A source with knowledge of the discussions between the NFL’s Competition Committee and Commissioner Roger Goodell tells us that the league’s influential rule-making (or, more accurately, rule-proposing) body has told Goodell that they want the situation involving Matt Walsh’s knowledge regarding possible cheating of the New England Patriots to be resolved.
The source explains that the pressure that the Competition Committee has placed on the Commish resulted in the sense of frustration displayed in Goodell’s recent remarks regarding the status of efforts to get to the bottom of what Walsh knows (or thinks he knows).
Specifically, Goodell said on Wednesday that he’ll eventually run out of patience with the protracted discussions. And Goodell wouldn’t rule out taking legal action against Walsh in order to force him to talk.
Since there’s no specific legal action that could be used to compel Walsh to speak, the strategy likely would be the filing of a defamation lawsuit by the Patriots against Walsh and/or the Boston Herald, which reported on February 2 (presumably with Walsh as its source) that the Pats videotaped the St. Louis Rams’ walk-through practice prior to Super Bowl XXXVI.
The negotiations between Walsh’s lawyer and the league have bogged down over the question of whether Walsh will receive immunity from civil actions. At first, Walsh suggested that his tongue was tied by a confidentiality agreement. There have been multiple reports, however, that no such agreement existed.
_2.gif)





April 4th, 2008 at 8:50 pm
Interesting how those insisting on getting Walsh to speak might get their wish - and might hear him say that he made the whole thing up as a disgruntled former employee who was fond of doing illegal taping of his co-workers himself!
While everyone’s focusing on what Walsh does and doesn’t know though, has anyone resolved how Walsh happens to have a high priced DC lawyer - who’s previous lawfirm Swidler Berlin is among the most “generous” lawfirms on Capital Hill? I’m sure it has nothing to do with the fact that one can follow the money from there and show that the firm has a strong connection with Comcast, on behalf of whom Senator Specter - a major recipient of such funds - is raising issues near and dear to Comcast and the NFL’s wallet.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 4th, 2008 at 10:05 pm
It’s obvious JoeSixPack has no axe to grind…geez, get off the Grassy Knoll.
The obvious question nobody has asked is WHY Walsh would have taped his coworkers? It’s funny how the Pats claimed he “taped” conversations but not the pregame walkthrough. So, he has a history of taping but not that kind of taping.
I seriously doubt the Pats will file suit against Walsh or the Herald. In doing so, their dirt would get out.
Sadly, the Pats and NFL just want this to go away.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 4th, 2008 at 11:07 pm
KY, a Passionate Fan, says: It’s obvious JoeSixPack has no axe to grind…geez, get off the Grassy Knoll.
What’s the greater leap of logic - the fact that a part time golf pro would have the connections, let alone the money to afford, one of the most exclusive white collar criminals who just so happens to work in the Nation’s Capital (which I’m sure is just a coincidence too) or the notion that Levy’s source of payment is someone other than Walsh - someone who hand picked Levy and has an interest other than “the integrity of the game.”
Amazing that folks are so righteously and readilly decry “corruption” in a spectator sport yet will look the other way and delude themselves of the lack of corruption in government.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 4th, 2008 at 11:17 pm
Why would the Patriots claim that Walsh committed a felony without any proof. Wouldn’t it be easier for the Patriots just to sign over the title of the team and stadium to him to shut him up. Accusing him of a felony without any proof or coorboration is going to cost Bob Kraft millions. Why in the world would the Patriots hand over Walsh a slam-dunk defamation lawsuit? Yes, Walsh has a high priced lawyer, but so do the Patriots.
No way would a lawyer allow the Patriots to accuse Walsh of a felony publically unless he felt he could successfully defend the claims in court. No way would Kraft allow Pioli to put his billion dollar franchise on the line unless he knew Pioli’s claims would be backed up in a court of law. Both Kraft and Pioli are very smart men. They are not going to put a billion dollar franchise in jeopardy for some good PR. Anyone who thinks that they would make up allegations of these claims without some coorboration are either not very bright or blinded by bias.
It is clear the Pats and NFL want it to go away by compelling Walsh to give up what he has which is probably nothing more than we already know. Never once has anyone claimed Walsh actually has a copy of the walkthrough tapes and he has never claimed he taped the walkthrough. It has only been an over zelous media (many of which seem to be backing off the rhetoric themselves), Arlen Specter (who also has backed off the rhetoric), and Patriots haters who have claimed he has such a tape.
Kudos to the member of the committee who realized what I have noticed for a while - the NFL and the Patriots have allowed Levy and Specter to control the public perception of the whole process. By taking the safe route, they allowed them to be painted as covering up something. Now they will take an agressive route to force Walsh to talk and remove the specter of deceit except to the most ardent Patriots haters.
If and when Walsh produces nothing of any bite, what will haters do then? Blame a cover up? Say he was paid off?
I don’t get where the claims of the audiotaping of a conversation and videotaping of the walkthrough are related though. Two different situations entirely.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 4th, 2008 at 11:17 pm
Seems to me the allegations that the perennial league champion “cheats” to achieve victory damages the credibility of the NFL.
In contrast, the actions of Chris Henry, Pacman Jones, Odell Thurman, etc. only damage the image of the player.
The NFL has decided to take quick action to rectify the “thug” or troublemaker image, but is reluctant to police itself.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 4th, 2008 at 11:33 pm
Mini Ball scratcher
The NFL has decided to take quick action to rectify the “thug” or troublemaker image, but is reluctant to police itself.
Hasn’t the NFL caused an 8 month controversy that has out weighed Vicks dog fighting, Farves retierment, and even the Super Bowl (The holiest of holy of all events.) by policing themselves?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 4th, 2008 at 11:34 pm
Reluctant to police itself? It gave the Patriots the worst penalty by a team ever. How is that not policing itself? Goodell has interviewed 50 people in relations to the Rams’ walkthrough and not one of them coorborated the RUMOR that the Patriots videotaped the walkthough. In fact, not even Walsh has done that as of yet. People assume Walsh is the person in question who videotaped the walkthrough, but he has never confirmed that.
As for Henry, Jones, and Thruman; all three were involved in confirmed altrications. What they were suspended for were not rumors, they were suspended based on FACTS. If there were only rumors that Chris Henry was supplying alcohol to minors, Pacman Jones was involved in a shooting in a strip club, and Thurman was involved in drugs; they wouldn’t have been suspended. All were investigated and Goodell found evidence to support claims. Something that has not happened with the Patriots.
I swear some of the haters don’t even understand what is going on. There was a rumor that Mike Shanahan videotaped practices of the Chargers. One that Yahoo sports recanted rather than face a lawsuit. Why isn’t Shanahan punished for that? Because like the supposive taping of the Rams’ walkthrough, there is no evidence to support it.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 5th, 2008 at 7:37 am
JoeSixPack - there is an easy explanation for how Walsh can afford a high-priced lawyer; lawyers take on high profile cases for free.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 5th, 2008 at 7:39 am
Most of the haters DON’T know what’s going on. Walsh was fired over 5 years ago for attempting to record a conversation he was having with Pioli. He’s a dirtbag and the Patriots fired him.
The connection between the DC lawyer and Specter/Comcast is so obvious. How else would a loser like Matt Walsh retain a law firm like that, who charges $1000/hr? Comcast is trying to break down the NFL’s antit-trust status so they can get a better TV deal, and Comcast is Specter’s biggest contributor. There are tens of millions at stake.
THAT’s what’s going on here.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 5th, 2008 at 9:28 am
Remember the saying “Don’t let your alligator mouth write a check it can’t cash”! Well, here’s the perfect scenerio!
Walsh’s rants, Herald gets wind of it. Prints a story based on rumors and inuendo. Specter picks up the fumble. Champions the cable companies cause. Determined to get Goodell for destroying the tapes… the appearence of impropriety! Lawsuits crop up, Lawsuits get dismissed. Kraft and Belichick apologize to the NFL. Goodell gets anxious, wants it to go away! Now Goodell may try an arm twisting technique “Walsh still isn’t talking”…..Maybe he doesn’t have anything to say!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 5th, 2008 at 1:26 pm
Here is what will happen next with this story. Walsh will issue a statement sometime before the draft claiming that the media misquoted him and read more into his comments than he ever intended thus creating this whole unfortunate situation. Going forward he just wants to be left alone since he has nothing of value to hand over to the league or discuss with the league.
Our friend Matt Walsh has nothing, he was looking to take his story and make some money but since it backfired on him he will now go away.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated