Giants defensive end Osi Umenyiora signed a new contract in December 2005. Last year, he changed agents, hiring Tony Agnone, who also represents Michael Strahan.
It was believed by many that Umenyiora made the change (as most players do) because he wanted a new deal. And with the same agent representing the two key players on the team’s defensive line, it was expected that Umenyiora and Strahan would both make a play for more money.
Though Strahan stayed away from training camp as he supposedly pondered retirement, the thinking in many circles was that this was Strahan’s misguided way of getting a raise. At the time, Umenyiora didn’t force the issue regarding his own contract.
A season later, and with a gleaming Super Bowl trophy due in large part to the efforts of Strahan and Umenyiora, Ralph Vacchiano of the New York Daily News reports that Umenyiora might hold out of training camp.
Says Vacchiano: “A lot of people who know him are absolutely convinced he’s going to holdout from training camp this summer if he doesn’t get a new contract. In fact, someone who talked to him recently told me ‘I guarantee you he’s not coming to camp.’” Umenyiora, per Vacchiano, hasn’t denied the possibility of holding out.
But Umenyiora has five years left on his most recent deal. Five years. He has no leverage on this one, unless he plans to owe the team bonus money and/or fines and, ultimately, give up game checks.
All the while, the Giants will continue to hold his rights for five more years.
Surely, the Giants won’t cave on this one. If they do, what’s the point in signing players to long-term deals?
_2.gif)





March 30th, 2008 at 2:30 pm
“Surely, the Giants won’t cave on this one. If they do, what’s the point in signing players to long-term deals?”
Let’s see… April 2005…Terrell Owens gets a new agent (Rosenhaus)…wants a new contract…he’s in the second year of a 5-year deal…Owens threatens to hold out…backloaded contract.
Surely, the Eagles won’t cave in…Worked out great for them.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 30th, 2008 at 3:42 pm
The rest of the NFL owners would be seriously pissed if the Giants caved… that being said, if a player is being seriously underpaid, regardless of entering into a contract in good faith, it’s tough to blame a player for sitting out of non-mandatory camps and workouts.
Since the organization holds nearly all the cards, I might do the same thing if I were a player in such a situation. If the team wants him in camp it seems to me that some contract incentives could be added to his deal to reward performance. That’s a GOOD precedent to set - and one that’s a win win for player and organization based on each treating each other with respect and acknowledging good performance from players.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
March 30th, 2008 at 4:43 pm
I’m waiting for the first player going to take a pay cut for underperforming his contract. Until then, they should all shut up and play for the contrat they igned.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 4 rating(s)