So we heard ESPN’s Merrill Hoge claim earlier in the day that, based on discussions with the Cincinnati Bengals, he believes that the Bengals would only trade receiver Chad Johnson if someone gives up two first-round picks and an established player. And the Bengals would want $5 million back from Johnson in previously-paid bonus money.
Hoge also declares that the Bengals would also be forced to cut running back Rudi Johnson if such a deal is done.
Huh?
We’ll assume for now that Hoge has had another concussion. If not, where in the heck did Hoge get the idea that the Bengals would be compelled to cut Johnson? As we’ve previously explained, the $8 million in dead money that the Bengals would be carrying after a pre-June 1 trade would be offset by Johnson’s $3 million base salary, resulting in a net hit of $5 million in 2008.
The easy way to clear the money arising from the Johnson cap hit would be to reduce quarterback Carson Palmer’s base salary from $7.75 million to the veteran minimum by paying him a big chunk of it right now as a guaranteed amount, which then would be prorated over time.
Paying Palmer $7 million right now and spreading it over five years would clear up $5.6 million in 2008 cap room. And that would be more than enough to cover the net cap hit from trading Johnson.
Bottom line — if the Bengals wanted to move Johnson, they could do it without cutting a single veteran. The truth is they don’t want to trade him, and the only way it happens today is if president Mike Brown takes a Hoge-style hit to the head.









April 26th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
You are speaking like the Bungles have a GM who understands the salary cap or football. They are trying to send a message around the NFL that they stink and Ocho is the mascot.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 26th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
The Bengals can spread the cap hit out over two seasons if 85 is cut or traded AFTER the June cutoff. Do it now and the hit counts 100% against the ‘08 cap. Have another cup of coffee.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 26th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
Strike that. My bad, I read your comments wrong, Florio.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 26th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
We’re talking about Mike Brown. He’s not gonna clear up room under the cap just so he can spend MORE money. Have the Bengals EVER restructured a player’s contract? That’s typically what you’re gonna see owners that try to maximize their ability to spend money under the cap do now and then
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 26th, 2008 at 1:38 pm
Even though we are talking about Mike Brown, this is not about money. This is about a guy (Chad) running his mouth, disrespecting his teammates, and threatening to sit out even though he is under contract until 2011. He and his sleeze agent are trying to basically bully the Bengals into trading Chad, and they are not going to do it because of the precedent it will set. If Mike Brown does decide to trade Chad at some point, it will be on Mike Browns terms.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 27th, 2008 at 1:32 pm
Why are we discussing anything based on something Merrill Hoge had to say?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated