Tampa Bay Buccaneers coach Jon Gruden says he has accepted that one of the quarterbacks he has under contract, Jake Plummer, will never be a Buc, but that he still holds out hope for another of his quarterbacks, Chris Simms.
“He’s retired,” Gruden said of Plummer, adding, “We tried. That’s all I can say. I think still he’s one of the top quarterbacks on the planet, personally. I think his performance, his won-loss record speaks for itself. We traded a seventh-round draft choice basically for Jake Plummer and unfortunately he’s decided to stay retired.”
Tampa Bay isn’t completely done with Plummer: The team still says that when it acquired Plummer in a trade with the Broncos, it also acquired the right to force Plummer to pay back a portion of the bonus money he received from the Broncos. That issue has not yet been resolved, but what has been resolved is that Plummer is done playing in the NFL.
As for Simms, Gruden says, “Chris is under contract and we expect him to compete.”
But Simms is skipping the team’s off-season workouts. Simms appears to want out, and the Bucs will likely cut him at some point before the start of the regular season. Right now, however, Gruden is talking as if he hasn’t made a final decision on Simms.
“It’s hard to accommodate everyone’s wants and wishes,” Gruden said. “We paid Chris Simms $7.5 million. We want to win. He’s part of our plans and we want him to compete. We’re going to keep our best quarterbacks, I promise you that. Right now, we’ve got five quarterbacks and he’s one of them.”
_2.gif)





April 2nd, 2008 at 7:48 pm
Once he’s cut by the Bucs, look for Simms to wind up in Miami vying for a starting role playing for Bill Parcells.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 3 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 8:42 pm
“I think still he’s one of the top quarterbacks on the planet, personally.”
This just in: Jon Gruden lives on Mars.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 9:36 pm
If/when Chris Simms is cut I think the Vikings should bring him into training camp and let him compete
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 10:01 pm
“It’s hard to accommodate everyone’s wants and wishes,” Gruden said.
Yeah, I guess he is right with, what, five or six QB’s on the roster?
“The Speen, Boss, The Spleen!”
Actually, I can see BigJoel’s situation coming true.
Trade the #1 and then pick up Simms and a few more picks makes
sense for Miami ….
if they don’t “really” think Beck or McCowan is the answer
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 2nd, 2008 at 10:49 pm
If Simms really is 100%, why on Earth would he not fully participate in offseason workouts and compete with Griese for the #2 spot behind Jeff Garcia? I think he is making a poor decision here. If he beat Griese out, Griese will get cut as Gruden will keep one of the young QBs (McCown or Gradkowski) as the third string.
If he doesn’t beat Griese out, at least he has some tape out there in order to get the Bucs some leverage in a trade (in order to keep his decent contract) or give him some leverage in contract negotiations if he gets cut. Right now, with no tape since his spleenectomy (sp?) he has no chance of getting a contract for the anything but the league minimum with no guarantees.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 2nd, 2008 at 11:08 pm
Jake Plummer is one of the best quarterbacks on the planet. Just not one of the best quarterbacks in North America. He is probably better than any other quarterback in Asia, Africa, Europe, South America, and Antartica.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 1 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 3rd, 2008 at 1:12 am
Simms will probably end up being Aaron Rodgers’ backup…
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 3rd, 2008 at 4:02 am
If you go to http://www.nfl.com, you can search for players by name - either as a “Current Player” or as a “Historical Player”.
I typed in “Plummer” and clicked on “Current Player”. Got nada.
I then typed “Plummer” again and this time clicked on “Historical Player”. No Jake…but did get Ahmed, Bruce, Chad, Gary and Tony.
IMHO, Plummer has handled this whole situation so poorly that he’s in danger of forever lurking in that NFL netherworld between “Current Player” and “Historical Player”.
Just one man’s opinion.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
April 3rd, 2008 at 6:59 am
John Gruden is having his own version of Flavor of Love with QBs. Jake Plummer doesn’t get to wear a clock this week.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 4th, 2008 at 2:15 am
My treat to all commenter’s on this article, including Florio, dinner at Ruth’s Chris Steak House in Sarasota if I’m wrong !
But, I’m sorry guys, I disagree – Jake will play for another team in the NFL and the Bucs will come out on the good-to-great side of swapping his rights to some team in need a of starting caliber QB. Jake will play for a team that pays him exceedingly well, and also promises him the starting spot. There are (and after a few early season surprises) will be several teams looking for a QB of Jake’s skills. The “key” is that Jake gets to determine the deal – periods. I don’t think its right, but its also hard to agree where he is coming from in wanting to choose the next/last gig.
Dinner is on mkurbo is he stays retired !
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 6th, 2008 at 3:54 am
Just commenting to get the dinner at Ruth’s Chris… Mkurbo, last year I would have agreed with you. This year, I am doubtful a qb can be out of the league for a full season and re-enter as a starter. I liked Jake but, like Shanahan, grew frustrated with the inevitable interceptions. I think he hasn’t turned in retirement papers because of the $7 million - he may stand a better chance of not having to give it back if retirement isn’t official and final.
As for Simms, good assessment by Slow Joe. Simms doesn’t have a prayer of starting ANYWHERE, and with two years off the field he’ll be lucky to compete for a backup job. Miami - nahhhh; Josh McCown is a place holder for a year while Parcells finds himself a qb.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated