Though as of a day ago it appeared that the league might eventually allow the St. Louis Rams to begin negotiating with one or more players at the No. 2 overall spot in the draft, NFL spokesman Greg Aiello tells us that the Rams will not be permitted to do so.
“That has been our policy,” Aiello said. “Only the team with the first pick can negotiate and sign the player.”
Aiello also said that, after this year’s draft, the league will re-evaluate the policy.
Multiple league insiders have told us that the reason for the rule is simple — the league doesn’t want to undermine the television coverage of the draft by permitting multiple teams to exercise their picks in advance via reaching contract agreements with players. In theory, four or five or six players could be under contract by the time the draft starts, which would be almost as annoying as Chris Berman disclosing picks while the Commissioner walks to the podium with the card.
If that’s the case, however, why not prohibit all pre-draft negotiation? Though we think it’s fascinating to follow the rumors (and the conflicts of interest) when a team is in a position to talk to multiple players, the only fair solution would be to stop the practice altogether, if the next team up doesn’t get a chance to negotiate before the draft after the first pick is signed.
_2.gif)





April 23rd, 2008 at 3:59 pm
they could also allow negotiation, but ask teams to keep it secret until draft day. But places like PFT would probably ruin that.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.6 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
April 23rd, 2008 at 4:00 pm
This makes the first pick way more valuable than the second pick (not on a trade chart, just in general, well, maybe on a trade chart if you make the trade well in advance of the draft).
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 23rd, 2008 at 4:08 pm
From a TV standpoint, I’d hope the NFL would allow as many teams as possible to negotiate with players before the draft. Saturday would be a lot more entertaining if the first two rounds of the draft were condensed into 3 hours instead of 10.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 23rd, 2008 at 4:08 pm
So, let’s get this straight, the NFL won’t allow the Rams to negotiate with players, and risk a possible JaMarcus Russell-like holdout, all for the sake of the draft’s TV ratings? Talk about MESSED up!!!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.8 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
April 23rd, 2008 at 4:16 pm
The rule allowing only the #1 pick holder to negotiate contracts makes perfect sense given the NFL’s desire to maintain some intrigue and television audience for the top of the first round. Mike, it seems like quite a logical leap to conclude that “the only fair solution would be to stop the practice altogether.” As you have done a nice job flushing out in the past, the #1 pick isn’t necessarily all that good for a team looking to build (given the economics). The right to negotiate with the #1 has the potential to offset the economic burden at least a bit. Why is this not “fair” to the team with the #2 pick? If this team with the #2 pick doesn’t like it, they should try winning a few less games next year.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 23rd, 2008 at 4:28 pm
Here’s a solution that might solve alot of problems. Why not let team negotiate a bunch of contract with different players prior to the draft, but have a clause in each of them saying the contract is only good if the team actually drafts the player. Thus for example the Rams could have, prior to the draft, negotiated contracts with Jake Long, Chris Long, and Matt Ryan all contingent upon them selecting the player with the 2nd pick. this would give teams the leverage necessary to lower these outrageous guaranteed monies to unproven rookies. if a guy didnt come to terms prior to the draft, the team could then make the choice of selecting him and taking the risk or being able to sign him, or pass on him and pick someone they could come to terms with. it would also leave suspense, because you still wouldn’t know who the team was going to take as long as they had multiple prospects they signed picks with. It could also alleviate some of the conflicts of interests as the agent, not knowing who the team is really going to take, would try to negotiate the best possible deal for each of his clients.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 23rd, 2008 at 4:31 pm
Or better yet, establish a rookie pay scale that eliminates the need for discussions before the draft. Then the NFL can abolish negotiating before the draft and keep their ratings.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 23rd, 2008 at 4:37 pm
I missed that reference to Chris Berman. Did he actually do that? (announcing picks on air as the Commissioner walked to the podium)
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 23rd, 2008 at 4:45 pm
good, i for one love watching the draft and am glad the nfl is putting my interest as a fan above the interest of the rams in getting an early start on their signing period. would be even better if Tuna wasn’t able to do it either, but i guess it’s never been much of an issue because it’s relatively rare for a # 1 to be signed so early — especially when it wasn’t clear whom the # 1 was going to be.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 23rd, 2008 at 4:54 pm
Just another rule that needs to be changed.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 23rd, 2008 at 4:54 pm
I know in the 2006 draft Berman was announcing picks right before the commissioner did. It was very annoying because it was obvious he was getting insider info. He’s was acting like he was a draft guru. Gonna never watch draft coverage on ESPN again… HD NFLN is the way to go!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 23rd, 2008 at 4:57 pm
Amen, about Berman telling everyone the pick before it happens. Espn is growing weaker and weaker.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 23rd, 2008 at 4:58 pm
I don’t think it’s as big a deal for the teams drafting after #1 to not have the negotiating rights. Presumably, the Dolphins have already established the ceiling for rookie contracts, and each subsequent pick will have to fall in line behind what Jake Long got. The #2 pick this year should get a contract somewhere between Long’s contract from this year and Calvin Johnson’s contract from last year. That’s not a very large window.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 23rd, 2008 at 5:02 pm
Berman doesn’t outright announce who the picks are before the Commissioner does, but he DOES hint heavily, which makes it obvious who the kinds of fans who watch the live draft coverage.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 23rd, 2008 at 5:08 pm
As a Browns fan with no real reason to watch on Saturday I will probably only tune in to see which future criminal/terrible teammate will be drafted by the Bengals. They take class acts every year…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 23rd, 2008 at 5:13 pm
Interesting that NFL.com has a video story labled “Rams on the Clock” on its Home Page…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 23rd, 2008 at 5:15 pm
WHAT THE? He does outright announce them. He says the Fiddlestix will select Bob the Builder with this pick. It ticks me off every year. Maybe they can just get rid of the commish and have Berman tell us instead. I must go with Sirius for the audio or pay $5 a month to have NFL network all year round, instead of Sept-Dec.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 23rd, 2008 at 5:19 pm
I’ve been thinking about the draft. There’s something that’s really stupid. The mystery is what’s fun. No one, not even the team with the first pick, should talk to any player regarding $ and a contract. That first pick anticipation would have been pretty cool. Let’s keep all the picks a mystery until the draft, including the first selection. What’s next? 7 picks are known before the draft?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 23rd, 2008 at 5:20 pm
smirish, while that is a good suggestion on paper, it unfortuneatly wouldn’t work.
First, if a team like the Saints starts negotiating with players, all the teams behind them would know who they were targeting and be able to try moving in front of the Saints.
Then, in order to prevent that, teams would have to negotiate with several players they have no intention of drafting to throw other teams off. That would cause turmoil in front offices to fake negotiate with dozens of players.
Then, agents would start pitting one offer against another and the teams would know who was targeting who, by the intensity of the negotiations with the agents.
That proposal would cause more problems than it corrects. Plus, it would open the door to tampering and other such issues.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 23rd, 2008 at 5:53 pm
Here’s my question:
What is actually stopping the Rams from talking to players? A slap on the wrist?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 23rd, 2008 at 7:52 pm
As long as Berman cannot announce the picks before the commish.
What a holier than thou idoit that Berman is.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated