<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: END OF DRAFT SPARKS &#8220;MASS CONFUSION&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/</link>
	<description>The Best Pro Football Scoop on the Internet</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: B1ACK A1</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21970</link>
		<dc:creator>B1ACK A1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21970</guid>
		<description>Give 3 days before any free agent can sign a deal. That would be more than enough time to listen to all offers, instead of being forced into a 'take it or leave it'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give 3 days before any free agent can sign a deal. That would be more than enough time to listen to all offers, instead of being forced into a &#8216;take it or leave it&#8217;.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21970">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snapper</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21798</link>
		<dc:creator>snapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21798</guid>
		<description>They should have a "match" similar to what they do for med students. The team submits a prioritized list of UDFA's and the players  prioritize their teams. A computer program makes the assignments based on an algorithm of some kind. Simple solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should have a &#8220;match&#8221; similar to what they do for med students. The team submits a prioritized list of UDFA&#8217;s and the players  prioritize their teams. A computer program makes the assignments based on an algorithm of some kind. Simple solution.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21798">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MFlick</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21667</link>
		<dc:creator>MFlick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21667</guid>
		<description>Sounds like the 'Inside Source' couldn't get the guys they wanted.

I would think the players like being able to field a bunch of offers, without a lot of restrictions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the &#8216;Inside Source&#8217; couldn&#8217;t get the guys they wanted.</p>
<p>I would think the players like being able to field a bunch of offers, without a lot of restrictions.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21667">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21598</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21598</guid>
		<description>I don't see how extending the draft  by a couple of rounds is going to help.  It is only going to give each team a few more players and there are still going to be free agents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how extending the draft  by a couple of rounds is going to help.  It is only going to give each team a few more players and there are still going to be free agents.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21598">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21594</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21594</guid>
		<description>Players at the bottom of the draft know there's a chance that they won't be drafted.  If I'm that player's agent, I have a set of teams in mind that would be a good fit, so that the minute after Mr. Irrelevant is announced I focus on those offers first.  Likewise, the teams should have a good idea of the players that will go undrafted and have those targets set as well.  Precedent has been set over the years on undrafted free agent contracts so it's not like there's a ton of negotiating room.  I think a waiting period gives undrafted players more bargaining power which would be unfair to the 7th rounders.  Adding rounds just pushes the problem ahead to the next group of undrafted free agents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Players at the bottom of the draft know there&#8217;s a chance that they won&#8217;t be drafted.  If I&#8217;m that player&#8217;s agent, I have a set of teams in mind that would be a good fit, so that the minute after Mr. Irrelevant is announced I focus on those offers first.  Likewise, the teams should have a good idea of the players that will go undrafted and have those targets set as well.  Precedent has been set over the years on undrafted free agent contracts so it&#8217;s not like there&#8217;s a ton of negotiating room.  I think a waiting period gives undrafted players more bargaining power which would be unfair to the 7th rounders.  Adding rounds just pushes the problem ahead to the next group of undrafted free agents.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21594">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3efin</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21591</link>
		<dc:creator>3efin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21591</guid>
		<description>With the death of NFL Europe, and the return of the hard 80 man roster, there will be fewer openings for these rookie free agents. Without the NFLE roster exemptions, here will probably only be spots for about 300 RFAs in NFL training camps this year. While there will be some bidding for a few of the top RFAs, the average guy better take any offer that he gets, because if he waits, he may find himself without a tryout. It's a buyers market this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the death of NFL Europe, and the return of the hard 80 man roster, there will be fewer openings for these rookie free agents. Without the NFLE roster exemptions, here will probably only be spots for about 300 RFAs in NFL training camps this year. While there will be some bidding for a few of the top RFAs, the average guy better take any offer that he gets, because if he waits, he may find himself without a tryout. It&#8217;s a buyers market this year.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21591">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaMayan</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21580</link>
		<dc:creator>DaMayan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21580</guid>
		<description>Or just extend the draft to 12 rounds again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or just extend the draft to 12 rounds again?
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21580">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian_21</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21569</link>
		<dc:creator>brian_21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21569</guid>
		<description>I don't know about the last paragraph, as I think it is better to be drafted than not to be drafted, but that 24 to 36 hr suggested lull is definitely a good idea -- and a must. The decisions players have to make on the spot are downright scary, and they know it can affect their football careers. The source is right. There has to be a better way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about the last paragraph, as I think it is better to be drafted than not to be drafted, but that 24 to 36 hr suggested lull is definitely a good idea &#8212; and a must. The decisions players have to make on the spot are downright scary, and they know it can affect their football careers. The source is right. There has to be a better way.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21569">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CheersAdam</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21558</link>
		<dc:creator>CheersAdam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21558</guid>
		<description>Kudos for addressing this topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos for addressing this topic.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21558">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonWoj</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21553</link>
		<dc:creator>DonWoj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21553</guid>
		<description>The easy answer is add a third day to the draft. They should add an additional 3-4 rounds. The order should be the exact order of the first round (not counting trades). They should just go down the line and pick the players they want. There should be no trades allowed, and teams should be allowed to pass and not make a pick if need be. Also any player in these rounds should all be paid the exact same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The easy answer is add a third day to the draft. They should add an additional 3-4 rounds. The order should be the exact order of the first round (not counting trades). They should just go down the line and pick the players they want. There should be no trades allowed, and teams should be allowed to pass and not make a pick if need be. Also any player in these rounds should all be paid the exact same thing.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21553">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonk1982</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21546</link>
		<dc:creator>jonk1982</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21546</guid>
		<description>“There’s got to be a better way,” the source said. -- How about adding another couple rounds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“There’s got to be a better way,” the source said. &#8212; How about adding another couple rounds?
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21546">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMB</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21543</link>
		<dc:creator>SMB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21543</guid>
		<description>Wouldn't there just be a ton of tampering during this 24 hours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t there just be a ton of tampering during this 24 hours?
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21543">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EagleMiz</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21532</link>
		<dc:creator>EagleMiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21532</guid>
		<description>As crazy as it sounds they really should add a few rounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As crazy as it sounds they really should add a few rounds.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21532">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomBradyWoot</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21527</link>
		<dc:creator>TomBradyWoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21527</guid>
		<description>Why not put them all on a 18, 24, or 36 hour waiver wire system?  I mean really, it's not fair that the kid who was drafted but drafted 252nd gets the brown end of the stick compared to a kick not drafted at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not put them all on a 18, 24, or 36 hour waiver wire system?  I mean really, it&#8217;s not fair that the kid who was drafted but drafted 252nd gets the brown end of the stick compared to a kick not drafted at all.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21527">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedScull</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21523</link>
		<dc:creator>RedScull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21523</guid>
		<description>Wouldn't delaying the singing period just give those players who have more than one option more leverage? As it is many of them get better signing bonuses than actual draft picks, why give their agents more time to squeeze more money out of teams?

Also, why would the union agree to the proposed change? It only serves players who are likely to not end up as members, and as such is effectively squeezing money from actual union members. Admittedly it's realistically not much, but the result is the same.

If there were a fixed bonus structure for rookie players (not just draftees) then why not? But as it is it doesn't serve anyone but the players who weren't good enough to be selected in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t delaying the singing period just give those players who have more than one option more leverage? As it is many of them get better signing bonuses than actual draft picks, why give their agents more time to squeeze more money out of teams?</p>
<p>Also, why would the union agree to the proposed change? It only serves players who are likely to not end up as members, and as such is effectively squeezing money from actual union members. Admittedly it&#8217;s realistically not much, but the result is the same.</p>
<p>If there were a fixed bonus structure for rookie players (not just draftees) then why not? But as it is it doesn&#8217;t serve anyone but the players who weren&#8217;t good enough to be selected in the first place.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21523">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DwayneRudd</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21519</link>
		<dc:creator>DwayneRudd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21519</guid>
		<description>Even simpler solution: Add another round to the draft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even simpler solution: Add another round to the draft.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21519">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ches</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21509</link>
		<dc:creator>Ches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21509</guid>
		<description>Agreed, give them a day or two to assess their situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, give them a day or two to assess their situation.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21509">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron32082</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21507</link>
		<dc:creator>ron32082</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/27/end-of-draft-sparks-mass-confusion/#comment-21507</guid>
		<description>Why not hold a supplemental free agent after draft party? Say Tuesday about noon to 6 pm....

I'm free to watch....how about you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not hold a supplemental free agent after draft party? Say Tuesday about noon to 6 pm&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m free to watch&#8230;.how about you?
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=21507">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
