NFL teams approved several rules changes at the league meeting today, most of which were an effort to make the rules easier to understand and enforce.
The biggest change is that the force out rule no longer exists. In the past, if a receiver jumped to catch a ball and was pushed out of bounds while he was in the air, officials had to make a judgment call to determine whether he would have come down in bounds. That rule, which many observers felt was enforced inconsistently, has been eliminated, and now it’s simple: If the receiver didn’t touch two feet or one of any other body part in bounds, it’s an incomplete pass.
Five-yard facemask penalties have also been eliminated. Serious face masks involving grabbing or twisting the player’s helmet will remain 15-yard penalties, and minor face masks involving a player accidentally grabbing the mask and immediately letting go will not be flagged at all.
Another rules change involves the opening coin toss, where the NFL will now adopt the college rule that allows the coach to defer his choice of kicking or receiving until the second half.
The league also made field goals on which the ball bounces off the goal post reviewable by instant replay. Last year Browns kicker Phil Dawson made a field goal that passed over the crossbar, bounced off the support post and went back into the field of play. The officials initially ruled the kick no good before correctly ruling it good. Last year they were not permitted to use replay to determine whether the kick was good; in the future they will be able to use it on such field goals.
The league also has changed two rules regarding fumbles: A legal forward handoff that is dropped is now a fumble, as is a direct snap from center that hits the ground before it is touched by the quarterback. In the past, the forward handoff would have been an incomplete pass and the botched snap would have been a false start.
_2.gif)







April 2nd, 2008 at 1:35 pm
I agree, the 5yd version should have stayed in place, we are going to have too many of both this year, 15yd variety when it was not warranted and the “no calls”, the 5yd was defintely a strong compromise in the course of the game.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 1:51 pm
That force-out rule was a good one. It will be way more risky to attempt sideline passes now. And why eliminate the 5-yard facemask penalty? Now, it’s just going to be a matter of: Do we flag him for 15 yards or not at all? A dilemma still exists.
I do agree with the field goal review and the fumble eligibility updates.
Eliminating the force-out rule absolutely bothers me, but I know that goes against the grain of what most of the PFT readers say. Majorities can be wrong!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 2:23 pm
Force out was a good rule. Might see fewer touchdowns this year and now what’s the point of tryin’ to make a sick grab by the sidelines when all the db has to do is murder you out of bounds. Weak sauce. We’ll be seeing more 15 yard penalties for face masking now too.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 2:28 pm
BREAKAWAY FACE MASK!!! bwahahaha
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 2:42 pm
Spandau- maybe the mean a shovel pass, which could be a forward handoff I guess??
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 3:00 pm
I agree with the new face mask rule. The offensive runner was always allowed to place their hands on the face mask of the defensive player without penalty. They’ve been calling it a stiff arm. Now the defender is allowed the same football move so long as the hand is immediately removed…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 3:06 pm
If the forward handoff is a shovel pass, I don’t agree with it at all. There are many times when a QB is just trying to make something happen, i.e. Rich Gannon, and he flips the ball underhand to an eligible receiver.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 3:06 pm
I’m OK with the rule changes, even though I will miss force out a bit, but what I am really dreading is hearing John Madden explain the changes once per quarter and every time they come up in a game. He’ll no doubt be wagging those sausage link-like fingers of his as he does it. Ugh…Maybe Michaels hairpiece will latch on to his face in an Alienesque manner if he does it too many times….
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 3:06 pm
All Rules are made to be broken and so will these!!!!!!
I wish for two rule changes:
1-Offensive Pass Interference if it happens beyond 15 Yards from the line of scrimmage the penalty should be 15 yards and loss of down. Obviously the team was going deep to begin with so why penalize them 10 yards and give them another try??
2- Why in the world if I return the ball 99 yards and fumble it forward through the endzone does the other team deserve the ball? If you didnt recover it in bounds than it shall not be your ball!!!
Any forward fumble not recovered should be given to team with last possession spotted where the possession was lost.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 4:03 pm
Good riddance to the force-out rule. It lets the defense play defense again! I was sick of seeing the force-out called when there was a good chance the receiver would’ve been out of bounds without being hit.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 4:09 pm
What would prevent a defensive player from literally carrying a wide receiver out of bounds as they catch the ball?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 4:17 pm
Why not just adopt the college system of getting one foot in bounds? That’s a great compromise. Make no mistake — this rule change WILL reduce scoring.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 5:31 pm
“2- Why in the world if I return the ball 99 yards and fumble it forward through the endzone does the other team deserve the ball? If you didnt recover it in bounds than it shall not be your ball!!!
Any forward fumble not recovered should be given to team with last possession spotted where the possession was lost.”
I agree, this is the worst rule in the NFL and needs to be changed. If a runner is untouched, loses control of the ball and it goes out of bounds at the 1, the offense keeps the ball at the goaline. If the ball goes a yard further into the endzone and bounces out of bounds past the pylon, then the defense gets the ball and 20 yards. Yeah that makes total sense.
But I think the new force out rule is going to change the game too much and result in some odd cases where a DB is going to wrap a WR legs as he jumps into the air, and try to up end him so that his upper body lands out of bounds. This could lead to some cheap hits along the sidelines and say goodbye to the corner fade.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 6:21 pm
caddyskack: Nothing …. and this will be exploited. Wanna bet this rule doesn’t last 2 years?
As for the breakaway face mask idea, it isn’t bad… because then penalties wouldn’t be needed. The penalty would be missing the tackle.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 6:23 pm
I really can’t imagine the forward handoff referring to a shovel pass. That would open a huge judgement call of a pass vs. handoff. If the ball is touching no player and moving forward, it is a pass ( I least I hope that is still the rule
)
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 6:27 pm
I found another article that explained it clearly… “Illegal forward handoffs past the line of scrimmage are now fumbles as opposed to dead balls.” so a forward lateral on an interception return or kickoff return. That makes sense.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 6:47 pm
The no-forceout rule is terrible. Not only will it narrow the field (as has been mentioned on this site) but such a hard-line rule w/no element of discretion might lead to some pretty absurd results. Isn’t it possible for an offensive player to make a mid-air catch easily five yards inbounds, caught by a defensive player before his feet hit the ground, and deposited out of bounds??
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 6:50 pm
The NFL does so much to protect QBs you’d think the owners wanted to make a new rule banning hand-offs! Dumping the force-out rule helps DBs alot, especially since WRs must touch both feet in bounds for it to be ruled a catch. I have a feeling passing numbers will be down as a result next year, and maybe taking a QB with my first round pick in my fantasy league isn’t such a good idea any more…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 7:47 pm
The change to the force out rule stinks. If it was being called inconsistently, get better refs. Don’t penalize the receiver!!!!! People saying that receivers will be carried out of bounds are right on the money. I’m thinking there will be more wideouts injured also.
My message to the owners is the same one I have for Congress. Go home before you screw anything else up.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 8:41 pm
I read somewhere else that the forward handoff refers to forward laterals past the line of scrimmage. For instance, on interception returns or kickoff returns.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 3rd, 2008 at 9:22 am
If a “forward handoff” refers to forward laterals past the line of scrimmage, is a pass when the QB goes in front of the line of srimmage a live ball then? That would be interesting on an “incomplete” pass in such a circumstance. I would imagine it’s still a penalty though, correct? I mean, if you try a backwards lateral and it goes forwards and you gain 10 more yards, the play will still go back 10 yards behind where the lateral occurred (or 5 yards, or whatever the penalty is), right?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 3rd, 2008 at 10:10 am
This is the play I’m waiting for:
Chad Johnson climbs the ladder and catches a high slant pattern against the Ravens. Ray Lewis Catches Ocho Stinko in the air and, like a dad with with a bratty little boy, carries the flailing Stinko to the sideline and deposits him on the bench.
-Incomplete Pass-
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated