After years (actually, decades) of virtually unquestioned authority over the NFL Players Association, long-time Executive Director Gene Upshaw faces the first real threat to his position.
According to Chris Mortensen of ESPN, Ravens kicker Matt Stover outlined in a Monday e-mail to other team player reps a plan for having a new leader in place by March 2009.
In the message, Stover mentioned a Friday conference call involving several player reps. “I was on that conference call and I am not the only rep who listened and felt that it is time for a change,” Stover wrote.
The full text of the Stover e-mail is right here.
The effort possibly is in response to recent comments from Upshaw in which he stridently declared an intention to ignore the union’s mandatory retirement rule until the right person is found to replace him, while also refusing to hire a second-in-command who could be groomed to do just that.
“There is only one No. 1 and there will not be a No. 2,” Upshaw told SportsBusiness Journal for its March 31 issue. “Number 2 is always trying to become No. 1 and never wants to wait. They can always do it better. They are like backup [quarterbacks]. There is a reason they are backups.”
Upshaw was characteristically defiant in response to the Stover e-mail. “Matt Stover has no clue,” Upshaw told Mort. “Whoever is pulling his chain is doing a disservice to the union. I could understand the idea that they need to get rid of me if I wasn’t doing a good job but, shoot, the owners are mad because they think I’ve done too good of a job.”
The problem is that it really is a bad time for the players to finally (how do I put this delicately?) grow a pair. The union has been doing things for years that, in our opinion, aren’t in the best interests of the players at large. But yet no one has ever done anything about it. Now, with the owners chugging toward an early scuttling of the current labor contract and serious negotiations needed in order to get an extension in place before the teams have to suffer the headaches of the last year with a salary cap in place, there isn’t enough time to make a change and get an extension in place before partial hell begins to break loose when the 2009 league year launches.
Then again, having a new Executive Director in position by March 2009 would give the new guy two years to work something out before all-out Armageddon arrives with the expiration of the CBA.
To be fair, Upshaw has done a great job in getting the players the biggest possible piece of the pie. But he has been involved in plenty of controversial issues, many of which haven’t previously stuck to him.
For starters, he gets paid way too much money for what he does. The players could find a highly capable and motivated Executive Director who would do the job for far less money than what Upshaw receives. In other words, Upshaw’s compensation doesn’t reflect the forces of the open market.
Also, he is too emotional and abrasive when challenged. Saying that Matt Stover “has no clue” isn’t the mark of a man who is capable of controlling his feelings and making objective and reasoned judgments. Last year, Upshaw said that he would “break [the] damn neck” of Hall of Fame lineman Joe DeLamielleure regarding the still-smoldering issue of benefits for retired players.
This isn’t the first time a player has complained about Upshaw. Two years ago, Vikings center Matt Birk called Upshaw a piece of something other than pizza. “Too many guys in the league just accept whatever Gene says,” Birk said at the time. “I don’t know why no one has called this guy out.”
Birk did, and now Stover is spearheading an effort to transform the effort into something more than periodic words.
But Stover might want to be careful. It’s a lot easier to break the neck of a kicker.
_2.gif)






April 8th, 2008 at 1:24 pm
That’s the kind of brass balls I like to see from my annual fantasy football kicker.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 8th, 2008 at 1:25 pm
This is kind of what I have talking about all day in reponse to some other bad finacial arangements and rules like one sided contracts and no apparent input, voting or influence even from the player reps.
The NFLPA really does need to unite make a better set of rules or the players would be better off getting rid of the union and the CBA altogether and enjoying the benifits of individual finacial freedom and negotiating power like the rest of the workforce.
The system is not too good for lowpaying labor jobs with a lot more supply than demand, but if there was no draft and players could simply be free agents from the start, the average football player is going to pocket a whole lot more cash without the expected right to retire at 30, but a much better opportunity to.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 8th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
Other than people selling peanuts in the stands, whos pay in football does reflect the open market?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 8th, 2008 at 1:55 pm
On the Waterfront, starring Matt Stover as Terry Malloy, Matt Birk as Father Barry, and Gene Upshaw as Johnny Friendly. Also starring Joe DeLamielleure as ‘Pop’ Doyle and Drew Rosenhaus as Charley ‘The Gent’ Malloy.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 8th, 2008 at 1:56 pm
I worked for the NFLPA in the 80’s, and can say that, without a doubt, Upshaw has very little to do with the inner workings and direction of the union. He is (and was) nothing more than a figurehead put in place by the NFLPA’s legal department.
Upshaw outlived his usefulness for this role the day he started.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 8th, 2008 at 1:59 pm
It’s about time somebody finally took steps to do something about Upshaw. It should have been done a few years ago, but it’s better now than after the upcoming negotiations.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 8th, 2008 at 2:08 pm
Well said Matt Stover. A year too late? Absolutely, but well said none the less.
The bottom line here is that Upshaw needs to go; I do not believe that his decisions are based on the best interests of those that pay him. Rather they are based on his own ego and relationships with the agents who keep his pocket full, as if the NFLPA doesnt do a good enough job on their own.
The most pressing need for the NFL and in turn the NFLPA is to maintain the popularity of the sport. The way I see it there are 3 things that need to happen;
1. Keep the salary cap. If the NFL turns into MLB where high revenue teams can just outbid the other ones, I am done. Sure I will still maintain an interest but it will be about the same level as my interest in MLB; which is to watch the highlights and to go to about two games a year.
2. Create a rookie pay scale. The NBA has one and it works extremely well, you get paid based on your slot and that is it. The number of years and the pay is fixed. This would open up trading and it would actually benefit the teams that need the most help.
3. Make it easier to discipline turds. I am sure most of us have worked in a union at some point and know the difficulties of getting rid of a bad apple. The NFL has gotten a lot of bad press regarding their own players who have run ins with the law. If the union is on board and can create a 3 strike type of system where each run in gets you a specific penalty, then the teams dont even need to get involved and everyone will be penalized according to the system. Also players would know ahead of time what the penalties will be.
Gene we all know you are loaded already, why not get out while its still your choice. Then you can do what other senile retirees do; sit in a rocking chair with your bloated bank account and watch reruns of Matlock while bitching about the old days.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
April 8th, 2008 at 2:09 pm
It’s a good time for a change. Upshaw has to much invested in the current situation to recognize that he played a huge role in formulating their mess. Why wouldn’t the owners want to renegotiate their deal with the NFLPA. Upshaw gave them that right. On top of that, when was that last time you’ve heard that a player wants to renegotiate? Like, at least once a day…
Contracts and agreements appear worthless in the world of the NFL.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 8th, 2008 at 2:23 pm
I agree totally that Upshaw’s abrasive personality is a real drawback and that he gets paid too much.
Usaually your stance on Upshaw has been a bit unfair I thought, but here you have a valid point also on what upheaval within the Union can do to the current challenges that are brewing.
It seems the writing is on the wall and am not sure who is gonna sav e my beautiful Sport from imminent Hell!!!
With all the money going around now, it seems that the reason no one has spoken up before is due to the lack of financial prize . Now that the pot is growing, then people see the position as a worthy one.
Too bad….The NFL has been in the forefront off technology in Sports and adaptation. If only the Union would adapt to a committee led decision making process rather than a single almighty head.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 8th, 2008 at 2:46 pm
If Upshaw breaks Stover’s damn neck will the union be awarded turd points ?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 8th, 2008 at 2:48 pm
Okay……..Upshaw is a tool and gets paid too much, but, by and large, the systems in place seem to be working. The players are making more money than ever; the owners are making more money than ever; the networks are making more money than ever; and the fans support the NFL like no other sport. Football survives because of the salary cap. Some of the most popular teams such as Green Bay, Pittsburg, KC etc are small market teams. You don’t want to mess with things too much……
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 8th, 2008 at 3:04 pm
yes, MVP — but priority #1 for everyone (including all of us) is for a revised, long-term CBA to be drafted. One which keeps the salary cap in place so that the current talent distribution remains scattered (except for Oakland).
Upshaw is not interested in doing this because he doesn’t see that getting rid of the cap would hurt his side more than it would help. A new leader who realizes this needs to be put in place.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 8th, 2008 at 3:21 pm
I don’t know which side is wrong in this whole CBA disagreement. Being an “average” person that makes around $50K a year, I feel that both sides make a lot of money and I would be pissed at both sides if it got to the point of a lock-out or strike, as neither side is hurting financially and I would be frustrated that something I am passionate about is taken away because each side wants to be greedier than the other.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 8th, 2008 at 3:32 pm
NonYahooHotmailAcct-
Agree 100%, Didn’t realize Upshaw was so against the cap. If that’s the case, he should be replaced.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 8th, 2008 at 3:38 pm
It’s time to get rid of that overpaid guy. He is quite disruptive and only has his bank account in mind when doing his job.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 8th, 2008 at 4:07 pm
upshaw”the owners don’t like me”well duh!!the rank and file don’t like you either.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 8th, 2008 at 4:10 pm
Who does Upshaw think he is, Jimmy Hoffa in the 60’s? Gene, it’s the Players Union, not your personal fiefdom, ya garbanzo.
The new head of the Union needs to keep one thing in mind: The interests of the players, past and present. Players now are getting all the money, but the old dudes laid the groundwork and made it all possible.
It doesn’t always have to be a dick contest when in negotiations with the owners. Go about it in a business-like manner and keep the best interests of the players and the game in mind instead of trying to prove what a big pair you have.
I nominate Birk for the new leader.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 8th, 2008 at 4:26 pm
Buh Bye Upshaw…I’ve loathed this guy for awhile now
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 8th, 2008 at 4:41 pm
having a number 2 guy worked out well for the Sith.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 8th, 2008 at 6:22 pm
If they don’t get rid of this guy soon, they’ll be Upshaws creek without a paddle.
Does he do anything besides try to come off like a tough guy wearing a nice suit?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 9th, 2008 at 2:51 am
At the risk of sounding like Morpheus, I still maintain the real “power behind the throne”, are the agents. Now everyone knows that owners aren’t legally allowed to collude (i.e. agree about money and hiring). But has anyone stopped for one f***ing second to think what the ramifications would be for football if agents collude?! Is it any wonder that there’s no rookie cap, when that’s where big agencies make their bread and butter? But of course, since agents get a reduced cut from the guaranteed money in a Franchise Tag contract, virtually every player parrots the “slap in the face” card. Hmm… slap in the player’s face or the agent’s? And how many times have we heard a player make a public statement about being willing to do a “sub-par” deal, only to drastically change their tune? How many players take a public relations hit or even a financial hit, because to do a certain contract would set a negative precedent for their agent’s other clients and future negotiations? How many times have players responded with surprise in interviews when they’re told about reported contract offers, and then quickly recover with the “I don’t know I’m just letting my agent handle it” line? To many people seem to represent their agent’s interests, rather than the other way around.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated