So with Sam Farmer (we wonder if there’s a farmer somewhere named “Sam Reporter”) of the Los Angeles Times reporting that agent Bus Cook has been quietly inquiring as to potential trade interest in Brett Favre and Cook vehemently denying the report, what’s really happening?
Here’s what we think — we think that Cook had planned to make three percent of $12 million when he prepared his 2008 budget, and he’s hoping to come up with a way to entice Brett into earning some of that money for Cook.
Cook previously has said that he thinks Brett retired because he believed that the Packers didn’t want him back. Brett, opting for magnanimity (thanks, Tiki) at his farewell press conference, surely would have never pointed such a finger at the team.
Cook, on the other hand, surely wouldn’t have made something like that up.
So Cook likely is thinking that if he can secretly broker a deal with a team like the Dolphins or the Ravens or the Chiefs or the Lions or the Falcons and bring it to Brett and hope that Brett takes a shine to the concept of continuing his career with a team that isn’t expected to win the Super Bowl in 2008, maybe Brett would come back.
And then maybe Cook would make three percent of $12 million, which by the way equates to $360,000.
If that were true and if word of Cook’s scam got out before he could find an interested team, what would Cook do? Well, we suppose he’d deny it. He might even call such a report ”absolutely false.”
Anyway, this is all speculation. But it’s the only way to reconcile Farmer’s report with Cook’s reaction.
Meanwhile, the fact that Favre has not yet filed his retirement papers is irrelevant. Players can unretire well into the season. Last year, the deadline to do so was November 30.
In fact, some players delay filing their retirement paperwork for years. Former Lions running back Barry Sanders, for example, didn’t file his retirement paperwork for years. In fact, it’s possible that he still hasn’t.
_2.gif)





April 3rd, 2008 at 6:25 pm
I’d take Brett in a heart beat
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 3rd, 2008 at 6:50 pm
There is just one problem with this scenario. If Bret unretires, he is still a Packer. To go to another team, the Packers would have to agree to trade him. After all the hoopla and nice things and plans for honoring the little baby, I don’t see the Pack agreeing to trade him. They do not want to feel used. It would be a case of either play back up for the Packers or stay unretired.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 3rd, 2008 at 6:55 pm
The decision to retire at this point made very little sense to me. And if Brett Favre had any inkling at all that he wanted to play more, he should have kept going. Physically (and I will even argue mentally, though obviously I can’t get into Favre’s head), he was still well above average — and the Green Bay Packers are a Super Bowl contender (well, maybe they “were” contenders and now they are not, but unfortunately, as a Chicago Bears fan, my guess is that Aaron Rodgers is very good).
But here’s what bothers me. Not that Bus Cook tries to manipulate things to get $$$; lots of individuals do that. I just think it would be soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo (did I make that clear enough?) awkward for Favre to be crying like a baby, genuinely, and having an uber-long press conference, for it to be all for naught.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 3rd, 2008 at 6:56 pm
What about Tampa adding a 6th QB? Gruden seems to love QBs on Medicare.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 3rd, 2008 at 7:26 pm
I can’t see Favre coming back immediately after that emotional goodbye. The only scenario I would see is if a team that looks to be going to the playoffs loses their QB to an injury, it might intrigue him to play half a season on a team without the emotional attachments, weithout having to go to training camp and set an example for the younger guys, play in meaningless preseason games etc. Go to a veteran team on the cusp of winning that loses their QB and he might be talked into returning. Otherwise he looks like he was faking his tearful goodbye amd loses his deity status in Green Bay
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 3rd, 2008 at 7:36 pm
Is the off season really that boring that we have to keep talking about something that isn’t even relevant anymore?
Favre isn’t un-retiring. He hasn’t filed his paperwork yet…big frickin’ deal! He’s got till June to do it!
And not to contradict our gracious host, Mr. Florio, but as was stated at Favre’s conference, the only way he could come back for another year, prove anything to him or anyone else, and make the most out of that year would be to win a Super Bowl. It doesn’t matter which team he’s on, he has to win a Super Bowl to make the comeback even worthwhile. Therefore, your whole concept of his agent enticing Favre to come back to play for a team that isn’t a Super Bowl contender is ridiculous and makes no sense based on what’s been said by Favre. To even suggest that means that Favre is saying one thing and going to do another. And, since when is Favre in the business of saying one thing and doing another? He’s not. Never has been.
Sure…the media likes to speculate that he was going to retire or wasn’t going to retire the past couple years. But he never said “I’m retiring” and then came back later and changed his mind. He always said, “I haven’t made up my mind yet.” And when he did, he played ball. I can’t stand how people are so thick-headed that they can’t seem to grasp that concept. He says he’s not coming back and we should all take the man at his word. He hasn’t lied to his fans yet!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 3rd, 2008 at 7:52 pm
Why would Favre unretire to play for a losing team (assuming a trade happens), when the Packers were so close? That makes no sense whatsoever.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 3rd, 2008 at 8:42 pm
Maybe the Packers can trade him to the QB-needy Falcons. Then Favre will retire before playing game. That way the Packers can screw over the Falcons twice in Brett Favre trades.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 3rd, 2008 at 9:37 pm
The LA times? Plz!
Let’s say Brett really does still want to play, does indeed hate Thompson, would love to spite him, and does not relish the mind crushing expectations and pressure that would come with being a Packer next year. So here is my speculation on what would happen:
1. He would crush the hearts of the Packer faithful who revere him by actually requesting a trade.
2. Thompson in retaliation would refuse to trade him. “Play for us or you’ll play for nobody”!
EVERYBODY LOSES! His entire legacy turns to Limberger. I really don’t think it’s very likely it would happen.
Although I basically agree with the Barry Sanders analogy staying un-retired for now adds more possibilities. Here are some scenarios:
1. The Pack is in contention in Dec and Rogers goes down. With no capable backup on the roster, who rides in and saves the day?
2. The Pack falters this year with Rogers and misses the playoffs. Favre takes a year off and comes back in 09 with a much more seasoned and equally talented team.
I think these are more likely.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 4th, 2008 at 9:30 am
i am not suprised one bit that this is coming up. and i wont be suprised when this goes away, and then comes up again. lets get one thing straight-brett favre will never play for another NFL team. brett made his name as a packer, collected all his records and accolations as one too. i would not be suprised in the least if either one of stingrays’ scenarios came true. although i think the first(rogers goes down, and favre swoops in to save the day) is more likely, its easy to argue the second. i am sure favre will go through the same “did i make the right decision” trip that all, or at least most freshly retirees go through. as a packer fan i woud love to see brett pull on the superman cape/#4 anytime he feels like it. but i have come to terms with the fact that it is 99% out of the question…..or is it???
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 4th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
how much speculation was there in the years following barry saunders retirement that he would come out of retirement to break paytons records? yet he never did. that’s all this is.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated