Here’s a look at the perceived draft needs of the Oakland Raiders, with heavy input from Matt Miller and David Gardner of NewEraScouting.com.
Left Tackle: With the second overall pick in the 2004 NFL Draft, the Raiders whiffed. Badly.
At a position where guys taken at the top of the first round tend to work out far more often than they don’t, Robert Gallery joins the ranks of Tony Mandarich and Mike Williams as busts at the position. The franchise has experimented with many players since then, with no lasting results. Building around franchise quarterback and 2007 No. 1 overall pick JaMarcus Russell is a key for this offseason. And giving Russell confidence in his line will help him take the next step in developing as a passer.
The Raiders can hope that Michigan’s Jake Long lasts to the fourth spot, but it might be a stretch. The team is rumored to like Ryan Clady of Boise State, but he’s not a top-four pick. With that high second-round pick shipped to Atlanta for cornerback DeAngelo Hall, hoping for a guy like Clady or Gosder Cherilus to be there in round two no longer matters.
Here’s another possibility — the Raiders will dangle their 2009 first-rounder to a team drafting in the bottom of round one, in order to land a left tackle. If, as many league insiders believe, the Raiders’ recent efforts to improve won’t bear fruit, it could end up being a great investment for the team that coughs up the pick.
And, yeah, we know that they’ve signed Kwame Harris. But if he were a high-end left tackle, he wouldn’t have been on the open market.
Wide receiver: Signing the talented (but weak-kneed) Javon Walker could bolster an anemic passing game. Or maybe it will just grease the skids toward salary-cap hell.
Walker is a dangerous receiver when healthy, but the knee with the torn ACL from 2005 flared up last year, raising real concerns about his long-term viability. Oakland is still relying on Ronald Curry to be a reliable receiver. While Curry has been solid, he is not a dynamic receiver and cannot be counted on to carry the team.
Adding a solid No. 2 wideout would take pressure off Walker and allow Curry to exploit single coverage from the slot. The Raiders have shown a lot of interest in Limas Sweed of Texas, but No. 4 is way too high for him to go. Vanderbilt’s Earl Bennett has been a name linked to Oakland as well.
Defensive end: After Warren Sapp retired, the Raiders’ brass gave converted end Tommy Kelly (another ACL poster child) an enormous contract to play defensive tackle. In so doing, they created a vacancy opposite pass rusher Derrick Burgess. Kalimba Edwards recently signed, but if he was any good the Lions would have kept him. We suppose it’s possible that Kelly would move back to end, if the Raiders take a defensive tackle like Sedrick Ellis or Glenn Dorsey in round one.
Vernon Gholston is a name that will be hard to overlook if he’s still on the board at No. 4. The team has also been linked to Lawrence Jackson, Quentin Groves, and Calais Campbell.
Defensive tackle: This team is thin at defensive tackle, with Gerard Warren currently the most consistent of the bunch. William Joseph offers name recognition, but has done little in his NFL career. The Raiders are banking on Kelly becoming a great player, but the team still needs more help in the middle.
The obvious picks are Dorsey and Ellis, as both would be immediate starters. The team also is thought to be fond of Red Bryant and Letroy Guinn.
Offensive guard: There are a host of characters here, but no leading man. Cooper Carlisle figures to start on the right side, with Robert Gallery returning on the left. Gallery actually performed well in 2007 and may have finally found a home at the position. Carlisle is a strong run blocker, but he has not been great in pass protection.
The starting duo are backed up by versatile tweeners such as Paul McQuistan and Jonathan Palmer, who can play either inside or outside.
Outside linebacker: Thomas Howard is becoming one of the better linebackers in the AFC, improving greatly each season. Opposite Howard, the Raiders are relying on Robert Thomas and Sam Williams. Thomas is a former
first-round selection of the Rams, who has bounced around the league a bit in his seven NFL seasons. Williams is a good tackler and special-teams player, but he doesn’t bring any real excitement to the table.
Ezra Butler of Nevada has had the eyes of the Raiders’ scouts on him this offseason, as has stud USC linebacker Keith Rivers. Rivers was a staff favorite at the Senior Bowl.
Strong safety: Michael Huff has been baptized by fire, with two up and down seasons at safety. There have been rumors of moving him to corner or trading him (but, as we’ve heard it, no one wants him). There is at this time no depth behind him. Adding a safety who can help on special teams and in coverage is a late-round need for Oakland.
The team could look at players like Jonathan Hefney (Tennessee) or Jamie Silva (Boston College) in the sixth or seventh round.
_2.gif)





March 29th, 2008 at 2:12 pm
nice job Flo-B.
Don’t discount Tom Cable’s abilities to turn around discarded offensive linemen though. His zone blocking scheme relies on quick agile blockers, and word is Cable hand picked Harris because he thought he’d fit into his scheme. Don’t be surprised if Harris revitalizes his career as our LT. Cable is a miracle worker.
Gallery wasn’t necessarily a whiff either, just a victim of the Raiders’ instability. He’s had new coaches (including line) just about every year there. If he had Callahan (as OL coach) or Cable his entire career i think he’d be a solid LT by now. The raiders have gotten pretty good at both squandering draft picks and destroying the careers of their few decent choices.
but yeah as a Raider fan i have to admit that despite this moranic (misspelled for emphasis) spending spree they are most likely going to suck again unless they bolster their run D in a big way and/or Al ascends to the big skybox in the sky. I hope they take Dorsey or Ellis or trade down but they’ll probably take McFadden.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 2.75 / 5 with 4 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 3:16 pm
im a big raiders fan but robert gallery has always been a bust at left tackle, ive watched almost every game where he lined up at left tackle and he totally whifs and his blocker is alwasys running past him
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 3:23 pm
Yeah I could definitely see them trading their 2009 1st for a
pick that could help them this year.
It actually could be a money saving strategy as well. Instead of them paying for a 1st rounder next year that will be probably be a top 10 pick they can get a player a year early, pay less and have them in the system for an extra year. Sure the argument that it could be a worse player is valid, but when you look at how many high picks are busts it does make some sense considering all the money Crazy Al has already spent.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 29th, 2008 at 3:48 pm
the funny part is that DMC will most certainly be the pick at #4, no way Al passes up on him. All of the other suggestions clearly make too much sense, but hey, In Al we trust!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 29th, 2008 at 4:08 pm
Gallery has been a bust because he had two coaches at the same time under Shell, telling him to do different things. The left hand didn’t know what the right was doing. Cable I think will get him settled in this year as an anchor. The man really wants to play. I’d love nothing more than to see Jake Long beside of him blocking the blind side of Russell. If Long isn’t available, go for a DT. The Raiders already have running backs, in Rhodes, Jordan is still there, Fargas was resigned, and Michael Bush is healed and ready to rumble. Not sure what’s going thru Al Davis’s head spending money the way he has. He had a decent DE with Clemmons who slipped thru their fingers and wasn’t resigned. Burgess needs a contract this year to keep him. Asomugha has to be kept also and given a contract. Al signed a lot of wrong players with way to much money. One last thing if Al is reading, quit changing the coaches so often. No wonder the Raiders are in the shape they’re in!!!!!!! Keep Kiffen.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 4 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 4:28 pm
Al will take the RB from Ark and never look back. Al likes Heisman winners and 2nd place Heisman vote getter, so he got his guy in Darren.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 3 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 5:16 pm
Left out was the signing of Drew Carter who is a big body that would probably work well at the #2 for us if Javon pans out. Curry excelled in the slot in the past.
There is depth behind Huff. Schweigert is a good special teamer. I think he was unfairly criticized because the line couldn’t slow anybody down either. Eugene is back there too.
Jake Long doesn’t seem to fit the zone blocking scheme.
Gholston appears more of a 3-4 backer than a 4-3 defensive end so I don’t see the Raiders taking him either.
We’re set at RB.
This year is ripe for a trade down. Let the Jets and the Patriots bid for Gholston or let the Cowboys get their man in Run DMC.
The Eagles overpaid for Chris Clemmons. He’s a situational guy and he’s not a full time starter, imo, but he’s being paid like he is. I think the Eagles made a mistake by thinking he can be their every down guy at that position.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 6:15 pm
The Raiders need a two-gap run-stuffer. Glenn Dorsey fits the bill. Ellis would be good as a 3-4 End or an Undertackle. There are enough current Raider DTs on the roster to play as an Undertackle.
As for the comment made earlier about Stuey Schweigert getting a bad rap ’cause the front seven can’t tackle, that’s bull. I was personally sick of seeing RBs and TEs running down the sidelines carrying life-sized Stuert Schweigert backpacks over their shoulders! Give him a paycut to stay on Special Teams and let him watch Wilson tear it up on Defense!
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 29th, 2008 at 8:44 pm
jgrange:
I agree that this would be a great time to trade for more picks later in the draft, however that is only if Gholston is gone. I think we’d (The Raiders) be missing this years Patrick Willis if Vernon G is passed by.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 29th, 2008 at 9:30 pm
After signing Gibril Wilson to go with Huff, I don’t see safety as a “need”.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 29th, 2008 at 9:47 pm
We all know crazy Al is probably going to draft McFadden regardless of their needs. If you look at recent Super Bowl winners most don’t really have superstar running backs. They should stick with the Rbs they have and look at other needs. Spending all that money on one RB is going to be a waste(which makes it more likely to happen in Oakland). There’s also a very slight chance they take Gholston because of his freakish combine performance if he’s still around at #4.
If Al is reading (haha, masterblaster) here’s what you should really do. Trade down to Dallas (paying attention Jerry?) for one of Dallas’ first round picks, the Dallas 2nd rd pick (60), and DE Chris Canty. Then take a WR in the 1st (Limas Bean Sweed or DeSean Jackson) and take the best offensive lineman available with Dallas’ 2nd rd pick.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: 5 / 5 with 1 rating(s)
March 29th, 2008 at 11:31 pm
I have been a Raider Fan all my life. I have lived and died (recently much more of the “died” part) on the whims of Uncle Al. Trust me on this. There is NO WAY if Darren McFadden is sitting there at #4 that the Raiders dont take him.
That being said, I would like to see us trade down. Even in the analysis above, the line “they need “X” and would take “Y” to fill it, but “Y” isnt a top 4 pick….exactly. So trade down, maybe with Dallas, and fill needs. But, If D-Mac is there, Al takes him, and thats the only guy Dallas would trade up for…so its a moot point… unless one of the top 3 takes McFadden, then a trade down scenario comes into play again.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 30th, 2008 at 10:03 am
No mention of Drew Carter… Isn’t he the #2?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 30th, 2008 at 11:36 am
jgrange :
in re: to your comment “Jake Long doesn’t seem to fit the zone blocking scheme.”
Your wrong, Michigan ran a zone blocking scheme in 06 and 07 so he has experience playing within that scheme.
I’m not a Raiders fan but from my POV Al Davis must either be banking on being able to trade down with his 1st pick. If he doesn’t and Jake Long is there he has to take him, protecting their 60 million dollar investment is a must. Mcfadden is tempting as would be either Ellis,Dorsey and Gholston but there defense isn’t in as bad as shape as the O-line. They may even be forced to reach for Clady if Long is off the board. (Unless they plan on moving Gallery back to LT or unless they think Henderson is the answer. Kwame Harris is a great run blocker but really struggles vs the pass and has a history of false start penalties. He played better in SF on the right then he did on the left side so I’m wouldn’t hold my breath on Cable revitalizing his career.)
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 30th, 2008 at 1:17 pm
Ummmm, one other need is a Center.
Since we don’t really have one (Grove doesn’t count).
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 31st, 2008 at 12:15 pm
I take issue with Florio on Gallery. We know he’s had problems but this past year he did better than holding his own on a very tough line. I also see two problems of which neither are draft solvable. Kiff blew his credibility chasing Arkansas; and, the 2008 defense is totally unknown. In that climate (and gambling $30+ mil) I don’t see McFadden being drafted - but in the almost unlikely event he’s actually there-I’ll bet the farm Jerry Jones is a sure-thing.
Under the ultra-competitive circumstances of zillionaire versus zillionaire - less-than-zillionaire Al Davis is coming out pretty decent.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 5th, 2008 at 4:39 am
this is what Davis is thinking:
1.) Howie’s son
2.) McFadden
3.) Gholston
One of those 3 will be there at 4.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 8th, 2008 at 10:09 am
There is no way we take McDadden at #4(Thank God!). Al does’nt have the $ to pay him…..
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
April 10th, 2008 at 10:49 pm
its not going to matter to uncle al, if dmc is there at #4, then thats who he is going to get, it dont matter to him, he will make dominique rhodes a tackle and move lamont jordan to the d line. al is that crazy, all he sees is a big name to fill seats, he hasnt relized winning fills seats as well. o well, one more year untill we do this again, hey wouldnt it be something if al drafts a qb?
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated