So much for the customer always being right.
In a piece of litigation that somehow has escaped the attention (as far as we can tell) of the national media, the New England Patriots have sued a former season-ticketholder, apparently for $67,500.
Paul Minihane, who also happens to be a member of the Boston Finance Commission, signed a ten-year contract in 2002 for two premium seats at Gillette Stadium. The contract contained a clause requiring the ticketholder to pay an accelerated lump sum representing the remaining price of the purchased tickets in the event that the ticketholder at any point failed to continue to make the required payments.
The club seats purchased by Minihame cost $3,750 per year. He bought two of the seats. Under the ten-year arrangement, the total cost was $75,000. Minihane stopped making the payments after a year, and the Patriots want the balance of the $75,000 that Minihane would have paid.
The Boston Herald characterizes the fight as an issue of “liquidated damages,” which is a term of art that is used to describe pre-agreed damages amounts in circumstances where it will be difficult to determine the actual financial harm suffered in the event a contract is broken. In this case, however, actual damages should be easy to calculate; if the customer’s tickets can’t be sold to someone else (and these are the Pats, not the Cardinals), then Minihane should be on the hook for the price. If/when the tickets are sold, the Patriots should be allowed to recover any costs and other expenses incurred in the reselling process.
The other piece of legal mumbo-jumbo that potentially applies here is called ”mitigation of damages.” It’s the concept that requires someone who has suffered harm to try to minimize it.
In this case, if the tickets are $3,750 each per year, then the Patriots should be required to re-sell the seats, and Mihihane should get credit for whatever they receive.
As it currently stands, a lower court found that the team may keep Minihane’s $7,500 security deposit, and that he owes another $6,000. Though $13,000 is still pretty steep, it’s a lot less than $67,500.
And so the Patriots want the highest court in Massachusetts to order Minihane to pay the difference. The final outcome will depend on many things, such as the current contours of the applicable Massachusetts laws and the specific mindsets and biases and ideologies of the judges.
Regardless, the notion that the Pats will drop the hammer on a previously paying customer might shed a little light on the current concerns of a certain former employee who fears getting thrust involuntarily into the legal system if/when he chooses to speak about matters that he might have observed during his tenure with the team.
_2.gif)





April 7th, 2008 at 8:00 am
These teams get tax breaks, free stadiums, revenue from other events held at their free stadiums, and laws ensuring that they recieve no competition, yet still treat their “fans” like this?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 8:14 am
Maybe they should just kill the guy.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 8:15 am
Is the ticketholder allowed to sell the “tickets”?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 8:17 am
These guys are really showing their true colors. as a Browns fan, I came to truly hating Their coach. Now I see reason to dislike their whole team!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 8:30 am
Isn’t this more likely to be driven by a fear of the precedent this could set? If the guy had a contract saying he’d pay the full amount, he’s essentially getting out of it for about a 10% penalty. Imagine if the pats suck (understand this is an astronomically low probability), or if Brady runs off to Brazil to live with Giselle, or if Belichick snaps and runs around the Meadowlands with a shotgun (going up in probabilities here…). Then potentially a lot of people may want to default on their contracts and the team would be Right Screwed. By holding to the terms the first time they prevent future times. And it’s not like pissing off a small portion of the fan base is a problem for a team that has a waiting list ten miles long.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 8:33 am
“Liquidated Damages”…where have I heard that before…
Rich Rodriguez v. WVU
I suppose by this case with the Patriots, it would seem Rodriguez wouldn’t have to pay the full 4 million either, as WVU would have a tough time proving full harm.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 8:42 am
The Patriots didn’t get any big tax breaks or a free stadium and have every right to go after deadbeat season ticketholders. This guy knew all of the rules going in and now doesn’t want to uphold his end of the bargain. If you don’t like the rules going in, don’t buy the freaking tickets. If there is anything on this planet worse than sports team owners, it’s Massachusetts politicians and political operatives who believe they are better than everyone else and play by different rules. Boston Finance Commission? I doubt that guy works too hard or uses his own money for everything he’s supposed to. He probably found another way to get into games into better premium seats for nothing. Those club seats in the Fidelity Club area are filled with politicians who aren’t paying for those $17 lobster salad rolls or their bloody marys. I’d have a bit more sympathy for this guy if he weren’t so “connected” and “entitled”.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.4 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 8:43 am
I also have Pats club seats and entered the 10 year contract, though I dont recall the lump sum clause, I certainly will check it out. The seat owner should have tried to get out of the contract or at minimum to sell the seats through the Pats. Not making payment was stupid but perhaps there is more to the story.?
@irishpat: the pats did not get tax breaks or a free stadium - they foot the entire bill.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 8:46 am
@hamilton hit it on the head.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 8:46 am
The Rodriguez case vs WVU is a lot easier to showcase Liquidated Damages. Say they lose one more game this year than last, that alone is easily worth $4 Million in today’s NCAA prices. The negative light he has cast upon them in the media or the amount of scouting information he destroyed could cause them to lose more than a few games over the next couple years or ruin a few chances at BCS games, which is well over $4 Million in damages.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 8:53 am
“Regardless, the notion that the Pats will drop the hammer on a previously paying customer…”
Umm… this wouldn’t be an issue if he was a paying customer. Or did I miss something?
And to think the Patriots wouldn’t operate like any other business is just stupid. If someone was trying to get out of a 10-year contract with another company, that company would surely go after them. Don’t be stupid people.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 8:54 am
the 10 mile long waiting list is NOT for club seats. To the best of my knowledge there is a short (if any) waiting list for Club Seats that formed this last year for the first time since the stadium opened.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 9:05 am
Oh, well, boo-frakkin’-hoo. I’m sorry if I can’t get worked up over the fate of someone who can (or thought he could) afford to spend what amounts to about 20% of my annual income on seats for a sporting event AND afford lawyers to work out the details of the damage payment in a suit that is the result of his own failure to meet the terms of the contract he signed.
Doesn’t matter much to me if it’s the Pats involved or the Lakers or the Marlins or whoever. This all just way above my pay grade.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1.75 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 9:08 am
1. Unlike most of the stadiums built these days, the Krafts paid all of the costs out of pocket. Of course, stadium parking is a hefty $40, and lots that charge for parking near the stadium are required to pay the Krafts $5 per vehicle out of their revenue.
2. I’m not sure that I understand the relationship between this incident and Walsh.
3. Pats ticketholders are not allowed to resell their ticket privately. They may resell them at face value through an approved broker.
4. Ticket holders who commit any infractions lose their season tickets, which makes for a more pleasant experience at the stadium (unlike the rowdiness in the Meadowlands.) A friend of mine lost his two tickets that he had held for 25 years when his son was caught on camera throwing a snowball at a game. I’m guessing this is the main reason they don’t charge seat licenses.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 9:13 am
Also, to be fair, the Patriots paid for their stadium with private funding, so they weren’t “given a stadium” by the public.
As hamilton mentioned above, this lawsuit is driven by fear of setting a precedent, not because the Patriots are out to get everyone. I imagine they will meet somewhere in the middle with this guy.
You can dislike the Pats for a lot of reasons, but this shouldn’t be one of them.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 9:17 am
The guy signed a contract. However if he breaks the contract he should pay his security deposit to cover administration costs, but the Pats can still sell the seats again and collect the majority. He should only be liable for actual damages.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 9:18 am
Football is becoming the new NBA. (lack of class)
Thought I’d never say it, but the greed of the owners, the conduct of the players, the obvious collusion, the general state of the game where no one can tackle.
I was at Mile High when 60,000 fans walked out at the end of the 3rd quarter, it had as much to do with with what was going on “off the field” (T Henry, B Marshall, a couple other idiots) as it was what was going on “on” the field.
They are starting to lose “the fan” by their arrogance.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 9:30 am
Oh, BTW responding to irishpat, it’s worth remembering that Gillette stadium was built with private money and without PSL’s. And that competition to the NFL is allowed (see XFL, USFL). I’d be pissed too if I could claim this was misuse of public funds, but private companies can to some extent do what they want (and reap what they decide to sow with bad PR moves). Those $3750 club seats sure look like a good deal now given that they were offered in 2001 before the Dynasty had done anything. And actually I don’t think they even offer them at that price any more; I believe the minimum club seat has gone up to $5K?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 9:32 am
The Pats didn’t have a waiting list for season tickets? I find that hard to believe. I would think that at least a couple of hundred Pats fans would have killed to snap up those seats. Keep the security deposit and call it a day.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 9:47 am
I realize the Patriots aren’t a corporation, but this is an excellent example of corporate behavior when an entity is a monopoly. There is no other football team that Boston can turn to.
I’ve been a Bucs season ticket holder for ten years, and sometimes I truly feel like I’m helpless against the whims of the Glazers. This year we were supposed to get the balance of our original deposits back, but they just sent out a letter that said we can only have it back if we’re giving up our seats. Otherwise, I have to sign ANOTHER contract that says they can keep our deposits another three years!
The NFL should really lose their anti-trust exemption, allowing another football league to start franchises in NFL cities.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1.8 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 10:32 am
Slow Joe, the NFL’s anti-trust exemption has nothing to do with not allowing other football leagues access to NFL cities. It has to do with the league being allowed to share revenue with national tv contracts. Even if Congress took the exemption away, the Courts would then have to prove that a national television contract, in itself, is anti-competitive.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 10:54 am
That clause that allows the Pats to seek the remainder lump sum value of the 10 year contract kind of makes the “security deposit” more of a 0% 10 year loan to the Pats doesn’t it?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 10:56 am
Most marriages don’t even last 10 years! I can see the Pats going after one season’s worth of damages, but they are basically telling this guy (and all other prospective premium ticket holders) you had better not lose your job or contract some life threatening disease, because you owe us for the next 10 years. This is not the best PR move considering the reputation the Pats have now. Poor form Robert Kraft. You’re better than this.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.75 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 12:36 pm
I don’t understand why so many people feel that the team did something evil. The guy signed a contract and broke it. Period.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 7th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
As swquintin mentioned, maybe the guy should of thrown a snowball instead of a hissy fit.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)