Though we still think that reports of a looming deal with Michigan offensive tackle Jake Long are merely aimed at squeezing someone else to agree to terms with the Miami Dolphins as the No. 1 overall selection in the 2008 draft, we’ve learned that Jake Long and Vernon Gholston are indeed the two guys whom the Fins are targeting with the first pick.
The wild card in the equation, however, is Dolphins V.P. of football operations Bill Parcells. If he becomes exasperated by efforts to sign Jake Long or Gholston, Parcells could move on to Plan B.
The current conventional wisdom is that Plan B would be Virginia defensive end Chris Long, who was long presumed to be the target of the Fins, but who is behind Jake Long and Gholston on the Dolphins’ draft board.
Meanwhile, CAA continues to be mired in a hopeless conflict of interest, since the firm represents both Jake Long and Gholston — and since the firm surely does not want either player to take less money than JaMarcus Russell received at No. 1 a year ago, regardless of whether either of both of them would be happy to do so.
Each player deserves to have a truly independent voice that is representing only that player’s best interests. At this point, neither does.
That’s why we firmly believe that, before the draft, players should be able to change agents without a five-day cooling off period. In this specific case, Jake Long or Gholston desperately need to be represented by a firm other than CAA, if for no reason other than to remove the cloud of potential impropriety that is currently hovering over the entire situation.
_2.gif)





April 22nd, 2008 at 9:21 am
I still think the Fins take Chris Long. They know he is the safest pick, and after seeing what a fellow ACC DE did for Houston, they feel as if they can get the same production. Jake Long would also be a really nice pick, but with the first pick, and with so much money, I feel as if they’ll play it safe without question. But it is Parcells, so who knows really?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 22nd, 2008 at 9:38 am
They need to write into the CBA (or whatever the heck would govern an agents involvement with the NFL) that if a firm represents 2 clients in a situation like we have here, that 2 separate agents need to represent them with a firewall between them.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 22nd, 2008 at 9:51 am
Changing Agents does not seem like a logical possibility.
Why would a well known established firm like CAA, who is
in line to get a percentage of both top five candidates
(Gholston & J.Long), choose to give up the revenue to be
obtained? I think PFT is correct a conflict of interest
may exist but CAA will certainly choose to represent both
parties unless directed by the commissioner of the NFL to
do otherwise.
I do believe however PFT’s insistance that Parcells’ actions
are all about a smokescreen are overstated. He has the first
pick in the draft and a smokescreen strategy would seem to
not be that important. The agents control the market with
their adamant stance of a 15% increase every year for the
# 1 pick in the draft. The NFL may have to change the agent’s
control over rookies in the future. I’m sure the agents will
have a response, “don’t mess with free enterprise”.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 22nd, 2008 at 9:56 am
It seems like the agents would be smart to get a deal done. They can explain that they got a good deal to future clients pretty easily. “Look, we got our guy to be the #1 pick when they were willing to take someone else. We got him the best money available.”
Besides, they’d be smart to take their huge paycheck now rather than delay it.
Hell, I’ll represent him and get the deal done.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 22nd, 2008 at 10:32 am
Pure greed on CAA’s part.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 22nd, 2008 at 10:34 am
Why not agree to terms before the draft, then you can focus your attention to your next client.
It’s a win-win for the team & agent.
If you can negotiate 2 of the top 3 or 4 picks and get them signed early, that’s more impressive than a month-long holdout for an extra $500,000 signing bonus.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 22nd, 2008 at 12:57 pm
How about a real slotting system to eliminate the agents conflict of interest all together? It’s the one thing that the NBA does right, and the NFL does horribly, horribly wrong.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)