In his weekly 100-word column posted on the NFL Players Association’s web site (maybe they should reduce that to 50 now that Mario Manningham is in the league), Executive Director Gene Upshaw reiterates that there will be no agreement to a rookie wage scale:
“Every spring, the buzz from general managers is, ‘We need to fix rookie compensation.’ We addressed this issue by limiting rookie pool growth and fixing the maximum number of years a rookie could sign. The length of contracts severely limits players’ ability to move money into future years. What the media doesn’t report is that the rookie pool is part of the overall salary cap, and a player is only a rookie for one season. Clubs want the players to pay for mistakes teams make in drafting. We’ll never agree to a rookie wage scale in such a short-career sport.”
Sorry, but the more Upshaw talks about this, the less sense he makes. And he never addresses the core question — whether it makes sense to take some of those millions that will be paid to Jake Long and Chris Long and Matt Ryan and Darren McFadden and Glenn Dorsey and Vernon Gholston and Sedrick Ellis and Derrick Harvey and Keith Rivers and Jerod Mayo and allow that money to be spent on players who already have proven that they can compete successfully on the NFL level.
The flaw in any reason that Upshaw can articulate is the salary cap. Every dollar not spent on a rookie is an extra dollar that is available for a veteran. So by reeling in the money paid to the guys taken at the top of the draft, who have no vote in the matter, there is more money to be paid to guys who already are in the league, and who have full say in the matter.
Upshaw’s position only illustrates, in our view, that he’s out of touch with the people he is paid a multi-million-dollar windfall of his own to serve.
As a player told us last week, the notion that they don’t want a rookie wage scale is flat-out wrong.
“It’s the exact opposite,” the player said. “Players want it because it benefits them.”
In our view, Upshaw’s stance on this issue is the very thing that could bring enough players together to make a meaningful run at bouncing him out of his job.
_2.gif)





April 28th, 2008 at 9:34 am
Florio, come on man, enough with the Manningham digs. I know there is some deep-seated resentment for Michigan because of the whole Rich Rod thing, but seriously! LET IT GO! You are only making yourself seem less intelligent and less-reliable with every joke. He got drafted late, really late. He paid the price, literally, for his bad attitude, lying, and witless remarks.
What makes him any dumber than Owen Schmitt, the guy that slammed his helmet into his fore-head?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1.25 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 9:35 am
Time for Gene to go….
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.8 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 9:38 am
The NBA has one and I think has been well accepted by all. ESPN had a segment on this yesterday morning. It’s just crazy to have a rookie become the highest paid player at his position without ever playing 1 minute in the NFL.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.85 / 5 with 7 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 9:41 am
This from a guy who tells retired players “I have yet to touch my pension. You didn’t plan ahead.” … Forgetting not eveyr retired player has a $6M a year job to do nothing.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.85 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 9:44 am
Looks like Upshaw really represents the agents - and himself of course.
Any football players who are worried about how short their careers are, should have thought about that while they were being offered a free college education. Sadly gas staions are all self service these days.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.2 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 9:50 am
“Every dollar not spent on a rookie is an extra dollar that is available for a veteran.”
The key word in that sentence is AVAILABLE. Why has no one addressed this yet? What makes you think that money saved on rookie contracts will automatically and undoubtedly be spent on veterans? Who’s to say that the cheaper owners in the league won’t just pocket that money, or spend just enough to get about the cap floor like they already do?
And with Shaun Alexander reminding us that getting paid for past performance is no guarantee for future performance, I doubt we’d see many owners breaking the bank to pay vets with newfound money in the event of a rookie pay scale. It’d just be more of the same: the owners that pay their players fairly would continue to do so, and the stingy ones would keep on keeping on.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1.65 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 9:57 am
Upshaw must go….the fact that the players are unable to see that he does not have their best interests at heart is pathetic….only a kicker and old Joe D have the balls to challenge Upshaw and his powerful agent buddies……his failure to implement a rookie wage scale or help retired players truly does a disservice to the union members…..the same people that pay him $6M a year for nothing!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 10:01 am
He almost makes sense. By having the coveted rookies setting the bar higher every year the idea is that is the new bargaining basement for top free agents.
The problem is it does not affect veteran min salary or the average player, if anything it dries up the funds that would go to keep mid level vets from being replaced every year by cheaper later round rookies.
The salary cap and basement along with the gauranteed high percentage of revenue are more than enough protection for vet players who don’t have real contracts anyway.
Just look at the other sports and there is no argument he can make for getting his players a much worse deal than the NBA, MLB and even NHL players have.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 10:04 am
There is no virtue in stating the obvious: “They’re only rookies for one year.”
What the Hell does that have to do with anything?
1. From Year 2 onward, they are veterans.
2. There is a new crop of rookies every year soaking up most of the money.
3. The pool of veterans always outnumbers rookies.
4. Only a small number of veterans get the huge money. Men who have PROVEN themselves.
Wake up, Players, and 86 that Numbskull Upshaw. He must be working for the agents, not the players.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 10:07 am
Good posts, except the Manningham one. He’ll be the poster-child for “dumb as a post” until next year when someone else does a single digit wonderlic.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 10:30 am
I agree that it’s time for Gene to go.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 10:40 am
The good thing about a rookie wage scale is that there wouldn’t be needs for holdouts, benefitting those rookies by getting them into camp sooner so they can earn their money. The bad thing is a few outstanding free agents will just adjust what they want skyward take most of that veteran gain. It would still be all that money going to a few of the players. If they impose the rookie wage, they need to increase the minimum veteran pay at the same time, therefore allocating the money more evenly amongst the players.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 28th, 2008 at 10:50 am
If they were to implement a rookie wage scale, a solution for veteran players to get more money would be to raise the Salary Floor.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 10:52 am
How Gene seems to believe that a rookie even deserves to be in the same pay role statosphere as the best player in the NFL at a given position, I have no idea. Who are the first players who have to restructure around this time of year? Its the top paid player on the team, not the rookies.
The money that the rookies are making is ruining the NFL in more ways than one. If they dont fix it soon, its going to run the NFL into the ground
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 10:58 am
I thought the Manningham post was funny as hell!!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 28th, 2008 at 10:58 am
the owners should implement their own wage scale- by agreeing not to draft anyone in the first round. imagine every team letting their turn pass until the second round started (not THAT would make for a nice draft party). I know it’s collusion and not really possible…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 28th, 2008 at 11:04 am
The more Upshaw dangles and dances on the strings the agents are pulling, the more obvious he makes it that he cares only about retaining his position and its high pay while caring absolutely nothing about the players he represents.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 11:08 am
Capo Gino is colluding with certain agents.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 11:59 am
Manningham may not seem too smart, I can name
a dozen or so GMs and owners with even less intelligence;
ex. - Wayne H. In Miami( someone tell that old man to take a nap…. Bill P. is perfoming an
Emergency Team-o-dectomy.
With that being said, I feel Gene Upshaw is taking the only recourse available.
With the induction of free agency, the only difference now between good teams
And bad teams …… Is Management! Bad management is never really addressed;
Instead we place blame with the players. Teams pay less talented free agents
Every year ….. Upsetting better players and team established players; in effect
Raising yearly expectations. Violations of the code of behavior policy with the
Smallest infraction could prove costly. And there’s always life after football issues.
So why not try to break the bank?
Gene has been dealing with the league for a long time and he knows how to get
Their attention. Its just unfortunate class people like the Rooneys and Steeler
Organization have to suffer.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 12:14 pm
I think that Upshaw’s bluster is a negotiating ploy to get as much as possible for the rookie cap concession. It could be the equivelant of “so and so will not be traded”.
I can’t wait for a groundswell of union revolt to put heat on him.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 12:27 pm
If the rookie cap is off limits, I suggest at least fixing the unfair consequences if the drafted player does not sign within a year. Give the team the pick after the one with which he is redrafted. This is only fair and gives them some leverage in the contract negotiations.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 28th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
*** The key word in that sentence is AVAILABLE. Why has no one addressed this yet? What makes you think that money saved on rookie contracts will automatically and undoubtedly be spent on veterans? Who’s to say that the cheaper owners in the league won’t just pocket that money, or spend just enough to get about the cap floor like they already do? ***
You miss a key point: There is a minimum total amount that teams must disburse to players. They can not decide unilaterally that their total payroll will be $5 Million spread out amongst the whole team. An owner can’t decide to ‘go on the cheap’ and pocket the difference. Yes, they can be creative cap-wise and carry amounts from years to year.
Say the minimum total amount the must be paid to a team is $90 million. Then say your team has one of the top six picks. You’re screwed because yo may be on the hook for $30 to sign a top rookie with only $60 million spread amongst all the other players on your team
If you have a group of veterans you’ve invested time and money in and want to keep, you may be screwed because you don’t have the money. Some unproven rookie schmuck has a fat contract and hasn’t proven anything or earned a dime yet.
So, your veterans want to cash in on what they’ve earned/proven, but wait. Ownership is in a bind financially and has to wave Buh-bye. Now he’s stuck with an unproven rookie, a bunch of lower-tier players, and no room to maneuver.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
Upshaw continually makes it obvious he is nothing more than a has been, who is so busy blustering about keeping his job, he’s completely forgetting to *do* his job.
It’s quite clear he completely misunderstands that his job is to work for the players and what they want, NOT to impose his will on the players.
The sooner the players jettison Upshaw, the better this league will be.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
I think the thing that confuses me more then anything about Upshaw is, why the hell does he still need an agent? The guy is making 6 million a year to represent ALL union players. What does he need an agent for, if he gets fired is he going to start playing agian?
Maybe i’m off base here and ever non-atheletic high paid posistion has an agent. If that’s the case, I need to get Donald Trump’s agent for myself. Just seems like a huge conflict of interest.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 28th, 2008 at 2:12 pm
Guys, guys, guys… There will be no groundswell to “oust” Upshaw. He’s doing his job. He’s on the verge of a contentious CBA negotiation and as a result, if he were to do ANYTHING that even remotely resembles giving an inch of conciliation; he’s not doing his job as head of the union.
The rhetoric may not make sense. So what? He doesn’t have to make sense. All he has to do is say “black” whenever the owners say “white.” Any talk of his collusion with agents is a little silly. Just for fun, let’s say Upshaw does go along and plays ball on a rookie salary cap - they you have guys like Florio and Bryant Gumble proclaiming he’s the Commissioner’s lapdog.
Ok, Mike, we get it. You don’t like Gene Upshaw. But spare us the Oliver Stone-style conspiracy theories. What would YOU do if you were in his spot? Give the owners what they want?
Players getting worked up about a non-existent salary cap would be short-sighted and stupid. That’s not the real issue. The real issue is hanging onto as many of the concessions as they got in the last CBA negotiation as they can. After you secure your part of the pie, then you can worry about how it gets cut up - if you can use it as part of negotiating a larger part of the pie, all the better.
If the owners were serious about a rookie cap, then they would have made concessions to get it. If the owners don’t care, why should the players? Having players demand a rookie cap will only result in players having to give concessions to get it. Giving up concessions to force owners to manage their league properly? It’s completely backwards.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)