It figures.
Now that Chicago Bears linebacker Lance Briggs has a long-term deal that presumably has resulted in the removal of the stick from his sphincter, said stick apparently has been shifted to another linebacker on the team.
Middle linebacker Brian Urlacher plans to miss the first day of voluntary workouts, according to the Chicago Tribune. Urlacher told the Trib of his plans, which arise in part from an “unresolved contract situation,” as the newspaper describes it.
Urlacher is signed through 2011, and he is due to earn a base salary of $3.95 million in 2008. But the market has changed dramatically since Urlacher signed his long-term deal, and he presumably wants his contract adjusted to reflect the new realities of a salary cap that increases by $7 million or so per year.
Under the Collective Bargaining Agreement, players may not be forced to attend or participate in voluntary workouts. Indeed, the teams are not permitted to say or do anything suggesting that the sessions aren’t totally voluntary.
But since the NFLPA generally has remained inactive over the years while teams have said and done plenty to indicate that the sessions are anything but voluntary, guys like Vaughan McClure of the Tribune believe that it is appropriate for a team like the Bears to “briefly demote” players who have not participated in voluntary workouts.
It’s not McClure’s fault; the fact that he thinks such action is permissible results directly from the union’s chronic failure to take a stand against such practices.
With the owners poised to pull the plug two years early on the current CBA and then to try to squeeze the players into taking a smaller overall piece of the pie, it’ll be interesting to see if the union finally decides to draw a line in the sand.
_2.gif)






April 7th, 2008 at 9:00 am
With that kind of money I would hope they each have their own stick,
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 10:08 am
That wasn’t a stick, it was Paris Hilton.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 10:09 am
It sounds as though they are sharing the stick. What worked for one will work for the other, right? Urlacher simply isn’t worth more. He has years left on his current “big boy” decision, the contract he agreed to, why is he complaining? He isn’t getting any faster, he isn’t getting any better, why should the Bears (or any other team) pay more for him? He should focus on getting to the “voluntary” workouts just so the team remains interested in keeping him through the end of his career. He should man up. The fact that he isn’t does not surprize me, though, his ego is deflating.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 7th, 2008 at 10:20 am
If it’s the same stick I hope Urlacher washed it first.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 7th, 2008 at 11:15 am
Haha. The Bears cry wolf to the NFL about Briggs tampering, and it scared off the Niners from signing him. Now they’ve created themselves a lovely situation. Pay their linebackers.
Urlacher is worth what Briggs is worth at the very least. But it isn’t funny how Briggs was in the similar situation last year? Is Urlacher gonna pull the, “I’m never playing for the Bears again” card?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 7th, 2008 at 11:37 am
Urlacher’s worth a raise, but good luck getting money from the Bears cheap ownership…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 7th, 2008 at 11:41 am
He’s a linebacker, they don’t wash butthole sticks!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 7th, 2008 at 12:54 pm
“Mr. Shalz, a Cheerleader, says:
April 7th, 2008 at 10:09 am
It sounds as though they are sharing the stick. ”
I wonder if Fred Smoot supplied it.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 7th, 2008 at 1:21 pm
It looks like the child support and divorce payments have
caught up to this guy…Its funny after such events these
players seem to think they are being cheated by a contract that they agree to
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 7th, 2008 at 1:28 pm
this is ridiculous. The NFL cannot keep paying players more money just because they “feel” underpaid. Urlacher in particular has nothing to gripe about. He plays in one of the biggest football markets in the world, and has benefited enourmuosly from it. He has raked in huge dollars, as a media figure, through endorsements and advertisements simply because he is a good linebacker in Chicago. If you don’t think Urlacher has benefited from playing in chicago, simply compare him to Zach Thomas. Sure he got his share of coverage and endorsements, but nothing near Urlacher. No LB ever got the media coverage Urlacher did with a subpar team. He has only gone to the playoffs 3 times in his whole career (and was one and done twice). No-one else would have had that kind of press with that kind of team record. He agreed to the contract he is under and has 3 years left on it. Situations like this are exactly why the NFL (and many other sports) are going to be heading toward strikes in the near future. NFL players get away with murder with their contracts. If their underpaid, they hold out. If theyre on a bad team, they hold out. If they want to live closer to their hometown, they hold out. If they dont like the coach, they hold out. If a player who is less skilled gets more money then them, they hold out. The only reason a team should pay a player in Urlachers situation more, is if he is willing to take reduced pay with dropping performance. But of course, that would be unfair. Oh the poor NFLPA, theyre always getting dumped. By the way, I’m a huge bears fan, and I love Urlacher but this is ridiculous.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 1:30 pm
It looks like child support and divorce payments have caught
up to this guy…Its funny how these players feel they have
been cheated on contracts they agreed on after such events.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 7th, 2008 at 1:33 pm
Bears ownership should go check their cell phones for abusive text messages.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 7th, 2008 at 1:51 pm
Anyone who hasn’t seen this one coming has their head in the sand. It’s been coming since the new CBA was renegotiated. The Bears have plenty of cap room and have been conspicuously silent during free agency. It’s time to use that space to re-do an antiquated contract. It will also be a popular move in the locker room to reward the face of the franchise.
As a side note, Rosenhaus is supposedly on his way to Chicago to discuss the extension of Tommie Harris’ contract. The Bears need to get these two guys locked up and start looking to the draft.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 7th, 2008 at 2:17 pm
yo Brian, 9ers will give you $20m a year ….
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 7th, 2008 at 4:11 pm
Even as a Bears fan I think Urlacher’s smoking something they scraped off of Ricky Williams. Come on, he thinks he’s going to get more money when it’s widely known that he has a rapidly degenerating arthritic back. Combine that with off-season neck surgery and we now have a player the Raiders will clamor to sign.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 7th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
Sure hope they didn’t the same stick to draw the line…..there will be a clump of sand at the end.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 8th, 2008 at 1:24 pm
Can you consider a demotion a punishment? I’d guess that it would be pretty easy to defend against any suit. Just claim you redo the rosters every year and obviously you can’t put a person you haven’t seen yet this year on the top of it. Besides, are you really not allowed to promote a player that shows up for voluntary workouts? I think proving it was a punishment and not just a personnel decision would be difficult.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated