<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SAINTS OFFER TWO PICKS FOR SHOCKEY</title>
	<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/26/saints-offer-two-picks-for-shockey/</link>
	<description>The Best Pro Football Scoop on the Internet</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PaulOttCarruth</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/26/saints-offer-two-picks-for-shockey/#comment-20994</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulOttCarruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/26/saints-offer-two-picks-for-shockey/#comment-20994</guid>
		<description>"because the story is entering the realm of the Brett Favre retirement/unretirement watch."

...in that you won't/can't stop talking about it, whether or not there's any news to report/create.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;because the story is entering the realm of the Brett Favre retirement/unretirement watch.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;in that you won&#8217;t/can&#8217;t stop talking about it, whether or not there&#8217;s any news to report/create.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=20994">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: filbertkiwi71</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/26/saints-offer-two-picks-for-shockey/#comment-20991</link>
		<dc:creator>filbertkiwi71</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/26/saints-offer-two-picks-for-shockey/#comment-20991</guid>
		<description>I would rather have Sheppard.  I don't know why the Saints would want Shockey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would rather have Sheppard.  I don&#8217;t know why the Saints would want Shockey.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=20991">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GR365</title>
		<link>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/26/saints-offer-two-picks-for-shockey/#comment-20987</link>
		<dc:creator>GR365</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/26/saints-offer-two-picks-for-shockey/#comment-20987</guid>
		<description>Why offer more than a 4th for Shockey? The Giants didn't seem to need him to win the SB42. You probably could've made the case that he's expenable, trouble maker who they could deal for a lower pick! He's over-rated in my view, more of a talker than a performer. 2nd round pick is too much for Shockey!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why offer more than a 4th for Shockey? The Giants didn&#8217;t seem to need him to win the SB42. You probably could&#8217;ve made the case that he&#8217;s expenable, trouble maker who they could deal for a lower pick! He&#8217;s over-rated in my view, more of a talker than a performer. 2nd round pick is too much for Shockey!
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.profootballtalk.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=20987">(report as inappropriate)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
