Periodically, the name still comes up. Matt Walsh. The guy who knows (or thinks he knows) something incriminating about the New England Patriots, the St. Louis Rams, and Super Bowl XXXVI.
The situation has become downright comical, for all concerned. Walsh, who initially hid behind a confidentiality agreement that in reality (according to the team, whose assertion has not been rebutted by Walsh’s lawyer) doesn’t exist, wants absolute and total legal immunity and protection before Walsh does or says anything. The league, ignoring perceptions and obsessing instead over legal mumbo-jumbo, comes off as fearful of what Walsh might say, and as hopeful that he’ll simply go away. Walsh, by striving to get the legal equivalent of an entire stack of “Get Out of Jail Free” cards, comes off as being unreasonably paranoid — or, on the other hand, reasonably worried that he has done something for which he could get into real trouble.
We mention this again because there’s a brief report from John Tomase of the Boston Herald regarding the status of the Walsh discussions. The full text of the entire article is as follows:
“It has been more than two months since the name Matt Walsh entered the local sports lexicon, and we may finally be close to knowing what light, if any, he can shed on the Patriots’ videotaping practices.
“Speaking at the SMU athletic forum luncheon in Texas on Wednesday, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell expressed hope that a deal allowing the former Patriots video assistant to talk will be struck soon.”
Um, Goodell has been expressing hope for most of the more than two months since Walsh’s name first surfaced. But hope isn’t putting Walsh in a position to talk. There’s an impasse between the two sides, and no one is willing to blink.
It’s well beyond the point of ridiculous, in our view. We think that the NFL should give Walsh whatever protections and indemnity he wants (but nothing more, such as for example payment of his lawyer’s fees), and publish to the media the letter (written hopefully in plain English) articulating the offer. If Walsh thereafter fails or refuses to speak, it will be safe to assume that the current resident of Hawaii is full of something other than pig and pineapple.
One of Roger Goodell’s biggest strengths during his time as Commissioner has been his willingness to approach problems with common sense, without allowing the stew of worries that lawyers can conjure to paralyze him. This time around, however, we fear that Goodell has let the lawyers set the agenda, which has prevented the league and the Patriots from putting these vague, but sinister, allegations behind them.
And that’s what ultimately needs to occur. One way or the other, the league and the Patriots need to close the book on this. If, as the Patriots contend, nothing improper occurred in connection with Super Bowl XXXVI, it’s in everyone’s interests to let Walsh speak, to respond to his statements, and to move forward.
_2.gif)





April 18th, 2008 at 8:39 am
Tomasse is an idiot. He has an ax to grind with the Patriots, ever since his fall out on the day before the Super Bowl. Tomasse, will not let this story go away. He’s embarrassed by what he said prior to the Super Bowl and will do whatever he can to get Walsh to talk, to try to cover up his tracks. He hates Belichick, because now the Patriots won’t give the Herald any info, because of Tomasse. Talk this story with a grain of salt, just look at the writer. If it came from a Mike Reiss or someone else, it have legs, but not from Tom Ass E.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.4 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 8:50 am
Walsh has been too busy looking for Mike Brady’s tiki statue to get with Goodell just yet.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 8:58 am
It’s getting tiresome to say the least. We all know what happened. The Patriots flat out cheated. Extensively at that. However, I’m sure we all want to hear exactly what this kid does or does not know. The Pats will go down in history with an aterisk firmly attached to anything won by them. Nothing their owner, coaches, players, or fans say will change that. They violated the sanctity of the league. Committed offeses far worse than anything Pac-Man Jones or Chris Henry could have ever done. They compromised the integrity of the game. There is no greater offense. In the end, they’ll get what they d deserve. Their “Dynsasty” status? Shattered. After all “Dynasties don’t lose Super Bowls. The 60’s Packers, 70’s Steelers, 80
s 49’s, & 90’s Cowboys went a 13-0 in Super Bowls. Funny how when the Pats could no longer see what was coming via video tape, the Giants ran over and through them. Dynasties don’t lose Super Bowls to double digit dogs. Everything else is just icing on the cake…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.6 / 5 with 17 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 9:01 am
So the NFL should simply give Walsh carte blanche to say anything he wants without consequences? The reports from the Globe have already portrayed Walsh as a guy with an axe to grind with the team, so now the league should simply accept what he says without consequences?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 9:05 am
Goddell showed great strength and wisdom back in Sept. when he tried to sweep what could have been one of the biggest sports scandal since the Black Sox scandal under the rug. The swift destruction of evidence without full transperency and full disclosure shows he just wants the whole thing to go away. He doesn’t want to know the truth.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 9:05 am
What is Matt paranoid for? One day, driving up to a toll booth only to be surprised by men with tommy guns? You went against the family Matt.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 9:11 am
Goddell wants the whole thing to go away. After all, he gave the Pats the slap on the wrist and had the evidence destroyed within no time. Where’s the transperency? Goddell is just another suit. Let’s hammer Pacman but let the Pats off with a slap on the wrist. He’s handled this with all the skill of Barney Fife.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.5 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 9:17 am
“So the NFL should simply give Walsh carte blanche to say anything he wants without consequences? The reports from the Globe have already portrayed Walsh as a guy with an axe to grind with the team, so now the league should simply accept what he says without consequences? ”
No one said that. Just let him say what he thinks he knows. If there is no proof to what he says, then the cheaters are off the hook.
The longer this goes on, the more it looks like the NFL just wants it to go away without addressing it.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 9:22 am
Is it possible that the league is purposely delaying any Walsh revelations on purpose. Perhaps their strategy is to drag it out as long as possible so that by the time anything is revealed, there is no longer an interest. Happens a lot. Hot one day, then nobody cares. If this strings out much longer, nobody will care.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 9:25 am
Dynasty shattered. So the Patriots went to one more Super Bowl than the 90s Cowboys, but since the Cowboys didn’t lose Super Bowls (they just weren’t good enough to get to 4 like the 2000s Pats did) they are a better Dynasty. So the Pats history as a Dynasty is shattered because they were more successful than the 90s Cowboys. So if the Pats win the next four Super Bowls, they will never be included in the same light as the 80s 49ers, 90s Cowboys, or 70s Steelers because they lost a Super Bowl.
Ladies and Gentlemen…. Introducing the intelligence of Patriots haters. There are all about as sharp as a bag of door knobs.
BTW, how is what they did any worse than what the 49ers and Broncos got punished for (yes, they were both punished for cheating during their Super Bowl years) where they cheated the cap to unfairly have more stocked teams where if they obeyed the cap rules would not have happened?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.1 / 5 with 9 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 9:29 am
Tomase’s ass is on the line on this. He broke the story, days before the Super Bowl. He desperately wants Walsh to have a tape of the Rams walkthrough. If it turns out that Walsh has nothing, he could possibly lose his job for irresponsible reporting.
As far a Walsh, why should anyone promise him that he can lie or slander, and not face a lawsuit? Reportedly the NFL’s main contention is that they will protect him,”provided that he tells the truth.” His lawyers reportedly have a problem with that provision.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 9:43 am
The Patriots won all of the Super Bowls long before there was any edict from the NFL emphasizing what and what you could not do with a video camera with respect to taping sidelines. The Walsh issue is something totally different. Everyone in New England has heard stories that Walsh stole team equipment and other property (stuff that doesn’t relate to tapes). That and the stories from the Globe about his other sleazeball behavior tell you that this is one screwed up guy. There’s no reason to believe a word he says. If he has physical evidence (surely stolen), let him show it and then let his extended 15 minutes of fame end.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.85 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 9:50 am
Girthy One,
Actually, the league is dragging this out so Walsh can do a halftime special interview right during the Thursday night kick off at Giants stadium. He isn’t going for delay, he is going for ratings.
Imagine if Walsh has something. What would the ratings be if he single handily brought down the Patriots and the NFL? Sure the league would be in trouble after that and could potentially be as popular as boxing is now, but it would be damn good television.
The league and Patriots wanted this to come out about a month ago. It was the perfect time to do it if Walsh had any dirt. Which I seriously doubt at least anything really damaging. The attention of the sports community were elsewhere and it is plenty of time to do damage control before the season starts. The league knows it isn’t going away and knows it is best for Walsh to talk sooner rather than later. The longer they wait to get him to talk the more people think they are trying to stop him from talking which clearly isn’t the case.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 9:52 am
I do agree that Goodell wants this to go away. That is why he is upping the pressure to get Walsh to talk. He knows it is the only way to make it go away. Both the Patriots and the League want Walsh to talk. Walsh doesn’t seem to want to talk unless he gets blanket indemnity. I don’t blame his lawyer for trying to get this, but it makes you wonder what evidence he has if he needs it.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 10:03 am
RJ Carrano still believes there were WMD’s in Iraq too.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 10:07 am
Matt Walsh, has had every opportunity to come forward. What’s the hold up? Well, the SuperBowl is over! Wait, maybe the Draft is a big enough forum? Ok, well How about the season opener? No! Hmm? Want to wait until the next SuperBowl? Maybe…The fact is that Walsh seems to be quite full of himself! He has a history of lying to advance, himself, his resume and now. Holding one of the best Franchises in the NFL hostage.
Jon Tomase Bostorn Herald has an axe to grind also…His rep. such as it is,..is on the line. The fact is that he should be called into the League office to explain why he went woth this unsubstanciated story! He can say no, Walsh being the source of the story! If Walsh won’t talk, then Goodell should go after Thomase for answers! I have never seen so many people make blanket statements about cheating, when the facts aren’t even in yet! It shows thier ignorence of professional sports… Not everybody tapes, OK I’ll give you that, however if your team isn’t trying to figure out what the other Teams are attempting, then your coaching staff isn’t doing thier job…
People who are convinced that BB and the Pats are just cheaters are dumb! To think that 3 SB victories are a result of tapes, defiles the players ability to execute on the field of play! That’s where the game is won and lost. Ask Rodney, Asante and the Oline about execution under pressure! Rodney knocks the ball out from Tyree, Asante makes that Int., the Oline gave TB 1 or 2 more opportunities. The Pats would be getting that 4th ring this year! My advise ti the hand wringers, get real!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 10:09 am
This is a total joke! He has NOTHING! If he did why didn’t he come out with it years ago? I love it when others try to demean the Pats Championships. It just shows their true JEALOUS COLORS. Those Championships were earned through hard work and commitment, not sideline video taping of opponents defensive signals.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.5 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 10:47 am
And we will rule again in 2008
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 10:53 am
Dynasties don’t lose Super Bowls.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 6 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 11:17 am
LOL! I love this logic that dynasties don’t lose Super Bowls. So Dynasties can go years without making it to Super Bowls, but they can’t lose them. I do realize it is much harder to get to a division round or conference championships and lose than to get to the Super Bowl and lose. Any team can lose the Super Bowl, but only Dynasties can lose in the conference round. Losing in the NFC Championships is a sing of excellence, but losing in the Super Bowl is a sign of failure.
People do realize that San Francisco had a total of 9 years they didn’t get to the Super Bowl in between their first Super Bowl and their last Super Bowl. Two of those years, they didn’t even make the playoffs.
In between the Steelers’ Super Bowls in the 70s, the Steelers lost in the first round of the playoffs in 1977.
First it was the Pats aren’t a dynasty because dynasties don’t only win by 3 points in the Super Bowl. Now it is dynasties don’t lose in the Super Bowl.
Why don’t the haters just say they wish their team was as good as the Patriots and be done with it? Trying to tear down the Patriots does not make haters teams better.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 11:20 am
he has nothing since there is no confidentiality agreement, which he lied about there being and he still won’t talk.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 11:22 am
Carrano, you do realize Jimmy Johnson admitted to taping signals too? i guess the Cowboys are tainted too. he said current O line coach for the Colts is the best in the game at stealing them.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 11:22 am
I think it’s pretty obvious Walsh has something. I’m not sure what it entails, but he appears to have something. Remember this… he wasn’t the one who came forward; people tracked back through old employees of the Patriots and found him during the initial controversy.
It’s also pretty clear why Matt Walsh is trying to get such an intricate indemnity agreement. There are two reasons he needs a significant amount of protection.
First, any evidence he has he must have stolen. Charges for corporate espionage are serious, and getting indemnity from them is difficult. Walsh isn’t protected by whistleblower laws here, and it’s not like he was taking them to protect the little guy. Walsh broke the law (and covered his ass) by keeping copies of the tapes/documents in question, not to mention opened himself up for a HUGE lawsuit from the Patriots.
Second, anything he comes up with the Patriots have 2 easy rebuttals for. First they can flat-out deny they are authentic (depending on what he comes up with) and second they can say they never asked him to create them. They’ll be painting a picture of Matt Walsh as a rogue filmer who, on his own accord, decided to make these films, and that the films were never used. Since they will claim they didn’t instruct him to make the films they will waive their indemnity to him and go after him for the things I outlined in #1.
This is the issue that is taking so long. No matter what Walsh comes up with they’ll say he’s lying about being directed to tape/record/transcribe it. And since they’ll claim he’s lying they’ll yank his indemnity. Walsh (well likely his atty) is smart to hold out and recognize this reality.
Walsh obviously has something… That should be a given at this point, the issue to be debated now is whether or not he should be fully protected for revealing whatever he has, whether or not he stole it, and whether or not he can prove he was directed to get it.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 11:29 am
“Dynasties don’t lose Super Bowls. ”
Do they lose World Series’?(See: New York Yankees).
Of course Dynasties lose championships. Teams just don’t go on winning forever. Why do sports fans go completely retarded when talking about the Patriots?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 11:30 am
Also.. it was because they didnt have video that they didn’t win the Superbowl? How in the hell did they win 18 straight up to that game? Friggin morons.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)