With Deion Sanders of NFL Network trying to get Bears kick returner/receiver/only decent skill-position player Devin Hester a new contract with two years remaining on his rookie deal, Hester might think that, absent an extension, he’ll finish out his current contract in 2009 and become an unrestricted free agent in 2010, which is on track to be the year without a salary cap.
Even if the Bears were to use the franchise tag on Hester in 2010, he’d be in line for a significant one-year salary, which by 2010 could be more than $10 million for a wideout.
But here’s the problem, and it’s something that few players realize. Though the prospect of a season without a salary cap causes many a player’s eyes to be replaced by dollar signs, the reality is that, in the uncapped year, the threshold for achieving unrestricted free agency moves from four years to six.
So Hester won’t be an unrestricted free agent. He’ll be a restricted free agent, and he’ll be in line for a salary in the neighborhood of $3 million for the 2010 season, assuming that the Bears use the high tender.
Of course, the Bears might still opt to use the franchise tag, since there very well could be a team out there that’s willing to give up a first-round pick and a third-round pick for one of the most dynamic players in the league. Then again, dynamic players can lose their mojo pretty quickly (see Hall, Dante); coughing up big money and two high draft picks might ultimately be viewed as a risk not worth taking.
Regardless, the point here is that Hester essentially is caught in a five-year deal with the Bears, given realities of the uncapped year about which many players are oblivious. And if the CBA is extended and the current free agency/salary cap system is still used as of 2011, the Bears will then be able to slap the franchise tag on him, meaning that they can force him to play for six years before he gets a realistic shot at the open market.








April 17th, 2008 at 9:12 am
I doubt the players are oblivious.. their agents take care of this stuff, because they’re, you know, really high paid athletes.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 17th, 2008 at 9:35 am
He signed the contract and I’ve always believed in honoring your contract. However, if the Bears wish to keep him beyond the 5 or 6 years, it would be in their best interest to “take care” of him probably after this year. By delaying, Hester will most likely have an axe to grind against the organization & make it a point leave on principle when the time comes. Or pull a Chad Johnson and bring negative publicity to the organization before that time comes.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 17th, 2008 at 12:51 pm
The guys not hurting for money….hes played himself into plenty of endorsements. He’s got two years left, Angelo always wait til the final year, as should be. He’s done a great job managing the financials of this team, Let him have a great third year in the league and then he’ll get paid.
On a sidenote, what do you pay a guy like him. If you franchise him, (there isn’t a franchise tag for a special teams player) he’ll be paid as the top 5 receivers in the league. That he is not, but is a return man worth top reciever money? Then again, he did score more td’s than any other bear last year, so maybe.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 17th, 2008 at 2:07 pm
We gotta find a way to keep this miraculous freak of nature spectacle happy.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated