A couple of weeks ago, we developed a revised trade chart for valuing draft picks. We’ve since caught wind of a new chart that has been developed by and among multiple teams, and that could be put in use as soon as this year.
The new chart can be seen right here.
In contrast to the current trade chart, the new chart has very different values for the picks in round one. At the top, the points are compressed. The first pick was worth 3,000; it’s now down to 2,000. However, the sixth pick is worth more under the new chart than it was under the prior version. Each remaining pick, from No. 7 to No. 32, is worth more as well, with the last pick in the round now worth 670, up from 590.
The only difference in round two is that the first pick in the round is worth 570 under the new chart. It previously had a value of 580. The values for all picks in rounds three through seven are unchanged.
The chart has been revised due to the dramatic increases in the contracts paid to the first few players selected in the draft. The financial investment required when exercising such a high pick necessarily has reduced the total value of these picks, necessitating a reduction in the total perceived trade value of the top selections.
The apparent reason for the 100-point gap between the bottom of round one and the top of round two is that the last player drafted in round one can be signed to a five-year deal. At the top of round two, the maximum duration is four years.
Under that theory, however, the difference between picks No. 16 and No. 17 should be more than 40 points, since the maximum contract length at the top half of round one is six years.
It remains to be seen whether the new chart becomes widely used by NFL teams. It’s clearly an improvement, however, over the outdated chart that was developed in the 1990s.
_2.gif)





April 15th, 2008 at 10:51 am
A new chart is definitely a good idea for now, but what about in the future. The new chart is updated to reflect the high contracts at the top. But what happens if/when they finally get a rookie pay scale approved? Will teams still be willing to use this chart, or will they revert to old one?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 15th, 2008 at 11:19 am
if this is legit, kudos to you for getting your hands on it. It’s very interesting to see how picks at the top of the draft have less drastic differences in value based on the bust factor and money shelled out that comes along with such high picks.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 15th, 2008 at 11:27 am
I think if a rookie pay scale was put into place an entirely new chart would have to be developed based on that.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 15th, 2008 at 11:53 am
A rookie pay scale is inevitable, how much longer do you see the veterans in the league sitting by each year asking for more money only to have the new kid come in getting more money up front than the vet has on the entire term of his contract? This chart will help teams move towards that, but I dont see it happening anytime soon. The chart needed to be tweaked based solely on the changesthee game has seen in the last decade.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 15th, 2008 at 12:14 pm
Given the new chart, the Cowboys could package picks 22 and 28 to get up as high as 5 if DMC falls that far.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 15th, 2008 at 12:26 pm
The drop of 100 points from pick 32 to 33 does not make any sense
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 15th, 2008 at 12:42 pm
Isn’t a trade chart de facto proof of collusion among the teams to lock players in to a salary slot, in the absence of a rookie pay scale? The owners are essentially agreeing to compensation for players without consent of the union. So changing the trade chart is a backdoor way for the owners to unilaterally adjust the rookie pay scale downward, at least at some points in the draft.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 15th, 2008 at 1:09 pm
If we get a rookie pay scale, this probably reverts back to being more similar to the old chart.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 15th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
I like it, a team like Jacksonville could package their 1st and 2nd and get all the way to 15th, currently getting to 16/17 takes practically their whole draft.
-C
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 15th, 2008 at 5:27 pm
Have to pat myself on the back. When Florio put out his trade chart, I commented that 2-7 should stay the same and the first pick should be worth 2000 pts. Looks like league execs do read PFT.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated