400 Bradybunch Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:56:25 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22400 How about the 49ers? Any of the QB's in the posts,from Farve to Culpepper. How about the 49ers? Any of the QB’s in the posts,from Farve to Culpepper.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: wingnut http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22361 wingnut Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:04:00 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22361 If Culpeper goes to the Bucs then they will 8 QBs.... If Culpeper goes to the Bucs then they will 8 QBs….

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: wingnut http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22357 wingnut Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:58:52 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22357 Culpeper sucks, this should at least a three, someone giving them out. The Sharks are winning. "YeaBaby" Oh sorry, thats hockey, "MyBad" Culpeper sucks, this should at least a three, someone giving them out. The Sharks are winning. “YeaBaby” Oh sorry, thats hockey, “MyBad”

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Mactator http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22350 Mactator Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:54:40 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22350 I hope they don't sign him. I hope they don’t sign him.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: shark67 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22341 shark67 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:20:04 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22341 Jon Gruden is going to bring in Daunte Culpepper, Rich Gannon, and Fran Tarkenton.....oh yeah, Brett Favre out of retirement as well. Jon Gruden is going to bring in Daunte Culpepper, Rich Gannon, and Fran Tarkenton…..oh yeah, Brett Favre out of retirement as well.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: GeeMenFan http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22340 GeeMenFan Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:12:56 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22340 most likely, he will land on his ass. after throwing an interception. most likely, he will land on his ass. after throwing an interception.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: RavensFan19 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22329 RavensFan19 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:33:12 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22329 Culpepper probably should have signed with Green Bay when he had the chance. There is still a possibility that Ted Thompson would want another vet QB who can step in if need be, but I can't see them throwing him too much of a bone. If Ted were smart he wouldn't do that at all because now that they drafted Brohm in the 2nd round Aaron Rogers has enough to worry about lurking behind him if he screws the pooch out there on the field. Rogers performed well the few times he has gotten to see some playing time, but injuries are a question with him and how is he going to handle an entire season? I think Ted sent a message to Rogers by drafting Brohm. Ted essentially told Rogers "if you can't hack it out there for whatever reason, we will not be hesitant to trade you..." I also think that this could be the Packers planning for the future and their idea of the future doesn't include Aaron Rogers, which is a shame because who knows what kind of player he is and can become. He certainly has had enough time to digest the game by watching one of the all-time greats. In my opinion, if Rogers performs extremely well the Packers will probably try and trade him for a 1st rounder and some next year and go with Brohm afterwards. There are also a lot of teams that have QB issues that would be interested in Rogers. The Dolphins, San Francisco, Seattle, St. Louis, Kansas City, Buffalo, Jets... Rogers could be more valuable to the Packers as trade bait than as a starting QB. Just throwing that out there. Culpepper probably should have signed with Green Bay when he had the chance.

There is still a possibility that Ted Thompson would want another vet QB who can step in if need be, but I can’t see them throwing him too much of a bone.

If Ted were smart he wouldn’t do that at all because now that they drafted Brohm in the 2nd round Aaron Rogers has enough to worry about lurking behind him if he screws the pooch out there on the field. Rogers performed well the few times he has gotten to see some playing time, but injuries are a question with him and how is he going to handle an entire season?

I think Ted sent a message to Rogers by drafting Brohm. Ted essentially told Rogers “if you can’t hack it out there for whatever reason, we will not be hesitant to trade you…”

I also think that this could be the Packers planning for the future and their idea of the future doesn’t include Aaron Rogers, which is a shame because who knows what kind of player he is and can become. He certainly has had enough time to digest the game by watching one of the all-time greats. In my opinion, if Rogers performs extremely well the Packers will probably try and trade him for a 1st rounder and some next year and go with Brohm afterwards.

There are also a lot of teams that have QB issues that would be interested in Rogers. The Dolphins, San Francisco, Seattle, St. Louis, Kansas City, Buffalo, Jets…

Rogers could be more valuable to the Packers as trade bait than as a starting QB.

Just throwing that out there.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: ButchD http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22307 ButchD Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:15:14 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22307 who cares about culpecker, more importantly where does this leave brett faver ? sincerely, John Madden who cares about culpecker, more importantly where does this leave brett faver ?

sincerely, John Madden

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Grulks http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22298 Grulks Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:48:39 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22298 I'm surprised that Daunte and Leftwich are both unsigned right now. Granted, neither of them are particularly great, but you *always* want an experienced QB as a backup on your roster, just in case. At the very least, they'd be good for providing another arm during training camp. Hell, Daunte, as bad as he is, is potentially an upgrade over Brad Johnson. This coming from a Cowboys fan..... I’m surprised that Daunte and Leftwich are both unsigned right now. Granted, neither of them are particularly great, but you *always* want an experienced QB as a backup on your roster, just in case.

At the very least, they’d be good for providing another arm during training camp. Hell, Daunte, as bad as he is, is potentially an upgrade over Brad Johnson. This coming from a Cowboys fan…..

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Stoogie http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22284 Stoogie Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:52:20 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22284 Culpepper teach Flacco and Smith what? How to fumble? How to get the WR that made him look good traded so he can then ask for $10 mil? At one point in his career, Culpepper could have been a good, solid QB for a long time in this league. But his over-inflated ego put him in a position that he couldn't handle. Culpepper is still riding on the coat-tails from Randy Moss making him look good. Plus, it didn't help his cause that his knee got blowed up, either. Culpepper teach Flacco and Smith what? How to fumble? How to get the WR that made him look good traded so he can then ask for $10 mil? At one point in his career, Culpepper could have been a good, solid QB for a long time in this league. But his over-inflated ego put him in a position that he couldn’t handle. Culpepper is still riding on the coat-tails from Randy Moss making him look good. Plus, it didn’t help his cause that his knee got blowed up, either.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Ditkas Cigar http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22282 Ditkas Cigar Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:51:41 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22282 There are plenty of teams that could do worse than have him as a backup at the very least. Hell, if he is only at 80-90% of what he once was, he could still start for many teams including the Bears, Vikings, Jets and Ravens. Or at the very least he could be an insurance policy for many other teams including the Panthers, Raiders, Broncos, Rams, Giants, Cowboys and quite a few more. There are plenty of teams that could do worse than have him as a backup at the very least.

Hell, if he is only at 80-90% of what he once was, he could still start for many teams including the Bears, Vikings, Jets and Ravens.

Or at the very least he could be an insurance policy for many other teams including the Panthers, Raiders, Broncos, Rams, Giants, Cowboys and quite a few more.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Jack in the Jack http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22274 Jack in the Jack Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:33:49 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22274 The Bucs are suppose to take Byron Leftwich too. The Bucs are suppose to take Byron Leftwich too.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: WMack http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22266 WMack Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:22:22 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22266 Baltimore seems like an ideal fit if they're trying to at least put forth the effort to win now. I don't trust Kyle Boller, and Troy Smith is Charlie Batch all over again. I agree that the Bears and Vikings also mak sense, but he burned some bridges in Minnesota and as has been stated, "Rex Grossman is the starting QB of the Chicago Bears". I would take an obligatory jab here, but being a 49er fan, I don't think I have much room. Hell, we'll take him in Frisco. The Alex Smith experiment needs to be scrapped ASAP! Baltimore seems like an ideal fit if they’re trying to at least put forth the effort to win now. I don’t trust Kyle Boller, and Troy Smith is Charlie Batch all over again.
I agree that the Bears and Vikings also mak sense, but he burned some bridges in Minnesota and as has been stated, “Rex Grossman is the starting QB of the Chicago Bears”. I would take an obligatory jab here, but being a 49er fan, I don’t think I have much room. Hell, we’ll take him in Frisco. The Alex Smith experiment needs to be scrapped ASAP!

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: MVP http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22263 MVP Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:17:21 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22263 Oh Canada! Oh Canada!

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: How You Tore Your Dress http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22255 How You Tore Your Dress Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:07:59 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22255 I know this may sound crazy, but Culpepper to Baltimore perhaps? They could use a guy who has performed well at some point in his career, as opposed to Boller, to help teach Flacco & Troy Smith. I know this may sound crazy, but Culpepper to Baltimore perhaps? They could use a guy who has performed well at some point in his career, as opposed to Boller, to help teach Flacco & Troy Smith.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: bcrane77 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22241 bcrane77 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:50:52 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22241 Will Gruden not be happy until he has double-digit QBs on his roster? Will Gruden not be happy until he has double-digit QBs on his roster?

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Razon http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22237 Razon Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:47:10 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22237 Bringing Culpepper in for a look was just a smoke screen pre-draft. Or at the worst, insurance if they didn't get a QB or two that they liked. Bringing Culpepper in for a look was just a smoke screen pre-draft. Or at the worst, insurance if they didn’t get a QB or two that they liked.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: brooks07 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22231 brooks07 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:36:04 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22231 I think Gruden might be interested. I think Gruden might be interested.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Gameison http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22230 Gameison Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:34:24 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22230 to say that Oakland could be Daunte's only option is bull crap. Have everyone forgotten about the Bucs..... to say that Oakland could be Daunte’s only option is bull crap.

Have everyone forgotten about the Bucs…..

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: ronry http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22227 ronry Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:25:13 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22227 maybe they can make a Love Boat movie and he can have a starring role. maybe they can make a Love Boat movie and he can have a starring role.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: bcfunk http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22223 bcfunk Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:20:56 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22223 The team I thought he'd go back to was Minnesota before they drafted a QB this weekend. Hell, I'm surprised the Rams don't give him a shot since Bulger is guaranteed to break down sometime during the season. The team I thought he’d go back to was Minnesota before they drafted a QB this weekend. Hell, I’m surprised the Rams don’t give him a shot since Bulger is guaranteed to break down sometime during the season.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: bavaro89 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22221 bavaro89 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:17:04 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22221 Don't the Bears, Jets, and Vikes make the most sense? I know the Bears said they're sticking with Grossman, but how long does the coaching team want to waste a top 5 defense? The Jets brass has said Pennington will duke it out with Clemens for the starting gig, but their FA signings and draft picks scream that they want to win now. Mangini can't forget that Chad couldn't throw a decent pass over 10 years last year, right? Meanwhile, Clemens is awful. Finally, the Vikes, have a very good defense, a good o-line, and a stud running back. All they need a decent QB to get to the playoffs (and maybe to win the NFC Norris Division). Jackson stinks (unless he's playing the Giants) and Booty can't be expected to play on a contender. Don’t the Bears, Jets, and Vikes make the most sense? I know the Bears said they’re sticking with Grossman, but how long does the coaching team want to waste a top 5 defense? The Jets brass has said Pennington will duke it out with Clemens for the starting gig, but their FA signings and draft picks scream that they want to win now. Mangini can’t forget that Chad couldn’t throw a decent pass over 10 years last year, right? Meanwhile, Clemens is awful. Finally, the Vikes, have a very good defense, a good o-line, and a stud running back. All they need a decent QB to get to the playoffs (and maybe to win the NFC Norris Division). Jackson stinks (unless he’s playing the Giants) and Booty can’t be expected to play on a contender.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: bluedoctor http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22220 bluedoctor Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:16:52 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22220 Yeah there are the Bears and don't forget depth behind Delhomme in Carolina. Matt Moore has potential but Brett Basanez? Come on.. Yeah there are the Bears and don’t forget depth behind Delhomme in Carolina. Matt Moore has potential but Brett Basanez? Come on..

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: NYJets28 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22216 NYJets28 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:12:28 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22216 Rex Grossman is our quarterback Rex Grossman is our quarterback

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: Chris from MD http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22215 Chris from MD Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:10:35 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22215 He should sign with the Bronco's. He should sign with the Bronco’s.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: bcrane77 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22213 bcrane77 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:07:25 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22213 Yeah, Oakland is his only option because the Bears are so rock-solid at the QB position they don't even need to think about bringing in any competition whatsoever for their savior, Rex Grossman. Culpepper may be nearly washed-up, but the Bears need to be looking at every Tom, Dick, and Harry that can or, at some point, could throw the ball. Yeah, Oakland is his only option because the Bears are so rock-solid at the QB position they don’t even need to think about bringing in any competition whatsoever for their savior, Rex Grossman. Culpepper may be nearly washed-up, but the Bears need to be looking at every Tom, Dick, and Harry that can or, at some point, could throw the ball.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: nerdmann http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22208 nerdmann Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:52:16 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22208 Culpepper will end up starting by the end of the season if he signs with the Raiders. Culpepper will end up starting by the end of the season if he signs with the Raiders.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: raidernation04 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22205 raidernation04 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:48:05 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22205 Culpepper sucks!!! Culpepper sucks!!!

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: PJW http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22204 PJW Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:47:10 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/29/where-will-culpepper-land/#comment-22204 How can this be? Dante is a 10 million a year QB....he said so How can this be?
Dante is a 10 million a year QB….he said so

(report as inappropriate)

]]>