One of the facts that he been lost in the question of whether the New York Giants will trade tight end Jeremy Shockey is the dollars and the cents.
A league source tells us that Shockey is due to earn only (only?) $1.9 million in 2008. Thus, the Giants can afford to keep him, and thus they very well might.
Next year, the analysis changes, when Shockey’s base salary surpasses $3.5 million. By then, it might make sense for the team to move him.
We’re also hearing that Shockey’s desire to be traded doesn’t arise only from the fact that he’s still having trouble dealing with the team’s playoff run and Super Bowl win without him. Shockey, as we’re told, also is angling for a new deal.
The problem, as a practical matter, is that few teams will be inclined to make the investment of cash and picks necessary to get him, given that he’s still recovering from a serious leg injury.
In the end, it’s possible that a deal will only be done if the package includes a conditional 2009 draft pick based on his performance in 2008, and if he agrees to a contract that diverts a big chunk of the money to per-game roster bonuses or incentives.
_2.gif)





April 18th, 2008 at 10:52 am
If the Giants were wise, they would keep Shock on the roster in 2008 as the G Men’s offense would present matchup problems all over the place with Shockey and Boss stretching the field. However, the Saints should only deal a draft choice and no player. Shockey would flourish in Paytons wide open scheme.
Hopefully Shockey will get (if he hasnt already) Drew Rosenhaus as his agent and play a TO, Javon Walker, Willis McGahee and a Chad Johnson on the G mane (whine and complain until you get traded), and then he will be a member of the Saints at a disounted rate.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 10:55 am
They should keep him on the bench so we can watch him whine all next season.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 18th, 2008 at 10:58 am
Please (please?) stop (stop?) the “(only?)” (”(only?)”?) thing. It’s old (old?). Thanks!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 18th, 2008 at 11:08 am
He is a talent, but cannot stay healthy. I’d be leary of making a big commitment. The Giants would be wise to hold on to him for one more year.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 18th, 2008 at 11:11 am
Will Shockey be there when the Giants visit the White House, scheduled for April 30? Intriguing….(Scratch chin).
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 18th, 2008 at 11:11 am
the Giants didn’t win because Shockey was hurt, they won because TO and Brady were hurt.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 11:38 am
Spot on, nwla. We know Shockey would fluorish in Payton’s scheme because he already has. Shocked’s best season, his rookie year, was the year he was used more receiver because Payton was the Giants’ OC for most of the year. That’s why Shockey wants to be a Saint and why SP wants Shockey.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 12:15 pm
Henry Plainview, football is a no-excuse game. It doesn’t matter if Brady was hurt. The bottom line is the Giants won and the Pats lost. Even in no excuse, the Giants won it all on the road.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 12:37 pm
“it doesn’t matter that Brady was hurt?”
i stopped reading after that part.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 18th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
Looks pretty good for the Giants. If he has a healthy and productive season more teams will probably get in the mix for him.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated