NFL teams approved several rules changes at the league meeting today, most of which were an effort to make the rules easier to understand and enforce.
The biggest change is that the force out rule no longer exists. In the past, if a receiver jumped to catch a ball and was pushed out of bounds while he was in the air, officials had to make a judgment call to determine whether he would have come down in bounds. That rule, which many observers felt was enforced inconsistently, has been eliminated, and now it’s simple: If the receiver didn’t touch two feet or one of any other body part in bounds, it’s an incomplete pass.
Five-yard facemask penalties have also been eliminated. Serious face masks involving grabbing or twisting the player’s helmet will remain 15-yard penalties, and minor face masks involving a player accidentally grabbing the mask and immediately letting go will not be flagged at all.
Another rules change involves the opening coin toss, where the NFL will now adopt the college rule that allows the coach to defer his choice of kicking or receiving until the second half.
The league also made field goals on which the ball bounces off the goal post reviewable by instant replay. Last year Browns kicker Phil Dawson made a field goal that passed over the crossbar, bounced off the support post and went back into the field of play. The officials initially ruled the kick no good before correctly ruling it good. Last year they were not permitted to use replay to determine whether the kick was good; in the future they will be able to use it on such field goals.
The league also has changed two rules regarding fumbles: A legal forward handoff that is dropped is now a fumble, as is a direct snap from center that hits the ground before it is touched by the quarterback. In the past, the forward handoff would have been an incomplete pass and the botched snap would have been a false start.
_2.gif)





April 2nd, 2008 at 11:54 am
About time the force-out rule was forced out. A DB coming up and smacking a WR in the mouth should be promoted and rewarded.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 5 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Glad they changed the fumble rule after it screwed the Eagles last year.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Good. They needed to get rid of the force-out rule. But as a Vikings fan this would have been handy in 2003.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:15 pm
Really? What about rewarding receivers for going up for the ball, now theres alot less reason to leap high in the air towards the sidelines. I really liked the force-out rule, and didn’t really see it called inaccurately at all… oh well, at least they changed that false start/fumble rule.
I don’t really get the face mask change… if you accidentally pass interfere with a receiver, does that make it not a penalty? Its not like players are picking up 5-yard face mask penalties too often–its incredibly easy to move a player wherever you want by the helmet…
Why not enforce the existing rules, like the horse collar tackle, or blowing a delay of game for the play clock expiring - how many times have we seen teams get the snap off with zero on the play clock?
Sorry for the rant, I’m pretty bored here at work…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:17 pm
I predict that facemasks are going to become even more of a judgement call. We’ll see 15 yard penalties handed out for incidental contact.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:18 pm
It is nice to see after a potential TD by the Eagles when the Seahawks couldn’t handle a similar fumble was called back as a false start (correctly) by rule.
Had this rule been done away with previously, the Eagles would have been in the playoffs this year!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:20 pm
The force out rule was stupid and needed to go. If a receiver is in the process of catching the ball, and a DB nails him and causes him to drop the ball, the ref doesn’t get to call it a catch just because the WR probably would have made the catch had the DB not been there. The same should be true for the sideline. I don’t care if the guy probably would have been inbounds if he was undefended. We wasn’t undefended. The defense shouldn’t be penalized for doing it’s job. It’s a contact sport, let them knock each other around a little.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.65 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:20 pm
The lack of a force out makes the end zone much smaller…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:24 pm
I agree ken_phin. Finally a rule to help the defenses, and not bowing down to the casual fan who wants every game to be 49-56. Lets see some more sweet hits this year. Lets see some more shutouts. Defense rules, the Norseman, will indeed slaughter those who intend to beat them with sideline passes from now on.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:24 pm
I agree. I hated the forceout rule.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:25 pm
This will make it much harder to throw to players in the end zone. There will be little incentive for a defensive player to play the ball in the air when all they have to do is shove the receiver as they catch it.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:26 pm
I agree. Hated the forceout rule.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:26 pm
I don’t like the change to the facemask rule. We will now inevitably see referees hiding behind the fact that they saw the player grab the facemask but did not see them twist. Then later in the game we will see a much less of a facemask infraction get flagged. This one is going to give the refs too much latitude.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:29 pm
It’s great to see these rules changed and made less vague. I think a lot of the issues with the rules stem from them being so ambiguous that it’s hard for the refs to make uniform calls.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.5 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:32 pm
The force-out rule did not need changed. It’s going to take away some great catches–catches that required a lot of effort for the receiver and very little for the defender. I think the officials have done a much better job with that over the years than, say, cleaning up offensive holding and getting some consistency on illegal contact/def. pass interference.
The elimination of the five-yard facemask is ridiculous. Either this will pave the way for the officials to call more 15-yarders, or this just smacks of some other discretionary area the officials will selectively enforce.
All in all, they traded one former grey area for one a new one. Wrong move.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:34 pm
booooooooooooooooooo. I hate this new force out rule … just like I hate that a guy on the sideline has to have the ball after he hits the ground.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:35 pm
I agree with the force-out rule as it’s just too subjective of a call. But, why the hell won’t they consider pass interference reviewable?
I realize that this is also a subjective call, but this comes into play way more often than the force rule, and it can completley change the flow of the game, due to the penalty which can amount to 30-40 yards at times. Not to mention, placing the ball on the 1 yd line if the penalty ocuurs in the end zone. Instant replay would resolve the following:
-Determine first whether or not the ball was catchable
-Determine if the DB turned around and played the ball
-Determine whether or not there was incidental contact
I don’t know how many times there’s a disagreement with refs on whether or not interference even took place. Many times one ref will throw the flag and another will run in and over rule him. That’s just garbage…..and it ruins the game.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:36 pm
I don’t like the 5 yd facemask rule going away… it’s still a judgement call on the official’s part.
Only now he has to decide whether it’s a 15 yd penalty or a no-call… the 5 yd was a nice compromise.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3.35 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:47 pm
So what is a forward handoff? Anything that doesn’t pass the line of scrimmage?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:59 pm
I think the facemask rule is being mis-interpreted here, based on what I’ve read elsewhere. Instead of a 5 yard facemask penalty, officials will now call an illegal hands to the face penalty — still 5 yards, and still a judgement of whether it’s flagrant or not.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 1:02 pm
So this rule goes away the first time a 175 pound receiver goes up for a ball catches it and a 270 pound linebacker catches him before the ground and carries him out of bounds, dropping him on the sideline for an incomplete pass…and to negate stopping forward progress, the LB just needs to move forward with the player
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 1:06 pm
I bet what will happen from this is an increased number of pass interference calls that happen on the sideline. The DB will be over-zealous to deliver the hit to the WR to knock him out of bounds and get there a split second early.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 1:11 pm
A forward handoff is a shovel pass-the league really needs to simplify the rules of the game overall, It’s hard for hardcore fans to keep track of this crap every year.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 1:14 pm
So now coaches just need to teach the defensive player to catch the receiver while still in the air and carry him out of bounds.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 2 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 1:20 pm
I see tear away face masks in the NFL’s future…if the mask gets a good enough jerk, the mask comes off and it’s 15 yards…(note to self: get a patent application in now).
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated