Comments on: MATT WALSH AGREEMENT http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/23/matt-walsh-agreement/ The Best Pro Football Scoop on the Internet Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:24:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: kellyb9 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/23/matt-walsh-agreement/#comment-21634 kellyb9 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:06:26 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/23/matt-walsh-agreement/#comment-21634 LuvThatDirtyWatah, As a Pats fan myself, I think the question of whether or not these tapes are freelance or not is inconsequential. In the court of public opinion, if these tapes exist they will be linked to Belichick regardlessly (however fair or unfair that might be). Spygate, in my opinion, is been a large stir over just about nothing. As an information technology major, I can safely tell you that Belichick's camerman could've been in the crowd, on top of the stadium, in a blimp getting the same footage, OR he could have been standing on the sidelines with a camera so small as to be untraceable. He wasn't, he was standing on the sidelines. This really only proves one thing to me - The Patriots are BAD at cheating, not that the rest of the league doesn't cheat and you can bet they do (oops did I state the obvious???). If these Rams walkthroughs exist, I think we need to first evaluate what the Rams were doing that day. I've read reports that it was a red zone offensive walk through. In that case, the Rams scored on EVERY SINGLE red zone attempt. But regardless, I must admit, it opens up a can of worms - it's better for the league that this tape not exist. LuvThatDirtyWatah, As a Pats fan myself, I think the question of whether or not these tapes are freelance or not is inconsequential. In the court of public opinion, if these tapes exist they will be linked to Belichick regardlessly (however fair or unfair that might be). Spygate, in my opinion, is been a large stir over just about nothing. As an information technology major, I can safely tell you that Belichick’s camerman could’ve been in the crowd, on top of the stadium, in a blimp getting the same footage, OR he could have been standing on the sidelines with a camera so small as to be untraceable. He wasn’t, he was standing on the sidelines. This really only proves one thing to me - The Patriots are BAD at cheating, not that the rest of the league doesn’t cheat and you can bet they do (oops did I state the obvious???). If these Rams walkthroughs exist, I think we need to first evaluate what the Rams were doing that day.
I’ve read reports that it was a red zone offensive walk through. In that case, the Rams scored on EVERY SINGLE red zone attempt. But regardless, I must admit, it opens up a can of worms - it’s better for the league that this tape not exist.

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: LuvThatDirtyWatah http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/23/matt-walsh-agreement/#comment-19740 LuvThatDirtyWatah Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:59:08 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/23/matt-walsh-agreement/#comment-19740 Hey Mike, Does the case rise or fall on the following language at the end of paragraph 2? <i><b>property may be deemed to belong to the Club</b></i> How can they establish the video tapes, if they exist, are in fact property of the Pats even if circumstantial audio tapes exist? How can they not be proven to be Walsh's property obtained on his "own time"? I think Walsh and his lawyers are in for a beat-down even if it's a PR beat-down. <b>DISCLAIMER</b>: Yes, I am a lifelong Pats fan. :) Hey Mike,

Does the case rise or fall on the following language at the end of paragraph 2?

property may be deemed to belong to the Club

How can they establish the video tapes, if they exist, are in fact property of the Pats even if circumstantial audio tapes exist?

How can they not be proven to be Walsh’s property obtained on his “own time”?

I think Walsh and his lawyers are in for a beat-down even if it’s a PR beat-down.

DISCLAIMER: Yes, I am a lifelong Pats fan. :)

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: skaybaltimore http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/23/matt-walsh-agreement/#comment-19488 skaybaltimore Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:41:53 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/23/matt-walsh-agreement/#comment-19488 Oh...I get it...the NFL is an "unincorporated not for profit association". REALLY?! Oh…I get it…the NFL is an “unincorporated not for profit association”. REALLY?!

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: LebronJeremy http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/23/matt-walsh-agreement/#comment-19454 LebronJeremy Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:31:03 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/23/matt-walsh-agreement/#comment-19454 it's all perfectly clear now it’s all perfectly clear now

(report as inappropriate)

]]> By: mcjj1310 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/23/matt-walsh-agreement/#comment-19283 mcjj1310 Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:49:03 +0000 http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/04/23/matt-walsh-agreement/#comment-19283 what??? what???

(report as inappropriate)

]]>